Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Orally Administered Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide (SPR994) Compared to Intravenous Ertapenem in Participants With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) or Acute Pyelonephritis (AP) (NCT NCT03788967)
NCT ID: NCT03788967
Last Updated: 2022-07-25
Results Overview
Overall response is participants with combined clinical cure and microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP that were present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antimicrobial therapy is warranted. Microbiological eradication is defined as reduction of baseline urine pathogen(s) to \<10\^3 colony forming unit/milliliter (CFU/mL) and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
1372 participants
Day 19 (TOC)
2022-07-25
Participant Flow
Participants took part in the study at 95 study centers in Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, Latvia, Moldova, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, South Africa, Ukraine, and the United States from 03 June 2019 to 27 May 2020.
Participants with diagnosis of complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) or Acute Pyelonephritis (AP) were enrolled to receive tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide (TBPM-PI-HBr) and ertapenem.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
685
|
687
|
|
Overall Study
Micro-Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population
|
449
|
419
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
653
|
663
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
32
|
24
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
14
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
Participant Non-Compliance/Uncooperativeness
|
3
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Participant Withdrawal of Consent
|
13
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
COVID-19
|
1
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Orally Administered Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide (SPR994) Compared to Intravenous Ertapenem in Participants With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) or Acute Pyelonephritis (AP)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=685 Participants
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=687 Participants
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
Total
n=1372 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
56.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.68 • n=5 Participants
|
57.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.23 • n=7 Participants
|
56.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.45 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
368 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
389 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
757 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
317 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
298 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
615 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
672 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
682 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1354 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
676 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
677 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1353 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 19 (TOC)Population: Microbiological intent-to-treat population (Micro-ITT) included all randomized participants with a confirmed diagnosis of cUTI or AP and a positive Screening urine culture defined as growth of one or two uropathogens at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL and/or positive Screening blood culture with isolation of one or more uropathogens.
Overall response is participants with combined clinical cure and microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP that were present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antimicrobial therapy is warranted. Microbiological eradication is defined as reduction of baseline urine pathogen(s) to \<10\^3 colony forming unit/milliliter (CFU/mL) and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=449 Participants
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=419 Participants
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Response (Combined Clinical Cure and Microbiological Eradication) at Test-of-Cure (TOC) in Micro Intent-to-Treat Population
|
264 Participants
|
258 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)Population: Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
An Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational/experimental) product, whether or not related to this product.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=685 Participants
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=687 Participants
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in The Safety Population
|
176 Participants
|
176 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 19 (TOC)Population: Microbiologically evaluable (ME) - TOC is a subset which included participants who met the definitions of both the micro-ITT Population and CE Population and were defined for each visit for the analyses in the ME Population at each respective visit as outlined in the evaluability review plan (ERP).
Overall response is participants with combined clinical cure and microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or acute pyelonephritis (AP) that were present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antimicrobial therapy is warranted. Microbiological eradication is defined as reduction of baseline urine pathogen(s) to \<10\^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=413 Participants
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=376 Participants
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Response (Combined Clinical Cure Plus Microbiological Eradication) At Test-Of-Cure (TOC) In The Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) - TOC Population
|
254 Participants
|
247 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 15 (EOT), Day 19 (TOC) and Day 25 (LFU)Population: Microbiological intent-to-treat population (Micro-ITT) included all randomized participants with a confirmed diagnosis of cUTI or AP and a positive Screening urine culture defined as growth of one or two uropathogens at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL and/or positive Screening blood culture with isolation of one or more uropathogens.
Clinical cure is defined as number of participants with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP that were present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antimicrobial therapy is warranted. Sustained clinical cure is defined as participants who met criteria for clinical cure at TOC and remained free of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP at LFU.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=449 Participants
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=419 Participants
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Cure at End-of-Treatment (EOT), TOC, and Sustained Clinical Cure at Late Follow-Up (LFU) Days in the Micro-ITT Populations
EOT
|
446 Participants
|
410 Participants
|
|
Clinical Cure at End-of-Treatment (EOT), TOC, and Sustained Clinical Cure at Late Follow-Up (LFU) Days in the Micro-ITT Populations
TOC
|
418 Participants
|
392 Participants
|
|
Clinical Cure at End-of-Treatment (EOT), TOC, and Sustained Clinical Cure at Late Follow-Up (LFU) Days in the Micro-ITT Populations
LFU
|
398 Participants
|
377 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 15 (EOT)Population: CE-EOT population is a subset which included participants who meet the definition for the ITT population, have no important protocol deviations that would affect the assessment of efficacy, and had an outcome assessed as clinical cure or clinical failure at EOT.
