Trial Outcomes & Findings for Compression Nail for Tibiocalcaneal Arthrodesis (NCT NCT03780452)
NCT ID: NCT03780452
Last Updated: 2025-05-31
Results Overview
Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Patients will disclose their pain level using the Visual Analog Scale, which measures pain on a scale of 0 - 100, with 0 indicating no pain and 100 indicating severe pain.
COMPLETED
13 participants
0 - 12 months postoperatively
2025-05-31
Participant Flow
Patients were recruited if they met the indications for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis, were able to understand the requirements of the study, provide a written consent, and were willing to comply with the study protocol, and were over 18 years of age. Patients were recruited between 2020 and 2023 at an Orthopedic Clinic at a busy urban medical center.
Patients were screened for those scheduled to undergo a tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis at an ambulatory surgery center with one of the participating foot and ankle fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons. Patients enrolled in the study had their surgery performed with a Dynamic compression Intramedullary Nail with the aim of improved function and pain. Follow-up occurred in clinic and via surveys pre-operatively, as well as, 2-weeks, 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks, and 1 year post-operatively
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With DynaNail
Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail
novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail: Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail. The assignment of the device is at the discretion of the standard of care provider, not the study investigator.
Patients were screened for those scheduled to undergo a tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis at an ambulatory surgery center with one of the participating foot and ankle fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons. Patients enrolled in the study had their surgery performed with a Dynamic compression Intramedullary Nail with the aim of improved function and pain. Follow-up occurred in clinic and via surveys pre-operatively, as well as, 2-weeks, 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks, and 1-year post-operativel
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
13
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With DynaNail
Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail
novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail: Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail. The assignment of the device is at the discretion of the standard of care provider, not the study investigator.
Patients were screened for those scheduled to undergo a tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis at an ambulatory surgery center with one of the participating foot and ankle fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons. Patients enrolled in the study had their surgery performed with a Dynamic compression Intramedullary Nail with the aim of improved function and pain. Follow-up occurred in clinic and via surveys pre-operatively, as well as, 2-weeks, 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks, and 1-year post-operativel
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Screening failure
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Compression Nail for Tibiocalcaneal Arthrodesis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With DynaNail
n=11 Participants
Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail
novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail: Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail. The assignment of the device is at the discretion of the standard of care provider, not the study investigator.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
BMI < 30
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
BMI > = 30
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 - 12 months postoperativelyPopulation: Patients having undergone tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with completion of Visual Analog Scale surveys
Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Patients will disclose their pain level using the Visual Analog Scale, which measures pain on a scale of 0 - 100, with 0 indicating no pain and 100 indicating severe pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With DynaNail
n=11 Participants
Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail
novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail: Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail. The assignment of the device is at the discretion of the standard of care provider, not the study investigator.
Patients were screened for those scheduled to undergo a tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis at an ambulatory surgery center with one of the participating foot and ankle fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons. Patients enrolled in the study had their surgery performed with a Dynamic compression Intramedullary Nail with the aim of improved function and pain. Follow-up occurred in clinic and via surveys pre-operatively, as well as, 2-weeks, 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks, and 1-year post-operativel
|
|---|---|
|
Pain Assessment
Baseline
|
52.73 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.60
|
|
Pain Assessment
2 Weeks
|
33.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.35
|
|
Pain Assessment
6 Weeks
|
17.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.19
|
|
Pain Assessment
12 Weeks
|
21.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.19
|
|
Pain Assessment
24 Weeks
|
20.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.11
|
|
Pain Assessment
1 Year
|
34.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.77
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 - 12 months postoperativelyPopulation: Patients analyzed include those that underwent tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a Dynamic Compression Intramedullary Nail who completed their Foot and Ankle Ability Measure surveys.
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). The FAAM is made up of a 21-item activity of daily living (ADL) and and 8-item sports subscale, which are combined to form a single total score. The ADL subscale ranges from 0 to 84 and the sports from 0 to 32. The total score is a calculated by adding the two subscores together and then reporting as a percentage of the total possible score (116). The percent score range is from 0% to 100%. For interpretation of the results a score closure to 100% is considered greater function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With DynaNail
n=11 Participants
Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail
novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail: Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail. The assignment of the device is at the discretion of the standard of care provider, not the study investigator.
