Evaluation of Triage Options After HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening Among HIV-infected Women

NCT ID: NCT03789513

Last Updated: 2022-02-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

3000 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-03-01

Study Completion Date

2022-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Cervical cancer is the most common cause of cancer and a leading cause of death among HIV-infected women living in resource-limited settings. Although screening for premalignant lesions is an effective way of reducing cervical cancer incidence, its uptake in low-resource settings to date is low. The use of HPV testing for primary screening is currently recommended by many guidelines - including the WHO guidelines for cervical cancer screening in resource-limited settings - because of its greater sensitivity and ease of use compared to other options. However, these WHO guidelines have both highlighted the need to conduct more research on appropriate HPV-based algorithms among HIV-infected women, as immunodeficiency may affect the screening performance. Indeed, HPV infections in HIV-infected women are very common, so there is a need for additional triage to identify women most at risk and there remains considerable uncertainty on the optimal option for such triage. Most of the evidence available comes from HIV-negative populations living in high-resource settings and is not necessarily relevant for low-resource contexts where the epidemiological background is different, women access late to screening and may not have follow up visits, where financial constraints are important and health service resources limited.

Hence, the proposed project aims to provide evidence on the effectiveness and feasibility of HPV-based screening algorithms among HIV-infected women in low-resource settings.

This multicenter cross-sectional study will include 3,000 HIV-infected women (30-49 years old) receiving HAART and followed in Abidjan (Ivory Coast), Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso) and Phnom Penh (Cambodia).

After self-collection of cervico-vaginal samples, each participant will have an HPV test with partial genotyping primary using the Xpert HPV assay, a real-time PCR assay that provides the possibility of identifying 14 HR-HPV types within one hour. The Xpert HPV test has been chosen because of the wide availability of the Genexpert platform in HIV care centers from resource-limited settings. Furthermore, it can specifically detect HPV-16, 18 and 45, the most carcinogenic HPV types in both HIV-negative and HIV-positive women, separately from other high-risk HPV types. VIA will be another triage option either alone or combined to HPV DNA genotyping.

In addition, participants treated for cervical lesion will be followed over 12 months to assess the risk of post-treatment lesions (CIN2+/HSIL) and to identify associated risk-factors.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HIV Infections HPV - Anogenital Human Papilloma Virus Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Triage with different options

All women will have an HPV test, partial genotyping (16/18/45 versus other high-risk HPV \[hr-HPV\]) and VIA. The different options for triage that will be compared are:

* Participants hr-HVP+ and VIA+ participants selected for treatment;
* Participants HPV 16/18/45+ selected for treatment;
* Participant HPV 16/18/45+ and/or VIA+ selected for treatment;

Group Type OTHER

HPV test with partial genotyping and VIA triage

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

HPV testing with the GenXpert platform VIA Biopsies of VIA+ lesions or random Treatment with thermal ablation of women with precancerous lesions

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

HPV test with partial genotyping and VIA triage

HPV testing with the GenXpert platform VIA Biopsies of VIA+ lesions or random Treatment with thermal ablation of women with precancerous lesions

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women
* HIV-1 infection
* Age 30 to 49 years
* In care for HIV infection, receiving or initiating antiretroviral therapy
* Written informed consent given

Exclusion Criteria

* HIV-2 infection
* Ongoing pregnancy (evidenced by self-report or clinical examination)
* Previous total hysterectomy
* Severe concomitant disease that, according to the investigators, may contraindicate or compromise participation to the study
* History of cervical cancer screening with treatment for precancerous lesions within the last 12 months

Differed inclusion

* Ongoing heavy menstruation
* Immediate post-partum (\<12 weeks post delivery)
* Sign of ongoing genital infection (e.g. mucopurulante discharge)
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

49 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

International Agency for Research on Cancer

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Programme PAC-CI, Site ANRS-MIE de Côte d'Ivoire

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Geneva

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Bordeaux

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

ANRS, Emerging Infectious Diseases

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pierre Debeaudrap, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Ceped UMR 196

Apollinaire Debeaudrap, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

PACCI - Ivory Coast

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

HIV day care center

Bobo-Dioulasso, , Burkina Faso

Site Status RECRUITING

Calmette Hospital

Phnom Penh, , Cambodia

Site Status RECRUITING

CEPREF

Abidjan, , Côte d’Ivoire

Site Status ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Burkina Faso Cambodia Côte d’Ivoire

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Pierre Debeaudrap, PhD

Role: CONTACT

(0) 1 76 53 34 53 ext. +33

Apollinaire Horo, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Armel Poda

Role: primary

Kim Sothea

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ANRS12375 AIMA-CC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.