Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
2871 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-04-01
2022-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim 1: Assess the effect of hepatocellular carcinoma screening on a) physical harms due to follow-up tests, b) financial harms, and c) overdiagnosis in patients with severe liver dysfunction or comorbid illness, through electronic medical record data, manual chart review, and validated survey measures.
Aim 2: Assess the effect of hepatocellular carcinoma screening on screening-related psychosocial harms, e.g. cancer-specific worry, situational anxiety, mood disturbances, and decisional regret, through longitudinal validated measures and qualitative interviews.
Aim 3: Create and disseminate a balance sheet of benefits and harms to inform patients, providers, healthcare organizations, payers, and policymakers about the value of hepatocellular carcinoma screening in patients with cirrhosis.
Over a 4-year period, electronic medical record data will be used to compare screening-related physical and financial harms between patients undergoing and those not undergoing hepatocellular carcinoma screening. Psychosocial harms, as ascertained through longitudinal measurement of validated survey instruments and qualitative interviews, will be compared between patients with positive or indeterminate screening results and those with negative results or without any screening. Mixed-effect regression analysis will be used to determine if screening harms differed by factors at multiple levels including patient (e.g. degree of liver dysfunction), provider (e.g. subspecialty training), and healthcare organization (e.g. access to liver transplantation). This study will seamlessly complement data from the parent randomized controlled trial. By immediately translating these high quality data about hepatocellular carcinoma screening benefits and harms into a balance sheet, the investigators will facilitate patient-provider discussions, inform payer decisions about reimbursement, and guide policy decisions. These data are also crucial to identify modifiable and high-yield intervention targets and strategies to reduce hepatocellular carcinoma screening harms in the future.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cohort
This study will collect prospective longitudinal data to characterize rates and identify correlates of a) physical harms due to follow-up tests, b) financial harms, and c) inappropriate screening using electronic medical record data and manual chart review. The study will also use surveys and semi-structured interviews to characterize rates and identify correlates of screening-related psychological harms, e.g. cancer specific worry, situational anxiety, mood disturbances, and decisional regret. Lastly, investigators will create and disseminate a balance sheet of benefits and harms to inform patients, providers, healthcare organizations, payers, and policymakers about the role of hepatocellular carcinoma screening in patients with cirrhosis.
Prospective Longitudinal Data
We will prospectively follow the cohort using electronic medical record to document the hepatocellular carcinoma screening process and characterize physical and financial harms related to positive or indeterminate screening results and burden of inappropriate screening. Patients are anticipated to undergo hepatocellular carcinoma screening every 6-12 months, so each patient will have \~4-8 screening encounters over the study duration. We will use manual chart review to determine intent of ultrasound exams (screening vs. diagnostic) and test results. Receipt of follow-up tests after positive or indeterminate screening results will be identified through electronic medical record extraction using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for CT, MRI, and biopsy.
Surveys and Semi-structured Interviews
We will use surveys and semi-structured interviews to characterize psychological harms after positive or indeterminate screening tests. Patient surveys will include patient-reported scales to measure psychosocial factors at three times points: baseline, 1 month after screening result, and 4 months after screening result. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted via telephone to explore patient attitudes toward risk perception, test follow-up, competing demands, and "downstream harms", particularly financial issues (e.g., out-of-pocket costs, access to insurance, and juggling hepatocellular carcinoma screening process completion with competing demands-work and family).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Prospective Longitudinal Data
We will prospectively follow the cohort using electronic medical record to document the hepatocellular carcinoma screening process and characterize physical and financial harms related to positive or indeterminate screening results and burden of inappropriate screening. Patients are anticipated to undergo hepatocellular carcinoma screening every 6-12 months, so each patient will have \~4-8 screening encounters over the study duration. We will use manual chart review to determine intent of ultrasound exams (screening vs. diagnostic) and test results. Receipt of follow-up tests after positive or indeterminate screening results will be identified through electronic medical record extraction using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for CT, MRI, and biopsy.
Surveys and Semi-structured Interviews
We will use surveys and semi-structured interviews to characterize psychological harms after positive or indeterminate screening tests. Patient surveys will include patient-reported scales to measure psychosocial factors at three times points: baseline, 1 month after screening result, and 4 months after screening result. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted via telephone to explore patient attitudes toward risk perception, test follow-up, competing demands, and "downstream harms", particularly financial issues (e.g., out-of-pocket costs, access to insurance, and juggling hepatocellular carcinoma screening process completion with competing demands-work and family).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Cirrhosis
* Outpatient visit in year prior to randomization
* English or Spanish speaking
Exclusion Criteria
* History of liver transplantation
* Child Pugh C cirrhosis
* Significant comorbid conditions with life expectancy \< 1 year, (e.g., extrahepatic malignancy)
21 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Parkland Health and Hospital System
OTHER
Baylor College of Medicine
OTHER
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center
FED
Kaiser Permanente
OTHER
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Amit Singal
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Amit Singal, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Singal AG, Daher D, Narasimman M, Yekkaluri S, Liu Y, Cerda V, Banala C, Khan A, Lee M, Seif El Dahan K, Murphy CC, Kramer JR, Hernaez R. Benefits and harms of hepatocellular carcinoma screening outreach in patients with cirrhosis: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025 Feb 1;117(2):262-269. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae228.
Singal AG, Reddy S, Radadiya Aka Patel H, Villarreal D, Khan A, Liu Y, Cerda V, Rich NE, Murphy CC, Tiro JA, Kramer JR, Hernaez R. Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of a Mailed Outreach Strategy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Dec;20(12):2818-2825.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.12.014. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STU 102016-012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id