Trial Outcomes & Findings for Evaluation of QDOT MICRO™ Catheter for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Subjects With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (NCT NCT03775512)
NCT ID: NCT03775512
Last Updated: 2023-03-16
Results Overview
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study. A Primary AEs is an event which occurred within 90 days following initial and repeated ablation procedure using the QDOT MICRO. Primary AEs included: atrio-esophageal fistula and pulmonary vein stenosis.
COMPLETED
NA
283 participants
Up to 90 days (post initial and repeated ablation procedure)
2023-03-16
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Main Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
Participants with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and radiofrequency (RF) ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for pulmonary vein isolation with nMARQ radiofrequency (RF) generator.
|
Variable Flow Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
Participants with symptomatic PAF who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and RF ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for variable flow with nMARQ RF generator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
191
|
92
|
|
Overall Study
Treated
|
177
|
87
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
162
|
75
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
29
|
17
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Main Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
Participants with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and radiofrequency (RF) ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for pulmonary vein isolation with nMARQ radiofrequency (RF) generator.
|
Variable Flow Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
Participants with symptomatic PAF who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and RF ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for variable flow with nMARQ RF generator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
7
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
5
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Excluded before Catheter insertion
|
14
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Discontinued before RF energy applied on inserted catheter
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Due to a late entrance criteria deviation
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Evaluation of QDOT MICRO™ Catheter for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Subjects With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Main Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=191 Participants
Participants with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and radiofrequency (RF) ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for pulmonary vein isolation with nMARQ radiofrequency (RF) generator.
|
Variable Flow Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=92 Participants
Participants with symptomatic PAF who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and RF ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for variable flow with nMARQ RF generator.
|
Total
n=283 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
63.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.69 • n=5 Participants
|
64.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.75 • n=7 Participants
|
64.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.22 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
75 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
113 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
116 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
170 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
166 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
71 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
237 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 90 days (post initial and repeated ablation procedure)Population: The modified Intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis set included all enrolled participants who met all eligibility criteria and have the investigational device inserted.
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study. A Primary AEs is an event which occurred within 90 days following initial and repeated ablation procedure using the QDOT MICRO. Primary AEs included: atrio-esophageal fistula and pulmonary vein stenosis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=167 Participants
Participants with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and radiofrequency (RF) ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for pulmonary vein isolation with nMARQ radiofrequency (RF) generator.
|
Variable Flow Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=85 Participants
Participants with symptomatic PAF who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and RF ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for variable flow with nMARQ RF generator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Early Onset Primary Adverse Events (PAEs): Atrio-esophageal Fistula and Pulmonary Vein (PV) Stenosis
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 7 days (post initial and repeated ablation procedure)Population: The mITT analysis set included all enrolled participants who met all eligibility criteria and have the investigational device inserted.
A Primary AEs is an event which occurred within the first week (7 days of the initial and repeated ablation procedure) which included death, myocardial infraction (MI), cardiac tamponade (CT)/perforation, thromboembolism, stroke/cardiovascular accident (CVA), transient ischemic attack (TIA), phrenic nerve paralysis (PNP), heart block, pulmonary edema, vagal nerve injury, pericarditis, and major vascular access complication/bleeding (MVAC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=167 Participants
Participants with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and radiofrequency (RF) ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for pulmonary vein isolation with nMARQ radiofrequency (RF) generator.
