Development and Validation of New "SNU Illustrated Pain Rating Scale" as a Tool for Postoperative Pain Assessment
NCT ID: NCT03764046
Last Updated: 2018-12-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-01-01
2019-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Metric-based Feedback Training for the Acquisition of Sonographic Skills
NCT02976623
The Effectiveness of Two Nursing Programs on the Surgery-related Pressure Injury
NCT06316726
The Effectiveness of Various Teaching Methods to Enhance the Comprehensive Nursing Assessment Skills of New Nurses
NCT06318468
Development and Effectiveness Verification of an AI Application for Pressure Injury Nursing Based on Clinical Judgment Model
NCT07132320
Evaluation of an E-learning Program for Assessing Pressure Ulcer Risk and Pressure Ulcer Classification - a Pilot Study
NCT01567410
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Administered with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain control
* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I-III patients
Exclusion Criteria
* Unable to communicate
* Aged less than 18, or more than 79
* Weighs less than 40kg or more than 89kg
* Has severe heart disease(s)
* Pregnant
18 Years
79 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Seoul National University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jin-Tae Kim
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jin-Tae Kim
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Seoul National University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986 Oct;27(1):117-126. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90228-9.
Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, Rosseland LA, Romundstad L, Hals EK, Kvarstein G, Stubhaug A. Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jul;101(1):17-24. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen103. Epub 2008 May 16.
Karcioglu O, Topacoglu H, Dikme O, Dikme O. A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: Which to use? Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;36(4):707-714. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
Pathak A, Sharma S, Jensen MP. The utility and validity of pain intensity rating scales for use in developing countries. Pain Rep. 2018 Aug 6;3(5):e672. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000672. eCollection 2018 Sep-Oct.
Eriksson K, Wikstrom L, Arestedt K, Fridlund B, Brostrom A. Numeric rating scale: patients' perceptions of its use in postoperative pain assessments. Appl Nurs Res. 2014 Feb;27(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2013.10.006. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
Noble B, Clark D, Meldrum M, ten Have H, Seymour J, Winslow M, Paz S. The measurement of pain, 1945-2000. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 Jan;29(1):14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.08.007.
Bond MR, Pilowsky I. Subjective assessment of pain and its relationship to the administration of analgesics in patients with advanced cancer. J Psychosom Res. 1966 Sep;10(2):203-8. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(66)90064-x. No abstract available.
Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974 Nov 9;2(7889):1127-31. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)90884-8. No abstract available.
Bodian CA, Freedman G, Hossain S, Eisenkraft JB, Beilin Y. The visual analog scale for pain: clinical significance in postoperative patients. Anesthesiology. 2001 Dec;95(6):1356-61. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200112000-00013.
Katz J, Melzack R. Measurement of pain. Surg Clin North Am. 1999 Apr;79(2):231-52. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(05)70381-9.
Singer T, Seymour B, O'Doherty J, Kaube H, Dolan RJ, Frith CD. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science. 2004 Feb 20;303(5661):1157-62. doi: 10.1126/science.1093535.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SNUMR2-2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.