Trial Outcomes & Findings for Stories for Change: Digital Storytelling for Diabetes Self-Management Among Hispanic Adults (NCT NCT03766438)
NCT ID: NCT03766438
Last Updated: 2024-10-08
Results Overview
The rationale for use of hemoglobin A1c as an indicator of diabetes control is based on national and regional data that demonstrate significant disparities in reaching hemoglobin A1c targets for Hispanic populations compared with non-Hispanic whites. The importance of glycemic control as part of the comprehensive management of diabetes is well documented, and hemoglobin A1c testing is a well-established strategy to monitor glycemic control in patients with diabetes.
COMPLETED
NA
451 participants
Baseline and 3 months.
2024-10-08
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Intervention
The intervention group will view the 12-minute digital storytelling intervention that has been previously pilot-tested, in addition to usual clinical care.
Digital Storytelling Intervention: 12-minute digital storytelling intervention in Spanish, with four individuals explaining their personal Type 2 Diabetes stories.
|
Control
The comparison group will receive usual clinical care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
227
|
224
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
191
|
199
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
36
|
25
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Stories for Change: Digital Storytelling for Diabetes Self-Management Among Hispanic Adults
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Intervention
n=227 Participants
The intervention group will view the 12-minute digital storytelling intervention that has been previously pilot-tested, in addition to usual clinical care.
Digital Storytelling Intervention: 12-minute digital storytelling intervention in Spanish, with four individuals explaining their personal Type 2 Diabetes stories.
|
Control
n=224 Participants
The comparison group will receive usual clinical care.
|
Total
n=451 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
54.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.25 • n=5 Participants
|
54.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.08 • n=7 Participants
|
54.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.15 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
158 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
156 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
314 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
69 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
68 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
137 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
227 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
224 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
451 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
227 participants
n=5 Participants
|
224 participants
n=7 Participants
|
451 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Hemoglobin A1C
|
9.1 Percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.72 • n=5 Participants
|
9.4 Percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.75 • n=7 Participants
|
9.25 Percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.73 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months.The rationale for use of hemoglobin A1c as an indicator of diabetes control is based on national and regional data that demonstrate significant disparities in reaching hemoglobin A1c targets for Hispanic populations compared with non-Hispanic whites. The importance of glycemic control as part of the comprehensive management of diabetes is well documented, and hemoglobin A1c testing is a well-established strategy to monitor glycemic control in patients with diabetes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention
n=191 Participants
The intervention group will view the 12-minute digital storytelling intervention that has been previously pilot-tested, in addition to usual clinical care.
Digital Storytelling Intervention: 12-minute digital storytelling intervention in Spanish, with four individuals explaining their personal Type 2 Diabetes stories.
|
Control
n=199 Participants
The comparison group will receive usual clinical care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Glycemic Control as Measured by Hemoglobin A1c at Baseline and 3 Months
3 months
|
8.4 Percent
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
8.8 Percent
Standard Deviation 2
|
|
Glycemic Control as Measured by Hemoglobin A1c at Baseline and 3 Months
Baseline
|
9.1 Percent
Standard Deviation 1.7
|
9.4 Percent
Standard Deviation 1.8
|
Adverse Events
Intervention
Control
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place