Overactive Bladder Syndrome: Incobotulinumtoxin Versus Onabotulinumtoxin
NCT ID: NCT03758235
Last Updated: 2020-11-06
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
UNKNOWN
Clinical Phase
PHASE3
Total Enrollment
140 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2018-09-01
Study Completion Date
2021-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of the original study was to compare Incobot/A versus Onabot/A in order to evaluate if the differences in the pharmacologic formulations between the two drugs could affect their efficacy and safety in the treatment of neurogenic overactive bladder (OAB).
In the original study protocol two different dosages for either Incobot/A and Onabot/A (200 U and 100 U) were considered, to treat patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity incontinence performing intermittent catheterization (IC) with higher dosages and those able to void spontaneously with lower dosage, with the resulting four treatment groups. For such a study, a very large sample of participants should have been treated and followed up, to have adequate power to demonstrate the hypothesis. At the end of last February 2020, we had to temporarily stop all the clinical activities related to the study and patients' recruitment, due to the occurrence of Sars-Cov-2 pandemic in our Country. At that point, a non-inferiority study seemed to be possible and adequate, and we adapted the protocol accordingly. In addition, on the basis of previously published information, we could hypothesize that the new drug (Incobot/A) would have had at least a roughly similar effect to the control drug (Onabot/A). In order to perform a non-inferiority study, the power and sample size analysis have been re-planned.
Thus, we perform a not planned interim analysis to show the preliminary results of an ongoing, non-inferiority trial in which patients' recruitment temporarily stopped due to incontrollable external factors. The present study will be aimed to assess the non-inferiority of Incobot/A compared to Onabot/A on the efficacy and safety parameters, in the treatment of patients with refractory NDOI performing IC, who are randomized to receive 200 U of Incobot/A or Onabot/A intradetrusor injections and who are followed up to 12 wks after treatment
In the original study protocol two different dosages for either Incobot/A and Onabot/A (200 U and 100 U) were considered, to treat patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity incontinence performing intermittent catheterization (IC) with higher dosages and those able to void spontaneously with lower dosage, with the resulting four treatment groups. For such a study, a very large sample of participants should have been treated and followed up, to have adequate power to demonstrate the hypothesis. At the end of last February 2020, we had to temporarily stop all the clinical activities related to the study and patients' recruitment, due to the occurrence of Sars-Cov-2 pandemic in our Country. At that point, a non-inferiority study seemed to be possible and adequate, and we adapted the protocol accordingly. In addition, on the basis of previously published information, we could hypothesize that the new drug (Incobot/A) would have had at least a roughly similar effect to the control drug (Onabot/A). In order to perform a non-inferiority study, the power and sample size analysis have been re-planned.
Thus, we perform a not planned interim analysis to show the preliminary results of an ongoing, non-inferiority trial in which patients' recruitment temporarily stopped due to incontrollable external factors. The present study will be aimed to assess the non-inferiority of Incobot/A compared to Onabot/A on the efficacy and safety parameters, in the treatment of patients with refractory NDOI performing IC, who are randomized to receive 200 U of Incobot/A or Onabot/A intradetrusor injections and who are followed up to 12 wks after treatment
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This is a pilot, prospective, randomized, double blinded, multicentre, clinical trial. After giving a written informed consent, all the patients will be randomized into two groups: Group 1, including patients who will be treated with the Incobot/A and Group 2, including patients who will be treated with Onabot/A. The randomization process will be made by a computerized system. Enrolling period: September 2018- April 2020.
Inclusion criteria:
* patients (males and females) with neurogenic urge urinary incontinence (UUI) (with urgency, increase in day- time and night- time urinary frequency) and with urodynamic diagnosis of detrusor overactivity (DO);
* 18- 80 years;
* women of childbearing age, who use a reliable method of contraception throughout the study period (a pregnancy test must be performed during enrolment in the study);
* spinal cord injury at or below T1, diagnosed at least 6 months before the screening in case of a vesico-sphincter dysfunction due to spinal cord injury;
* EDSS score ≤ 6, in MS patients;
* patients refractory to anticholinergic therapy (≥ 1 anticholinergic agent)
* application of intermittent catheterizations to empty the bladder. In the case of spontaneous micturition, the patients should agree for the use of intermittent catheterizations, in case this will be necessary after treatment with the detrusor injection of botulinumtoxin A.
Urodynamic characteristics:
urodynamic diagnosis of DO, refractory to standard anticholinergics and naïve to intradetrusor injection of onabotulinumtoxin A.
