SmartHMD for Improved Mobility

NCT ID: NCT03781583

Last Updated: 2024-12-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

21 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-04-26

Study Completion Date

2022-11-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The National Eye Institute estimated about 3 million people over age 40 in the US had low vision in 2010 and projects an increase to nearly 5 million in 2030 and 9 million in 2050. Current assistive technologies are a patchwork of mostly low-technology aids with limited capabilities that are often difficult to use, and are not widely adopted. This shortfall in capabilities of assistive technology often stems from lack of a user-centered design approach and is a critical barrier to improve the everyday activities of life (EDAL) and the quality of life (QOL) for individuals with low vision.

An intuitive head mounted display (HMD) system on enhancing orientation and mobility (O\&M) and crosswalk navigation, could improve independence, potentially decrease falls, and improve EDAL and QOL. The central hypothesis is that an electronic navigation system incorporating computer vision will enhance O\&M for individuals with low vision. The goal is to develop and validate a smartHMD by incorporating advanced computer vision algorithms and flexible user interfaces that can be precisely tailored to an individual's O\&M need. This project will address the specific question of mobility while the subject crosses a street at a signaled crosswalk. This is a dangerous and difficult task for visually impaired patients and a significant barrier to independent mobility.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study was originally intended as a single-arm study. Early results and unanticipated events related to component availability made it clear that multiple configurations of the device would be necessary to produce a functional device. Therefore, the study was split into multiple cohorts representing each iteration of the device and testing process, as follows:

As the trial progressed, the participants recruited were consistently unable to perform tasks without smartHMD. This is due to the recruitment of participants with severe vision loss. Due to this finding, data was only acquired when participants used the smartHMD when active instead of collecting data with and without the system being active.

The participants performed a subset of experiments due to time constraints. Some performed only outdoor trials; some performed only indoor trials; others performed both. The outcome measures depend on which experiments were performed.

After the first test involving the initial three participants, the ODG system became unsupported by the company that produced the device. In response, the study team developed a prototype system (RGBD), which was used in the ODG system's place for the remaining tests. The RGBD was initially used indoors with laptop and subsequently outdoors with mobile hardware and new software.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Vision Orientation Mobility Limitation Navigation, Spatial Visual Impairment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Testing will be done in three conditions: baseline (no HMD), sham (smartHMD worn but not active), and smartHMD (smartHMD worn and active)
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Outdoor and ODG

Participants used the first version of the SmartHMD device, which used custom software running on commercially available ODG R7 smart glasses and accompanying earbuds. Participants used the device to navigate across an outdoor crosswalk.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SmartHMD version 1

Intervention Type DEVICE

First version of the SmartHMD device, which used custom software running on commercially available ODG R7 smart glasses and accompanying earbuds.

Indoor and Laptop

Participants use the second version of the SmartHMD device, which uses RGB-D smart glasses, custom software running on a laptop, and bone-conducting earphones. Participants use the device to locate the door within an indoor course.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SmartHMD version 2

Intervention Type DEVICE

Second version of the SmartHMD device, which uses RGB-D smart glasses, custom software running on a laptop, and bone-conducting earphones.

RGBD & Jetson - Indoor Course

Participants use a new iteration of the SmartHMD device, which uses RGB-D smart glasses, bone-conducting earphones, a Jetson mobile computer, and custom software. Participants use the device to navigate their way through an indoor course.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SmartHMD version 3

Intervention Type DEVICE

Third iteration of the SmartHMD device, which uses RGB-D smart glasses, bone-conducting earphones, a Jetson mobile computer, and custom software.

RGBD & Jetson - Outdoor Crosswalk

Participants use the SmartHMD device, which uses RGB-D smart glasses, bone-conducting earphones, a Jetson mobile computer, and a specific version of custom software. Participants use the device to navigate their way through an outdoor crosswalk.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SmartHMD version 4

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fourth iteration of the SmartHMD device, which uses RGB-D smart glasses, bone-conducting earphones, a Jetson mobile computer, and a specific version of custom software.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SmartHMD version 1

First version of the SmartHMD device, which used custom software running on commercially available ODG R7 smart glasses and accompanying earbuds.

Intervention Type DEVICE

SmartHMD version 2

Second version of the SmartHMD device, which uses RGB-D smart glasses, custom software running on a laptop, and bone-conducting earphones.

Intervention Type DEVICE

SmartHMD version 3

Third iteration of the SmartHMD device, which uses RGB-D smart glasses, bone-conducting earphones, a Jetson mobile computer, and custom software.

Intervention Type DEVICE

SmartHMD version 4

Fourth iteration of the SmartHMD device, which uses RGB-D smart glasses, bone-conducting earphones, a Jetson mobile computer, and a specific version of custom software.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosed with low vision
* Self reported difficulty with mobility and finding doors (either indoors or outdoors) and using signalized crosswalks.
* Ability to cooperate for tests
* Able to participate in all visits

Exclusion Criteria

* Unable to use head mounted display technology
* Unstable age-related macular degeneration within the past 3 months
* Unstable diabetic retinopathy within the past 3 months
* Unstable diabetes within the past 3 months
* Ocular infection or ocular inflammation in the past 3 months
* Ocular trauma within the past 6 months
* Intraocular surgery within 6 months
* Optical coherence tomography retinal findings of concern to investigator for unstable vision during the study
* Women who are pregnant (due to risk of falls and change in gait).
* Uncontrolled seizure disorder in the past 6 months
* Cerebrovascular accident occurring in the past 6 months
* Parkinson disease or neurological condition that limits mobility
* Alzheimer disease or other forms of dementia
* Conditions of concern to investigator that would confound orientation and mobility, such as severe arthritis, pain that limits ambulatory activities, or orthopedic surgery (e.g., hand, arm, shoulder, knee, or hip surgery within 12 months)
Minimum Eligible Age

14 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

89 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

James Weiland

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

James Weiland

Professor of Biomedical Engineering

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

James Weiland, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Michigan

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

North Campus Research Complex

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HUM00141598

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id