Clinical cure is defined as number of participants with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP that were present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antimicrobial therapy is warranted.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=677 Participants
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=674 Participants
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Cure at EOT Days the Clinically Evaluable (CE-EOT) Populations
|
673 Participants
|
665 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 19 (TOC)Population: CE-TOC population is a subset which included participants who meet the definition for the ITT population, have no important protocol deviations that would affect the assessment of efficacy, and had an outcome assessed as clinical cure or clinical failure at TOC.
Clinical cure is defined as number of participants with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP that were present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antimicrobial therapy is warranted.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=641 Participants
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=637 Participants
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Cure at TOC in the CE-TOC Populations
|
611 Participants
|
617 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 25 (LFU)Population: CE-LFU population is a subset which included participants who meet the definition for the ITT population, have no important protocol deviations that would affect the assessment of efficacy, and had an outcome assessed as clinical cure or clinical failure at LFU.
Clinical cure is defined as number of participants with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP that were present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antimicrobial therapy is warranted. Sustained clinical cure is defined as number of participants who met criteria for clinical cure at TOC and remained free of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP at LFU.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=596 Participants
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=596 Participants
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sustained Clinical Cure at LFU in the CE-LFU Populations
|
556 Participants
|
559 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 15 (EOT)Population: ME-EOT population is a subset which included participants who met the definitions of both the micro-ITT Population and CE Population and were defined for each visit for the analyses in the ME Population at each respective visit as outlined in the ERP.
Clinical cure is defined as number of participants with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP that were present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antimicrobial therapy is warranted.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=439 Participants
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=401 Participants
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Cure at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
|
437 Participants
|
394 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 19 (TOC)Population: ME-TOC population is a subset which included participants who met the definitions of both the micro-ITT Population and CE Population and were defined for each visit for the analyses in the ME Population at each respective visit as outlined in the ERP.
Clinical cure is defined as number of participants with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP that were present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antimicrobial therapy is warranted.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=413 Participants
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=376 Participants
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Cure at TOC Days in the ME-TOC Populations
|
390 Participants
|
363 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 25 (LFU)Population: ME-LFU population is a subset which included participants who met the definitions of both the micro-ITT Population and CE Population and were defined for each visit for the analyses in the ME Population at each respective visit as outlined in the ERP.
Clinical cure is defined as number of participants with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP that were present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antimicrobial therapy is warranted. Sustained clinical cure is defined as participants who met criteria for clinical cure at TOC and remained free of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP at LFU.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=391 Participants
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=353 Participants
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sustained Clinical Cure at LFU in the ME-LFU Population
|
360 Participants
|
329 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 15 (EOT), 19 (TOC) and 25 (LFU)Population: Micro-ITT include all randomized participants with a confirmed diagnosis of cUTI or AP and a positive Screening urine culture defined as growth of one or two uropathogens at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL and/or positive Screening blood culture with isolation of one or more uropathogens.
Microbiological eradication is defined as reduction of baseline urine pathogen(s) to \<10\^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline. Microbiological eradication is defined as number of participants with reduction of Baseline urine pathogen(s) to \<10\^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at Baseline. Sustained Microbiological Eradication is defined as number of participants with microbiologic eradication at the TOC and no subsequent urine culture after TOC demonstrating recurrence of the original baseline uropathogen at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=449 Participants
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=419 Participants
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
By-Patient Microbiological Eradication at EOT, TOC, and Sustained Microbiological Eradication at LFU Days in the Micro-ITT Population
EOT
|
439 Participants
|
403 Participants
|
|
By-Patient Microbiological Eradication at EOT, TOC, and Sustained Microbiological Eradication at LFU Days in the Micro-ITT Population
TOC
|
267 Participants
|
266 Participants
|
|
By-Patient Microbiological Eradication at EOT, TOC, and Sustained Microbiological Eradication at LFU Days in the Micro-ITT Population
LFU
|
257 Participants
|
244 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 15 (EOT)Population: Micro-ITT-all randomized participants with confirmed diagnosis of cUTI/AP and positive Screening urine culture defined as growth of one or two uropathogens at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL and/or positive Screening blood culture with isolation of one or more uropathogens. Overall Number of Units Analyzed=number of pathogens available for analysis at given timepoint. Participant may have had more than 1 pathogen. Multiple isolates of same species/category from same participant are counted only once towards total.
