Comparison of Procedural Sedation With Propofol and Dexmedetomidine During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

NCT ID: NCT03747432

Last Updated: 2023-05-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-15

Study Completion Date

2021-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Aortic valve stenosis is the most common valvular heart disease in the developed world, affecting 3,9% of population over 70 years of age. If untreated it carries a poor prognosis, leading to heart failure and death in 2 years after first symptom presentation. Treatment of choice for severe aortic stenosis is surgical aortic valve replacement. A new treatment option for severe aortic stenosis emerged in the last decade - Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). This minimally invasive method was formerly reserved for high risk patients deemed unfit for surgical aortic valve replacement. Increasing use throughout the developed world and recent studies have established TAVR as a safe and viable treatment option also for intermediate-risk patients. TAVR not only enables a less aggressive surgical approach, but also a less invasive type of anaesthesia. Anaesthesiologists are trying to modify the type of anaesthesia in the way of minimally invasive approach, aiming to improve the overall outcome.

TAVR can be performed under general anaesthesia or procedural sedation (PS). From the start, TAVR was performed solely under general anaesthesia. Over time the procedure became routine and the anaesthesiologists started to commonly decide for PS. Many US and European retrospective studies have established PS to be a safe and compelling method of anaesthetic care for TAVR procedures with a favorable perioperative course, less complications, shorter intensive care unit and in-hospital stay and lower early mortality, when performed by an experienced anaesthesia team. There are many anaesthesia agents currently accepted for PS in everyday anaesthesia practice. Presently, reliable data from studies comparing different agents for PS for TAVR procedures is scarce. Most of it comes from retrospective nonrandomized trials. Propofol is a popular anaesthetic agent for PS. According to current studies, it is a safe anaesthetic agent with favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles with quite low incidence of side effects. In recent years, dexmedetomidine has been commonly used for PS having analgesic properties inclusive of its anaesthetic properties. In addition, dexmedetomidine is associated with a lesser degree of respiratory depression as to other anaesthetic agents. Patient comfort is also believed to be improved with dexmedetomidine. Studies comparing outcomes of PS with propofol versus dexmedetomidine for different non-cardiac and interventional procedures showed benefits of dexmedetomidine, owing to its analgesic properties and preferable respiratory parameters.

The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of patients undergoing TAVR under PS with dexmedetomidine against those undergoing TAVR under PS with propofol. With the results the investigators aim to aid in defining the optimal anaesthetic agent for PS for TAVR and possibly other interventional cardiology procedures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Procedural Sedation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Propofol

Procedural sedation with propofol during the TAVR procedure (anticipated around 2 hours), dosage: 0,5-2,5 mg/kg/h for appropriate level of sedation - Ramsay sedation score 3-4)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

Procedural sedation during TAVR procedure using propofol

Dexmedetomidine

Procedural sedation with dexmedetomidine during the TAVR procedure (anticipated around 2 hours), dosage: bolus of 0,5 mcg/kg during 10 minutes, then continuous infusion of 0,2-1 mcg/kg/h for appropriate level of sedation - Ramsay sedation score 3-4)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dexmedetomidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Procedural sedation during TAVR procedure using dexmedetomidine

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Propofol

Procedural sedation during TAVR procedure using propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexmedetomidine

Procedural sedation during TAVR procedure using dexmedetomidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Admission to University Medical Centre Ljubljana cardiology ward for TAVR using transfemoral approach
* Voluntary agreement to participate in the study
* Aged over 18 years

Exclusion Criteria

* Disagreement to participate in the study
* Unable to voluntarily agree to participate in the study
* Unable to participate in Mini-Mental State Examination
* History of alcohol abuse
* Diagnosed progressive dementia
* History of cerebrovascular insult
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Medical Centre Ljubljana

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Pia Vovk

Doctor of Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UMC Ljubljana

Ljubljana, , Slovenia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Slovenia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UMCLJTAVR

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.