Efficacy of a Novel Walking Assist Device With Auxiliary Laser Illuminator on Stroke Patients
NCT ID: NCT03786341
Last Updated: 2024-10-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-12-01
2018-12-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Ambulation training with the use of visual feedback strategy is one of the promising rehabilitation in patients with chronic stroke.
Walking assist device with auxiliary laser illuminator during ambulation training could correct gait parameters, improve balance and basic activity of daily living among stroke patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Therapeutic Effects of Robotic Exoskeleton-Assisted Gait Re-habilitation and Predictive Factors of Significant Improvements in Stroke Patients
NCT05825144
The Feasibility and Therapeutic Effect of Hybrid End-effector Robot-assisted Gait Training With an Active-assisted Module in Chronic Stroke Survivors
NCT07034521
Robot-assisted Gait Training for Patients With Stroke
NCT02781831
Influence of Assistive Device Use While Performing Dual Task in Patients With Stroke
NCT00173719
Robotic-assisted Therapy With Bilateral Practice Improves Task and Motor Performance of the Upper Extremity for Chronic Stroke Patients
NCT03847103
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods: This was a randomized-prospective study and participants were recruited to each the experimental and the control group equally. Patients in the experimental group (EG) received 30-minutes rehabilitation, consisting of 15 minutes of walking training with laser quad-cane and 15 minutes of traditional physical therapy (such as strengthening and balance training). Patients in the control group (CG) received the same rehabilitation except that the walking training was by conventional strategy without lase quad-cane. The rehabilitation lasted for 4 weeks, twice per week. Gait parameters were measured by Rehab watch as primary outcomes and Berg's balance scale (BBS), timed-up-and-go test (TUG), and Barthel index were used as secondary outcomes. Both the primary and secondary outcomes were measured before the rehabilitation (baseline), 4 weeks (week 4), and 8 weeks (week 8) after the rehabilitation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
with auxiliary illuminator
the walking training was by conventional strategy with lase quad-cane.
with auxiliary illuminator
Ambulation training with laser quad-cane for 15 minutes and typical physical therapy with strengthening and balance training for 15 minutes.
control group
Ambulation training WITHOUT laser quad-cane.
with auxiliary illuminator
Ambulation training with laser quad-cane for 15 minutes and typical physical therapy with strengthening and balance training for 15 minutes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
with auxiliary illuminator
Ambulation training with laser quad-cane for 15 minutes and typical physical therapy with strengthening and balance training for 15 minutes.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* with hemiplegia
* with sufficient cognition that could follow the instructions and procedure
* walk independently for a distance of more than 20 meters with or without the use of a walking aid.
Exclusion Criteria
* Myopathy
* Multiple sclerosis
* Spinal cord injury that might interfere with walking ability
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Wan-Yun Huang
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pei-Te Hsu, MD.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital ,
Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
VGHKS17-CT8-11
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.