Microbiological eradication is defined as reduction of baseline urine pathogen(s) to \<10\^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline. Microbiological eradication rate is the percentage of pathogens being eradicated from the overall number of pathogens analyzed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=493 Pathogens
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=455 Pathogens
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Citrobacter braakii
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Citrobacter freundii
|
75.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
66.7 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Citrobacter koseri
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Enterobacter amnigenus
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Enterobacter asburiae
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Enterobacter bugandensis
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Enterobacter cloacae
|
90.9 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Escherichia coli
|
98.3 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
96.7 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Klebsiella aerogenes
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
0.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Klebsiella oxytoca
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Klebsiella pneumoniae
|
98.1 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
98.6 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Klebsiella variicola
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Morganella morganii
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Proteus hauseri
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
—
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Proteus mirabilis
|
97.1 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Proteus penneri
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Proteus vulgaris
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Providencia rettgeri
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Providencia stuartii
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Raoultella ornithinolytica
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
—
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Serratia liquefaciens
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Serratia marcescens
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Gram Positive, Enterococcus faecalis
|
94.8 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
91.7 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Gram Positive, Enterococcus faecium
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Gram Positive, Enterococcus hirae
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
—
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Gram Positive, Staphylococcus aureus
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
75.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Gram Positive, Staphylococcus lugdunensis
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Gram Positive, Staphylococcus saprophyticus
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at EOT in the Micro-ITT Population
Gram Positive, Streptococcus gallolyticus
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 19 (TOC)Population: Micro-ITT included all randomized participants with a confirmed diagnosis of cUTI or AP and a positive Screening urine culture defined as growth of one or two uropathogens at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL and/or positive Screening blood culture with isolation of one or more uropathogens. Number analyzed are the number of pathogens available for analysis at the given timepoint.
Microbiological eradication is defined as reduction of baseline urine pathogen(s) to \<10\^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline. Microbiological eradication rate is the percentage of pathogens being eradicated from the overall number of pathogens analyzed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=493 Pathogens
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=455 Pathogens
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Citrobacter braakii
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Citrobacter freundii
|
50.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Citrobacter koseri
|
66.7 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
50.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Enterobacter amnigenus
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Enterobacter asburiae
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Enterobacter bugandensis
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Enterobacter cloacae
|
54.5 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
50.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Escherichia coli
|
62.7 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
65.2 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Klebsiella aerogenes
|
0.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
0.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Klebsiella oxytoca
|
75.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
33.3 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Klebsiella pneumoniae
|
45.3 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
63.4 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Klebsiella variicola
|
50.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
75.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Morganella morganii
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Proteus hauseri
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
—
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Proteus mirabilis
|
48.6 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
69.6 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Proteus penneri
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Proteus vulgaris
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Providencia rettgeri
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Providencia stuartii
|
0.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Raoultella ornithinolytica
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
—
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Serratia liquefaciens
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Enterobacterales, Serratia marcescens
|
50.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Gram Positive, Enterococcus faecalis
|
67.2 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
55.6 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Gram Positive, Enterococcus faecium
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Gram Positive, Enterococcus hirae
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
—
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Gram Positive, Staphylococcus aureus
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
37.5 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Gram Positive, Staphylococcus lugdunensis
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Gram Positive, Staphylococcus saprophyticus
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
83.3 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate at TOC in the Micro-ITT Population
Gram Positive, Streptococcus gallolyticus
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 25 (LFU)Population: mITT-all randomized participants with confirmed diagnosis of cUTI/AP \& positive Screening urine culture defined as growth of one/two uropathogens at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL and/or positive Screening blood culture with isolation of one or more uropathogens. Overall Number of Units Analyzed are number of enterobacterale pathogens. Participant may have more than 1 pathogen. Multiple isolates of same species/category from same participants are counted once towards total.
