Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of BIIB104 in Participants With Cognitive Impairment Associated With Schizophrenia (CIAS) (NCT NCT03745820)
NCT ID: NCT03745820
Last Updated: 2023-04-18
Results Overview
The MCCB is a cognitive battery that assesses 7 domains recommended by the MATRICS initiative (i.e., Working Memory, Verbal Learning, Speed of Processing, Attention/Vigilance, Visual Learning, Social Cognition, and Reasoning and Problem Solving). MCCB was administered via laptop computer and paper-and-pencil assessments. T-scores for the individual tests were calculated according to the developer's recommended scoring algorithms. MCCB composite T scores are between 40 and 60 (normal range). Higher scores indicate better cognitive functioning. The working memory domain score of the MCCB is reported in this outcome measure.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
195 participants
Baseline and Week 12
2023-04-18
Participant Flow
Participants took part in the study at 53 investigative sites in the United States, Japan, Spain, Germany, and the United Kingdom from 15 Nov 2018 to 07 April 2022.
A total of 554 participants were screened out of which, 195 participants were randomized and dosed to receive BIIB104 or placebo.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received BIIB104 matching placebo capsules, twice a day (BID), orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.15 mg
Participants received 0.15 milligrams (mg) capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.5 mg
Participants received 0.5 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
64
|
66
|
65
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Analysis Set
|
63
|
66
|
66
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
52
|
52
|
51
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
12
|
14
|
14
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received BIIB104 matching placebo capsules, twice a day (BID), orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.15 mg
Participants received 0.15 milligrams (mg) capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.5 mg
Participants received 0.5 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
3
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Non-Compliance with Study Drug
|
4
|
3
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Physician decision unrelated to safety/efficacy
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
0
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Reason not Specified
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of BIIB104 in Participants With Cognitive Impairment Associated With Schizophrenia (CIAS)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=64 Participants
Participants received BIIB104 matching placebo capsules, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.15 mg
n=66 Participants
Participants received 0.15 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.5 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants received 0.5 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
Total
n=195 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
40.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.47 • n=5 Participants
|
37.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.41 • n=7 Participants
|
41.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.63 • n=5 Participants
|
39.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.58 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
59 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
44 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
45 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
136 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
141 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
82 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Working Memory Domain Score
|
39.6 score on a scale
n=5 Participants
|
38.5 score on a scale
n=7 Participants
|
39.8 score on a scale
n=5 Participants
|
39.3 score on a scale
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (BIIB104 or placebo). Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies the number of participants analyzed in this outcome measure.
The MCCB is a cognitive battery that assesses 7 domains recommended by the MATRICS initiative (i.e., Working Memory, Verbal Learning, Speed of Processing, Attention/Vigilance, Visual Learning, Social Cognition, and Reasoning and Problem Solving). MCCB was administered via laptop computer and paper-and-pencil assessments. T-scores for the individual tests were calculated according to the developer's recommended scoring algorithms. MCCB composite T scores are between 40 and 60 (normal range). Higher scores indicate better cognitive functioning. The working memory domain score of the MCCB is reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=50 Participants
Participants received BIIB104 matching placebo capsules, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.15 mg
n=50 Participants
Participants received 0.15 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.5 mg
n=49 Participants
Participants received 0.5 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Change From Baseline in Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Working Memory Domain Score at Week 12
|
1.17 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.939
|
0.91 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.936
|
0.84 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.934
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug through end of the study (up to Week 14)Population: The safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment (BIIB104 or placebo).
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, places the participant at immediate risk of death, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a medically important event.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=63 Participants
Participants received BIIB104 matching placebo capsules, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.15 mg
n=66 Participants
Participants received 0.15 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.5 mg
n=66 Participants
Participants received 0.5 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
AEs
|
28 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
SAEs
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 6, 12 and safety follow-up (Week 14)Population: The safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment (BIIB104 or placebo). Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies the number of participants analyzed in this outcome measure and "number analyzed" signifies the number of participants analyzed at specified time-point.
The SARA is a clinical scale that is based on a semiquantitative assessment of cerebellar ataxia on an impairment level and complements the brief neurological examination. The SARA scale is an eight-item clinical rating scale (gait, stance, sitting, speech, finger-chase test, nose-finger test, fast alternating movements, and heel-shin test) with a total score range of 0-40, where 0 is the best neurological status and 40 is the worst neurological status.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=62 Participants
Participants received BIIB104 matching placebo capsules, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.15 mg
n=64 Participants
Participants received 0.15 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.5 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants received 0.5 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Total Score Assessed by Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)
Baseline
|
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
|
Mean Total Score Assessed by Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)
Week 2
|
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
|
Mean Total Score Assessed by Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)
Week 6
|
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
|
Mean Total Score Assessed by Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)
Week 12
|
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.80
|
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.72
|
|
Mean Total Score Assessed by Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)
Week 14
|
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.69
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 14Population: The safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment (BIIB104 or placebo). Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies the number of participants analyzed in this outcome measure.