The wash- out period after anticholinergics should be of at least 3 weeks. It will be also possible for patients continuing to assume previous anticholinergic therapy through the study period.
Exclusion criteria:
* recurring urinary tract infections (UTIs) (≥ 4 episodes/year);
* spinal cord injuries above T1;
* MS patients: EDSS score ≥ 6;
* patients who won't or can't perform intermittent catheterization;
* pregnancy or breast- feeding, if female patients
* post- void residual volume (PRV) \> 150 ml, in the case of spontaneous micturition
Time 0 (pre-screening):
* history and physical examination;
* urinalysis and cultures (pregnancy test);
* 3- days voiding diary;
* urodynamic study;
* "Incontinence Quality of Life" (I- QoL) standardized Questionnaire;
* Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for evaluation of treatment satisfaction.
Time 1. Treatment.
Patients will be randomized into two groups, assigned by a computerized system:
\- Group 1- Incobot/A:
patients with spontaneous micturitions will undergo only one administration of Incobot/A 100 U diluted in 10 ml of sodium chloride solution 0.9% by endoscopic detrusor injections (20 injections, 0.5 ml of solution for each injection); patients who perform intermittent catheterization will undergo only one administration of Incobot/A 200 U diluted in 30 ml of sodium chloride solution 0.9% by endoscopic detrusor injections (30 injections, 1 ml of solution for each injection)
\- Group 2- Onabot/A:
patients with spontaneous micturitions will undergo only one administration of Onabot/A 100 U diluted in 10 ml of sodium chloride solution 0.9% by endoscopic detrusor injections (20 injections, 0.5 ml of solution for each injection); patients who perform intermittent catheterization will undergo only one administration of Onabot/A 200 U diluted in 30 ml of sodium chloride solution 0.9% by endoscopic detrusor injections (30 injections, 1 ml of solution for each injection)
Follow-up:
History and physical examination, 3-day voiding diary and VAS were repeated at 2, 4 and 12 weeks, in order to make better comparisons with previously published pivotal trials on Botox. Urinalyses and cultures and I-QoL questionnaire were repeated at 2 and 12 weeks after treatment; urodynamic examination was obtained at 12 weeks follow- up.
Outcomes of the study The primary outcome measure is change from baseline in the daily frequency of UI at week 12. Secondary outcomes measures are: the occurrence of UTIs and other treatment-related local and systemic adverse events following the two botulinum toxins A injections, during the observation period; changes from baseline in I-QOL total score and VAS scores (week 2 and week 12); changes from baseline in MCC, first volume and maximum pressure of detrusor overactivity (weeks 12), following the two botulinum toxins A administration.
Statistical Analysis:
In a non- inferiority trial, it is recommended to set the non-inferiority limit below the minimal clinically important difference such that, after the intervention, the two groups are expected to differ by less than this difference. Group sample sizes of 50 and 50 subjects are required to be 80% sure that the higher limit of 95% confidence interval was below the clinically important non-inferiority limit of + one in UI episodes/day between the experimental and the standard treatment. The true difference between the means is assumed to be 0 with standard deviation (SD) of 2. The significance level (alpha) of the test is 0.05. The sample size is calculated using PASS 11.0.7, Power Analysis and Sample Size Software (2011). NCSS, LLC. Kaysville, Utah, USA. In establishing the non-inferiority margin, we have considered one incontinence episodes/day as non-inferiority limit as the difference of one less urinary incontinence episode represents the smallest difference that can be measured in the count. Moreover, when considering the frequency of daily urinary incontinence (UI) at baseline in both groups of treatment, one UI episode represents about 15%. In the present study, due to the temporary stop of patients' recruitment, a not planned interim analysis of the current data from the ongoing trial is conducted, in order to detect whether the research outcomes will be addressed. The true difference between the means is assumed to be 0 with SD of 2. The significance level (alpha) of the test is 0.05. The sample size is calculated using PASS 11.0.7, Power Analysis and Sample Size Software (2011). NCSS, LLC. Kaysville, Utah, USA. The primary endpoint was analysed using a standard analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, including treatment group as fixed factors and baseline UI episodes/day as a covariate. If the higher one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) limit that is produced from the ANCOVA model is lower than + one UI episode, the efficacy of the experimental treatment group is considered not inferior to that of the standard treatment group. Mann-Whitney's U-test is used for comparisons of unpaired data and Friedman and Wilcoxon tests for comparisons of paired data, X2 with Yates' continuity correction or Fisher's exact test are used to analyse categorical data. All statistical analyses are performed using IBM-SPSS® version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA, 2019). In all analyses, a two-sided p-value \<0.05 was considered significant.
