New App for Monitoring Postoperative Pain in Total Ankle Replacement

NCT ID: NCT03777072

Last Updated: 2018-12-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-12-12

Study Completion Date

2020-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study evaluates a novel web-based application for monitoring the postoperative pain in patients undergoing total ankle replacement, from preoperative condition to 30 days follow-up. The indexes provided by the app in terms of percentages of pain areas are compared with that obtained with traditional visual analogue scale. Moreover, the relation between the percentage of pain area and the presence of side effects of the intervention are compared as well.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background:

The management of postoperative pain in patients undergoing total ankle replacement is routinely based on one of the two following drugs: tapentadol and oxycodone/naloxone (Nett, 2010). The drugs are used with similar frequencies. Indeed, previous studies compared the two drugs in terms of efficacy in reducing postoperative pain and frequency of side effects, in the field of orthopaedic and trauma surgery (Haeseler, 2017, Hartrick, 2009). The studies demonstrated that there are no substantial differences.

With regard to pain monitoring, the gold standard is the visual-analogue scale (VAS), which allows the patient to indicate the pain level as a score ranging from 0 to 10 (from minimum to maximum) (Campbell, 1990). Recently, a pain monitoring web-based application has been developed and distributed: 'NavigatePain' (NavigatePain, Aglance Solutions, Denmark). The app can be used in a simple and intuitive manner by PC, smartphone or tablet devices (Boudreau, 2016; Matthews, 2018). Moreover, physicians can easily schedule postoperative self-monitoring sessions for the patients (exploiting automatic notification messages sent by e-mail). The app allows the user to draw the pain areas in the frontal, posterior and lateral body planes, providing an index that quantifies the percentage of pain area with respect to the total body area in the considered plane. VAS score and notes reporting side effects can be reported as well in the app. Compared to VAS score, the pain area index is differentiated in the body planes and can represent a complementary and more specific source of information in monitoring postoperative pain.

Aim of the study:

The study evaluates the NavigatePain app for monitoring the postoperative pain in patients undergoing total ankle replacement, from preoperative condition to 30 days follow-up. The indexes provided by the app in terms of percentages of pain areas are compared to VAS reference score. Moreover, the relation between the percentage of pain area and the presence of side effects of the intervention are compared as well.

Methods:

A sample of 70 subjects undergoing total ankle replacement surgery will be consecutively enrolled. Age range will be 18 to 60 years. A user account will be created in the app for every subject, allowing to acquire data immediately visible to the physician. Pain areas, VAS score and presence of side effects will be acquired using the app at the following times: i) the day before surgery, without drug administration; ii) day 1 after surgery; iii) day 2; iv) day of hospital discharge (corresponding to day 3); v) day 7; vi) day 15; vii) day 30. Monitorings from i) to iv) will be acquired during hospitalization using a dedicated tablet device. In v), vi) and vii), the monitoring sessions will be notified to patients by the automatic notification service of the app (via e-mail); in these cases, patients will use own devices (e.g. PC, tablet or smartphone) to connect to account and perform drawing.

Outcomes:

The mean value of pain area index, and of VAS score will be compared over time and tested according to one way ANOVA for repeated measurements.

The relation between pain area index and VAS will be assessed according to Pearson correlation coefficient, or Spearman rank correlation in case of not normal distribution. Statistical significance of the coefficients will be tested according to two-tailed t-test or permutation distribution test assessing Pearson and Spearman coefficients, respectively. Linear regression analysis will be performed as well.

The relation between pain area index and presence of side effects (expressed as dichotomic variable: 1 in case of reported effects, 0 otherwise) will be tested according to point biserial correlation coefficient.

Correlation coefficient and linear regression will be evaluated in each time session. The results will be compared among the consecutive times in order to assess the potential dependence on the follow-up time.

The sample size of 70 subjects has been verified to guarantee identifying statistically significant differences in the mean value along the follow-up times (ANOVA test, one group, seven repetitions, 0.05 level alpha, power 95%, expected correlation 0.5, effect size 0.15). Moreover, the sample size guarantees identifying as significantly different from zero a correlation value larger than 0.7 (i.e. strong correlation), by t-test at 0.05 level alpha and power 95% (G\*Power software, Universitat Dusseldorf, Germany).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ankle Osteoarthritis Pain, Postoperative

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Total Ankle Replacement Pain Measurement

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age from 18 to 60 years
* ankle arthrosis grade 3 or 4, according to Kellgren-Lawrence classification
* subject undergoing first implant of total ankle replacement
* skeletal maturity
* signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* previous ankle replacement implants or ipsilateral ankle arthrodesis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Federico Federico, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Irccs Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi

Milan, Milano, Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Tito Bassani, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +390266214939

Email: [email protected]

Federico Usuelli, MD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +39‭3357351838‬

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Federico Usuelli, MD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Boudreau SA, Badsberg S, Christensen SW, Egsgaard LL. Digital Pain Drawings: Assessing Touch-Screen Technology and 3D Body Schemas. Clin J Pain. 2016 Feb;32(2):139-45. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000230.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25756558 (View on PubMed)

Campbell WI, Lewis S. Visual analogue measurement of pain. Ulster Med J. 1990 Oct;59(2):149-54.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2278111 (View on PubMed)

Haeseler G, Schaefers D, Prison N, Ahrens J, Liu X, Karch A. Combatting pain after orthopedic/trauma surgery- perioperative oral extended-release tapentadol vs. extended-release oxycodone/naloxone. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0383-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28693439 (View on PubMed)

Hartrick C, Van Hove I, Stegmann JU, Oh C, Upmalis D. Efficacy and tolerability of tapentadol immediate release and oxycodone HCl immediate release in patients awaiting primary joint replacement surgery for end-stage joint disease: a 10-day, phase III, randomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled study. Clin Ther. 2009 Feb;31(2):260-71. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.02.009.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19302899 (View on PubMed)

Matthews M, Rathleff MS, Vicenzino B, Boudreau SA. Capturing patient-reported area of knee pain: a concurrent validity study using digital technology in patients with patellofemoral pain. PeerJ. 2018 Mar 8;6:e4406. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4406. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29568700 (View on PubMed)

Nett MP. Postoperative pain management. Orthopedics. 2010 Sep;33(9 Suppl):23-6. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20100722-60.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20839719 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ARP1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id