Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Evaluate the Single Dose Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of IV BCX4430 (NCT NCT03800173)
NCT ID: NCT03800173
Last Updated: 2021-07-23
Results Overview
Any event reported on the subject's study record that occurred on or after the initiation of study drug was defined as treatment emergent (TEAE).
COMPLETED
PHASE1
32 participants
AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up period, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1.
2021-07-23
Participant Flow
A single dose of study drug was administered to subjects in each of cohorts 1 to 4. In each cohort, 6 subjects received galidesivir and 2 subjects received matching placebo.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
single placebo IV infusion
|
5 mg/kg Galidesivir
Single IV infusion 5 mg/kg galidesivir
|
10 mg/kg Galidesivir
Single IV infusion 10 mg/kg galidesivir
|
15 mg/kg Galidesivir
Single IV infusion 15 mg/kg galidesivir
|
20 mg/kg Galidesivir
Single IV infusion 20 mg/kg galidesivir
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
8
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Population
|
8
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
PK Population
|
0
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
8
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
single placebo IV infusion
|
5 mg/kg Galidesivir
Single IV infusion 5 mg/kg galidesivir
|
10 mg/kg Galidesivir
Single IV infusion 10 mg/kg galidesivir
|
15 mg/kg Galidesivir
Single IV infusion 15 mg/kg galidesivir
|
20 mg/kg Galidesivir
Single IV infusion 20 mg/kg galidesivir
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Evaluate the Single Dose Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of IV BCX4430
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=8 Participants
single placebo IV infusion
|
5 mg/kg Galidesivir
n=6 Participants
Single IV infusion 5 mg/kg galidesivir
|
10 mg/kg Galidesivir
n=6 Participants
Single IV infusion 10 mg/kg galidesivir
|
15 mg/kg Galidesivir
n=6 Participants
Single IV infusion 15 mg/kg galidesivir
|
20 mg/kg Galidesivir
n=6 Participants
Single IV infusion 20 mg/kg galidesivir
|
Total
n=32 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
31.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.88 • n=5 Participants
|
39.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.76 • n=7 Participants
|
33.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.76 • n=5 Participants
|
41.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.04 • n=4 Participants
|
31.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.98 • n=21 Participants
|
35.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.87 • n=8 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up period, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1.Population: The safety population included all randomized subjects who received any amount of study drug (i.e. a partial infusion).
Any event reported on the subject's study record that occurred on or after the initiation of study drug was defined as treatment emergent (TEAE).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=8 Participants
single placebo IV infusion
|
5 mg/kg Galidesivir
n=6 Participants
Single IV infusion 5 mg/kg galidesivir
|
10 mg/kg Galidesivir
n=6 Participants
Single IV infusion 10 mg/kg galidesivir
|
15 mg/kg Galidesivir
n=6 Participants
Single IV infusion 15 mg/kg galidesivir
|
20 mg/kg Galidesivir
n=6 Participants
Single IV infusion 20 mg/kg galidesivir
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Galidesivir Safety and Tolerability, as Measured by the Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events.
Moderate TEAE
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Galidesivir Safety and Tolerability, as Measured by the Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events.
Subjects with at least 1 TEAE
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
4 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Galidesivir Safety and Tolerability, as Measured by the Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events.
Not related TEAEs
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Galidesivir Safety and Tolerability, as Measured by the Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events.
Related TEAEs
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Galidesivir Safety and Tolerability, as Measured by the Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events.
Mild TEAE
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
3 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Galidesivir Safety and Tolerability, as Measured by the Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events.
Severe TEAE
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Galidesivir Safety and Tolerability, as Measured by the Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events.
Subjects with at least 1 SAE
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Galidesivir Safety and Tolerability, as Measured by the Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events.
Subject Discontinuation due to AE
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Plasma PK parameters are based on sampling over a 21 day periodPopulation: The PK population included subjects for whom at least 1 PK parameter was estimated. The PK population was the primary population for the PK analysis.
Serial blood samples for PK assessment of plasma galidesivir were collected at the following time points: * Day 1 to Day 5: 0 hour (pre dose), halfway through the infusion (0.5 hour), 1 hour (end of the infusion), 1.25, 1.50, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 96 hours post dose. * Day 6 (+1 day), Day 8 (+1 day), Day 14 (± 1 day) * Day 21 (+2 days) or early termination. Cmax for galidesivir was estimated using non compartmental methods with Phoenix® WinNonlin® v8.1 or higher (Certara, Inc.).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=6 Participants
single placebo IV infusion
|
5 mg/kg Galidesivir
n=6 Participants
Single IV infusion 5 mg/kg galidesivir
|
10 mg/kg Galidesivir
n=6 Participants
Single IV infusion 10 mg/kg galidesivir
|
15 mg/kg Galidesivir
n=6 Participants
Single IV infusion 15 mg/kg galidesivir
|
20 mg/kg Galidesivir
Single IV infusion 20 mg/kg galidesivir
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Plasma PK - Galidesivir Cmax (Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug)
|
5540 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 7.8
|
10300 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 22.3
|
17730 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17.5
|
20490 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.2
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Plasma PK parameters are based on sampling over a 21 day periodPopulation: The PK population included subjects for whom at least 1 PK parameter was estimated. The PK population was the primary population for the PK analysis. Only 5 subjects were included in the 20 mg/kg cohort for AUC0-t analysis, as 1 subject was lost to follow-up after discharge from clinic on Day 5.
Serial blood samples for PK assessment of plasma galidesivir were collected at the following time points: * Day 1 to Day 5: 0 hour (pre dose), halfway through the infusion (0.5 hour), 1 hour (end of the infusion), 1.25, 1.50, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 96 hours post dose. * Day 6 (+1 day), Day 8 (+1 day), Day 14 (± 1 day) * Day 21 (+2 days) or early termination. AUC0-inf (AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time) and AUC0-t (AUC from time 0 to time t, where "t" = the last quantifiable concentration) for galidesivir was estimated using non compartmental methods with Phoenix® WinNonlin® v8.1 or higher (Certara, Inc.).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=6 Participants
single placebo IV infusion
|
5 mg/kg Galidesivir
n=6 Participants
Single IV infusion 5 mg/kg galidesivir
|
10 mg/kg Galidesivir
n=6 Participants
Single IV infusion 10 mg/kg galidesivir
|
15 mg/kg Galidesivir
n=6 Participants
Single IV infusion 15 mg/kg galidesivir
|
20 mg/kg Galidesivir
Single IV infusion 20 mg/kg galidesivir
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Plasma PK - Galidesivir AUC (Area Under the Concentration vs. Time Curve)
AUC0-inf
|
21160 ng*h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 23.0
|
37080 ng*h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 14.5
|
65860 ng*h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.9
|
81230 ng*h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 14.3
|
—
|
|
Plasma PK - Galidesivir AUC (Area Under the Concentration vs. Time Curve)
AUC0-t
|
17150 ng*h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.0
|
32360 ng*h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17.4
|
59590 ng*h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 22.0
|
73350 ng*h/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 14.1
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Urine PK parameters are based on sampling over a 96 hour period.Population: The PK population included subjects for whom at least 1 PK parameter was estimated. The PK population was the primary population for the PK analysis. There were only 5 subjects in the 20 mg/kg cohort as 1 subject was lost to follow-up after discharge from clinic on Day 5.
Urine was collected from subjects over a 96 hour period per protocol, analyzed for galidesivir concentrations. Urine PK parameters including CLR (renal clearance of unchanged drug cumulatively over all collection intervals or in a specific interval) were estimated in SAS for Windows v9.4 or higher (SAS Institute, Inc.) based on the recorded urine concentrations and volumes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=6 Participants
single placebo IV infusion
|
5 mg/kg Galidesivir
n=6 Participants
Single IV infusion 5 mg/kg galidesivir
|
10 mg/kg Galidesivir
n=6 Participants
Single IV infusion 10 mg/kg galidesivir
|
15 mg/kg Galidesivir
n=5 Participants
Single IV infusion 15 mg/kg galidesivir
|
20 mg/kg Galidesivir
Single IV infusion 20 mg/kg galidesivir
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Galidesivir Renal Clearance
|
9.305 L/hr
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.7
|
11.66 L/hr
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17.8
|
11.51 L/hr
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 14.5
|
7.131 L/hr
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 90.4
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
5 mg/kg Galidesivir
10 mg/kg Galidesivir
15 mg/kg Galidesivir
20 mg/kg Galidesivir
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=8 participants at risk
single placebo IV infusion
|
5 mg/kg Galidesivir
n=6 participants at risk
Single IV infusion 5 mg/kg galidesivir
|
10 mg/kg Galidesivir
n=6 participants at risk
Single IV infusion 10 mg/kg galidesivir
|
15 mg/kg Galidesivir
n=6 participants at risk
Single IV infusion 15 mg/kg galidesivir
|
20 mg/kg Galidesivir
n=6 participants at risk
Single IV infusion 20 mg/kg galidesivir
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
gastrooesophageal cancer
|
0.00%
0/8 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion spontaneous
|
0.00%
0/8 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=8 participants at risk
single placebo IV infusion
|
5 mg/kg Galidesivir
n=6 participants at risk
Single IV infusion 5 mg/kg galidesivir
|
10 mg/kg Galidesivir
n=6 participants at risk
Single IV infusion 10 mg/kg galidesivir
|
15 mg/kg Galidesivir
n=6 participants at risk
Single IV infusion 15 mg/kg galidesivir
|
20 mg/kg Galidesivir
n=6 participants at risk
Single IV infusion 20 mg/kg galidesivir
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/8 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.00%
0/8 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Distension
|
0.00%
0/8 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/8 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/8 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/8 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/8 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/8 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
0.00%
0/8 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic lesion
|
0.00%
0/8 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Iron deficiency anaemia
|
0.00%
0/8 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukocytosis
|
0.00%
0/8 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
0.00%
0/8 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper airway cough syndrome
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs were assessed and recorded from the time of signing the ICF through to the appropriate follow-up visit, up to 23 days from IMP dosing on Day 1. All AEs were graded for severity using the modified 2014 DMID Adult Toxicity Grading Scale. Any AEs not covered by the DMID criteria were assessed and classified into 1 of 3 clearly defined categories (mild, moderate, or severe).
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place