Treatment of Restless Legs Syndrome With the Hypocretin Antagonist Suvorexant
NCT ID: NCT03755310
Last Updated: 2018-11-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
43 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-02-28
2020-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
However, no data exist on its effects in RLS, so far. The investigators consider that suvorexant might provide a stable therapeutic efficacy for the long treatment, avoiding the risk of augmentation of symptoms commonly seen under dopamine agonists.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Rotigotine Effect on All-day Functioning and Quality of Life in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS)
NCT01569464
A Clinical Research Study Evaluating Ropinirole Treatment For Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS)
NCT00225862
Ropinirole XR (Extended Release) In Patients With Restless Legs Syndrome
NCT00197080
Effect of Ropinirole on Spinal Cord Reflexes and Restless Legs Syndrome
NCT00051961
Clinical Evaluation of Ropinirole CR-RLS ( SK&F101468)Tablets in Restless Legs Syndrome
NCT00530790
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Over the last years, dopamine agonists (DAs) have been widely used for RLS/WED. However, there is growing concern about the long-term consequences of DAs, such as dopaminergic augmentation. This complication consists of an overall increase in symptom severity, with symptoms starting earlier in the afternoon and expanding to previously unaffected parts of the body. If not stopped, augmentation can develop into a serious complication, as it will eventually progress and can lead to discontinuation of treatment. Existing studies show that after a treatment period of approximately 10 years, which is the amount of time that has elapsed since the first DA agonists were approved, the prevalence of augmentation nears 50%. But since RLS is a chronic disease in many patients, it is likely that with longer treatment times the risk of augmentation will increase even further. In light of this, there is a clinical need for treatment alternatives to dopaminergic drugs. Furthermore, a recent consensus paper by three RLS expert organizations recommends treatment begin with drugs other than dopaminergic agonists.
The pathophysiology of RLS/WED is not yet clear, but a number of findings link it to iron metabolism and to a mild dopaminergic dysfunction. Furthermore, it is not even clear whether the dopaminergic dysfunction plays a causal role at all, a fact that adds additional concerns about the use of dopaminergics. Drugs with non-dopaminergic mechanisms of action that have shown therapeutic efficacy for RLS/WED are alpha-2 delta ligands (pregabalin, gabapentin), opiates, benzodiazepines or clonidine. The only common mechanism through which these different agents might improve RLS symptoms is probably reduction of arousal. In fact, RLS even when moderate profoundly disturbs sleep, reducing sleep times to 5-6 hours or less. Patients report some daytime problems with alertness and cognitive clarity, but despite this reduction in sleep times untreated patients do not describe such profound episodes of sleepiness that occur for normal subjects maintained on such restricted sleep schedules. There is apparently some alerting mechanism partially compensating for the sleep loss. Such-hyperarousal-resembles the one found in Primary Insomnia. Indeed, RLS patients treated with dopaminergics over long periods frequently exhibit poor sleep despite the improvement of sensory and motor symptoms.
Increased glutamatergic activity has been discussed as one of the potential mechanisms leading to increased arousal in RLS. However, it is possible that the hypocretin system may also play a role in causing RLS-related hyperarousal. Hypocretins are well known to play a key role in the central regulation of both motor control and arousal. Two main studies have examined hypocretin levels in RLS patients. A first small study found increased evening hypocretin-1 levels in previously untreated patients with early onset RLS when compared to controls, but not in those treated. However, Stiasny-Kolster et al. were not able to replicate this finding, although the difference between both studies could be related to the treatment status and to the use of different extraction methods of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). No evidence exists so far in the literature regarding the effect of hypocretin antagonist drugs in the treatment of RLS-related sensory and motor symptoms. However, unpublished data have shown non-significant improvements of periodic limb movements (PLMs) during treatment with almorexant.
This study hypothesizes that treatment of RLS symptoms with the hypocretin antagonist suvorexant might lead to an improvement of sleep as well as to an improvement of both dysesthesias and motor symptoms (PLMs).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Suvorexant
10mg tabs during the first week, 10-20 mg tabs on the second week.
Suvorexant
First week: 10 mg tabs; Second week: 10-20 mg tabs
Placebo
Equivalent dosage, route of administration and dose regimen.
Placebo
Equivalent dosage, route of administration and dose regimen
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Suvorexant
First week: 10 mg tabs; Second week: 10-20 mg tabs
Placebo
Equivalent dosage, route of administration and dose regimen
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* A history (if currently controlled on medication) or the presence of RLS symptoms causing insomnia/ sleep disturbance on 3 or more days per week for at least 12 months.
* Both treatment-naïve and treated patients without a sufficient response will be included. In both of these groups, the IRLS score ≥20 at the screening assessment (for the latter group, measured under current treatment), with an absence of significant RLS symptoms before 9PM (measured by diary)
* Aged 18 - 80 years.
* PSG at baseline containing:
* WASO≥ 60 minutes
* PLMAI of ≥ 15
* TST\<6.6hours
* Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at screen and must agree not to become pregnant.
* Prior to any study-specific procedures, a personally signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the patient has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the trial.
Exclusion Criteria
* History or current diagnosis of other clinically relevant diseases that may confound assessments or RLS symptoms.
* Serum ferritin \<18 mcg/ml
* If the patient is currently being treated with drugs likely to influence sleep architecture or motor manifestations during sleep (such as neuroleptics, L-dopa, dopamine agonists, hypnotics, sedatives, antidepressants, anxiolytics, anticonvulsants, psychostimulant medications, steroids, barbiturates and opiates), a wash-out period of at least \> 5 half-lives will be undertaken.
* Employed in shift work (for example, employment hours disruptive to the normal circadian sleep-wake cycle such as nighttime or variable rotating shifts) or irregular sleep-wake schedules.
* Patients who require prescription medication for concurrent conditions which could interfere with efficacy assessments such as dopamine antagonists, serotonin reuptake inhibitors or antihistamines.
* Surgery within 180 days of baseline visit, which in the opinion of the investigator would negatively impact the patient's participation in the study.
* A significant medical or psychiatric disorder.
* Any other clinically significant condition or laboratory assay abnormality, which would interfere with the patient's ability to participate in the study.
* Other severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory assay abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation or study drug administration or may interfere with the interpretation of study results and would make the patient inappropriate for entry into this study.
* Pregnancy and breastfeeding.
* Any disorders for which suvorexant is contraindicated, such as: narcolepsy, COPD, sleep apnea, depression, suicidal thoughts, severe hepatic illness.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sleep Research Institute (Paseo de la Habana 151, Madrid 28036, SPAIN)
UNKNOWN
Diego García-Borreguero, MD, PhD
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Diego García-Borreguero, MD, PhD
Sleep Research Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sleep Research Institute; Paseo de la Habana 151
Madrid, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Diego García-Berreguero
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
1. Sleep Med 2014;15(8):860-73. 2. Sleep Med. 2013;14(7):675-84. 3. Sleep Med 2012;13:1280-5. 4. Sleep Med 2011;12:440-4. 5. Sleep Med 2015;16(10):1252-8. 6. Sleep Med. 2016;21:1-11. 7. Sleep Med Clin 2015;10:207-14, xi. 8. Sleep Med. 2009;10(1):134-8. 9. Neurology. 2013;80(22):2028-34 10. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015;49:43-54. 11. Peptides. 2014;52:29-37. 12. Curr Biol. 2013;23(18):1719-25. 13. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013;23(5):752-9. 14. Neurosci Bull. 2013;29(3):355-65. 15. Neurology. 2002;59(4):639-
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IISP-57325
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.