Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
940 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-05-10
2018-10-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The project consisted of three phases; formative research, intervention implementation and analysis and dissemination. Formative research included key informant interviews and observation at the ART Centers, screening of close to 10,000 patients to identify male PLHIV who met the eligibility criteria, a baseline survey instrument (T1) that assessed a wide range of variables associated with the outcome variables and modeling alternative intervention programs for impact and cost effectiveness. Of 13 ART Centers in the Mumbai, Navi Mumbai, and Thane areas of Maharashtra, five ART Centers were selected for the project with a sample of 940 male PLHIV, 188 from each of the five ART Centers.
The second phase of the project was the development and implementation of three interventions assigned randomly to each of the experimental ART Centers with two of the Centers selected randomly as controls. The interventions were individual counseling (IC), group intervention (GI) and collective advocacy (CA). In Cycle 1 of the intervention phase, the interventions were implemented in each of three experimental ART Centers. In Cycle 2, each of the experimental centers received a second intervention (e.g. GI in Cycle 1+ IC in Cycle 2) and in Cycle 3 each of the experimental Centers received the third intervention (GI in Cycle 1 + IC in Cycle 2 + CA in Cycle 3). In addition, in Cycle 3, one of the two controls received an integrated package of IC, GI and CA. This crossover design test the sequencing and packaging of multi-level interventions for behavior change by examining the efficacy of any one intervention versus control, any two combinations of interventions versus controle, all interventions versus control and the integrated package versus control.
The IC intervention involved one-on-one interaction with a project counselor involving a pre-intervention session in which the PLHIV participant selected the priority issues to be discussed and four additional sessions to address tensions and anxieties, stigma and disclosure, relationships and alcohol and adherence. The sessions were facilitated by in the use of a tablet both to structure the interaction and to collect process data. GI involved four sessions in which 6-10 PLHIV were gathered for intervention on healthy living with HIV, tension, relationships and alcohol and adherence. CA involved groups of 10-15 PLHIV in five sessions in which the focus was on increasing the capacity of participants to advocate both for themselves and a collective group for issues that affected PLHIV human rights, entitlements and services.
The third and current phase of the project is analysis of qualitative data including key informant and in-depth interviews with PLHIV and assessments of fidelity and acceptability of the interventions and quantitative data that includes the screening instrument and baseline (T1) and follow-up outcome data (T2, T3, T4 follow-up surveys after each intervention for both experimental and control centers. This phase will also involve dissemination of results to the National AIDS Control Organizations and its subsidiaries at the State and District levels, the participating ART Centers and to Positive Peoples' Networks at the state and national levels and to national and international meetings and publications.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control ART Center
Control arm with no intervention throughout the course of the study
No interventions assigned to this group
Control and Cycle 3 integrated package
Control arm in Cycles 1 and 2 and in Cycle three converts to experimental
Behavioral intervention
Individual counseling, group intervention, collective advocacy
GI + CA + IC
Receives one alternative sequence of three interventions
Behavioral intervention
Individual counseling, group intervention, collective advocacy
IC + GI + CA
Receives a second alternative sequence of three interventions
Behavioral intervention
Individual counseling, group intervention, collective advocacy
CA + IC + GI
Receives a third alternative sequence of three interventions
Behavioral intervention
Individual counseling, group intervention, collective advocacy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Behavioral intervention
Individual counseling, group intervention, collective advocacy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* age 18-60
* six months or more on ART
* consumed alcohol at least once in the last 30 days
Exclusion Criteria
* outside the age range
* less than 6 months on ART
* did not consume alcohol in the last 30 days
18 Years
60 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Institute for Community Research
UNKNOWN
International Center for Research on Women
UNKNOWN
Population Council
OTHER
UConn Health
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Stephen Schensul
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stephen L Schensul, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UConn Health
Jean J Schensul, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Institute for Community Research
Niranjan Saggurti, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Population Council, India Country office
Avina Sarna, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Population Council, India Country office
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Connecticut Health
Farmington, Connecticut, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Schensul SL, Ha T, Schensul JJ, Vaz M, Singh R, Burleson JA, Bryant K. The Role of Alcohol on Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence Among Persons Living With HIV in Urban India. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017 Sep;78(5):716-724. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.716.
Schensul JJ, Ha T, Schensul S, Sarna A, Bryant K. Identifying the Intersection of Alcohol, Adherence and Sex in HIV Positive Men on ART Treatment in India Using an Adapted Timeline Followback Procedure. AIDS Behav. 2017 Nov;21(Suppl 2):228-242. doi: 10.1007/s10461-017-1916-1.
Ruggles KV, Patel AR, Schensul S, Schensul J, Nucifora K, Zhou Q, Bryant K, Braithwaite RS. Betting on the fastest horse: Using computer simulation to design a combination HIV intervention for future projects in Maharashtra, India. PLoS One. 2017 Sep 5;12(9):e0184179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184179. eCollection 2017.
Patel AR, Ruggles KV, Nucifora K, Zhou Q, Schensul S, Schensul J, Bryant K, Braithwaite RS. Evaluating Alternative Designs of a Multilevel HIV Intervention in Maharashtra, India: The Impact of Stakeholder Constraints. MDM Policy Pract. 2018 Oct 16;3(2):2381468318803940. doi: 10.1177/2381468318803940. eCollection 2018 Jul-Dec.
Ha T, Pham TQ, Misra S, Su TW, Ha L, Cunningham SD, Carandang RR, Schensul SL. Impact of multilevel interventions on reducing reasons for drinking among men living with HIV. AIDS Care. 2025 Oct;37(10):1696-1705. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2025.2547030. Epub 2025 Aug 22.
Ha T, Shi H, Pham BN, Dsouza A, Shrestha R, Kuchipudi SV, Luu HN, Le NT, Schensul SL. Assessing the Effectiveness of Multilevel Intervention Sequences on "Tension" Among Men Living with HIV: A Randomized-Control Trial. Int J Behav Med. 2024 Jul 29. doi: 10.1007/s12529-024-10310-5. Online ahead of print.
Ha T, Shi H, Shrestha R, Gaikwad SS, Joshi K, Padiyar R, Schensul SL. The Mediating Effect of Changes in Depression Symptoms on the Relationship between Health-Related Quality of Life and Alcohol Consumption: Findings from a Longitudinal Study among Men Living with HIV in India. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 18;20(8):5567. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20085567.
Schensul SL, Ha T, Schensul JJ, Grady J, Burleson JA, Gaikwad S, Joshi K, Malye R, Sarna A. Multilevel and Multifactorial Interventions to Reduce Alcohol Consumption and Improve ART Adherence and Related Factors Among HIV Positive Men in Mumbai, India. AIDS Behav. 2021 Dec;25(Suppl 3):290-301. doi: 10.1007/s10461-021-03303-y. Epub 2021 May 20.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.