A Protocol Comparing Temporary Transvenous Diaphragm Pacing to Standard of Care for Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation

NCT ID: NCT03783884

Last Updated: 2024-12-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

223 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-06-14

Study Completion Date

2023-01-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This clinical investigation is an open-label, multi-center RCT to demonstrate the safety and effective performance of the Lungpacer DPTS (plus standard of care) as compared to Control (standard of care only) in patients aged 18 years or older who are receiving mechanical ventilation. Eligible Subjects will have received mechanical ventilation for ≥96 hours (4 days) and have failed two weaning attempts.

The goal or outcome is to show a numerically greater proportion of subjects weaned in the Treatment (Lungpacer DPTS) group as compared to the Control group.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The intended patient population is applicable for Lungpacer DPT because there are no noninvasive alternative treatments for patients who are difficult to wean from MV (i.e., ≥96 hours (4 days) on MV) or who have required prolonged MV (\>7 days). The intended patient population includes approximately one-third of all patients on mechanical ventilation. Under standard of care, approximately 50% of these patients will recover from mechanical ventilation (Jung, 2016). Standard of care involves daily weaning attempts, known as Spontaneous Breathing Trials (SBTs) or Ventilator Liberation Trials (VLTs) that are intended to encourage diaphragm use and strengthening over time.Therefore, Lungpacer DPT efficacy evaluation must be compared to standard of care in a Control group. Lack of recovery from mechanical ventilation may be due to the inability of a patient to participate in VLTs or weaning attempts, due to extensive diaphragm weakness or sedation, the inability of VLTs to induce sufficient diaphragm strengthening, or co-morbidities that prevent recovery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ventilator Induced Diaphragm Dysfunction

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

VIDD Diaphragm Atrophy Weaning Failure VLT SBT VILI Phrenic Nerve Stimulation Maximal Inspiratory Pressure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

1:1 randomization of treatment and control group
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Treatment

Subject receives Lungpacer Catheter for transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation to deliver Diaphragm Pacing Therapy Sessions. DPT sessions are 6 sets of 10, delivered twice daily, for a total of 120 stimulation reps per day, plus standard of care for weaning from mechanical ventilation.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lungpacer Diaphragm Pacing Therapy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation to induce diaphragm contraction.

Control

Subject does not receive Lungpacer Catheter or DPT. Subject receives only Standard of care for weaning from mechanical ventilation.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lungpacer Diaphragm Pacing Therapy

Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation to induce diaphragm contraction.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lungpacer DPTS AeroPace System

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Are 18 years or older, and,
2. Have been mechanically ventilated for ≥96 hours (4 days), and,
3. Have satisfied the Readiness-to-Wean criteria, and,
4. Have failed at least 2 weaning attempts (that were conducted at least 48 hours after initiation of MV, and, that were conducted on different calendar days, and, at least one of which was the protocol-specific Ventilator Liberation Trial).

Exclusion Criteria

1. MIP (absolute value) \>50 cm H2O;
2. Invasive mechanical ventilation \>90 days;
3. Currently on ECMO;
4. Weaning failure due to hypervolemia;
5. Medical history (including imaging) or known anatomy that prevents percutaneous insertion of the Catheter into the intended thoracic vein on the left side.
6. Clinically overt congestive heart failure that is preventing weaning;
7. Currently being treated with neuromuscular blockade;
8. Pre-existing neurological, neuromuscular or muscular disorder that could affect the respiratory muscles;
9. Pre-existing severe chronic pulmonary fibrosis;
10. Pleural effusions occupying greater than one third of the pleural space on either side;
11. BMI \>45 kg/m2;
12. Known or suspected phrenic nerve paralysis;
13. Any electrical device (implanted or external) that may be prone to interaction with, or interference from the Lungpacer DPTS including neurological pacing/stimulator devices, cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators;
14. Current hemodynamic instability, sepsis or septic shock;
15. Prior bacteremia reported within the last 48 hours;
16. Anticipating withdrawal of life support and/or shift to palliation as the goal of care;
17. Known or suspected to be pregnant or lactating;
18. Currently being treated in another clinical trial studying an experimental treatment that could affect the study primary outcome.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Lungpacer Medical Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Stanford University Medical Center

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

University of Florida, Shands

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Rush University Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

U of Illinois at Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Edward Hines VA Hospital

Hines, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Loyola University Medical Center

Maywood, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

University of Louisville

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Lahey Hospital and Medical Center

Burlington, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

CHI Health Creighton University Medical Center - Bergan Mercy

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Englewood Hospital Medical Center

Englewood, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

University of Cincinnati

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Ohio State University

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Temple University Hospital

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Kent County Memorial Hospital

Warwick, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Prisma Health Baptist Hospital

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

University of Texas Southwestern, Zale Lipshy Hospital

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Utah

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

CHU Angers

Angers, , France

Site Status

CHU Montpellier

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Hôpital La Pitié-Salpêtrière

Paris, , France

Site Status

CHU Strasbourg

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Universitätsmedizin Greifswald

Greifswald, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany

Site Status

Berlin Charite Mitte

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

KEM Essen

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

SLK Löwenstein

Löwenstein, , Germany

Site Status

Nürnberg Klinikum Nord

Nuremberg, , Germany

Site Status

FKKG Schmallenberg

Schmallenberg, , Germany

Site Status

Solingen Krankenhaus Bethanien

Solingen, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States France Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dres M, Ewert R, Conrad SA, Ataya A, Shrager J, Mortaza S, Delamaire F, Nilius G, Heine A, Mehta N, Ways J, Evans D, Paulon G, Khandwala F, Berry N, Viele K, Nelson T, Gilbertson M, Similowski T, Gama de Abreu M, Goligher EC; RESCUE-3 Trial Investigators. Temporary Transvenous Diaphragm Neurostimulation for Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation (RESCUE-3). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202505-1056OC. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40498082 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://lungpacer.com

Sponsor website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P-300

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id