Inclusion criteria:
* patients (males and females) with neurogenic urge urinary incontinence (UUI) (with urgency, increase in day- time and night- time urinary frequency) and with urodynamic diagnosis of detrusor overactivity (DO);
* 18- 80 years;
* women of childbearing age, who use a reliable method of contraception throughout the study period (a pregnancy test must be performed during enrolment in the study);
* spinal cord injury at or below T1, diagnosed at least 6 months before the screening in case of a vesico-sphincter dysfunction due to spinal cord injury;
* EDSS score ≤ 6, in MS patients;
* patients refractory to anticholinergic therapy (≥ 1 anticholinergic agent)
* application of intermittent catheterizations to empty the bladder. In the case of spontaneous micturition, the patients should agree for the use of intermittent catheterizations, in case this will be necessary after treatment with the detrusor injection of botulinumtoxin A.
Urodynamic characteristics:
urodynamic diagnosis of DO, refractory to standard anticholinergics and naïve to intradetrusor injection of onabotulinumtoxin A.
The wash- out period after anticholinergics should be of at least 3 weeks. It will be also possible for patients continuing to assume previous anticholinergic therapy through the study period.
Exclusion criteria:
* recurring urinary tract infections (UTIs) (≥ 4 episodes/year);
* spinal cord injuries above T1;
* MS patients: EDSS score ≥ 6;
* patients who won't or can't perform intermittent catheterization;
* pregnancy or breast- feeding, if female patients
* post- void residual volume (PRV) \> 150 ml, in the case of spontaneous micturition
Time 0 (pre-screening):
* history and physical examination;
* urinalysis and cultures (pregnancy test);
* 3- days voiding diary;
* urodynamic study;
* "Incontinence Quality of Life" (I- QoL) standardized Questionnaire;
* Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for evaluation of treatment satisfaction.
Time 1. Treatment.
Patients will be randomized into two groups, assigned by a computerized system:
\- Group 1- Incobot/A:
patients with spontaneous micturitions will undergo only one administration of Incobot/A 100 U diluted in 10 ml of sodium chloride solution 0.9% by endoscopic detrusor injections (20 injections, 0.5 ml of solution for each injection); patients who perform intermittent catheterization will undergo only one administration of Incobot/A 200 U diluted in 30 ml of sodium chloride solution 0.9% by endoscopic detrusor injections (30 injections, 1 ml of solution for each injection)
\- Group 2- Onabot/A:
patients with spontaneous micturitions will undergo only one administration of Onabot/A 100 U diluted in 10 ml of sodium chloride solution 0.9% by endoscopic detrusor injections (20 injections, 0.5 ml of solution for each injection); patients who perform intermittent catheterization will undergo only one administration of Onabot/A 200 U diluted in 30 ml of sodium chloride solution 0.9% by endoscopic detrusor injections (30 injections, 1 ml of solution for each injection)
Follow-up:
History and physical examination, 3-day voiding diary and VAS were repeated at 2, 4 and 12 weeks, in order to make better comparisons with previously published pivotal trials on Botox. Urinalyses and cultures and I-QoL questionnaire were repeated at 2 and 12 weeks after treatment; urodynamic examination was obtained at 12 weeks follow- up.
Outcomes of the study The primary outcome measure is change from baseline in the daily frequency of UI at week 12. Secondary outcomes measures are: the occurrence of UTIs and other treatment-related local and systemic adverse events following the two botulinum toxins A injections, during the observation period; changes from baseline in I-QOL total score and VAS scores (week 2 and week 12); changes from baseline in MCC, first volume and maximum pressure of detrusor overactivity (weeks 12), following the two botulinum toxins A administration.