Patients were screened for those scheduled to undergo a tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis at an ambulatory surgery center with one of the participating foot and ankle fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons. Patients enrolled in the study had their surgery performed with a Dynamic compression Intramedullary Nail with the aim of improved function and pain. Follow-up occurred in clinic and via surveys pre-operatively, as well as, 2-weeks, 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks, and 1-year post-operativel
|
|---|---|
|
Functional Assessment
Baseline
|
48.18 percentage of total score
Standard Deviation 36.32
|
|
Functional Assessment
2 Weeks
|
42.27 percentage of total score
Standard Deviation 60.95
|
|
Functional Assessment
6 Weeks
|
14.55 percentage of total score
Standard Deviation 16.53
|
|
Functional Assessment
12 Weeks
|
56.00 percentage of total score
Standard Deviation 50.79
|
|
Functional Assessment
24 Weeks
|
77.85 percentage of total score
Standard Deviation 60.29
|
|
Functional Assessment
1 Year
|
53.5 percentage of total score
Standard Deviation 3.5
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 - 12 months postoperativelyPopulation: Patients analyzed include those that underwent tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a Dynamic Compression Intramedullary Nail who completed their Short Form 36 surveys.
The Short Form 36 (SF-36) is a total of 36 questions covering 8 domains of health: (1) limitations in physical activities, (2) limitations in social activities, (3) limitations in usual role activities due to physical health problems, (4) bodily pain, (5) general mental health, (6) Limitations in usual role activities due to emotional problems, (7) Vitality, and (8) General health perceptions. The domain scores are added together for a total score. The total is a reported as a percentage from 0% to 100% with 50 serving as the normative value. Higher scores represent a greater level of functioning.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With DynaNail
n=11 Participants
Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail
novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail: Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail. The assignment of the device is at the discretion of the standard of care provider, not the study investigator.
Patients were screened for those scheduled to undergo a tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis at an ambulatory surgery center with one of the participating foot and ankle fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons. Patients enrolled in the study had their surgery performed with a Dynamic compression Intramedullary Nail with the aim of improved function and pain. Follow-up occurred in clinic and via surveys pre-operatively, as well as, 2-weeks, 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks, and 1-year post-operativel
|
|---|---|
|
Change in Functional Assessment
Baseline
|
24.74 percentage of total score
Standard Deviation 12.78
|
|
Change in Functional Assessment
2 Weeks
|
23.82 percentage of total score
Standard Deviation 12.25
|
|
Change in Functional Assessment
6 Weeks
|
27.46 percentage of total score
Standard Deviation 15.00
|
|
Change in Functional Assessment
12 Weeks
|
37.64 percentage of total score
Standard Deviation 9.68
|
|
Change in Functional Assessment
24 Weeks
|
40.56 percentage of total score
Standard Deviation 12.64
|
|
Change in Functional Assessment
1 Year
|
39.64 percentage of total score
Standard Deviation 8.73
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 - 12 months postoperativePopulation: Patients analyzed include those that underwent tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a Dynamic Compression Intramedullary Nail with post-operative imaging.
radiographs taken Pre-operatively, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months and 24 Months. A CT scan will be done at 6 months.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With DynaNail
n=8 Participants
Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail
novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail: Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail. The assignment of the device is at the discretion of the standard of care provider, not the study investigator.
Patients were screened for those scheduled to undergo a tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis at an ambulatory surgery center with one of the participating foot and ankle fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons. Patients enrolled in the study had their surgery performed with a Dynamic compression Intramedullary Nail with the aim of improved function and pain. Follow-up occurred in clinic and via surveys pre-operatively, as well as, 2-weeks, 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks, and 1-year post-operativel
|
|---|---|
|
Fusion, as Measured by Radiograph and CT Scan
Union
|
7 Participants
|
|
Fusion, as Measured by Radiograph and CT Scan
Nonunion
|
1 Participants
|
|
Fusion, as Measured by Radiograph and CT Scan
Malunion
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With DynaNail
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With DynaNail
n=11 participants at risk
Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail
novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail: Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis with a novel dynamic compression intramedullary nail. The assignment of the device is at the discretion of the standard of care provider, not the study investigator.
Patients were screened for those scheduled to undergo a tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis at an ambulatory surgery center with one of the participating foot and ankle fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons. Patients enrolled in the study had their surgery performed with a Dynamic compression Intramedullary Nail with the aim of improved function and pain. Follow-up occurred in clinic and via surveys pre-operatively, as well as, 2-weeks, 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks, and 1-year post-operativel
|
|---|---|
|
Product Issues
Implant Failure
|
27.3%
3/11 • 0-12 months post-operative
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Ashish Shah
UAB Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place