|
Variable Flow Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=85 Participants
Participants with symptomatic PAF who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and RF ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for variable flow with nMARQ RF generator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Early Onset PAEs: Death, Myocardial Infraction, Cardiac Tamponade/Perforation, Thromboembolism, Stroke/Cardiovascular Accident , TIA, PNP, Heart Block, Pulmonary Edema, Vagal Nerve Injury, Pericarditis, and MVAC/Bleeding
|
3.6 Percentage of Participants
|
2.4 Percentage of Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 91 to Day 365Population: The per-protocol (PP) analysis set included participants who satisfied the following criteria: a) enrolled and meet eligibility criteria, b) had undergone RF ablation, c) were treated with the study catheters, and d) were treated for the study related arrhythmia, without major protocol deviations that deemed to affect the scientific integrity of the study. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participants with freedom from documented AF, AT, or AFL episodes or following failure modes: a) Acute procedural: Failure to confirm entrance block in all pulmonary veins post-procedure and use of a non-study catheter to treat left atrial ablation targets and Cavo-tricuspid isthmus; b) Repeat ablation: \>2 repeat ablation procedures with the study catheter during the 3-Month blanking period (Day 0-90) after the index ablation procedure, use of a non-study catheter to treat study arrhythmia ablation targets during the blanking period, and any repeat ablation procedure during the Evaluation Period; c) Antiarrhythmic drug: taking a new AAD for AF or a previously failed AAD at a greater than the highest ineffective historical dose for AF during the evaluation period, were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=156 Participants
Participants with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and radiofrequency (RF) ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for pulmonary vein isolation with nMARQ radiofrequency (RF) generator.
|
Variable Flow Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=77 Participants
Participants with symptomatic PAF who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and RF ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for variable flow with nMARQ RF generator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Documented Atrial Fibrillation (AF), Atrial Tachycardia (AT), or Atrial Flutter (AFL) Episodes or Other Failure Modes
|
76.3 Percentage of Participants
|
67.5 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 20 monthsPopulation: The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants of the study who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
Number of participants with UADEs were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=177 Participants
Participants with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and radiofrequency (RF) ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for pulmonary vein isolation with nMARQ radiofrequency (RF) generator.
|
Variable Flow Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=87 Participants
Participants with symptomatic PAF who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and RF ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for variable flow with nMARQ RF generator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects (UADEs)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Within 7 days (early onset), 8-30 days (peri-procedural) and >=31 days (late onset) of initial ablation procedure (up to 20 months)Population: The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants of the study who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
Number of participants with serious non-primary AEs within 7 days (early onset), 8-30 days (peri-procedural) and \>=31 days (late onset) of initial ablation were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=177 Participants
Participants with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and radiofrequency (RF) ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for pulmonary vein isolation with nMARQ radiofrequency (RF) generator.
|
Variable Flow Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=87 Participants
Participants with symptomatic PAF who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and RF ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for variable flow with nMARQ RF generator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Serious Non-Primary Adverse Events (SAEs) Within 7 Days (Early Onset), 8-30 Days (Peri-procedural) and Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 31 Days (Late Onset) of Initial Ablation Procedure
0 - 7 Days
|
8 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Serious Non-Primary Adverse Events (SAEs) Within 7 Days (Early Onset), 8-30 Days (Peri-procedural) and Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 31 Days (Late Onset) of Initial Ablation Procedure
8 - 30 Days
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Serious Non-Primary Adverse Events (SAEs) Within 7 Days (Early Onset), 8-30 Days (Peri-procedural) and Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 31 Days (Late Onset) of Initial Ablation Procedure
>= 31 Days
|
25 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Within 7 days (early onset), 8-30 days (peri-procedural) and >=31 days (late onset) of initial ablation procedure (up to 20 months)Population: The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants of the study who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
Number of participants with bleeding complication (ISTH definitions): a) major, b) clinically relevant non-major and c) minor bleeding were reported. The ISTH classification of major bleeding event is a hemoglobin drop of greater than or equal to (\>=) 2 grams per deciliter (g/dL), transfusion of \>= 2 units (U) packed red blood cells, symptomatic bleed in a critical area, or fatal bleed. Clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) events require prolong hospitalization or result in laboratory testing, imaging, compression, procedure, interruption of the study medication or a change in concomitant therapy. Minor bleeding events are overt bleeding events that do not meet the criteria for CRNM or major bleeding events.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=177 Participants
Participants with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and radiofrequency (RF) ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for pulmonary vein isolation with nMARQ radiofrequency (RF) generator.