Microbiological eradication is defined as reduction of baseline urine pathogen(s) to \<10\^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline. Sustained Microbiological Eradication is defined as microbiologic eradication at the TOC and no subsequent urine culture after TOC demonstrating recurrence of the original baseline uropathogen at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL. Microbiological eradication rate is the percentage of pathogens being eradicated from the overall number of pathogen analyzed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=417 Pathogens
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=402 Pathogens
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Citrobacter braakii
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Citrobacter freundii
|
50.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Citrobacter koseri
|
66.7 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
50.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Enterobacter amnigenus
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Enterobacter asburiae
|
—
|
0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Enterobacter bugandensis
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Enterobacter cloacae
|
54.5 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
37.5 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Enterococcus faecalis
|
63.8 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
50.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Enterococcus faecium
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Enterococcus hirae
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
—
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Escherichia coli
|
59.9 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
60.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Klebsiella aerogenes
|
0.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
0.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Klebsiella oxytoca
|
75.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
33.3 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Klebsiella pneumoniae
|
43.4 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
60.6 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Klebsiella variicola
|
50.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
75.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Morganella morganii
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Proteus hauseri
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
—
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Proteus mirabilis
|
48.6 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
60.9 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Proteus penneri
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Proteus vulgaris
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Providencia rettgeri
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Providencia stuartii
|
0.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Raoultella ornithinolytica
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
—
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Serratia liquefaciens
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Serratia marcescens
|
50.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Staphylococcus aureus
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
37.5 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Staphylococcus lugdunensis
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Staphylococcus saprophyticus
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
83.3 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-Pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate at LFU in the Micro-ITT Population (m-ITT)
Staphylococcus gallolyticus
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 15 (EOT)Population: ME-EOT population is a subset which included participants who met the definitions of both the micro-ITT Population and CE Population and were defined for each visit for the analyses in the ME Population at each respective visit as outlined in the ERP.
Microbiological eradication is defined as reduction of baseline urine pathogen(s) to \<10\^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=439 Participants
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=401 Participants
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
By-Patient Microbiological Eradication at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
|
436 Participants
|
399 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 15 (TOC)Population: ME-TOC population included participants who met the definitions of both the micro-ITT Population and CE Population and were defined for each visit for the analyses in the ME Population at each respective visit as outlined in the ERP.
Microbiological eradication is defined as number of participants with reduction of baseline urine pathogen(s) to \<10\^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline. Microbiological eradication rate is the percentage of pathogens being eradicated from the overall number of pathogens analyzed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=413 Participants
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=376 Participants
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
By-Patient Microbiological Eradication at TOC in the ME-TOC Population
|
257 Participants
|
254 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 25 (LFU)Population: ME-LFU population included participants who met the definitions of both the micro-ITT Population and CE Population and were defined for each visit for the analyses in the ME Population at each respective visit as outlined in the ERP
Microbiological eradication is defined as number of participants with reduction of baseline urine pathogen(s) to \<10\^3 colony forming unit/milliliter (CFU/mL) and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline. Sustained Microbiological Eradication is defined participants with microbiologic eradication at the TOC and no subsequent urine culture after TOC demonstrating recurrence of the original baseline uropathogen at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=391 Participants
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=353 Participants
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
By-Patient Sustained Microbiological Eradication at LFU Days in the ME-LFU Populations
|
234 Participants
|
216 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 15 (EOT)Population: ME-EOT population included participants who met the definitions of both the micro-ITT Population and CE Population and were defined for each visit for the analyses in the ME Population at each respective visit as outlined in the ERP. Number analyzed are the number of pathogens available for analysis at the given timepoint.
Microbiological eradication is defined as number of participants with reduction of baseline urine pathogen(s) to \<10\^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline. Microbiological eradication rate is the percentage of pathogens being eradicated from the overall number of pathogens analyzed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=481 Pathogens
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=436 Pathogens
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Enterobacterales, Citrobacter braakii
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Enterobacterales, Citrobacter freundii
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Enterobacterales, Citrobacter koseri
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Enterobacterales, Enterobacter amnigenus
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Enterobacterales, Enterobacter asburiae
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Enterobacterales, Enterobacter bugandensis
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Enterobacterales, Enterobacter cloacae
|
90.9 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Enterobacterales, Escherichia coli
|
99.6 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Enterobacterales, Klebsiella aerogenes
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
—
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Enterobacterales, Klebsiella oxytoca
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Enterobacterales, Klebsiella pneumoniae
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Enterobacterales, Klebsiella variicola
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Enterobacterales, Morganella morganii
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Enterobacterales, Proteus hauseri
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
—
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Enterobacterales, Proteus mirabilis
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Enterobacterales, Proteus penneri
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Enterobacterales, Proteus vulgaris
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Enterobacterales, Providencia rettgeri
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Enterobacterales, Providencia stuartii
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Enterobacterales, Raoultella ornithinolytica
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
—
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Enterobacterales, Serratia liquefaciens
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Enterobacterales, Serratia marcescens
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Gram Positive, Enterococcus faecalis
|
98.1 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
97.1 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Gram Positive, Enterococcus faecium
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Gram Positive, Enterococcus hirae
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
—
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Gram Positive, Staphylococcus aureus
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
85.7 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Gram Positive, Staphylococcus lugdunensis
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Gram Positive,Staphylococcus saprophyticus
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at EOT in the ME-EOT Populations
Gram Positive, Streptococcus gallolyticus
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 19 (TOC)Population: ME-EOT population included participants who met the definitions of both the micro-ITT Population and CE Population and were defined for each visit for the analyses in the ME Population at each respective visit as outlined in the ERP. Number analyzed are the number of pathogens available for analysis at the given timepoint. A participant may have had more than 1 pathogen. Multiple isolates of the same species/category from the same participants are counted only once towards total.