Statistical Analysis:
In a non- inferiority trial, it is recommended to set the non-inferiority limit below the minimal clinically important difference such that, after the intervention, the two groups are expected to differ by less than this difference. Group sample sizes of 50 and 50 subjects are required to be 80% sure that the higher limit of 95% confidence interval was below the clinically important non-inferiority limit of + one in UI episodes/day between the experimental and the standard treatment. The true difference between the means is assumed to be 0 with standard deviation (SD) of 2. The significance level (alpha) of the test is 0.05. The sample size is calculated using PASS 11.0.7, Power Analysis and Sample Size Software (2011). NCSS, LLC. Kaysville, Utah, USA. In establishing the non-inferiority margin, we have considered one incontinence episodes/day as non-inferiority limit as the difference of one less urinary incontinence episode represents the smallest difference that can be measured in the count. Moreover, when considering the frequency of daily urinary incontinence (UI) at baseline in both groups of treatment, one UI episode represents about 15%. In the present study, due to the temporary stop of patients' recruitment, a not planned interim analysis of the current data from the ongoing trial is conducted, in order to detect whether the research outcomes will be addressed. The true difference between the means is assumed to be 0 with SD of 2. The significance level (alpha) of the test is 0.05. The sample size is calculated using PASS 11.0.7, Power Analysis and Sample Size Software (2011). NCSS, LLC. Kaysville, Utah, USA. The primary endpoint was analysed using a standard analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, including treatment group as fixed factors and baseline UI episodes/day as a covariate. If the higher one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) limit that is produced from the ANCOVA model is lower than + one UI episode, the efficacy of the experimental treatment group is considered not inferior to that of the standard treatment group. Mann-Whitney's U-test is used for comparisons of unpaired data and Friedman and Wilcoxon tests for comparisons of paired data, X2 with Yates' continuity correction or Fisher's exact test are used to analyse categorical data. All statistical analyses are performed using IBM-SPSS® version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA, 2019). In all analyses, a two-sided p-value \<0.05 was considered significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Overactive Bladder Syndrome
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
overactive bladder syndrome
botulinum toxin type A
onabotulinumtoxin/A
incobotulinumtoxin/A
treatment
neurogenic detrusor overactivity incontinence
urinary incontinence
urinary tract infections
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
RANDOMIZED
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Participants are assigned to the 4 groups (Incobot/A Group different dosages, or Onabot/A Group different dosages ) in parallel for the duration of the study.
Primary Study Purpose
TREATMENT
Blinding Strategy
DOUBLE
Participants
Investigators
Partecipants, investigators and outcomes assessor
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Incobot/A 100 U
Incobot/A 100 U diluted in 10 ml of sodium chloride solution 0.9% by endoscopic detrusor injections (20 injections, 0.5 ml of solution for each injection) will be administered in patients able to perform spontaneous micturitions
Group Type
EXPERIMENTAL
IncobotulinumtoxinA 100 UNT Injection [Xeomin]
Intervention Type
DRUG
Incobot/A intradetrusor injections under cystscopic guidance, with local anaethesia in an outpatient basis
Incobot/A 200 U
Incobot/A 200 U diluted in 30 ml of sodium chloride solution 0.9% by endoscopic detrusor injections (30 injections, 1 ml of solution for each injection) will be administered in patients performin intermittent catheterization.
Group Type
EXPERIMENTAL
IncobotulinumtoxinA 100 UNT Injection [Xeomin]
Intervention Type
DRUG
Incobot/A intradetrusor injections under cystscopic guidance, with local anaethesia in an outpatient basis
Onabot/A 100 U
Onabot/A 100 U diluted in 10 ml of sodium chloride solution 0.9% by endoscopic detrusor injections (20 injections, 0.5 ml of solution for each injection) will be administered in patients able to perform spontaneous micturitions
Group Type
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 UNT [Botox]
Intervention Type
DRUG
Onabot/A intradetrusor injections under cystscopic guidance, with local anaethesia in an outpatient basis
Onabot/A 200 U
Onabot/A 200 U diluted in 30 ml of sodium chloride solution 0.9% by endoscopic detrusor injections (30 injections, 1 ml of solution for each injection) will be administered to patients performing intermittent catheterization
Group Type
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 UNT [Botox]
Intervention Type
DRUG
Onabot/A intradetrusor injections under cystscopic guidance, with local anaethesia in an outpatient basis
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
IncobotulinumtoxinA 100 UNT Injection [Xeomin]
Incobot/A intradetrusor injections under cystscopic guidance, with local anaethesia in an outpatient basis
Intervention Type
DRUG
OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 UNT [Botox]
Onabot/A intradetrusor injections under cystscopic guidance, with local anaethesia in an outpatient basis
Intervention Type
DRUG
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Incobot/A
Onabot/A
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* patients (males and females) with neurogenic urge urinary incontinence (UUI) (with urgency, increase in day- time and night- time urinary frequency) and with urodynamic diagnosis of DO;
* 18- 80 years;
* women of childbearing age, who use a reliable method of contraception throughout the study period (a pregnancy test must be performed during enrolment in the study);
* spinal cord injury at or below T1, diagnosed at least 6 months before the screening in case of a vesico-sphincter dysfunction due to spinal cord injury;
* EDSS score ≤ 6, in MS patients;
* patients refractory to anticholinergic therapy (≥ 1 anticholinergic agent)
* application of intermittent catheterizations to empty the bladder. In the case of spontaneous micturition, the patients should agree for the use of intermittent catheterizations, in case this will be necessary after treatment with the detrusor injection of botulinumtoxin A.
