Chlorhexidine-Alcohol Versus Povidone Iodine-Alcohol, Combined or Not With Use of a Bundle of New Devices, for Prevention of Intravascular-catheter Colonization and Catheter Failure
NCT ID: NCT03757143
Last Updated: 2019-10-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
1000 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-01-07
2019-09-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Prevention of these complications is based on the respect of hygiene rules and the use of bio-compatible catheters. The choice of the antiseptic solution for skin disinfection is key. Similarly, the use of new technologies such as catheters designed to minimize blood exposure, zero-reflux needleless-connectors, disinfecting caps, and flushing PVCs before and after each medication administration to maintain catheter patency are of theoretical interest, but little scientific data support their use in routine.
The primary objectives of this study are, first, to demonstrate that skin preparation with 2% chlorhexidine (CHG)-70% isopropanol decreases the risk of PVC colonization compared to skin preparation with 5% povidone iodine (PVI)-69% ethanol. Second, to demonstrate that use of a bundle of technologies including a new PVC, zero-reflux needless-connectors, disinfecting caps, and single-use prefilled flush syringes extends the time between catheter insertion and catheter failure.
The secondary objectives are to compare between the four study group incidence of phlebitis, accidental catheter removal, infiltration, catheter occlusion, CR-BSI, local infection, all-cause bloodstream infections, catheter colonization, duration of catheter remaining in place without complication, length of hospital stay, safety and patient satisfaction.
The CLEAN 3 study is an open-label, single centre, investigator-initiated, randomised, four-parallel group, two-by-two factorial trial. Patients requiring PVC for an expected 48 h will be randomised in one of four groups according to skin disinfection method and type of devices used. Randomization will be carried out through a secure web-based randomization system. Inclusions are expected to begin in January 2019 and continue until July 2019, once the number of catheters required has been reached.
Patients will be enrolled at the Emergency department of the Poitiers University Hospital before being hospitalised in one of five wards (neurology, neurology, pneumology, internal medicine and downstream emergency unit).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Alcoholic Chlorhexidine Compared to Povidone Iodine to Limit Perineural Catheter Colonisation
NCT02950246
Randomized Trial of 2% Chlorhexidine-70% Isopropanol vs 5% Povidone Iodine-69% Ethanol for Skin Antisepsis in Reducing Surgical-site Infection After Cardiac Surgery
NCT03560193
Chlorhexidine vs Povidone Iodine in Alcoholic Solutions for Prevention of Central Venous Catheter Infection
NCT00259350
Novel Antimicrobial Dressing in Peripheral Intravenous Catheters (PIVCs)
NCT05741866
Estimation of the Incidence of Colonization of Peripheral Venous Catheters After Skin Disinfection With 0.5% Sodium Hypochlorite, Preceded or Not by an Application of 70% Ethanol
NCT04391660
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PVI et Insyte
Groupe A: (1) 5% (w/v) PVI-69% (v/v) ethanol (Bétadine alcoolique™, MEDA Pharma SAS); (2) InsyteTM AutoguardTM BC Winged, BD
Povidone-Iodine-Alcohol
Povidone-Iodine-Alcohol will be used to disinfect the skin
Insyte Autoguard BC Winged
Pose of Insyte Autoguard BC Winged
CHG et Insyte
Groupe B: (1) 2% (w/v) CHG-70% (v/v) isopropanol (ChloraPrep™, CareFusion); (2) InsyteTM AutoguardTM BC Winged, BD
Chlorhexidine-Alcohol
Chlorhexidine-Alcohol will be used to disinfect the skin
Insyte Autoguard BC Winged
Pose of Insyte Autoguard BC Winged
PVI et Nexiva
Groupe C: (1) 5% (w/v) PVI-69% (v/v) ethanol (Bétadine alcoolique™, MEDA Pharma SAS); (2) NexivaTM single port catheter, MaxZeroTM needleless connector, , PureHub™ Desinfecting Caps, PosiflushTM prefilled saline syringes, all from BD
Povidone-Iodine-Alcohol
Povidone-Iodine-Alcohol will be used to disinfect the skin
Nexiva single port catheter, MaxZero needless connector, PureHub Deinfecting Caps and Posiflush prefilled saline syringes
Pose of Nexiva single port catheter
CHG et Nexiva
Groupe D: (1) 2% (w/v) CHG-70% (v/v) isopropanol (ChloraPrep™, CareFusion); (2) NexivaTM single port catheter, MaxZeroTM needleless connector, PureHub™ Desinfecting Caps, PosiflushTM prefilled saline syringes, all from BD
Chlorhexidine-Alcohol
Chlorhexidine-Alcohol will be used to disinfect the skin
Nexiva single port catheter, MaxZero needless connector, PureHub Deinfecting Caps and Posiflush prefilled saline syringes
Pose of Nexiva single port catheter
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Povidone-Iodine-Alcohol
Povidone-Iodine-Alcohol will be used to disinfect the skin
Chlorhexidine-Alcohol
Chlorhexidine-Alcohol will be used to disinfect the skin
Insyte Autoguard BC Winged
Pose of Insyte Autoguard BC Winged
Nexiva single port catheter, MaxZero needless connector, PureHub Deinfecting Caps and Posiflush prefilled saline syringes
Pose of Nexiva single port catheter
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Having clinical indication for placement of a single PVC for at least 48 hours (no minimum port access during the study duration),
* Willing and able to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Participation to another clinical trial aimed at reducing PVC complications,
* Suspicion of bloodstream infection at catheter insertion,
* Skin injury a catheter insertion site increasing the risk of catheter infection,
* PVC inserted extremely urgently, making it impossible to comply with the protocol,
* Intravascular catheter in place within the last 2 days, or within the last 2 weeks and with local signs of catheter complication,
* Difficult catheter insertion suspected (obesity, known IV drug users, non-visible venous network after placement of a tourniquet...),
* Patients already enrolled in this study,
* Terminal or moribund patient not expected to live more than one week,
* Patients not benefiting from a Social Security scheme or not benefiting from it through a third party,
* Persons benefiting from enhanced protection, namely minors, persons deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, adults under legal protection.
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women
* Women at age to procreate and not using effective contraception
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Poitiers University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital of Poitiers
Poitiers, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Maunoury F, Drugeon B, Boisson M, Marjanovic N, Couvreur R, Mimoz O, Guenezan J; CLEAN-3 Study. Cost-effectiveness analysis of bundled innovative devices versus standard approach in the prevention of unscheduled peripheral venous catheters removal due to complications in France. PLoS One. 2022 Jun 14;17(6):e0269750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269750. eCollection 2022.
Guenezan J, Marjanovic N, Drugeon B, Neill RO, Liuu E, Roblot F, Palazzo P, Bironneau V, Prevost F, Paul J, Pichon M, Boisson M, Frasca D, Mimoz O; CLEAN-3 trial investigators. Chlorhexidine plus alcohol versus povidone iodine plus alcohol, combined or not with innovative devices, for prevention of short-term peripheral venous catheter infection and failure (CLEAN 3 study): an investigator-initiated, open-label, single centre, randomised-controlled, two-by-two factorial trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;21(7):1038-1048. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30738-6. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
Guenezan J, Drugeon B, O'Neill R, Caillaud D, Senamaud C, Pouzet C, Seguin S, Frasca D, Mimoz O. Skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone iodine-alcohol, combined or not with use of a bundle of new devices, for prevention of short-term peripheral venous catheter-related infectious complications and catheter failure: an open-label, single-centre, randomised, four-parallel group, two-by-two factorial trial: CLEAN 3 protocol study. BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 2;9(4):e028549. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028549.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CLEAN3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.