Trial Outcomes & Findings for Flexible Intubation Scope With or Without Video Laryngoscope in Supporting Endotracheal Tube Placement in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Before Surgery (NCT NCT03757091)
NCT ID: NCT03757091
Last Updated: 2026-01-22
Results Overview
Defined as the number of participants with any of the following during initial intubation attempt.1 Intubation time exceeding 60 seconds, 2. Failure to intubate on the first attempt, 3. Provider assessment of intubation as difficult or unsuccessful.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
143 participants
intubation time, up to 3 minutes
2026-01-22
Participant Flow
The Main OR procedure daily schedule will be used for patient selection. Once eligibility of a study candidate has been identified, the study coordinator will be informed to start the patient interview and obtain written informed consent.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Flexible Intubation Scope (FIS)
control group will utilize FIS (flexible intubation scope)
|
Flexible Intubation Scope + Video Laryngoscope (FIS+VL)
treatment group will utilize FIS+VL (flexible intubation scope + video laryngoscope)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
69
|
66
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
64
|
58
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
8
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Flexible Intubation Scope (FIS)
n=69 Participants
control group will utilize FIS (flexible intubation scope)
|
Flexible Intubation Scope + Video Laryngoscope (FIS+VL)
n=66 Participants
treatment group will utilize FIS+VL (flexible intubation scope + video laryngoscope)
|
Total
n=135 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=69 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=66 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=135 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
36 Participants
n=69 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=66 Participants
|
77 Participants
n=135 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
33 Participants
n=69 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=66 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=135 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
63.20 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.84 • n=69 Participants
|
59.26 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.97 • n=66 Participants
|
61.23 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.905 • n=135 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
30 Participants
n=69 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=66 Participants
|
57 Participants
n=135 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
39 Participants
n=69 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=66 Participants
|
78 Participants
n=135 Participants
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
69 participants
n=69 Participants
|
66 participants
n=66 Participants
|
135 participants
n=135 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: intubation time, up to 3 minutesDefined as the number of participants with any of the following during initial intubation attempt.1 Intubation time exceeding 60 seconds, 2. Failure to intubate on the first attempt, 3. Provider assessment of intubation as difficult or unsuccessful.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Flexible Intubation Scope + Video Laryngoscope (FIS+VL)
n=63 Participants
treatment group will utilize FIS+VL (flexible intubation scope + video laryngoscope)
|
Flexible Intubation Scope (FIS)
n=67 Participants
control group will utilize FIS (flexible intubation scope)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Difficult Endotracheal Tube (ETT) Placement
Yes
|
29 Participants
|
40 Participants
|
|
Difficult Endotracheal Tube (ETT) Placement
No
|
34 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: time captured when FIS passed the lips to CO2 confirmationTime from induction to successful intubation
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Flexible Intubation Scope + Video Laryngoscope (FIS+VL)
n=58 Participants
treatment group will utilize FIS+VL (flexible intubation scope + video laryngoscope)
|
Flexible Intubation Scope (FIS)
n=64 Participants
control group will utilize FIS (flexible intubation scope)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Intubation Time
|
50.92 seconds
Interval 44.04 to 57.8
|
58.37 seconds
Interval 51.44 to 65.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: intubation time, up to 3 minutesNumber of Intubation Attempts
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Flexible Intubation Scope + Video Laryngoscope (FIS+VL)
n=58 Participants
treatment group will utilize FIS+VL (flexible intubation scope + video laryngoscope)
|
Flexible Intubation Scope (FIS)
n=64 Participants
control group will utilize FIS (flexible intubation scope)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Intubation Attempts
1
|
54 Participants
|
50 Participants
|
|
Number of Intubation Attempts
2 or more
|
4 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: during intubation process/attemptFailed Airway Rate
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Flexible Intubation Scope + Video Laryngoscope (FIS+VL)
n=58 Participants
treatment group will utilize FIS+VL (flexible intubation scope + video laryngoscope)
|
Flexible Intubation Scope (FIS)
n=64 Participants
control group will utilize FIS (flexible intubation scope)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of Failure at Intubation
|
1.72 percentage of participants
Interval 0.42 to 11.91
|
7.81 percentage of participants
Interval 7.76 to 26.86
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: duration of intubation attemptThe number of people who had 1= extremely easy, 2=somewhat easy, 3=resistance, 4= difficult, 5= unsuccessful (for both groups)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Flexible Intubation Scope + Video Laryngoscope (FIS+VL)
n=64 Participants
treatment group will utilize FIS+VL (flexible intubation scope + video laryngoscope)
|
Flexible Intubation Scope (FIS)
n=67 Participants
control group will utilize FIS (flexible intubation scope)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Ease of Intubation (Provider Assessment)
1= extremely easy
|
40 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
|
Ease of Intubation (Provider Assessment)
2=somewhat easy
|
14 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Ease of Intubation (Provider Assessment)
3=resistance
|
6 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Ease of Intubation (Provider Assessment)
4= difficult
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Ease of Intubation (Provider Assessment)
5= unsuccessful
|
2 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Flexible Intubation Scope (FIS)
Flexible Intubation Scope + Video Laryngoscope (FIS+VL)
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Carin Hagberg
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place