Microbiological eradication is defined as number of participants with reduction of baseline urine pathogen(s) to \<10\^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline. Microbiological eradication rate is the percentage of pathogens being eradicated from the overall number of participants analyzed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=451 Pathogens
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=408 Pathogens
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Gram Positive, Streptococcus gallolyticus
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
—
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Enterobacterales, Citrobacter braakii
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Enterobacterales, Citrobacter freundii
|
66.7 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Enterobacterales, Citrobacter koseri
|
66.7 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
66.7 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Enterobacterales, Enterobacter amnigenus
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Enterobacterales, Enterobacter asburiae
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Enterobacterales, Enterobacter bugandensis
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Enterobacterales, Enterobacter cloacae
|
54.5 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
50.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Enterobacterales, Escherichia coli
|
65.8 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
68.3 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Enterobacterales, Klebsiella aerogenes
|
0.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
—
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Enterobacterales, Klebsiella oxytoca
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
50.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Enterobacterales, Klebsiella pneumoniae
|
49.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
71.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Enterobacterales, Klebsiella variicola
|
50.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
75.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Enterobacterales, Morganella morganii
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Enterobacterales, Proteus hauseri
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
—
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Enterobacterales, Proteus mirabilis
|
51.6 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
76.2 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Enterobacterales, Proteus penneri
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Enterobacterales, Proteus vulgaris
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Enterobacterales, Providencia rettgeri
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Enterobacterales, Providencia stuartii
|
0.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Enterobacterales, Raoultella ornithinolytica
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
—
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Enterobacterales, Serratia liquefaciens
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Enterobacterales, Serratia marcescens
|
66.7 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Gram Positive, Enterococcus faecalis
|
69.8 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
57.6 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Gram Positive, Enterococcus faecium
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Gram Positive, Enterococcus hirae
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
—
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Gram Positive, Staphylococcus aureus
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
50.0 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Gram Positive, Staphylococcus lugdunensis
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
|
By-pathogen Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at TOC in the ME-TOC Populations
Gram Positive,Staphylococcus saprophyticus
|
100 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
83.3 percentage of pathogen eradication
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 25 (LFU)Population: ME-LFU population included participants who met the definitions of both the micro-ITT Population and CE Population and were defined for each visit for the analyses in the ME Population at each respective visit as outlined in the ERP. Overall Number of Units Analyzed are the number of enterobacteral pathogens. A participant may have had more than 1 pathogen. Multiple isolates of the same species/category from the same participants are counted only once towards total.
Microbiological eradication is defined as number of participants with reduction of baseline urine pathogen(s) to \<10\^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline. Sustained Microbiological Eradication is defined participants with microbiologic eradication at the TOC and no subsequent urine culture after TOC demonstrating recurrence of the original baseline uropathogen at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL.Microbiological eradication rate is the percentage of pathogens being eradicated from the overall number of pathogen analyzed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=391 Pathogens
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=353 Pathogens
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Citrobacter braakii
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Citrobacter freundii
|
66.7 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
100 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Citrobacter koseri
|
100 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
66.7 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Enterobacter amnigenus
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Enterobacter asburiae
|
—
|
0 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Enterobacter bugandensis
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Enterobacter cloacae
|
55.6 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
33.3 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Enterococcus faecalis
|
66.7 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
52.9 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Enterococcus faecium
|
100 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
100 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Enterococcus hirae
|
100 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
—
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Escherichia coli
|
62.4 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
61.8 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Klebsiella aerogenes
|
0 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
—
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Klebsiella oxytoca
|
100 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
50.0 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Klebsiella pneumoniae
|
46.7 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
68.4 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Klebsiella variicola
|
50.0 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
66.7 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Morganella morganii
|
100 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
100 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Proteus hauseri
|
100 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
—
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Proteus mirabilis
|
51.7 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
70.0 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Proteus penneri
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Proteus vulgaris
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Providencia rettgeri
|
100 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
100 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Providencia stuartii
|
0.0 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
100 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Raoultella ornithinolytica
|
100 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
—
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Serratia liquefaciens
|
—
|
100 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Serratia marcescens
|
66.7 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
100 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Staphylococcus aureus
|
100 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
50.0 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
1Staphylococcus lugdunensis
|
100 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
100 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Staphylococcus saprophyticus
|
100 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
80.0 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
|
By-pathogen Sustained Microbiological Eradication Rate in Participants at LFU in the ME-LFU Populations
Staphylococcus gallolyticus
|
100 percentage of pathogens eradications
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 19 (TOC)Population: Micro-ITT population included all randomized participants with a confirmed diagnosis of cUTI or AP and a positive Screening urine culture defined as growth of one or two uropathogens at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL and/or positive Screening blood culture with isolation of one or more uropathogens. Number analyzed are the number of participants with data available for analysis.