* 18- 80 years;
* women of childbearing age, who use a reliable method of contraception throughout the study period (a pregnancy test must be performed during enrolment in the study);
* spinal cord injury at or below T1, diagnosed at least 6 months before the screening in case of a vesico-sphincter dysfunction due to spinal cord injury;
* EDSS score ≤ 6, in MS patients;
* patients refractory to anticholinergic therapy (≥ 1 anticholinergic agent)
* application of intermittent catheterizations to empty the bladder. In the case of spontaneous micturition, the patients should agree for the use of intermittent catheterizations, in case this will be necessary after treatment with the detrusor injection of botulinumtoxin A.
Exclusion Criteria
* recurring urinary tract infections (UTIs) (≥ 4 episodes/year);
* spinal cord injuries above T1;
* MS patients: EDSS score ≥ 6;
* patients who won't or can't perform intermittent catheterization;
* pregnancy or breast- feeding, if female patients;
* post- void residual volume (PRV) \> 150 ml, in the case of spontaneous micturition;
* hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients (listed in section 6.1 of RCP);
* generalized diseases of muscular activity (e.g. myasthenia gravis, Lambert-Eaton syndrome);
* presence of infection or inflammation at the injection site;
* patients with acute urinary retention at the time of treatment, not routinely subjected to catheterization;
* men with overactive bladder and signs or symptoms of urinary obstruction should not be treated;
* documented or suspected active malignant neoplasia or previous history, within 2 years prior to screening;
* patients who must or want to continue taking illegal drugs or drugs that may interfere with the proper conduct of the study;
* chronic abuse of alcohol or drugs or any condition that in the opinion of the investigator doctor makes an unreliable subject in correctly completing the study procedures;
* any other clinical condition that would endanger the safety of patients in participating in the study or that could prevent the subjects from adhering to the protocol.
* spinal cord injuries above T1;
* MS patients: EDSS score ≥ 6;
* patients who won't or can't perform intermittent catheterization;
* pregnancy or breast- feeding, if female patients;
* post- void residual volume (PRV) \> 150 ml, in the case of spontaneous micturition;
* hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients (listed in section 6.1 of RCP);
* generalized diseases of muscular activity (e.g. myasthenia gravis, Lambert-Eaton syndrome);
* presence of infection or inflammation at the injection site;
* patients with acute urinary retention at the time of treatment, not routinely subjected to catheterization;
* men with overactive bladder and signs or symptoms of urinary obstruction should not be treated;
* documented or suspected active malignant neoplasia or previous history, within 2 years prior to screening;
* patients who must or want to continue taking illegal drugs or drugs that may interfere with the proper conduct of the study;
* chronic abuse of alcohol or drugs or any condition that in the opinion of the investigator doctor makes an unreliable subject in correctly completing the study procedures;
* any other clinical condition that would endanger the safety of patients in participating in the study or that could prevent the subjects from adhering to the protocol.
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Maximum Eligible Age
80 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Of Perugia
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Antonella Giannantoni
PA
Responsibility Role
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Antonella Giannantoni, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Siena
Emanuele Rubilotta, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Universita di Verona
Matteo Balzarro, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Universita di Verona
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Antonella Giannantoni
Siena, SI, Italy
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Italy
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mohee A, Khan A, Harris N, Eardley I. Long-term outcome of the use of intravesical botulinum toxin for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB). BJU Int. 2013 Jan;111(1):106-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11282.x. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Thuroff JW, Abrams P, Andersson KE, Artibani W, Chapple CR, Drake MJ, Hampel C, Neisius A, Schroder A, Tubaro A. EAU guidelines on urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2011 Mar;59(3):387-400. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.11.021. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
Reference Type
RESULT
Gormley EA, Lightner DJ, Faraday M, Vasavada SP; American Urological Association; Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine. Diagnosis and treatment of overactive bladder (non-neurogenic) in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline amendment. J Urol. 2015 May;193(5):1572-80. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.087. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
Reference Type
RESULT
Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A; Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(2):167-78. doi: 10.1002/nau.10052. No abstract available.