|
Variable Flow Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=87 Participants
Participants with symptomatic PAF who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and RF ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for variable flow with nMARQ RF generator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Bleeding Complication by International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Class and Timing of Onset
Major: 0 - 7 Days
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Bleeding Complication by International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Class and Timing of Onset
Major: 8 - 30 Days
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Bleeding Complication by International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Class and Timing of Onset
Major: >= 31 Days
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Bleeding Complication by International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Class and Timing of Onset
CRNM: 0-7 Days
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Bleeding Complication by International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Class and Timing of Onset
CRNM: 8-30 Days
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Bleeding Complication by International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Class and Timing of Onset
CRNM: >= 31 Days
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Bleeding Complication by International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Class and Timing of Onset
Minor: 0-7 Days
|
5 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Bleeding Complication by International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Class and Timing of Onset
Minor: 8-30 Days
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Bleeding Complication by International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Class and Timing of Onset
Minor: >= 31 Days
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: End of the Procedure (up to 20 months)Population: The PP analysis set included participants who satisfied the following criteria: a) enrolled and meet eligibility criteria, b) had undergone RF ablation, c) were treated with the study catheters, and d) were treated for the study related arrhythmia, without major protocol deviations that deemed to affect the scientific integrity of the study. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participants with electrical isolation of PVs (entrance block) at the end of the procedure were reported
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=164 Participants
Participants with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and radiofrequency (RF) ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for pulmonary vein isolation with nMARQ radiofrequency (RF) generator.
|
Variable Flow Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=82 Participants
Participants with symptomatic PAF who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and RF ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for variable flow with nMARQ RF generator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Electrical Isolation of Pulmonary Veins (PVs) (Entrance Block) at the End of the Procedure
|
100 Percentage of Participants
|
100 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 20 monthsPopulation: The PP analysis set included participants who satisfied the following criteria: a) enrolled and meet eligibility criteria, b) had undergone RF ablation, c) were treated with the study catheters, and d) were treated for the study related arrhythmia, without major protocol deviations that deemed to affect the scientific integrity of the study. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participants with electrical isolation of PV after first encirclement with acute reconnection were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=164 Participants
Participants with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and radiofrequency (RF) ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for pulmonary vein isolation with nMARQ radiofrequency (RF) generator.
|
Variable Flow Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=82 Participants
Participants with symptomatic PAF who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and RF ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for variable flow with nMARQ RF generator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Electrical Isolation of PV After First Encirclement With Acute Reconnection
|
42.7 Percentage of Participants
|
31.7 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 20 monthsPopulation: The PP analysis set included participants who satisfied the following criteria: a) enrolled and meet eligibility criteria, b) had undergone RF ablation, c) were treated with the study catheters, and d) were treated for the study related arrhythmia, without major protocol deviations that deemed to affect the scientific integrity of the study. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participants with electrical isolation of PV after first encirclement without acute reconnection were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=164 Participants
Participants with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and radiofrequency (RF) ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for pulmonary vein isolation with nMARQ radiofrequency (RF) generator.
|
Variable Flow Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=82 Participants
Participants with symptomatic PAF who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and RF ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for variable flow with nMARQ RF generator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Electrical Isolation of PV After First Encirclement Without Acute Reconnection
|
57.3 Percentage of Participants
|
68.3 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 20 monthsPopulation: The PP analysis set included participants who satisfied the following criteria: a) enrolled and meet eligibility criteria, b) had undergone RF ablation, c) were treated with the study catheters, and d) were treated for the study related arrhythmia, without major protocol deviations that deemed to affect the scientific integrity of the study. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participants with PV touch-up were reported. PV touch-up was defined as additional ablations being performed after first encirclement for targeted veins with acute reconnection.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=164 Participants
Participants with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and radiofrequency (RF) ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for pulmonary vein isolation with nMARQ radiofrequency (RF) generator.
|
Variable Flow Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=82 Participants
Participants with symptomatic PAF who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and RF ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for variable flow with nMARQ RF generator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Pulmonary Veins (PV) Touch-up
|
42.7 Percentage of Participants
|
31.7 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 20 monthsPopulation: The PP analysis set included participants who satisfied the following criteria: a) enrolled and meet eligibility criteria, b) had undergone RF ablation, c) were treated with the study catheters, and d) were treated for the study related arrhythmia, without major protocol deviations that deemed to affect the scientific integrity of the study. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure.
