Stimulant vs. Non-stimulant Treatments and Reward Processing in Drug-naive Youth at SUD Risk
NCT ID: NCT03781765
Last Updated: 2024-08-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE4
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-06-04
2025-09-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact of Stimulants and In-Scanner Motion on Attentive Task Performance in ADHD (ADHD_NFB)
NCT06779825
Imaging Stimulant and Non Stimulant Treatments for ADHD: A Network Based Approach
NCT01678209
Stimulant Versus Nonstimulant Medication for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Children
NCT00183391
Brain Indices of Stimulant Treatment in Drug-Naive Youth at Risk for Substance Use Disorder
NCT04170738
Investigating the Impact of Methylphenidate on Neural Response in Disruptive Behavioral Disorder
NCT02247986
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Findings from animal research have raised the possibility that stimulants such as methylphenidate (MPH) may have "sensitization" effects - which prime the brain reward system for enhanced responding to the rewarding effects of abusable substances, whereas non-stimulants such as atomoxetine (ATX) may diminish drug self-administration. However, no studies have examined the purported different effects of stimulants vs. non-stimulants on the brain reward system utilizing a targeted biomarker approach linked to an a priori model, which focuses on intermediate phenotypes. Such research could provide important knowledge regarding the biological basis of addiction vulnerability and aid in the development of preventive interventions.
This proposal will provide pilot data for the hypotheses that stimulant and non-stimulant medications have differential effects on activation in the brain reward system in High Risk (HR) youth, and that differences activation will be related to changes in measures of reward sensitivity on psychometric tests. The study team believes that this protocol is uniquely innovative in its approach to study drug-naïve children at the highest levels of risk for SUD, thus providing an opportunity to delineate differential effects of medication treatment in relation to SUD risk. This research is also significant since it will be the first neuroimaging study to assess the biological correlates of the effects of stimulants on reward sensitivity in HR children, and especially in relation to purported changes in reward processing.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Methylphenidate
0.5 mg/kg for 1 week and 1 mg/kg for 2 weeks
Methylphenidate
stimulant medication
Atomoxetine
0.5 mg/kg for 1 week and 1 mg/kg for 2 weeks
Atomoxetine
non-stimulant medication
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Methylphenidate
stimulant medication
Atomoxetine
non-stimulant medication
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 7-12 inclusive
* Signed consent/assent
* Parent communicates sufficiently in English to provide informed consent and complete assessment instruments;
* ADHD as determined by computerized DISC (C-DISC) parent interview
* ADHD-Rating Scale-5 total score (interview with parent )
* SNAP ADHD total score (teacher) of 1.5 SD \> age/sex norms
* CD or severe ODD: CD or ODD + 2 symptoms of CD on C-DISC
* SNAP ODD/CD subscale (parent and teacher) 1.5 SD \> age/sex norms
Exclusion Criteria
* History of head injury
* Fetal exposure to alcohol/drugs
* Diagnosis of major psychiatric disorder (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression, generalized anxiety, social phobia, Tourette's Disorder, PTSD, autism spectrum disorder)
* Current suicidal ideation or past history of suicide attempt
* Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI)75 score \<75
* Prior or current treatment with stimulants (prior or current treatment with non-stimulants is permitted, but participants must be off medication for 2 weeks at baseline)
* Current or past alcohol/drug use (DISC interview; urine toxicology)
* Psychological or medical condition which precludes being in the scanner (e.g., claustrophobia, morbid obesity)
* Metal in the body that cannot be removed (e.g., braces, metal plate)
* Visual disturbances that may impair task performance
* Precocious puberty (e.g. Tanner stage \>2) or pregnancy
Notes:
* History of SUD in a 1st degree relative is permitted, and is expected in \~1/2 of the subjects
* Ongoing psychosocial treatment is allowed but should not be initiated during the study
7 Years
12 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
NIH
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jeffrey Newcorn
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jeffrey Newcorn, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Iliyan Ivanov, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Jeffrey Newcorn, MD
Role: CONTACT
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GCO 17-0423
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.