The C-SSRS is an interview-based rating scale to systematically assess suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior. Suicidal ideation is classified on a 5-item scale: 1 (wish to be dead), 2 (nonspecific active suicidal thoughts), 3 (active suicidal ideation with any methods \[not plan\] without intent to act), 4 (active suicidal ideation with some intent to act, without specific plan), and 5 (active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent). Suicidal behavior is classified on a 6-item scale: 1 (actual attempt), 2 (interrupted attempt), 3 (aborted attempt), 4 (preparatory acts or behavior), 5 (suicidal behavior), and 6 (suicide). The data analyzed signifies the participants with at least one event of suicidal ideation and/or suicidal behavior.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=63 Participants
Participants received BIIB104 matching placebo capsules, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.15 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants received 0.15 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.5 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants received 0.5 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With at Least One Event of Suicidal Ideation and/or Suicidal Behavior as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (BIIB104 or placebo). Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies the number of participants analyzed in this outcome measure.
The UPSA-Bi, international version, an abbreviated version of the UPSA-Validation of Intermediate Measures, is a measure of functional capacity and assesses skills used in community tasks. This assessment measures 2 general skills that were previously identified as essential to functioning in the community: financial skills and communication skills. The UPSA-Bi assessment is scored from 0-100, higher scores indicating higher functional status.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=49 Participants
Participants received BIIB104 matching placebo capsules, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.15 mg
n=50 Participants
Participants received 0.15 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.5 mg
n=49 Participants
Participants received 0.5 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in University of California, San Diego Performance Based Skills Assessment-Brief International Version (UPSA-Bi) Assessment at Week 12
|
2.07 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.303
|
5.50 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.292
|
5.49 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.305
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (BIIB104 or placebo). Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies the number of participants analyzed in this outcome measure.
The SCoRS is an interview-based assessment of cognition that involves interviews with participants and informants. The SCoRS includes 20 items designed to specifically assess aspects of cognitive functioning found in each of the seven MCCB cognitive domains including the following: Memory: 4 items; Learning: 2 items; Attention: 3 items; Working memory: 2 items; Problem solving: 3 items; Processing/motor speed: 2 items; Social cognition: 3 items; Language: 1 item. Total score range is 20-80, lower scores indicating higher functional status. The data reported in this outcome measure are for global rating score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=49 Participants
Participants received BIIB104 matching placebo capsules, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.15 mg
n=48 Participants
Participants received 0.15 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.5 mg
n=50 Participants
Participants received 0.5 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Assessment Score at Week 12
|
-0.51 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.146
|
-0.42 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.148
|
-0.41 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.145
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (BIIB104 or placebo). Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies the number of participants analyzed in this outcome measure.
The MCCB is a cognitive battery that assesses 7 domains recommended by the MATRICS initiative (i.e., Working Memory, Verbal Learning, Speed of Processing, Attention/Vigilance, Visual Learning, Social Cognition, and Reasoning and Problem Solving). MCCB was administered via laptop computer and paper-and-pencil assessments. T-scores for the individual tests were calculated according to the developer's recommended scoring algorithms. MCCB composite T scores are between 40 and 60 (normal range). Higher scores indicate better cognitive functioning. The MCCB composite score contains all of the tests and domains of the MCCB.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=50 Participants
Participants received BIIB104 matching placebo capsules, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.15 mg
n=50 Participants
Participants received 0.15 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.5 mg
n=49 Participants
Participants received 0.5 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in MCCB Neurocognitive Composite Scores at Week 12
|
2.90 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.733
|
1.80 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.728
|
3.39 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.727
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (BIIB104 or placebo). Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies the number of participants analyzed in this outcome measure.