Percentage of targeted veins with touch-up (ablation of acute reconnection) among all targeted veins were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=328 Targeted Veins
Participants with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and radiofrequency (RF) ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for pulmonary vein isolation with nMARQ radiofrequency (RF) generator.
|
Variable Flow Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=164 Targeted Veins
Participants with symptomatic PAF who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and RF ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for variable flow with nMARQ RF generator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Targeted Veins With Touch-up (Ablation of Acute Reconnection) Among All Targeted Veins
|
27.4 Percentage of Targeted Veins
|
20.7 Percentage of Targeted Veins
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 20 monthsPopulation: The PP set had participants who satisfied these criteria: a) enrolled and meet eligibility criteria, b) had undergone RF ablation, c) treated with the study catheters, and d) were treated for the study related arrhythmia, without major protocol deviations that deemed to affect the scientific integrity of the study. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) is number of participants analyzed for this endpoint and 'n' (number analyzed) is number of participants analyzed for specified categories.
Percentage of participants with touch-up at anatomical location of acute PV reconnection after first encirclement was reported. The location included anterior, superior, ridge, posterior, and inferior region of the left pulmonary veins (LPV) and right pulmonary veins (RPV). The review of all ablation targets for the 1 participant with RPV ridge entered by site resulted in reclassification to RPV superior. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for specified arm (main arm) only.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=45 Participants
Participants with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and radiofrequency (RF) ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for pulmonary vein isolation with nMARQ radiofrequency (RF) generator.
|
Variable Flow Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
Participants with symptomatic PAF who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and RF ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for variable flow with nMARQ RF generator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Touch-up at Anatomical Location of Acute PV Reconnection After First Encirclement
LPV: Anterior
|
31.1 Percentage of Participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Touch-up at Anatomical Location of Acute PV Reconnection After First Encirclement
LPV: Inferior
|
28.9 Percentage of Participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Touch-up at Anatomical Location of Acute PV Reconnection After First Encirclement
LPV: Posterior
|
53.3 Percentage of Participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Touch-up at Anatomical Location of Acute PV Reconnection After First Encirclement
LPV: Ridge
|
42.2 Percentage of Participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Touch-up at Anatomical Location of Acute PV Reconnection After First Encirclement
LPV: Superior
|
44.4 Percentage of Participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Touch-up at Anatomical Location of Acute PV Reconnection After First Encirclement
RPV: Anterior
|
53.5 Percentage of Participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Touch-up at Anatomical Location of Acute PV Reconnection After First Encirclement
RPV: Inferior
|
37.2 Percentage of Participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Touch-up at Anatomical Location of Acute PV Reconnection After First Encirclement
RPV: Posterior
|
58.1 Percentage of Participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Touch-up at Anatomical Location of Acute PV Reconnection After First Encirclement
RPV: Superior
|
27.9 Percentage of Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 20 monthsPopulation: The PP analysis set included participants who satisfied the following criteria: a) enrolled and meet eligibility criteria, b) had undergone RF ablation, c) were treated with the study catheters, and d) were treated for the study related arrhythmia, without major protocol deviations that deemed to affect the scientific integrity of the study.
