Trial Outcomes & Findings for Mindful Action for Pain (NCT NCT03800654)

NCT ID: NCT03800654

Last Updated: 2026-02-17

Results Overview

The BPI Pain Interference subscale consists of 7-items rated on a 0 - 10 scale that measures the degree to which pain interferes with various aspects of life, including mobility, social activities, and mood. Scores are averaged with a range from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate higher levels of pain interference (i.e., worse outcome).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

126 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline and week 9

Results posted on

2026-02-17

Participant Flow

126 participants completed the informed consent procedure. However, 9 of these participants either declined or were excluded prior to assigning them to an intervention and 1 participant did not complete the baseline assessment (violating are intent-to-treat criterion). Thus, only 116 (Phase 1: n=29; Phase 2: n=87) were assigned to an intervention and completed the baseline assessment.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Mindful Action for Pain (MAP) Development (Years 1-2)
In the first arm, MAP will be fully developed. Mindful Action for Pain: MAP integrates formal mindfulness meditation with methods from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Dialectical Behavior Therapy.
MAP (Years 3-5)
Mindful Action for Pain: MAP integrates formal mindfulness meditation with methods from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Dialectical Behavior Therapy.
CBT (Years 3-5)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain: CBT-CP is the current gold standard psychosocial intervention for chronic pain and will be compared to MAP in the second arm of the study.
Overall Study
STARTED
29
46
41
Overall Study
COMPLETED
23
39
31
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
6
7
10

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Mindful Action for Pain (MAP) Development (Years 1-2)
In the first arm, MAP will be fully developed. Mindful Action for Pain: MAP integrates formal mindfulness meditation with methods from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Dialectical Behavior Therapy.
MAP (Years 3-5)
Mindful Action for Pain: MAP integrates formal mindfulness meditation with methods from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Dialectical Behavior Therapy.
CBT (Years 3-5)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain: CBT-CP is the current gold standard psychosocial intervention for chronic pain and will be compared to MAP in the second arm of the study.
Overall Study
Time constraints
3
3
3
Overall Study
Did Not Meet Inclusion Criteria
1
0
0
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
2
1
6
Overall Study
Medical Health Issue
0
0
1
Overall Study
Personal Issues
0
2
0
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
0
1
0

Baseline Characteristics

2 phases of project

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Mindful Action for Pain (MAP) Development (Years 1-2)
n=29 Participants
In the first arm, MAP will be fully developed. Mindful Action for Pain: MAP integrates formal mindfulness meditation with methods from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy .
MAP (Years 3-5)
n=46 Participants
Mindful Action for Pain: MAP integrates formal mindfulness meditation with methods from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy .
CBT (Years 3-5)
n=41 Participants
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain: CBT-CP is the current gold standard psychosocial intervention for chronic pain and will be compared to MAP in the second arm of the study.
Total
n=116 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
57.28 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.92 • n=25 Participants • 2 phases of project
50.83 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.21 • n=20 Participants • 2 phases of project
47.88 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.62 • n=45 Participants • 2 phases of project
51.40 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.20 • n=76 Participants • 2 phases of project
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
n=25 Participants
10 Participants
n=20 Participants
10 Participants
n=45 Participants
26 Participants
n=76 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants
n=25 Participants
36 Participants
n=20 Participants
31 Participants
n=45 Participants
90 Participants
n=76 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants
n=25 Participants
10 Participants
n=20 Participants
10 Participants
n=45 Participants
27 Participants
n=76 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
22 Participants
n=25 Participants
35 Participants
n=20 Participants
31 Participants
n=45 Participants
88 Participants
n=76 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=25 Participants
1 Participants
n=20 Participants
0 Participants
n=45 Participants
1 Participants
n=76 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=25 Participants
1 Participants
n=20 Participants
1 Participants
n=45 Participants
2 Participants
n=76 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
n=25 Participants
5 Participants
n=20 Participants
3 Participants
n=45 Participants
9 Participants
n=76 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=25 Participants
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
1 Participants
n=45 Participants
1 Participants
n=76 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
8 Participants
n=25 Participants
13 Participants
n=20 Participants
13 Participants
n=45 Participants
34 Participants
n=76 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
9 Participants
n=25 Participants
18 Participants
n=20 Participants
18 Participants
n=45 Participants
45 Participants
n=76 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
n=25 Participants
3 Participants
n=20 Participants
1 Participants
n=45 Participants
5 Participants
n=76 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
10 Participants
n=25 Participants
6 Participants
n=20 Participants
4 Participants
n=45 Participants
20 Participants
n=76 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
29 Participants
n=25 Participants
46 Participants
n=20 Participants
41 Participants
n=45 Participants
116 Participants
n=76 Participants
Brief Pain Inventory - Pain Interference
6.77 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.66 • n=25 Participants
7.31 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.76 • n=20 Participants
7.38 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.95 • n=45 Participants
7.20 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.81 • n=76 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and week 9

Population: Veterans with heterogenous chronic pain

The BPI Pain Interference subscale consists of 7-items rated on a 0 - 10 scale that measures the degree to which pain interferes with various aspects of life, including mobility, social activities, and mood. Scores are averaged with a range from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate higher levels of pain interference (i.e., worse outcome).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Mindful Action for Pain (MAP) Development (Years 1-2)
n=29 Participants
In the first arm, MAP will be fully developed. Mindful Action for Pain: MAP integrates formal mindfulness meditation with methods from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy.
MAP Group (Years 3-5)
n=46 Participants
In Years 3-5, MAP will be compared to CBT-CP to establish feasibility of a larger, future trial. Mindful Action for Pain: MAP integrates formal mindfulness meditation with methods from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy.
CBT Group (Years 3-5)
n=41 Participants
In Years 3-5, MAP will be compared to CBT-CP to establish feasibility of a larger, future trial. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain: CBT-CP is the current gold standard psychosocial intervention for chronic pain and will be compared to MAP in the second arm of the study.
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Interference Subscale Change
Baseline
6.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.66
7.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.76
7.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.95
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Interference Subscale Change
Post-treatment
5.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.32
6.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.04
5.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.20

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and week 9

Population: Veterans with heterogenous chronic pain

The CPAQ consists of 20-items rated on a 0 - 6 scale that measures the degree that patients have adjusted to pain as part of their identity and lifestyle. Scores range from 0 to 120. Higher scores indicate higher levels of pain acceptance (i.e., better outcome).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Mindful Action for Pain (MAP) Development (Years 1-2)
n=29 Participants
In the first arm, MAP will be fully developed. Mindful Action for Pain: MAP integrates formal mindfulness meditation with methods from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy.
MAP Group (Years 3-5)
n=46 Participants
In Years 3-5, MAP will be compared to CBT-CP to establish feasibility of a larger, future trial. Mindful Action for Pain: MAP integrates formal mindfulness meditation with methods from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy.
CBT Group (Years 3-5)
n=41 Participants
In Years 3-5, MAP will be compared to CBT-CP to establish feasibility of a larger, future trial. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain: CBT-CP is the current gold standard psychosocial intervention for chronic pain and will be compared to MAP in the second arm of the study.
Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ)
Baseline
65.55 units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.54
63.50 units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.80
62.78 units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.72
Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ)
Posttreatment
72.78 units on scale
Standard Deviation 7.90
65.23 units on scale
Standard Deviation 14.02
67.03 units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.99

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and week 9

Population: Veterans with heterogenous chronic pain

The MAAS consists of 15-items assessing present-moment attention and awareness of everyday experiences. Scores range from 1-6 with higher scores reflecting greater mindfulness (i.e., better outcome).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Mindful Action for Pain (MAP) Development (Years 1-2)
n=29 Participants
In the first arm, MAP will be fully developed. Mindful Action for Pain: MAP integrates formal mindfulness meditation with methods from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy.
MAP Group (Years 3-5)
n=46 Participants
In Years 3-5, MAP will be compared to CBT-CP to establish feasibility of a larger, future trial. Mindful Action for Pain: MAP integrates formal mindfulness meditation with methods from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy.
CBT Group (Years 3-5)
n=41 Participants
In Years 3-5, MAP will be compared to CBT-CP to establish feasibility of a larger, future trial. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain: CBT-CP is the current gold standard psychosocial intervention for chronic pain and will be compared to MAP in the second arm of the study.
Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)
Baseline
3.62 units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
3.87 units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
3.55 units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)
Posttreatment
3.93 units on scale
Standard Deviation .80
3.97 units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
3.63 units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.18

