Trial Outcomes & Findings for PMCF Study on PEEK Suture Anchors for Hip Indications (NCT NCT03814044)

NCT ID: NCT03814044

Last Updated: 2024-10-15

Results Overview

Clinical success was defined as hip repairs without signs of device failure and/or re-intervention as assessed by the surgeon (Yes/No). Specifically, clinical success was achieved with "Yes" responses on the following 3 main criteria: * no inflammatory or allergic response * no device-related adverse event (AE) * no device deficiencies (DDs) leading to revision surgery (reintervention) on the index hip

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

149 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

6 months

Results posted on

2024-10-15

Participant Flow

A total of 149 participants were enrolled in the study and 150 joints were observed.

Unit of analysis: joints

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Hip Suture Anchors
Participants who have received PEEK Suture Anchors in the hip which included: BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor and SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor
Overall Study
STARTED
149 150
Overall Study
BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor
58 58
Overall Study
SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor
93 94
Overall Study
COMPLETED
148 149
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
1 1

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Hip Suture Anchors
Participants who have received PEEK Suture Anchors in the hip which included: BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor and SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor
Overall Study
Protocol deviation
1

Baseline Characteristics

Data only available for 20 participants due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Hip Suture Anchors
n=150 joints
Participants who have received PEEK Suture Anchors in the hip which included: BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor and SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor
Age, Continuous
38 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9 • n=150 joints
Sex: Female, Male
Female
105 joints
n=150 joints
Sex: Female, Male
Male
45 joints
n=150 joints
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 joints
n=150 joints
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
97 joints
n=150 joints
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
52 joints
n=150 joints
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native · No
149 joints
n=150 joints
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native · Yes
1 joints
n=150 joints
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian · No
150 joints
n=150 joints
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian · Yes
0 joints
n=150 joints
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American · No
147 joints
n=150 joints
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American · Yes
3 joints
n=150 joints
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander · No
150 joints
n=150 joints
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander · Yes
0 joints
n=150 joints
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White · No
6 joints
n=150 joints
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White · Yes
144 joints
n=150 joints
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other · No
147 joints
n=150 joints
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other · Yes
3 joints
n=150 joints
Location of Device Implantation
Left Hip
71 Participants
n=149 Participants
Location of Device Implantation
Right Hip
77 Participants
n=149 Participants
Location of Device Implantation
Bilaterally
1 Participants
n=149 Participants
Duration of Surgery (min)
87.4 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9 • n=20 Participants • Data only available for 20 participants due to the retrospective nature of the study.
Intervention
Arthroscopic
150 joints
n=150 joints
Intervention
Open
0 joints
n=150 joints
Intervention
Unknown
0 joints
n=150 joints
Duration of time from injury to surgery (days)
905.6 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 823.1 • n=86 Participants • Data only available for 86 participants due to the retrospective nature of the study.
Any Medical History
Yes
95 joints
n=150 joints
Any Medical History
No
55 joints
n=150 joints

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months

Population: Participants analyzed for each row indicate those with available retrospective data for the time frame \& outcome specified. 2 participants implanted with multiple Suture Anchors (devices). Data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants with multiple devices analyzed by unique suture anchor). Anchors shown by rows/categories as the same procedure occurred on the same joint. Overall number of participants analyzed shows combined total of distinct participants assessed.

Clinical success was defined as hip repairs without signs of device failure and/or re-intervention as assessed by the surgeon (Yes/No). Specifically, clinical success was achieved with "Yes" responses on the following 3 main criteria: * no inflammatory or allergic response * no device-related adverse event (AE) * no device deficiencies (DDs) leading to revision surgery (reintervention) on the index hip

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Hip Suture Anchors
n=149 Participants
Participants who have received PEEK Suture Anchors in the hip which included: BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor and SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor
Number of Participants With Clinical Success of the Study Devices in the Hip Over a Time Period of 6 Months After Intervention
BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor · Yes
58 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Success of the Study Devices in the Hip Over a Time Period of 6 Months After Intervention
BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor · No
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Success of the Study Devices in the Hip Over a Time Period of 6 Months After Intervention
SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor · Yes
93 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Success of the Study Devices in the Hip Over a Time Period of 6 Months After Intervention
SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor · No
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months

Population: Participants analyzed for each row indicate those with available retrospective data for the time frame \& outcome specified. 2 participants implanted with multiple Suture Anchors (devices). Data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants with multiple devices analyzed by unique suture anchor). Anchors shown by rows/categories as the same procedure occurred on the same joint. Overall number of participants analyzed shows combined total of distinct participants assessed.

Clinical success was defined as hip repairs without signs of device failure and/or re-intervention as assessed by the surgeon (Yes/No). Specifically, clinical success was achieved with "Yes" responses on the following 3 main criteria: * no inflammatory or allergic response * no device-related adverse event (AE) * no device deficiencies (DDs) leading to revision surgery (reintervention) on the index hip

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Hip Suture Anchors
n=64 Participants
Participants who have received PEEK Suture Anchors in the hip which included: BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor and SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor
Number of Participants With Clinical Success of the Study Devices in the Hip Over a Time Period of 12 Months After Intervention
BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor · Yes
42 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Success of the Study Devices in the Hip Over a Time Period of 12 Months After Intervention
BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor · No
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Success of the Study Devices in the Hip Over a Time Period of 12 Months After Intervention
SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor · Yes
24 Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Success of the Study Devices in the Hip Over a Time Period of 12 Months After Intervention
SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor · No
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 and 12 months

Population: No data were collected at 6 months or 12 months for VAS pain score due to the retrospective nature of the study.

The VAS pain score is presented on a scale ranging from 0 to 10. A score of 0 represents no pain and a score of 10 indicates extreme/unbearable pain. The VAS rating was recorded retrospectively, per standard of care at 6 and 12 months post-surgery.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months and 12 months

Population: Participants analyzed for each row indicate those with available retrospective data for the time frame \& outcome specified. 2 participants implanted with multiple Suture Anchors (devices). Data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants with multiple devices analyzed by unique suture anchor). Anchors shown by rows/categories as the same procedure occurred on the same joint. Overall number of participants analyzed shows combined total of distinct participants assessed.

Range of motion defined as the participant having a full functional arc "Yes" or "No" at 6 month and 12 month post-operative visits.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Hip Suture Anchors
n=106 Participants
Participants who have received PEEK Suture Anchors in the hip which included: BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor and SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor
Count of Participants With Range of Motion (ROM) Full Functional Arc
BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor: 6 months · Has full functional arc: Yes
18 Participants
Count of Participants With Range of Motion (ROM) Full Functional Arc
BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor: 6 months · Has full functional arc: No
10 Participants
Count of Participants With Range of Motion (ROM) Full Functional Arc
BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor: 6 months · Has full functional arc: Unknown
0 Participants
Count of Participants With Range of Motion (ROM) Full Functional Arc
BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor: 12 months · Has full functional arc: Yes
8 Participants
Count of Participants With Range of Motion (ROM) Full Functional Arc
BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor: 12 months · Has full functional arc: No
7 Participants
Count of Participants With Range of Motion (ROM) Full Functional Arc
BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor: 12 months · Has full functional arc: Unknown
0 Participants
Count of Participants With Range of Motion (ROM) Full Functional Arc
SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor: 6 months · Has full functional arc: Yes
47 Participants
Count of Participants With Range of Motion (ROM) Full Functional Arc
SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor: 6 months · Has full functional arc: No
14 Participants
Count of Participants With Range of Motion (ROM) Full Functional Arc
SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor: 6 months · Has full functional arc: Unknown
17 Participants
Count of Participants With Range of Motion (ROM) Full Functional Arc
SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor: 12 months · Has full functional arc: Yes
4 Participants
Count of Participants With Range of Motion (ROM) Full Functional Arc
SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor: 12 months · Has full functional arc: No
4 Participants
Count of Participants With Range of Motion (ROM) Full Functional Arc
SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor: 12 months · Has full functional arc: Unknown
10 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 and 12 months

Population: Participants analyzed for each row indicate those with available retrospective data for the time frame \& outcome specified. 2 participants implanted with multiple Suture Anchors (devices). Data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants with multiple devices analyzed by unique suture anchor). Anchors shown by rows/categories as the same procedure occurred on the same joint. Overall number of participants analyzed shows combined total of distinct participants assessed.

Forward flexion angle, internal rotation angle, and external rotation angle captured in degrees based on the physician's Standard of Care.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Hip Suture Anchors
n=22 Participants
Participants who have received PEEK Suture Anchors in the hip which included: BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor and SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor
Range of Motion (ROM)
BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor: Forward Flexion Angle (6 months)
97.5 degrees
Standard Deviation 6.3
Range of Motion (ROM)
BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor: Internal Rotation Angle (6 months)
10.0 degrees
Standard Deviation 0
Range of Motion (ROM)
BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor: External Rotation (6 months)
37.5 degrees
Standard Deviation 10.6
Range of Motion (ROM)
BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor: Forward Flexion Angle (12 months)
102.9 degrees
Standard Deviation 12.5
Range of Motion (ROM)
BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor: Internal Rotation Angle (12 months)
35.0 degrees
Standard Deviation 7.1
Range of Motion (ROM)
BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor: External Rotation (12 months)
40.0 degrees
Standard Deviation 0
Range of Motion (ROM)
SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor: Forward Flexion Angle (6 months)
102.9 degrees
Standard Deviation 31.8
Range of Motion (ROM)
SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor: Internal Rotation Angle (6 months)
27.5 degrees
Standard Deviation 24.7
Range of Motion (ROM)
SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor: External Rotation (6 months)
35.0 degrees
Standard Deviation 14.1
Range of Motion (ROM)
SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor: Forward Flexion Angle (12 months)
112.8 degrees
Standard Deviation 11.7
Range of Motion (ROM)
SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor: Internal Rotation Angle (12 months)
16.0 degrees
Standard Deviation 8.5
Range of Motion (ROM)
SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor: External Rotation (12 months)
38.5 degrees
Standard Deviation 9.2