Percentage of participants who underwent repeat ablation procedures were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=166 Participants
Participants with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and radiofrequency (RF) ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for pulmonary vein isolation with nMARQ radiofrequency (RF) generator.
|
Variable Flow Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=82 Participants
Participants with symptomatic PAF who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and RF ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for variable flow with nMARQ RF generator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Underwent Repeat Ablation Procedures
|
10.8 Percentage of Participants
|
13.4 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 20 monthsPopulation: The PP analysis set included participants who satisfied the following criteria: a) enrolled and meet eligibility criteria, b) had undergone RF ablation, c) were treated with the study catheters, and d) were treated for the study related arrhythmia, without major protocol deviations that deemed to affect the scientific integrity of the study. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participants with PVs re-isolation among all of the targeted PVs at repeat procedure were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=23 Participants
Participants with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and radiofrequency (RF) ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for pulmonary vein isolation with nMARQ radiofrequency (RF) generator.
|
Variable Flow Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=11 Participants
Participants with symptomatic PAF who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and RF ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for variable flow with nMARQ RF generator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With PVs Re-isolation Among All of the Targeted PVs at Repeat Procedure
|
100 Percentage of Participants
|
100 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 20 monthsPopulation: The PP analysis set included participants who satisfied the following criteria: a) enrolled and meet eligibility criteria, b) had undergone RF ablation, c) were treated with the study catheters, and d) were treated for the study related arrhythmia, without major protocol deviations that deemed to affect the scientific integrity of the study. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participants requiring new linear lesion and/or new foci identified during the repeat ablation procedure were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=18 Participants
Participants with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and radiofrequency (RF) ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for pulmonary vein isolation with nMARQ radiofrequency (RF) generator.
|
Variable Flow Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=11 Participants
Participants with symptomatic PAF who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and RF ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for variable flow with nMARQ RF generator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Requiring New Linear Lesion and/or New Foci Identified During the Repeat Ablation Procedure
|
50.0 Percentage of Participants
|
63.6 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 12 monthsPopulation: The PP analysis set included participants who satisfied the following criteria: a) enrolled and meet eligibility criteria, b) had undergone RF ablation, c) were treated with the study catheters, and d) were treated for the study related arrhythmia, without major protocol deviations that deemed to affect the scientific integrity of the study.
Percentage of participants with 12-month single procedure success were reported. The 12-month single procedure success is defined as freedom from documented AF/AFL/AT recurrence (episodes \> 30 seconds) during the evaluation period after a single ablation procedure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=166 Participants
Participants with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and radiofrequency (RF) ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for pulmonary vein isolation with nMARQ radiofrequency (RF) generator.
|
Variable Flow Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=82 Participants
Participants with symptomatic PAF who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and RF ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for variable flow with nMARQ RF generator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With 12-Month Single Procedure Success
|
77.3 Percentage of Participants
|
72.4 Percentage of Participants
|
Adverse Events
Main Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
Variable Flow Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Main Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=177 participants at risk
Participants with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and radiofrequency (RF) ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for pulmonary vein isolation with nMARQ radiofrequency (RF) generator.
|
Variable Flow Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=87 participants at risk
Participants with symptomatic PAF who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and RF ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for variable flow with nMARQ RF generator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
7.9%
14/177 • Number of events 16 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
6.9%
6/87 • Number of events 6 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial flutter
|
4.5%
8/177 • Number of events 8 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
4.6%
4/87 • Number of events 4 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac tamponade
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
3.4%
6/177 • Number of events 6 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Arteriovenous fistula
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleuritic pain
|
0.00%
0/177 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus node dysfunction
|
0.00%
0/177 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Cardiac valve fibroelastoma
|
0.00%
0/177 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.56%
1/177 • Number of events 1 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
4.6%
4/87 • Number of events 4 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
|
0.00%
0/177 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
3.4%
3/87 • Number of events 3 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericardial effusion
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
0.00%
0/177 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial tachycardia
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
4.6%
4/87 • Number of events 4 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrioventricular block
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
2.3%
4/177 • Number of events 4 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular extrasystoles
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
General disorders
Cyst
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.56%
1/177 • Number of events 1 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischemic attack
|
0.56%
1/177 • Number of events 1 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Aortic dilatation
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Orthostatic hypotension
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal hemorrhage
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hiatus hernia
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abscess
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
2.3%
4/177 • Number of events 4 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Vascular pseudoaneurysm
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthropathy
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bursitis
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Aortic valve calcification
|
0.00%
0/177 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiovascular disorder
|
0.00%
0/177 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Retroperitoneal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/177 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
General disorders
Chest discomfort
|
0.00%
0/177 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Corona virus infection
|
0.00%
0/177 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hip fracture
|
0.00%
0/177 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Haemorrhagic stroke
|
0.00%
0/177 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral vascular disorder
|
0.00%
0/177 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Main Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=177 participants at risk
Participants with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and radiofrequency (RF) ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for pulmonary vein isolation with nMARQ radiofrequency (RF) generator.