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and week 9

Population: Veterans with heterogenous chronic pain

The PCS consists of 13 items rated on 0 - 4 scale that measures the degree to which people experience an aversive orientation towards pain. Scores range from 0 - 52). Higher scores indicate higher levels of pain catastrophizing (i.e., worse outcome).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Mindful Action for Pain (MAP) Development (Years 1-2)
n=28 Participants
In the first arm, MAP will be fully developed. Mindful Action for Pain: MAP integrates formal mindfulness meditation with methods from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy.
MAP Group (Years 3-5)
n=45 Participants
In Years 3-5, MAP will be compared to CBT-CP to establish feasibility of a larger, future trial. Mindful Action for Pain: MAP integrates formal mindfulness meditation with methods from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy.
CBT Group (Years 3-5)
n=41 Participants
In Years 3-5, MAP will be compared to CBT-CP to establish feasibility of a larger, future trial. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain: CBT-CP is the current gold standard psychosocial intervention for chronic pain and will be compared to MAP in the second arm of the study.
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Posttreatment
21.74 units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.66
22.72 units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.88
21.52 units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.49
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Baseline
26.86 units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.29
28.98 units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.31
27.80 units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.25

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Collected daily during the 8-week intervention

Population: Data not collected for participants in the CBT (Years 3-5) Arm.

On these diaries, participants report the duration of daily meditation practice via a smartphone application. The investigators then aggregated the total amount of meditation minutes completed at home during the 8-week intervention.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Mindful Action for Pain (MAP) Development (Years 1-2)
n=23 Participants
In the first arm, MAP will be fully developed. Mindful Action for Pain: MAP integrates formal mindfulness meditation with methods from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy.
MAP Group (Years 3-5)
n=46 Participants
In Years 3-5, MAP will be compared to CBT-CP to establish feasibility of a larger, future trial. Mindful Action for Pain: MAP integrates formal mindfulness meditation with methods from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy.
CBT Group (Years 3-5)
In Years 3-5, MAP will be compared to CBT-CP to establish feasibility of a larger, future trial. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain: CBT-CP is the current gold standard psychosocial intervention for chronic pain and will be compared to MAP in the second arm of the study.
Meditation Diaries
12.11 Hours
Standard Deviation 5.49
11.14 Hours
Standard Deviation 6.02

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and week 9

Population: Data from MAP Development years 1-2 not included because there was no randomization.

Participants in Phase 2 MAP and CBT groups wore actiwatches for two 7-day periods at baseline and week 9 to measure average physical activity counts.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Mindful Action for Pain (MAP) Development (Years 1-2)
n=31 Participants
In the first arm, MAP will be fully developed. Mindful Action for Pain: MAP integrates formal mindfulness meditation with methods from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy.
MAP Group (Years 3-5)
n=34 Participants
In Years 3-5, MAP will be compared to CBT-CP to establish feasibility of a larger, future trial. Mindful Action for Pain: MAP integrates formal mindfulness meditation with methods from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy.
CBT Group (Years 3-5)
In Years 3-5, MAP will be compared to CBT-CP to establish feasibility of a larger, future trial. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain: CBT-CP is the current gold standard psychosocial intervention for chronic pain and will be compared to MAP in the second arm of the study.
Actigraphy
Activity counts post-treatment
220.01 Activity counts
Standard Deviation 127.49
227.46 Activity counts
Standard Deviation 136.96
Actigraphy
Activity counts baseline
220.09 Activity counts
Standard Deviation 133.36
210.93 Activity counts
Standard Deviation 136.43

Adverse Events

Mindful Action for Pain (MAP) Development (Years 1-2)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

MAP (Years 3-5)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

CBT (Years 3-5)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Matthew Herbert

VA San Diego Healthcare System

Phone: 858-642-1411

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place