Overall response rate is percentage of participants with combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP that were present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antimicrobial therapy is warranted. Microbiological eradication is defined as reduction of baseline urine pathogen(s) to \<10\^3 colony forming unit/milliliter (CFU/mL) and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=449 Participants
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=419 Participants
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Response Rate (Combined Clinical Cure Plus Microbiological Eradication) In Subgroup Including: Stratified Infection Category
AP
|
65.9 percentage of participants
|
70.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Overall Response Rate (Combined Clinical Cure Plus Microbiological Eradication) In Subgroup Including: Stratified Infection Category
cUTI
|
51.6 percentage of participants
|
53.2 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 19 (TOC)Population: Micro-ITT population included all randomized participants with a confirmed diagnosis of cUTI or AP and a positive Screening urine culture defined as growth of one or two uropathogens at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL and/or positive Screening blood culture with isolation of one or more uropathogens. Number analyzed is number of participants with data available for analysis.
Overall response rate is percentage of participants with combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP that were present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antimicrobial therapy is warranted. Microbiological eradication is defined as reduction of baseline urine pathogen(s) to \<10\^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=449 Participants
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=419 Participants
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Response Rate (Combined Clinical Cure Plus Microbiological Eradication) at TOC In Subgroup Stratified Age Category
≥18 to <65 years
|
66.7 percentage of participants
|
65.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Overall Response Rate (Combined Clinical Cure Plus Microbiological Eradication) at TOC In Subgroup Stratified Age Category
≥65 to <75 years
|
49.2 percentage of participants
|
57.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Overall Response Rate (Combined Clinical Cure Plus Microbiological Eradication) at TOC In Subgroup Stratified Age Category
≥75 years
|
49.4 percentage of participants
|
56.9 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 25 (LFU)Population: Micro-ITT included all randomized participants with a confirmed diagnosis of cUTI or AP and a positive Screening urine culture defined as growth of one or two uropathogens at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL and/or positive Screening blood culture with isolation of one or more uropathogens. Number analyzed is number of participants with data available for analysis.
Overall response rate is percentage of participants with combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP that were present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antimicrobial therapy is warranted. Microbiological eradication is defined as reduction of baseline urine pathogen(s) to \<10\^3 colony forming unit/milliliter (CFU/mL) and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline. The point estimate and confidence interval (CI) is presented for Central and eastern Europe subgroup.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=449 Participants
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=419 Participants
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Response Rate (Combined Clinical Cure Plus Microbiological Eradication) at TOC In Subgroup Including Region
Central and Eastern Europe
|
58.9 percentage of participants
|
62.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Overall Response Rate (Combined Clinical Cure Plus Microbiological Eradication) at TOC In Subgroup Including Region
South Africa
|
100 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Overall Response Rate (Combined Clinical Cure Plus Microbiological Eradication) at TOC In Subgroup Including Region
United States
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 25 (LFU)Population: Micro-ITT population included all randomized participants with a confirmed diagnosis of cUTI or AP and a positive Screening urine culture defined as growth of one or two uropathogens at ≥105 CFU/mL and/or positive Screening blood culture with isolation of one or more uropathogens.
Time (days) to resolution or improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI and AP present at baseline was defined as follows: date of the first visit at which all baseline signs/symptoms have improved by at least 1 grade with worsening of none and development of no new signs/symptoms of the index infection minus the date of randomization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=449 Participants
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=419 Participants
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time (Days) to Resolution or Improvement of Signs and Symptoms of cUTI and AP Present a Baseline in the Micro-ITT Populations
|
4.1 days
Standard Deviation 3.85
|
3.7 days
Standard Deviation 3.26
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 25 (LFU)Population: Micro-ITT population included all randomized participants with a confirmed diagnosis of cUTI or AP and a positive Screening urine culture defined as growth of one or two uropathogens at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL and/or positive Screening blood culture with isolation of one or more uropathogens. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants with data available for analysis.
Time to Defervescence (days) = date of first post-baseline temperature measure with maximum daily Temperature ≤38°C at the date of randomization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=226 Participants
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=193 Participants
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time (Days) to Defervescence in Micro-ITT Population With a Documented Fever at Screening or Day 1
|
2.2 days
Standard Deviation 1.33
|
2.2 days
Standard Deviation 1.40
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 25 (LFU)Population: Micro-ITT population included all randomized participants with a confirmed diagnosis of cUTI or AP and a positive Screening urine culture defined as growth of one or two uropathogens at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL and/or positive Screening blood culture with isolation of one or more uropathogens.
Clinical relapse is participants who met criteria for clinical cure at TOC, but new signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP are present at the LFU Visit and the subject requires antibiotic therapy for the cUT. Clinical cure is defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP that were present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antimicrobial therapy is warranted.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=449 Participants
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=419 Participants
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of Clinical Relapse at the LFU Days in the Micro-ITT Population
|
2.7 percentage of participants
|
3.6 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 25 (LFU)Population: Micro-ITT population included all randomized participants with a confirmed diagnosis of cUTI or AP and a positive Screening urine culture defined as growth of one or two uropathogens at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL and/or positive Screening blood culture with isolation of one or more uropathogens.
Superinfection was isolation of a new uropathogen at ≥105 CFU/mL (other than the original Baseline pathogen\[s\] from blood and/or urine) from a urine culture that was accompanied by clinical signs and symptoms of infection requiring alternative antimicrobial therapy (e.g., the participant was assessed by the investigator as a clinical failure) during the period up to and including EOT. New infection was isolation of a new uropathogen at ≥105 CFU/mL (other than the original baseline pathogen\[s\] from blood and/or urine) from a urine culture that was accompanied by clinical signs and symptoms of infection requiring alternative antimicrobial therapy (e.g., the participant was assessed by the Investigator as a clinical failure) in the period after EOT.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=449 Participants
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=419 Participants
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Rates Of Superinfection And New Infection In The Micro-ITT Population
Superinfection
|
0.2 percentage of participants
|
2.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Rates Of Superinfection And New Infection In The Micro-ITT Population
New Infection
|
1.1 percentage of participants
|
1.9 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose and post-dose at 0.25h, 0.5h, 1h, 2h, and 8h on Days 1 and 3Population: PK population included participants treated with at least 1 dose of TBPM-PI-HBr with at least 1 analyzable plasma or urine PK sample. The data is reported only for TBPM-PI-HBr arm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=29 Participants
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vss) at Steady State in TBPM-PI-HBr Recipients in the Pharmacokinetic (PK) Population
Day 1
|
75.5 Liters (L)
Interval 49.5 to 89.9
|
—
|
|
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vss) at Steady State in TBPM-PI-HBr Recipients in the Pharmacokinetic (PK) Population
Day 3
|
75.5 Liters (L)
Interval 49.5 to 89.9
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose and post-dose at 0.25h, 0.5h, 1h, 2h, and 8h on Days 1 and 3Population: PK population included participants treated with at least 1 dose of TBPM-PI-HBr with at least 1 analyzable plasma or urine PK sample. The data is reported only for TBPM-PI-HBr arm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=29 Participants
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cmax in TBPM-PI-HBr Recipients in the PK Population
Day 1
|
7.01 microgram per milliliter (μg/mL)
Interval 2.05 to 17.2
|
—
|
|
Cmax in TBPM-PI-HBr Recipients in the PK Population
Day 3
|
7.21 microgram per milliliter (μg/mL)
Interval 2.11 to 18.8
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose and post-dose at 0.25h, 0.5h, 1h, 2h, and 8h on Days 1 and 3Population: PK population included participants treated with at least 1 dose of TBPM-PI-HBr with at least 1 analyzable plasma or urine PK sample. The data is reported only for TBPM-PI-HBr arm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=29 Participants
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Area Under Curve (AUC 0-24) in TBPM-PI-HBr Recipients in the PK Population
Day 1
|
65.5 microgram.hour per milliliter (μg•h/mL)
Interval 27.6 to 243.0
|
—
|
|
Area Under Curve (AUC 0-24) in TBPM-PI-HBr Recipients in the PK Population
Day 3
|
74.6 microgram.hour per milliliter (μg•h/mL)
Interval 27.6 to 318.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose and post-dose at 0.25h, 0.5h, 1h, 2h, and 8h on Days 1 and 3Population: PK population included subjects treated with at least 1 dose of TBPM-PI-HBr with at least 1 analyzable plasma or urine PK sample. The data is reported only for TBPM-PI-HBr arm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=29 Participants
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Minimum Concentration (Cmin) in TBPM-PI-HBr Recipients in the PK Population
Day 1
|
0.706 μg/mL
Interval 0.000913 to 4.89
|
—
|
|
Minimum Concentration (Cmin) in TBPM-PI-HBr Recipients in the PK Population
Day 3
|
1.17 μg/mL