|
Variable Flow Arm: QDOT Micro Catheter
n=87 participants at risk
Participants with symptomatic PAF who have failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug were ablated with electrophysiology mapping and RF ablation using QDOT Micro Catheter for variable flow with nMARQ RF generator.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
0.00%
0/177 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
4.6%
4/87 • Number of events 4 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/177 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea exertional
|
0.00%
0/177 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac Tamponade/Perforation
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
1.1%
1/87 • Number of events 1 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Phrenic Nerve Injury / Diaphragmatic Paralysis
|
0.56%
1/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Major Vascular Access Complication / Bleeding
|
1.7%
3/177 • Number of events 3 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary Edema
|
0.00%
0/177 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
1.1%
1/87 • Number of events 1 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericardial effusion
|
2.3%
4/177 • Number of events 4 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial flutter
|
2.3%
4/177 • Number of events 4 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericarditis
|
2.3%
4/177 • Number of events 4 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
General disorders
Non-Cardiac Chest pain
|
2.3%
4/177 • Number of events 4 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Incision site hemorrhage
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Urinary tract injury
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Investigations
Laboratory test abnormal
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Groin pain
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint swelling
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck Pain
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
2.8%
5/177 • Number of events 5 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoesthesia
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hematuria
|
1.7%
3/177 • Number of events 3 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Prostatitis
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
|
4.5%
8/177 • Number of events 8 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
1.7%
3/177 • Number of events 3 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleuritic pain
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hematoma
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
4.6%
4/87 • Number of events 4 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
9.2%
8/87 • Number of events 10 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
6.8%
12/177 • Number of events 12 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Fluid overload
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal hemorrhage
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary vein stenosis
|
3.4%
6/177 • Number of events 6 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial tachycardia
|
2.3%
4/177 • Number of events 4 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
0.56%
1/177 • Number of events 1 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
|
0.56%
1/177 • Number of events 1 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus bradycardia
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus tachycardia
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular extrasystoles
|
2.3%
4/177 • Number of events 4 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular tachycardia
|
3.4%
6/177 • Number of events 6 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
4.6%
4/87 • Number of events 4 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular arrhythmia
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular extrasystoles
|
4.5%
8/177 • Number of events 8 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular tachycardia
|
2.3%
4/177 • Number of events 4 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
General disorders
Peripheral swelling
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Investigations
Heart rate increased
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery stenosis
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Seizure
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
1.1%
2/177 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
0.56%
1/177 • Number of events 1 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/177 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Anaesthetic complication
|
0.00%
0/177 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/177 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Orthostatic hypotension
|
0.00%
0/177 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/177 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/177 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
0.00%
0/177 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
0.00%
0/177 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Up to 20 months
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who had the investigational device inserted, regardless if RF energy was delivered.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Publications and presentation of clinical investigation results will be coordinated between sponsor and the clinical investigation authors. Authorship to be determined prior to development of any manuscript. All information concerning the study, investigational medical device, sponsor operations, patent application, manufacturing processes and basic scientific data supplied by the sponsor to the investigator and not previously published, are confidential and remain sole property of the sponsor.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER