Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-12-19
2021-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
As a separate exploratory study, the follow-up of the cohort planned will also be used to investigate the effects that the development of the gastrointestinal microbiome, and any perturbations in the microbiome caused by antibiotic use, have on immune development and vaccine immunogenicity over the first 10 months of life.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Case-control Study of the Efficacy of a New Serogroup A Meningococcal Conjugate Vaccine (MenAfriVac) in Mali and Niger
NCT01303211
Study on the Impact of Vaccination With a Conjugate Vaccine on Meningococcal Carriage
NCT01119482
Immunogenicity and Safety of Meningococcal Vaccine GSK134612 Given as 1 or 2 Doses to Healthy 9-12 Months Old Toddlers.
NCT00471081
Safety and Immunogenicity Evaluation After One or Two Doses of Novartis Meningococcal ACWY Conjugate Vaccine in Healthy Infants and Toddlers
NCT00667602
Study of a Quadrivalent Meningococcal Conjugate Vaccine (MenACYW Conjugate Vaccine) Given With Routine Pediatric Vaccines in Healthy Infants and Toddlers in India and the Republic of South Africa
NCT05794230
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
An important limitation of such a regimen is that infants are left without direct protection against Men A infection up to the age of at least nine months. While not classically considered to be a disease of early infancy, the incidence of invasive Men A infection is as high or higher in this age group as compared to the incidence in older children and the case fatality rate is also at its peak under the age of one. Recent mass vaccination campaigns rapidly achieved exceptionally high levels of coverage across the entire one to 29 year old adult population and have resulted in herd protection and reduced level of invasive disease in those under one year of age. However, such levels of herd protection cannot be assumed following routine scheduling at nine months of age and thus alternative strategies both to protect the infant up to nine months of age and also to boost herd protection in the population warrant exploration.
Maternal immunization represents a potentially attractive option with both regards. The safety of the vaccine when administered in pregnancy has been assessed through comparing the rate of safety events in 1730 expectant mothers immunized during campaigns in the Navrongo region of Ghana, and their subsequent born infants with the rates in the women who did not receive the vaccine during the same campaign (n=919) and those vaccinated the previous year (n=3551). No evidence of any safety concerns were reported. These data support current WHO technical guidance which considers it safe to include pregnant and lactating women within mass vaccination campaigns. Although the safety profile is reassuring, there are currently no data on the immunogenicity of MenAfriVac in pregnancy or on the transplacental transfer of Men A specific antibodies to subsequent borne infants. In addition, the comparability of the tetanus toxoid specific seroprotection provided to the newborn through the tetanus toxoid carrier protein and through the standard tetanus toxoid antenatal booster needs to be established.
Within the Protecting from Pneumococcus in Early Life (PROPEL) trial (NCT02628886) trial a group of 200 expectant mothers were randomized into the control group and received tetanus toxoid (and a 0.9% sodium chloride injection to maintain blinding) at 28 to 34 weeks gestation. This group will serve as a control group for the MenAfriVac vaccinated mothers who will be recruited here using an otherwise identical protocol. Those mothers confirmed to be eligible (n = 100) will receive a dose of MenAfriVac at 28 to 34 weeks of gestation and will subsequently followed up using the same approach as undertaken in the PROPEL trial. Their subsequent born infants will also be followed until nine months of age in the same way. Maternal and cord blood samples will be collected at delivery with peripheral infant samples being obtained at delivery, 8 and 20 weeks and at 9 months plus 9 months 4 weeks. The meningococcal serogroup A and tetanus toxoid specific seroprotection in the infants of mothers vaccinated with MenAfriVac will be compared to the seroprotection in those mothers in the control group for the main randomized trial who will only have received tetanus toxoid in pregnancy. All safety procedures will be undertaken in the same way for comparability.
Most mothers in the study will have been immunized in the national MenAfriVac campaign in the Gambia in Nov/Dec 2013, so the controls will not be naïve, and the MenAfriVac arm will be receiving a second dose of the vaccine. This reflects the likely situation were maternal immunization to be recommended in the future. Information on prior immunization history will be collected and assessed within the statistical analysis.
Exploratory nested study:
The study provides an opportunity to monitor the development of the intestinal microbiome from birth to 10 months of age and to assess the effects that any antibiotics, administered in early life for clinical indication, have on this development. Furthermore, to study the downstream effects of distinct microbial profiles on baseline and post-vaccination transcriptomic and metabolomic profiles and immune cell phenotypes, and on the serological responses to vaccination.
The gastrointestinal microbiome is at its most dynamic in early life from the point of first colonization at birth. It is also the period during which parenteral empirical antibiotics are most likely to be administered given the difficulty in excluding invasive bacterial diseases at this age. Thus, early infancy provides the best possible opportunity to study the effects of the microbiome, including of any disruption in the microbiome driven by antibiotic therapy, on baseline (unstimulated) and post-vaccination transcriptomic and metabolomic profiles, immune cell phenotypes and serological response to vaccination.
This component of the study is observational and exploratory. All 100 infants will be administered the routine vaccines in the national schedule due at the time points they are routinely given. Associations between the development of the microbiome with transcriptional and metabolomics signatures, cellular and serological responses to vaccination will be made within group.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
meningococcal serogroup A conjugate
mothers will be vaccinated with meningococcal serogroup A conjugate vaccine between 28 - 34 weeks gestation
meningococcal serogroup A conjugate vaccine
Once final eligibility has been confirmed by a study clinician on the day, expectant mothers will be administered a single intramuscular dose of MenAfriVac™.
control
serological samples from 100 control mother-infant pairs already recruited as part of the PROPEL trial, (SCC1433), NCT02628886
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
meningococcal serogroup A conjugate vaccine
Once final eligibility has been confirmed by a study clinician on the day, expectant mothers will be administered a single intramuscular dose of MenAfriVac™.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Pregnant woman aged between 18 and 40 years of age inclusive\* (note that those over 33 years of age would not be expected to have been vaccinated in the national MenAfriVac™ campaign targeting 1 to 29 years olds in Nov/Dec 2013)7
* Singleton pregnancy\*
* From 28 to 34 weeks gestation as determined by ultrasound scan
* Resident within easy reach of the clinical trial site (no fixed boundaries will be set, and such judgements will be made on a case by case basis by members of the field team in discussion with the potential participant, taking into account knowledge of the local transport links and geography) \*
* Intention to deliver at the health centre related to the clinical trial site (i.e. Faji Kunda health centres) \*
* Willingness and capacity to comply with all the study procedures, including those relating to the newborn infant, in the opinion of the principal investigator or delegee
Exclusion Criteria
* History of gestational diabetes\*
* Rhesus negative multigravida who did not receive anti-D in previous pregnancies
* Five or more previous pregnancies (grand-multigravida)
* Previous late stillbirth (defined as loss of pregnancy at any time after 28 weeks gestation) \*
* Previous premature delivery (defined as delivery before 37 weeks gestation) \*
• Previous neonatal death (defined as death of an infant within the first 28 days of life) \*
* Previous Caesarean section\*
* Previous delivery of an infant with major congenital anomalies (see Table 7 for definition) \*
* Previous delivery of an infant with a known or suspected genetic9 or chromosomal abnormality\*
* History of other significant pregnancy related complications judged likely to affect the safety of the mother or infant or to significantly compromise the endpoint data collected\*
* History of other significant neonatal complications judged likely to affect the safety of the mother or infant or to significantly compromise the endpoint data collected\*
* Significant complications in current pregnancy
* Significant alcohol consumption during current pregnancy
* Significant maternal chronic illness including but not limited to hypertension requiring treatment, heart disease, lung disease, neurological disorders including a history of epilepsy or recurrent afebrile seizures, kidney disease, liver disease, anaemia and other haematological disorders, endocrine disorders including known diabetes mellitus, autoimmunity
* Severe anaemia (\<7.0g/dL) \[35\] \*
* Known Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) or hepatitis B (HBV virus positive or found to be HIV or HBV positive during screening\*
* Positive result for syphilis infection on laboratory testing\*
* Receipt of any vaccine during the current pregnancy or plans to receive any non-study vaccines during the current pregnancy (tetanus toxoid vaccination is not an exclusion and vaccines given during national campaigns if applicable will not generally be exclusions)
* Any other condition judged to significantly increase the risks to either the mother or the infant within the current pregnancy (including relevant history from previous pregnancies)
* History of anaphylactic or severe allergic reactions to previous vaccines or history of anaphylactic or severe allergic reactions in previous offspring (if applicable) \*
* Receipt of any blood product including human immunoglobulins at any stage during the current pregnancy or plan to receive any blood products during the period of trial participation (receipt or blood products in an emergency or for obstetric reasons will not represent a protocol deviation given such situations are unplanned)
* Receipt of immunosuppressive or immuno-modulatory medication at any stage during the current pregnancy or plan to receive any such medication during the period or trial participation
* Clinically suspected or confirmed congenital or acquired clotting or bleeding disorders or the current receipt of medications known to alter clotting or bleeding\*
* Current malaria infection (on the day of vaccination)
* Any clinically significant signs or symptoms of acute illness, significant abnormalities in vital signs, an axillary temperature of \> 37.5°C or any recorded fever (\> 37.5°C) in the preceding 24 hours.
* 2 or more symptoms (nausea/vomiting, diarrhoea, headaches, fatigue and myalgia) rated as grade 2 and clinically significant on the maternal systemic reactogenicity scale (Table 5) present at baseline on the day of vaccination
In cases on uncertainly, the clinical significance of any particular complaint will be judged by the PI, in discussion with other members of the clinical trial team. The safety of the expectant mother and unborn infant will always represent the key criteria with this regard. The basis of such decisions will be documented in the participant notes maintained by the clinical trial team.
18 Years
40 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Public Health England
OTHER_GOV
Department of State for Health and Social Welfare, The Gambia
OTHER_GOV
World Health Organization
OTHER
University of Cambridge
OTHER
Stanford University
OTHER
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ed Clarke, MBChB
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
MRC @ LSHTM
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Medical Research Council Unit (MRC), The Gambia
Fajara, , The Gambia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SCC 1585
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.