Adverse Events

BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor

Serious events: 5 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor

Serious events: 6 serious events
Other events: 11 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor
n=58 participants at risk
Participants who have received PEEK Suture Anchors in the hip: BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor
SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor
n=93 participants at risk
Participants who have received PEEK Suture Anchors in the hip: SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
STROKE
0.00%
0/58 • Surgery to End of Study (EOS) visit, approximately 12 months
AE reporting was collected retrospectively from the information available in the participant's medical records. A total of 149 participants were enrolled in the study. However, there were 2 participants with multiple devices implanted. Participant Suture Anchor data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants implanted with multiple devices were analyzed individually based on unique suture anchor).
1.1%
1/93 • Number of events 1 • Surgery to End of Study (EOS) visit, approximately 12 months
AE reporting was collected retrospectively from the information available in the participant's medical records. A total of 149 participants were enrolled in the study. However, there were 2 participants with multiple devices implanted. Participant Suture Anchor data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants implanted with multiple devices were analyzed individually based on unique suture anchor).
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
POST SURGICAL RIGHT HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS
1.7%
1/58 • Number of events 1 • Surgery to End of Study (EOS) visit, approximately 12 months
AE reporting was collected retrospectively from the information available in the participant's medical records. A total of 149 participants were enrolled in the study. However, there were 2 participants with multiple devices implanted. Participant Suture Anchor data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants implanted with multiple devices were analyzed individually based on unique suture anchor).
0.00%
0/93 • Surgery to End of Study (EOS) visit, approximately 12 months
AE reporting was collected retrospectively from the information available in the participant's medical records. A total of 149 participants were enrolled in the study. However, there were 2 participants with multiple devices implanted. Participant Suture Anchor data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants implanted with multiple devices were analyzed individually based on unique suture anchor).
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
REPEAT LEFT HIP LABRAL TEAR
1.7%
1/58 • Number of events 1 • Surgery to End of Study (EOS) visit, approximately 12 months
AE reporting was collected retrospectively from the information available in the participant's medical records. A total of 149 participants were enrolled in the study. However, there were 2 participants with multiple devices implanted. Participant Suture Anchor data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants implanted with multiple devices were analyzed individually based on unique suture anchor).
0.00%
0/93 • Surgery to End of Study (EOS) visit, approximately 12 months
AE reporting was collected retrospectively from the information available in the participant's medical records. A total of 149 participants were enrolled in the study. However, there were 2 participants with multiple devices implanted. Participant Suture Anchor data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants implanted with multiple devices were analyzed individually based on unique suture anchor).
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
RIGHT PSOAS TENDONITIS/SNAP
1.7%
1/58 • Number of events 1 • Surgery to End of Study (EOS) visit, approximately 12 months
AE reporting was collected retrospectively from the information available in the participant's medical records. A total of 149 participants were enrolled in the study. However, there were 2 participants with multiple devices implanted. Participant Suture Anchor data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants implanted with multiple devices were analyzed individually based on unique suture anchor).
0.00%
0/93 • Surgery to End of Study (EOS) visit, approximately 12 months
AE reporting was collected retrospectively from the information available in the participant's medical records. A total of 149 participants were enrolled in the study. However, there were 2 participants with multiple devices implanted. Participant Suture Anchor data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants implanted with multiple devices were analyzed individually based on unique suture anchor).
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
LEFT HIP LABRAL ACETABULAR RETEAR
1.7%
1/58 • Number of events 1 • Surgery to End of Study (EOS) visit, approximately 12 months
AE reporting was collected retrospectively from the information available in the participant's medical records. A total of 149 participants were enrolled in the study. However, there were 2 participants with multiple devices implanted. Participant Suture Anchor data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants implanted with multiple devices were analyzed individually based on unique suture anchor).
0.00%
0/93 • Surgery to End of Study (EOS) visit, approximately 12 months
AE reporting was collected retrospectively from the information available in the participant's medical records. A total of 149 participants were enrolled in the study. However, there were 2 participants with multiple devices implanted. Participant Suture Anchor data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants implanted with multiple devices were analyzed individually based on unique suture anchor).
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
LEFT HIP LABRAL RETEAR
0.00%
0/58 • Surgery to End of Study (EOS) visit, approximately 12 months
AE reporting was collected retrospectively from the information available in the participant's medical records. A total of 149 participants were enrolled in the study. However, there were 2 participants with multiple devices implanted. Participant Suture Anchor data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants implanted with multiple devices were analyzed individually based on unique suture anchor).
1.1%
1/93 • Number of events 1 • Surgery to End of Study (EOS) visit, approximately 12 months
AE reporting was collected retrospectively from the information available in the participant's medical records. A total of 149 participants were enrolled in the study. However, there were 2 participants with multiple devices implanted. Participant Suture Anchor data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants implanted with multiple devices were analyzed individually based on unique suture anchor).
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
RIGHT HIP LABRAL TEAR
0.00%
0/58 • Surgery to End of Study (EOS) visit, approximately 12 months
AE reporting was collected retrospectively from the information available in the participant's medical records. A total of 149 participants were enrolled in the study. However, there were 2 participants with multiple devices implanted. Participant Suture Anchor data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants implanted with multiple devices were analyzed individually based on unique suture anchor).
1.1%
1/93 • Number of events 1 • Surgery to End of Study (EOS) visit, approximately 12 months
AE reporting was collected retrospectively from the information available in the participant's medical records. A total of 149 participants were enrolled in the study. However, there were 2 participants with multiple devices implanted. Participant Suture Anchor data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants implanted with multiple devices were analyzed individually based on unique suture anchor).
General disorders
LEFT HIP INTRA-ARTICULAR PAIN
0.00%
0/58 • Surgery to End of Study (EOS) visit, approximately 12 months
AE reporting was collected retrospectively from the information available in the participant's medical records. A total of 149 participants were enrolled in the study. However, there were 2 participants with multiple devices implanted. Participant Suture Anchor data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants implanted with multiple devices were analyzed individually based on unique suture anchor).
1.1%
1/93 • Number of events 1 • Surgery to End of Study (EOS) visit, approximately 12 months
AE reporting was collected retrospectively from the information available in the participant's medical records. A total of 149 participants were enrolled in the study. However, there were 2 participants with multiple devices implanted. Participant Suture Anchor data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants implanted with multiple devices were analyzed individually based on unique suture anchor).
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
HIP LABRAL TEAR
0.00%
0/58 • Surgery to End of Study (EOS) visit, approximately 12 months
AE reporting was collected retrospectively from the information available in the participant's medical records. A total of 149 participants were enrolled in the study. However, there were 2 participants with multiple devices implanted. Participant Suture Anchor data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants implanted with multiple devices were analyzed individually based on unique suture anchor).
2.2%
2/93 • Number of events 2 • Surgery to End of Study (EOS) visit, approximately 12 months
AE reporting was collected retrospectively from the information available in the participant's medical records. A total of 149 participants were enrolled in the study. However, there were 2 participants with multiple devices implanted. Participant Suture Anchor data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants implanted with multiple devices were analyzed individually based on unique suture anchor).

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor
n=58 participants at risk
Participants who have received PEEK Suture Anchors in the hip: BIORAPTOR™ Knotless Suture Anchor
SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor
n=93 participants at risk
Participants who have received PEEK Suture Anchors in the hip: SpeedLock Hip Suture Anchor
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
ILIOPSOAS TENDENOPATHY
0.00%
0/58 • Surgery to End of Study (EOS) visit, approximately 12 months
AE reporting was collected retrospectively from the information available in the participant's medical records. A total of 149 participants were enrolled in the study. However, there were 2 participants with multiple devices implanted. Participant Suture Anchor data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants implanted with multiple devices were analyzed individually based on unique suture anchor).
7.5%
7/93 • Number of events 7 • Surgery to End of Study (EOS) visit, approximately 12 months
AE reporting was collected retrospectively from the information available in the participant's medical records. A total of 149 participants were enrolled in the study. However, there were 2 participants with multiple devices implanted. Participant Suture Anchor data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants implanted with multiple devices were analyzed individually based on unique suture anchor).
General disorders
RIGHT LEG PAIN
1.7%
1/58 • Number of events 1 • Surgery to End of Study (EOS) visit, approximately 12 months
AE reporting was collected retrospectively from the information available in the participant's medical records. A total of 149 participants were enrolled in the study. However, there were 2 participants with multiple devices implanted. Participant Suture Anchor data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants implanted with multiple devices were analyzed individually based on unique suture anchor).
0.00%
0/93 • Surgery to End of Study (EOS) visit, approximately 12 months
AE reporting was collected retrospectively from the information available in the participant's medical records. A total of 149 participants were enrolled in the study. However, there were 2 participants with multiple devices implanted. Participant Suture Anchor data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants implanted with multiple devices were analyzed individually based on unique suture anchor).
General disorders
HIP PAIN
0.00%
0/58 • Surgery to End of Study (EOS) visit, approximately 12 months
AE reporting was collected retrospectively from the information available in the participant's medical records. A total of 149 participants were enrolled in the study. However, there were 2 participants with multiple devices implanted. Participant Suture Anchor data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants implanted with multiple devices were analyzed individually based on unique suture anchor).
4.3%
4/93 • Number of events 4 • Surgery to End of Study (EOS) visit, approximately 12 months
AE reporting was collected retrospectively from the information available in the participant's medical records. A total of 149 participants were enrolled in the study. However, there were 2 participants with multiple devices implanted. Participant Suture Anchor data analyzed independently based on device implanted (i.e., participants implanted with multiple devices were analyzed individually based on unique suture anchor).

Additional Information

Judith Horner

Smith + Nephew, Inc.

Phone: +44 1482 673251

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: LTE60