The MCCB is a cognitive battery that assesses 7 domains recommended by the MATRICS initiative (i.e., working memory, verbal learning, speed of processing, attention/vigilance, visual learning, social cognition, and reasoning and problem solving). MCCB was administered via laptop computer and paper-and-pencil assessments. T-scores for the individual tests were calculated according to the developer's recommended scoring algorithms. MCCB composite T scores are between 40 and 60 (normal range). Higher scores indicate better cognitive functioning. All the domain scores of the MCCB are reported in this outcome measure with the exception of working memory domain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=50 Participants
Participants received BIIB104 matching placebo capsules, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.15 mg
n=50 Participants
Participants received 0.15 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.5 mg
n=49 Participants
Participants received 0.5 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in MCCB Individual Domain Scores (Excluding Working Memory Domain) at Week 12
Verbal Learning: Change at Week 12
|
0.95 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.951
|
1.41 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.946
|
0.41 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.950
|
|
Change From Baseline in MCCB Individual Domain Scores (Excluding Working Memory Domain) at Week 12
Speed of Processing: Change at Week 12
|
4.42 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.824
|
2.28 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.819
|
3.99 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.817
|
|
Change From Baseline in MCCB Individual Domain Scores (Excluding Working Memory Domain) at Week 12
Attention/Vigilance: Change at Week 12
|
0.62 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.852
|
0.53 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.848
|
1.55 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.848
|
|
Change From Baseline in MCCB Individual Domain Scores (Excluding Working Memory Domain) at Week 12
Visual Learning: Change at Week 12
|
1.70 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.131
|
0.19 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.125
|
1.77 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.125
|
|
Change From Baseline in MCCB Individual Domain Scores (Excluding Working Memory Domain) at Week 12
Social Cognition: Change at Week 12
|
-0.13 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.959
|
1.06 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.953
|
0.95 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.955
|
|
Change From Baseline in MCCB Individual Domain Scores (Excluding Working Memory Domain) at Week 12
Reasoning and Problem Solving: Change at Week 12
|
2.81 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.019
|
2.10 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.1014
|
4.40 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.011
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (BIIB104 or placebo). Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies the number of participants analyzed in this outcome measure.
The PANSS includes 3 subscales and 30 items: 7 items that make up the Positive subscale (e.g., delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behaviour); 7 items that make up the Negative subscale (e.g., blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal); and 16 items that make up the General Psychopathology subscale (e.g., somatic concern, anxiety, guilt feelings, mannerisms and posturing, motor retardation, uncooperativeness, disorientation, poor impulse control, preoccupation). Each item on the positive, negative and general psychopathology subscale is rated from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme). The score range is 7-49 for positive and negative subscales, score range is 16-112 for the general psychopathology subscale. Total PANSS score (positive+ negative + general psychopathology subscale scores) range from 30 to 210. Higher scores represent more severity in symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants received BIIB104 matching placebo capsules, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.15 mg
n=51 Participants
Participants received 0.15 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.5 mg
n=50 Participants
Participants received 0.5 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score, Positive Subscale, and Negative Subscale Scores at Week 12
Positive Symptoms Subscale: Change From Baseline at Week 12
|
-0.65 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.431
|
-1.09 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.430
|
-0.98 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.429
|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score, Positive Subscale, and Negative Subscale Scores at Week 12
Negative Symptoms Subscale: Change From Baseline at Week 12
|
-0.90 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.461
|
-0.98 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.461
|
-1.40 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.460
|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score, Positive Subscale, and Negative Subscale Scores at Week 12
Total Score: Change From Baseline at Week 12
|
-3.06 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.429
|
-4.26 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.421
|
-5.03 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.427
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (BIIB104 or placebo). Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies the number of participants analyzed in this outcome measure.
The CGI-S consists of a single 7-point rating score of illness severity. The following question: "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is your participant at this time?" is rated with a score from 1 to 7- 1: Normal, not ill at all; 2: Borderline mentally ill; 3: Mildly ill; 4: Moderately ill; 5: Markedly ill; 6: Severely ill; or 7: Among the most severely ill participants. Lower scores indicate less severity of illness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants received BIIB104 matching placebo capsules, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.15 mg
n=50 Participants
Participants received 0.15 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.5 mg
n=50 Participants
Participants received 0.5 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Scores at Week 12
|
-0.19 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.091
|
-0.16 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.091
|
-0.19 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.091
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (BIIB104 or placebo). Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies the number of participants analyzed in this outcome measure.
The CGI-I consists of a single 7-point rating score total improvement, regardless of whether or not the change is due entirely to drug treatment. The following question: "Compared to your participant's condition at the beginning of treatment, how much has your participant changed?" is rated with a score from 1 to 7- 1: Very much improved; 2: Much improved; 3: Minimally improved; 4: No change; 5: Minimally worse; 6: Much worse; or 7: Very much worse. Lower scores indicate greater improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants received BIIB104 matching placebo capsules, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.15 mg
n=50 Participants
Participants received 0.15 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.5 mg
n=50 Participants
Participants received 0.5 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Response on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at Week 12
Very Much Improved
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Response on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at Week 12
Much Improved
|
11 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Response on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at Week 12
Minimally Improved
|
13 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Response on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at Week 12
No Change
|
22 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Response on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at Week 12
Minimally Worse
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Response on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at Week 12
Much Worse
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Response on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at Week 12
Very Much Worse
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
BIIB104 0.15 mg
BIIB104 0.5 mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=63 participants at risk
Participants received BIIB104 matching placebo capsules, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.15 mg
n=66 participants at risk
Participants received 0.15 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.5 mg
n=66 participants at risk
Participants received 0.5 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
1.6%
1/63 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug through end of the study (up to Week 14)
The safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment(BIIB104 or placebo).One participant randomized to placebo,inadvertently received one or more doses of active treatment. For participants affected, a participant was counted only once within each system organ class/preferred term/study period.