Interval 0.000877 to 8.44
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose and post-dose at 0.25h, 0.5h, 1h, 2h, and 8h on Days 1 and 3Population: PK population included subjects treated with at least 1 dose of TBPM-PI-HBr with at least 1 analyzable plasma or urine PK sample. The data is reported only for TBPM-PI-HBr arm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=29 Participants
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Systemic Clearance (CL) in TBPM-PI-HBr Recipients in the PK Population
Day 1
|
31.6 Litre per hour (L/h)
Interval 5.65 to 65.3
|
—
|
|
Systemic Clearance (CL) in TBPM-PI-HBr Recipients in the PK Population
Day 3
|
31.6 Litre per hour (L/h)
Interval 5.65 to 65.3
|
—
|
Adverse Events
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
Ertapenem 1 g
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=685 participants at risk
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=687 participants at risk
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischaemia
|
0.15%
1/685 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/687 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Duodenal ulcer hemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/685 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.15%
1/687 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.15%
1/685 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.15%
1/687 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Cyst
|
0.00%
0/685 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.15%
1/687 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis acute
|
0.15%
1/685 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.29%
2/687 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Clostridium difficile infection
|
0.00%
0/685 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.15%
1/687 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Intervertebral discitis
|
0.15%
1/685 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/687 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Perirectal abscess
|
0.15%
1/685 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/687 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Retroperitoneal abscess
|
0.15%
1/685 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/687 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.15%
1/685 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/687 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection enterococcal
|
0.00%
0/685 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.15%
1/687 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urosepsis
|
0.15%
1/685 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/687 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pneumothorax
|
0.15%
1/685 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/687 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Clostridium test positive
|
0.00%
0/685 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.15%
1/687 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/685 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.15%
1/687 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteochondrosis
|
0.00%
0/685 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.15%
1/687 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Generalized tonic-clonic seizure
|
0.15%
1/685 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/687 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Radiculopathy
|
0.00%
0/685 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.15%
1/687 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal colic
|
0.15%
1/685 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/687 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute pulmonary edema
|
0.15%
1/685 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/687 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
|
0.15%
1/685 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/687 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary artery thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/685 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.15%
1/687 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Subcutaneous emphysema
|
0.15%
1/685 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/687 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg
n=685 participants at risk
TBPM-PI-HBr 600 mg (300 mg×2 ) film-coated tablets, administered orally three times per day (every 8 hours \[q8h\] ± 0.5 h) plus a single dummy IV infusion over 30 minutes (min) once daily (every 24 hours \[q24h\] ± 0.5 h) up to Day 15; participants with moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \>30 to ≤50 mL/min) required TBPM-PI-HBr dosage adjustment to 300 mg (one tablet) q8h ± 0.5 h.
|
Ertapenem 1 g
n=687 participants at risk
Ertapenem for IV injection, administered as a 1-gram IV infusion over 30 min once daily (q24h ± 0.5 h) plus dummy placebo tablets administered orally q8h (±0.5 h) up to Day 14; no dose adjustment of ertapenem was required for participants with renal insufficiency.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
5.7%
39/685 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
4.4%
30/687 • From the first dose of administration up to Day 25 post-treatment ± 2 days (up to approximately 27 days)
Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug.
|
Additional Information
Angela Talley
Senior Vice President Clinical Development
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee No publication related to study results will be published prior to publication of a multi-center report submitted for publication within 18 months after conclusion or termination of a study at all study sites. Results publications will be submitted to sponsor for review 60 days in advance of publication. Sponsor can require removal of confidential information unrelated to study results. Sponsor can embargo a proposed publication for another 45 days to preserve intellectual property
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER