Comparison of Procedural Sedation With Propofol and Dexmedetomidine During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
NCT ID: NCT03747432
Last Updated: 2023-05-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-01-15
2021-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
TAVR can be performed under general anaesthesia or procedural sedation (PS). From the start, TAVR was performed solely under general anaesthesia. Over time the procedure became routine and the anaesthesiologists started to commonly decide for PS. Many US and European retrospective studies have established PS to be a safe and compelling method of anaesthetic care for TAVR procedures with a favorable perioperative course, less complications, shorter intensive care unit and in-hospital stay and lower early mortality, when performed by an experienced anaesthesia team. There are many anaesthesia agents currently accepted for PS in everyday anaesthesia practice. Presently, reliable data from studies comparing different agents for PS for TAVR procedures is scarce. Most of it comes from retrospective nonrandomized trials. Propofol is a popular anaesthetic agent for PS. According to current studies, it is a safe anaesthetic agent with favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles with quite low incidence of side effects. In recent years, dexmedetomidine has been commonly used for PS having analgesic properties inclusive of its anaesthetic properties. In addition, dexmedetomidine is associated with a lesser degree of respiratory depression as to other anaesthetic agents. Patient comfort is also believed to be improved with dexmedetomidine. Studies comparing outcomes of PS with propofol versus dexmedetomidine for different non-cardiac and interventional procedures showed benefits of dexmedetomidine, owing to its analgesic properties and preferable respiratory parameters.
The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of patients undergoing TAVR under PS with dexmedetomidine against those undergoing TAVR under PS with propofol. With the results the investigators aim to aid in defining the optimal anaesthetic agent for PS for TAVR and possibly other interventional cardiology procedures.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact of Anesthesia Technique on Post-operative Delirium After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
NCT03323619
Sedation or General Anesthesia During TAVR
NCT04347603
Periprocedural Continuation Versus Interruption of Oral Anticoagulant Drugs During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (POPular PAUSE TAVI)
NCT04437303
Effect of TF-TAVR on Emotional Status, Quality of Life, Frailty and Inflammation
NCT03308435
Hypnosis Versus SIVOC by Remifentanil During TAVI Procedures : Iloact on Peripoperative Confusion
NCT03974269
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Propofol
Procedural sedation with propofol during the TAVR procedure (anticipated around 2 hours), dosage: 0,5-2,5 mg/kg/h for appropriate level of sedation - Ramsay sedation score 3-4)
Propofol
Procedural sedation during TAVR procedure using propofol
Dexmedetomidine
Procedural sedation with dexmedetomidine during the TAVR procedure (anticipated around 2 hours), dosage: bolus of 0,5 mcg/kg during 10 minutes, then continuous infusion of 0,2-1 mcg/kg/h for appropriate level of sedation - Ramsay sedation score 3-4)
Dexmedetomidine
Procedural sedation during TAVR procedure using dexmedetomidine
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Propofol
Procedural sedation during TAVR procedure using propofol
Dexmedetomidine
Procedural sedation during TAVR procedure using dexmedetomidine
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Voluntary agreement to participate in the study
* Aged over 18 years
Exclusion Criteria
* Unable to voluntarily agree to participate in the study
* Unable to participate in Mini-Mental State Examination
* History of alcohol abuse
* Diagnosed progressive dementia
* History of cerebrovascular insult
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Medical Centre Ljubljana
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Pia Vovk
Doctor of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UMC Ljubljana
Ljubljana, , Slovenia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UMCLJTAVR
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.