Trial Outcomes & Findings for Compression Nail for Tibiocalcaneal Arthrodesis (NCT NCT03780452)

NCT ID: NCT03780452

Last Updated: 2025-05-31

Results Overview

Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Patients will disclose their pain level using the Visual Analog Scale, which measures pain on a scale of 0 - 100, with 0 indicating no pain and 100 indicating severe pain.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

13 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

0 - 12 months postoperatively

Results posted on

2025-05-31

Participant Flow

Patients were recruited if they met the indications for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis, were able to understand the requirements of the study, provide a written consent, and were willing to comply with the study protocol, and were over 18 years of age. Patients were recruited between 2020 and 2023 at an Orthopedic Clinic at a busy urban medical center.

Patients were screened for those scheduled to undergo a tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis at an ambulatory surgery center with one of the participating foot and ankle fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons. Patients enrolled in the study had their surgery performed with a Dynamic compression Intramedullary Nail with the aim of improved function and pain. Follow-up occurred in clinic and via surveys pre-operatively, as well as, 2-weeks, 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks, and 1 year post-operatively

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With DynaNail
Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail: Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail. The assignment of the device is at the discretion of the standard of care provider, not the study investigator. Patients were screened for those scheduled to undergo a tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis at an ambulatory surgery center with one of the participating foot and ankle fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons. Patients enrolled in the study had their surgery performed with a Dynamic compression Intramedullary Nail with the aim of improved function and pain. Follow-up occurred in clinic and via surveys pre-operatively, as well as, 2-weeks, 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks, and 1-year post-operativel
Overall Study
STARTED
13
Overall Study
COMPLETED
11
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
2

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With DynaNail
Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail: Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail. The assignment of the device is at the discretion of the standard of care provider, not the study investigator. Patients were screened for those scheduled to undergo a tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis at an ambulatory surgery center with one of the participating foot and ankle fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons. Patients enrolled in the study had their surgery performed with a Dynamic compression Intramedullary Nail with the aim of improved function and pain. Follow-up occurred in clinic and via surveys pre-operatively, as well as, 2-weeks, 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks, and 1-year post-operativel
Overall Study
Screening failure
2

Baseline Characteristics

Compression Nail for Tibiocalcaneal Arthrodesis

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With DynaNail
n=11 Participants
Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail: Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail. The assignment of the device is at the discretion of the standard of care provider, not the study investigator.
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Body Mass Index (BMI)
BMI < 30
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Body Mass Index (BMI)
BMI > = 30
8 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 0 - 12 months postoperatively

Population: Patients having undergone tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with completion of Visual Analog Scale surveys

Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Patients will disclose their pain level using the Visual Analog Scale, which measures pain on a scale of 0 - 100, with 0 indicating no pain and 100 indicating severe pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With DynaNail
n=11 Participants
Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail: Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail. The assignment of the device is at the discretion of the standard of care provider, not the study investigator. Patients were screened for those scheduled to undergo a tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis at an ambulatory surgery center with one of the participating foot and ankle fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons. Patients enrolled in the study had their surgery performed with a Dynamic compression Intramedullary Nail with the aim of improved function and pain. Follow-up occurred in clinic and via surveys pre-operatively, as well as, 2-weeks, 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks, and 1-year post-operativel
Pain Assessment
Baseline
52.73 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.60
Pain Assessment
2 Weeks
33.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.35
Pain Assessment
6 Weeks
17.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.19
Pain Assessment
12 Weeks
21.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.19
Pain Assessment
24 Weeks
20.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.11
Pain Assessment
1 Year
34.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.77

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 0 - 12 months postoperatively

Population: Patients analyzed include those that underwent tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a Dynamic Compression Intramedullary Nail who completed their Foot and Ankle Ability Measure surveys.

Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). The FAAM is made up of a 21-item activity of daily living (ADL) and and 8-item sports subscale, which are combined to form a single total score. The ADL subscale ranges from 0 to 84 and the sports from 0 to 32. The total score is a calculated by adding the two subscores together and then reporting as a percentage of the total possible score (116). The percent score range is from 0% to 100%. For interpretation of the results a score closure to 100% is considered greater function.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With DynaNail
n=11 Participants
Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail: Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail. The assignment of the device is at the discretion of the standard of care provider, not the study investigator. Patients were screened for those scheduled to undergo a tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis at an ambulatory surgery center with one of the participating foot and ankle fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons. Patients enrolled in the study had their surgery performed with a Dynamic compression Intramedullary Nail with the aim of improved function and pain. Follow-up occurred in clinic and via surveys pre-operatively, as well as, 2-weeks, 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks, and 1-year post-operativel
Functional Assessment
Baseline
48.18 percentage of total score
Standard Deviation 36.32
Functional Assessment
2 Weeks
42.27 percentage of total score
Standard Deviation 60.95
Functional Assessment
6 Weeks
14.55 percentage of total score
Standard Deviation 16.53
Functional Assessment
12 Weeks
56.00 percentage of total score
Standard Deviation 50.79
Functional Assessment
24 Weeks
77.85 percentage of total score
Standard Deviation 60.29
Functional Assessment
1 Year
53.5 percentage of total score
Standard Deviation 3.5

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 0 - 12 months postoperatively

Population: Patients analyzed include those that underwent tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a Dynamic Compression Intramedullary Nail who completed their Short Form 36 surveys.

The Short Form 36 (SF-36) is a total of 36 questions covering 8 domains of health: (1) limitations in physical activities, (2) limitations in social activities, (3) limitations in usual role activities due to physical health problems, (4) bodily pain, (5) general mental health, (6) Limitations in usual role activities due to emotional problems, (7) Vitality, and (8) General health perceptions. The domain scores are added together for a total score. The total is a reported as a percentage from 0% to 100% with 50 serving as the normative value. Higher scores represent a greater level of functioning.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With DynaNail
n=11 Participants
Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail: Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail. The assignment of the device is at the discretion of the standard of care provider, not the study investigator. Patients were screened for those scheduled to undergo a tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis at an ambulatory surgery center with one of the participating foot and ankle fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons. Patients enrolled in the study had their surgery performed with a Dynamic compression Intramedullary Nail with the aim of improved function and pain. Follow-up occurred in clinic and via surveys pre-operatively, as well as, 2-weeks, 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks, and 1-year post-operativel
Change in Functional Assessment
Baseline
24.74 percentage of total score
Standard Deviation 12.78
Change in Functional Assessment
2 Weeks
23.82 percentage of total score
Standard Deviation 12.25
Change in Functional Assessment
6 Weeks
27.46 percentage of total score
Standard Deviation 15.00
Change in Functional Assessment
12 Weeks
37.64 percentage of total score
Standard Deviation 9.68
Change in Functional Assessment
24 Weeks
40.56 percentage of total score
Standard Deviation 12.64
Change in Functional Assessment
1 Year
39.64 percentage of total score
Standard Deviation 8.73

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 0 - 12 months postoperative

Population: Patients analyzed include those that underwent tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a Dynamic Compression Intramedullary Nail with post-operative imaging.

radiographs taken Pre-operatively, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months and 24 Months. A CT scan will be done at 6 months.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With DynaNail
n=8 Participants
Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail: Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail. The assignment of the device is at the discretion of the standard of care provider, not the study investigator. Patients were screened for those scheduled to undergo a tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis at an ambulatory surgery center with one of the participating foot and ankle fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons. Patients enrolled in the study had their surgery performed with a Dynamic compression Intramedullary Nail with the aim of improved function and pain. Follow-up occurred in clinic and via surveys pre-operatively, as well as, 2-weeks, 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks, and 1-year post-operativel
Fusion, as Measured by Radiograph and CT Scan
Union
7 Participants
Fusion, as Measured by Radiograph and CT Scan
Nonunion
1 Participants
Fusion, as Measured by Radiograph and CT Scan
Malunion
0 Participants

Adverse Events

Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With DynaNail

Serious events: 3 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With DynaNail
n=11 participants at risk
Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail: Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail. The assignment of the device is at the discretion of the standard of care provider, not the study investigator. Patients were screened for those scheduled to undergo a tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis at an ambulatory surgery center with one of the participating foot and ankle fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons. Patients enrolled in the study had their surgery performed with a Dynamic compression Intramedullary Nail with the aim of improved function and pain. Follow-up occurred in clinic and via surveys pre-operatively, as well as, 2-weeks, 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks, and 1-year post-operativel
Product Issues
Implant Failure
27.3%
3/11 • 0-12 months post-operative

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Ashish Shah

UAB Department of Orthopaedic Surgery

Phone: (205) 930-8339

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place