Global Self-management Telematic Support for Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

NCT ID: NCT03792880

Last Updated: 2022-04-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-06-01

Study Completion Date

2021-12-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This clinical trial compares the usual follow-up to a program of telematic control and self-management in a group of patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS), few symptoms and treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). The objective of the intervention is to achieve a CPAP compliance of ≥4 hours per day in at least 90% of the subjects.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Low CPAP compliance in OSAHS could mean that its possible cardiovascular benefits are not achieved. Telemedicine can be an effective tool to increase CPAP compliance with low cost.

The researchers propose to carry out a randomized study about patients with severe OSAHS and few symptoms, who are expected to have low CPAP compliance.

The main objective is to evaluate if a telematic control and self-management program can increase the compliance with CPAP treatment compared to conventional follow-up, getting at least 90% of patients to use CPAP ≥ 4 hours per day.

Sixty patients from the Pneumology departments of two hospitals, diagnosed with severe OSAHS and with few symptoms (Epworth Sleepiness Scale ≤10) will be randomized to two follow-up groups, telematic and conventional, for 6 months. Patients in the intervention group (telematic monitoring) will collect variables related to symptoms of sleep apnea and side effects of CPAP treatment, using their own smartphone or a tablet provided during the study if they prefer. Other variables as the hours per day of CPAP use, leaks and residual apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) will be transmitted daily and automatically from latest generation CPAP. All information will be processed and each variable will generate alarms and instructions for each patient, allowing the self-management and an early solution of the possible problems related to the treatment. Alarms may also be generated in the database if the professional intervention is necessary.

In addition, before starting CPAP treatment and after six months of treatment, patients will be monitored during a week with a watch-like device. Variables related to circadian rhythm will be collected and analyzed to know the effect of CPAP treatment in both groups (control and intervention groups).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Telemedicine Compliance, Patient

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized control trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control arm

Usual follow-up in Healthcare System for patients with obstructive sleep apnea and CPAP treatment

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Habitual follow-up in Healthcare System

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

According to the SEPAR regulation, patients treated with CPAP should be evaluated by the pulmonologist one month after beginning treatment, every 3 months during the first year, every 6 months during the second year and annually from the third year.

Intervention arm

Usual follow-up in the Healthcare System for patients with obstructive sleep apnea and CPAP treatment and a telematic control and self-management program

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Telematic control and self-management program

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

During 6 months with CPAP treatment, patients must complete some questionnaires about the presence of refreshing sleep and side effects with the frequency established, using a computing application. Patients can download this application on their own smartphone but, if they prefer, they can be provided with a tablet during the study with this application installed.

A set of variables will be collected using an automatic and wireless transmission from latest generation CPAP to control the CPAP compliance and tolerance. All data will be processed in a platform to generate alarms, which will be controled daily by a researcher, as well as solutions to the problems presented during the monitoring.

Habitual follow-up in Healthcare System

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

According to the SEPAR regulation, patients treated with CPAP should be evaluated by the pulmonologist one month after beginning treatment, every 3 months during the first year, every 6 months during the second year and annually from the third year.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Telematic control and self-management program

During 6 months with CPAP treatment, patients must complete some questionnaires about the presence of refreshing sleep and side effects with the frequency established, using a computing application. Patients can download this application on their own smartphone but, if they prefer, they can be provided with a tablet during the study with this application installed.

A set of variables will be collected using an automatic and wireless transmission from latest generation CPAP to control the CPAP compliance and tolerance. All data will be processed in a platform to generate alarms, which will be controled daily by a researcher, as well as solutions to the problems presented during the monitoring.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Habitual follow-up in Healthcare System

According to the SEPAR regulation, patients treated with CPAP should be evaluated by the pulmonologist one month after beginning treatment, every 3 months during the first year, every 6 months during the second year and annually from the third year.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with a recent diagnostic of OSAHS with AHI≥ 30 and indication of CPAP.
* Age≥ 18 years
* Few symptoms, so that, without hypersomnolence (Epworth sleepiness scale ≤ 10)
* Absence of clinic suspect or confirmation of other sleep pathology
* With interest in the use of new technologies

Exclusion Criteria

* Nasal obstruction that prevents the use of CPAP
* Psycho-physical inability to complete questionnaires and carry out the program
* Patients undergoing uvulopalatopharyngoplasty
* Cheyne-Stoke syndrome
* Pregnancy
* Absence of informed consent
* Shift work in the last 3 months and transmeridian trips in the last month.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Virgen del Puerto Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

María Ángeles Sánchez Quiroga

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Virgen del Puerto Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Virgen del Puerto Hospital

Plasencia, Cáceres, Spain

Site Status

San Pedro de Alcántara

Cáceres, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

4/2016

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.