Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
COMPLETED
Total Enrollment
180 participants
Study Classification
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Start Date
2019-01-22
Study Completion Date
2021-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This is an observational cohort study of the association between patient expectations for functional recovery and quality of life among acute respiratory failure survivors 6 months after hospital discharge.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study will enroll adults who are diagnosed with acute respiratory failure during an ICU admission and discharged from the ICU alive. All participants will receive usual clinical care. Participant expectations for functional recovery will be assessed before hospital discharge via a standardized questionnaire containing a visual analogue scale and questions about expected ability and importance of being able to perform activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living in 6 months. At 6 months, participants will be re-contacted by phone. Study staff will administer questionnaires to assess whether patient expectations have been met. Quality of life will be assessed using the WHOQOL-BREF and the EQ-5D-VAS.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Acute Respiratory Failure
Post Intensive Care Syndrome
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Observational Model Type
COHORT
Study Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patient's expectations met at Hospital discharge
ARF survivors whose expectations for recovery at hospital discharge are fully met 6 months later.
No interventions assigned to this group
Patient's with unmet expectations at Hospital Discharge
ARF survivors whose expectations for recovery at hospital discharge are not fully met 6 months later.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age ≥ 18 years
* Respiratory failure managed in the ICU, where respiratory failure is defined as ≥1 of the following:
* Mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube ≥ 24 hours OR
* Non-invasive ventilation (CPAP, BiPAP) ≥ 24 consecutive hours\* provided for acute respiratory failure (not for Obstructive Sleep Apnea or other stable use) OR
* High flow nasal cannula with FIO2 ≥ 0.5 and flow rate ≥ 30 LPM for ≥ 24 consecutive hours\*
\*Occasional rest periods of ≤ 1 hour each are not deducted from the calculation of consecutive hours.
* Expected by the clinical team to be discharged home alive
* Respiratory failure managed in the ICU, where respiratory failure is defined as ≥1 of the following:
* Mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube ≥ 24 hours OR
* Non-invasive ventilation (CPAP, BiPAP) ≥ 24 consecutive hours\* provided for acute respiratory failure (not for Obstructive Sleep Apnea or other stable use) OR
* High flow nasal cannula with FIO2 ≥ 0.5 and flow rate ≥ 30 LPM for ≥ 24 consecutive hours\*
\*Occasional rest periods of ≤ 1 hour each are not deducted from the calculation of consecutive hours.
* Expected by the clinical team to be discharged home alive
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient in ICU \< 24 hours
* Mechanical ventilation at baseline or mechanical ventilation solely for airway protection or obstruction
* Residing in a medical institution at the time of hospital admission
* Homeless / Prisoner / Primary residence not in the USA / Unable to communicate by telephone in English
* More than mild dementia (either known diagnosis of moderate or worse dementia or IQ-CODE \> 3.6; screening performed on patients \> 50 years old or with family reports of possible memory decline)
* Patient on hospice at or before time of enrollment
* Patients who, based solely on pre-existing medical problems (such as poorly controlled neoplasm or other end stage disease, including Stage IV heart failure or severe burns), would not be expected to survive 6 months in the absence of the acute respiratory failure.
* Patients with neurological injury either receiving treatment for intracranial hypertension or who are not expected to return to consciousness.
* Pregnancy
* Mechanical ventilation at baseline or mechanical ventilation solely for airway protection or obstruction
* Residing in a medical institution at the time of hospital admission
* Homeless / Prisoner / Primary residence not in the USA / Unable to communicate by telephone in English
* More than mild dementia (either known diagnosis of moderate or worse dementia or IQ-CODE \> 3.6; screening performed on patients \> 50 years old or with family reports of possible memory decline)
* Patient on hospice at or before time of enrollment
* Patients who, based solely on pre-existing medical problems (such as poorly controlled neoplasm or other end stage disease, including Stage IV heart failure or severe burns), would not be expected to survive 6 months in the absence of the acute respiratory failure.