Reference Type
RESULT
Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN; International Urogynecological Association; International Continence Society. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4-20. doi: 10.1002/nau.20798.
Reference Type
RESULT
Lemack GE, Dewey RB Jr, Roehrborn CG, O'Suilleabhain PE, Zimmern PE. Questionnaire-based assessment of bladder dysfunction in patients with mild to moderate Parkinson's disease. Urology. 2000 Aug 1;56(2):250-4. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00641-5.
Reference Type
RESULT
Aharony SM, Lam O, Corcos J. Evaluation of lower urinary tract symptoms in multiple sclerosis patients: Review of the literature and current guidelines. Can Urol Assoc J. 2017 Jan-Feb;11(1-2):61-64. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.4058.
Reference Type
RESULT
Wyndaele JJ. The management of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction after spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Dec;13(12):705-714. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.206. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
Reference Type
RESULT
Campos-Sousa RN, Quagliato E, da Silva BB, de Carvalho RM Jr, Ribeiro SC, de Carvalho DF. Urinary symptoms in Parkinson's disease: prevalence and associated factors. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2003 Jun;61(2B):359-63. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2003000300007. Epub 2003 Jul 28.
Reference Type
RESULT
Kanai A, Andersson KE. Bladder afferent signaling: recent findings. J Urol. 2010 Apr;183(4):1288-95. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.060. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
Reference Type
RESULT
Veenboer PW, Bosch JL. Long-term adherence to antimuscarinic therapy in everyday practice: a systematic review. J Urol. 2014 Apr;191(4):1003-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.10.046. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
Reference Type
RESULT
Di Stasi SM, Giannantoni A, Vespasiani G, Navarra P, Capelli G, Massoud R, Stephen RL. Intravesical electromotive administration of oxybutynin in patients with detrusor hyperreflexia unresponsive to standard anticholinergic regimens. J Urol. 2001 Feb;165(2):491-8. doi: 10.1097/00005392-200102000-00032.
Reference Type
RESULT
Jost WH, Benecke R, Hauschke D, Jankovic J, Kanovsky P, Roggenkamper P, Simpson DM, Comella CL. Clinical and pharmacological properties of incobotulinumtoxinA and its use in neurological disorders. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015 Apr 1;9:1913-26. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S79193. eCollection 2015.
Reference Type
RESULT
Veeratterapillay R, Harding C, Teo L, Vasdev N, Abroaf A, Dorkin TJ, Pickard RS, Hasan T, Thorpe AC. Discontinuation rates and inter-injection interval for repeated intravesical botulinum toxin type A injections for detrusor overactivity. Int J Urol. 2014 Feb;21(2):175-8. doi: 10.1111/iju.12205. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
Reference Type
RESULT
Frevert J. Response to Commentary by W. Jost on: Pharmaceutical, Biological, and Clinical Properties of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A Products. Drugs R D. 2015 Jun;15(2):217-8. doi: 10.1007/s40268-015-0091-y. No abstract available.
Reference Type
RESULT
Benecke R. Clinical relevance of botulinum toxin immunogenicity. BioDrugs. 2012 Apr 1;26(2):e1-9. doi: 10.2165/11599840-000000000-00000.
Reference Type
RESULT
Wang L, Sun Y, Yang W, Lindo P, Singh BR. Type A botulinum neurotoxin complex proteins differentially modulate host response of neuronal cells. Toxicon. 2014 May;82:52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Feb 21.
Reference Type
RESULT
Jost WH, Blumel J, Grafe S. Botulinum neurotoxin type A free of complexing proteins (XEOMIN) in focal dystonia. Drugs. 2007;67(5):669-83. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200767050-00003.
Reference Type
RESULT
Kumar R, Zhou Y, Ghosal K, Cai S, Singh BR. Anti-apoptotic activity of hemagglutinin-33 and botulinum neurotoxin and its implications to therapeutic and countermeasure issues. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012 Jan 13;417(2):726-31. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.12.020. Epub 2011 Dec 11.
Reference Type
RESULT
Campanati A, Giuliodori K, Martina E, Giuliano A, Ganzetti G, Offidani A. Onabotulinumtoxin type A (Botox((R))) versus Incobotulinumtoxin type A (Xeomin((R))) in the treatment of focal idiopathic palmar hyperhidrosis: results of a comparative double-blind clinical trial. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2014 Jan;121(1):21-6. doi: 10.1007/s00702-013-1074-1. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
Reference Type
RESULT
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Inco_Ona
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id