* Patients with neurological injury either receiving treatment for intracranial hypertension or who are not expected to return to consciousness.
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
NIH
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Johns Hopkins University
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Responsibility Role
SPONSOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alison Turnbull
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Johns Hopkins University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Site Status
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Site Status
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Site Status
Intermountain Medical Center
Murray, Utah, United States
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
United States
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rubenfeld GD, Caldwell E, Peabody E, Weaver J, Martin DP, Neff M, Stern EJ, Hudson LD. Incidence and outcomes of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 20;353(16):1685-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050333.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cox CE, Docherty SL, Brandon DH, Whaley C, Attix DK, Clay AS, Dore DV, Hough CL, White DB, Tulsky JA. Surviving critical illness: acute respiratory distress syndrome as experienced by patients and their caregivers. Crit Care Med. 2009 Oct;37(10):2702-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b6f64a.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Spragg RG, Bernard GR, Checkley W, Curtis JR, Gajic O, Guyatt G, Hall J, Israel E, Jain M, Needham DM, Randolph AG, Rubenfeld GD, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Ware LB, Young D, Harabin AL. Beyond mortality: future clinical research in acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 May 15;181(10):1121-7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201001-0024WS. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Zambon M, Vincent JL. Mortality rates for patients with acute lung injury/ARDS have decreased over time. Chest. 2008 May;133(5):1120-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2134. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Phua J, Badia JR, Adhikari NK, Friedrich JO, Fowler RA, Singh JM, Scales DC, Stather DR, Li A, Jones A, Gattas DJ, Hallett D, Tomlinson G, Stewart TE, Ferguson ND. Has mortality from acute respiratory distress syndrome decreased over time?: A systematic review. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Feb 1;179(3):220-7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200805-722OC. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Needham DM, Davidson J, Cohen H, Hopkins RO, Weinert C, Wunsch H, Zawistowski C, Bemis-Dougherty A, Berney SC, Bienvenu OJ, Brady SL, Brodsky MB, Denehy L, Elliott D, Flatley C, Harabin AL, Jones C, Louis D, Meltzer W, Muldoon SR, Palmer JB, Perme C, Robinson M, Schmidt DM, Scruth E, Spill GR, Storey CP, Render M, Votto J, Harvey MA. Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: report from a stakeholders' conference. Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):502-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232da75.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hopkins RO, Suchyta MR, Kamdar BB, Darowski E, Jackson JC, Needham DM. Instrumental Activities of Daily Living after Critical Illness: A Systematic Review. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Aug;14(8):1332-1343. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201701-059SR.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kamdar BB, Huang M, Dinglas VD, Colantuoni E, von Wachter TM, Hopkins RO, Needham DM; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Joblessness and Lost Earnings after Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in a 1-Year National Multicenter Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct 15;196(8):1012-1020. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201611-2327OC.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lieu TA, Au D, Krishnan JA, Moss M, Selker H, Harabin A, Taggart V, Connors A; Comparative Effectiveness Research in Lung Diseases Workshop Panel. Comparative effectiveness research in lung diseases and sleep disorders: recommendations from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Oct 1;184(7):848-56. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201104-0634WS.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Carson SS, Goss CH, Patel SR, Anzueto A, Au DH, Elborn S, Gerald JK, Gerald LB, Kahn JM, Malhotra A, Mularski RA, Riekert KA, Rubenfeld GD, Weaver TE, Krishnan JA; American Thoracic Society Comparative Effectiveness Research Working Group. An official American Thoracic Society research statement: comparative effectiveness research in pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Nov 15;188(10):1253-61. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201310-1790ST.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cox CE, Martinu T, Sathy SJ, Clay AS, Chia J, Gray AL, Olsen MK, Govert JA, Carson SS, Tulsky JA. Expectations and outcomes of prolonged mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2009 Nov;37(11):2888-94; quiz 2904. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181ab86ed.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lamas DJ, Owens RL, Nace RN, Massaro AF, Pertsch NJ, Gass J, Bernacki RE, Block SD. Opening the Door: The Experience of Chronic Critical Illness in a Long-Term Acute Care Hospital. Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr;45(4):e357-e362. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002094.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Turnbull AE, Davis WE, Needham DM, White DB, Eakin MN. Intensivist-reported Facilitators and Barriers to Discussing Post-Discharge Outcomes with Intensive Care Unit Surrogates. A Qualitative Study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Sep;13(9):1546-52. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201603-212OC.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Thompson AG, Sunol R. Expectations as determinants of patient satisfaction: concepts, theory and evidence. Int J Qual Health Care. 1995 Jun;7(2):127-41. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/7.2.127.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Gonzalez Saenz de Tejada M, Escobar A, Herrera C, Garcia L, Aizpuru F, Sarasqueta C. Patient expectations and health-related quality of life outcomes following total joint replacement. Value Health. 2010 Jun-Jul;13(4):447-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00685.x. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Soroceanu A, Ching A, Abdu W, McGuire K. Relationship between preoperative expectations, satisfaction, and functional outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar and cervical spine surgery: a multicenter study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jan 15;37(2):E103-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182245c1f.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hamilton DF, Lane JV, Gaston P, Patton JT, Macdonald D, Simpson AH, Howie CR. What determines patient satisfaction with surgery? A prospective cohort study of 4709 patients following total joint replacement. BMJ Open. 2013 Apr 9;3(4):e002525. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002525. Print 2013.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Pihl K, Roos EM, Nissen N, JoRgensen U, Schjerning J, Thorlund JB. Over-optimistic patient expectations of recovery and leisure activities after arthroscopic meniscus surgery. Acta Orthop. 2016 Dec;87(6):615-621. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1228411. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Waljee J, McGlinn EP, Sears ED, Chung KC. Patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes in surgery: a systematic review. Surgery. 2014 May;155(5):799-808. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.015. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Aversa M, Chowdhury NA, Tomlinson G, Singer LG. Preoperative expectations for health-related quality of life after lung transplant. Clin Transplant. 2018 Oct;32(10):e13394. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13394. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Katz S, Downs TD, Cash HR, Grotz RC. Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist. 1970 Spring;10(1):20-30. doi: 10.1093/geront/10.1_part_1.20. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969 Autumn;9(3):179-86. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Charney DS. Psychobiological mechanisms of resilience and vulnerability: implications for successful adaptation to extreme stress. Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Feb;161(2):195-216. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.2.195.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Connor KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety. 2003;18(2):76-82. doi: 10.1002/da.10113.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cosco TD, Kaushal A, Richards M, Kuh D, Stafford M. Resilience measurement in later life: a systematic review and psychometric analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Jan 28;14:16. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0418-6.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O'Connell KA; WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res. 2004 Mar;13(2):299-310. doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Zimet GD, Powell SS, Farley GK, Werkman S, Berkoff KA. Psychometric characteristics of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. J Pers Assess. 1990 Winter;55(3-4):610-7. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674095.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Shumaker SC, Frazier SK, Moser DK, Chung ML. Psychometric Properties of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support in Patients With Heart Failure. J Nurs Meas. 2017 Apr 1;25(1):90-102. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.25.1.90.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hoffmann TC, Del Mar C. Patients' expectations of the benefits and harms of treatments, screening, and tests: a systematic review. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Feb;175(2):274-86. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6016.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Turnbull AE, Lee EM, Dinglas VD, Beesley S, Bose S, Banner-Goodspeed V, Hopkins RO, Jackson JC, Mir-Kasimov M, Sevin CM, Brown SM, Needham DM; APICS-01 Study Team. Fulfillment of Patient Expectations after Acute Respiratory Failure: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023 Apr;20(4):566-573. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202207-600OC.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
00181895
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
IRB00197235
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id