|
0.00%
0/66 • From first dose of study drug through end of the study (up to Week 14)
The safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment(BIIB104 or placebo).One participant randomized to placebo,inadvertently received one or more doses of active treatment. For participants affected, a participant was counted only once within each system organ class/preferred term/study period.
|
0.00%
0/66 • From first dose of study drug through end of the study (up to Week 14)
The safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment(BIIB104 or placebo).One participant randomized to placebo,inadvertently received one or more doses of active treatment. For participants affected, a participant was counted only once within each system organ class/preferred term/study period.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Schizophrenia
|
0.00%
0/63 • From first dose of study drug through end of the study (up to Week 14)
The safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment(BIIB104 or placebo).One participant randomized to placebo,inadvertently received one or more doses of active treatment. For participants affected, a participant was counted only once within each system organ class/preferred term/study period.
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug through end of the study (up to Week 14)
The safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment(BIIB104 or placebo).One participant randomized to placebo,inadvertently received one or more doses of active treatment. For participants affected, a participant was counted only once within each system organ class/preferred term/study period.
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 2 • From first dose of study drug through end of the study (up to Week 14)
The safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment(BIIB104 or placebo).One participant randomized to placebo,inadvertently received one or more doses of active treatment. For participants affected, a participant was counted only once within each system organ class/preferred term/study period.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Psychiatric decompensation
|
0.00%
0/63 • From first dose of study drug through end of the study (up to Week 14)
The safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment(BIIB104 or placebo).One participant randomized to placebo,inadvertently received one or more doses of active treatment. For participants affected, a participant was counted only once within each system organ class/preferred term/study period.
|
0.00%
0/66 • From first dose of study drug through end of the study (up to Week 14)
The safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment(BIIB104 or placebo).One participant randomized to placebo,inadvertently received one or more doses of active treatment. For participants affected, a participant was counted only once within each system organ class/preferred term/study period.
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug through end of the study (up to Week 14)
The safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment(BIIB104 or placebo).One participant randomized to placebo,inadvertently received one or more doses of active treatment. For participants affected, a participant was counted only once within each system organ class/preferred term/study period.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=63 participants at risk
Participants received BIIB104 matching placebo capsules, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.15 mg
n=66 participants at risk
Participants received 0.15 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
BIIB104 0.5 mg
n=66 participants at risk
Participants received 0.5 mg capsules of BIIB104, BID, orally for 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
1.6%
1/63 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug through end of the study (up to Week 14)
The safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment(BIIB104 or placebo).One participant randomized to placebo,inadvertently received one or more doses of active treatment. For participants affected, a participant was counted only once within each system organ class/preferred term/study period.
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug through end of the study (up to Week 14)
The safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment(BIIB104 or placebo).One participant randomized to placebo,inadvertently received one or more doses of active treatment. For participants affected, a participant was counted only once within each system organ class/preferred term/study period.
|
6.1%
4/66 • Number of events 4 • From first dose of study drug through end of the study (up to Week 14)
The safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment(BIIB104 or placebo).One participant randomized to placebo,inadvertently received one or more doses of active treatment. For participants affected, a participant was counted only once within each system organ class/preferred term/study period.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Schizophrenia
|
1.6%
1/63 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug through end of the study (up to Week 14)
The safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment(BIIB104 or placebo).One participant randomized to placebo,inadvertently received one or more doses of active treatment. For participants affected, a participant was counted only once within each system organ class/preferred term/study period.
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug through end of the study (up to Week 14)
The safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment(BIIB104 or placebo).One participant randomized to placebo,inadvertently received one or more doses of active treatment. For participants affected, a participant was counted only once within each system organ class/preferred term/study period.
|
6.1%
4/66 • Number of events 4 • From first dose of study drug through end of the study (up to Week 14)
The safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment(BIIB104 or placebo).One participant randomized to placebo,inadvertently received one or more doses of active treatment. For participants affected, a participant was counted only once within each system organ class/preferred term/study period.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Our agreement is subject to confidentiality but generally the PI can publish, for non-commercial purposes only, results and methods of the trial, but no other Sponsor Confidential Information. PI must give Sponsor no less than 60 days to review any manuscript for a proposed publication and must delay publication for up to an additional 90 days thereafter if Sponsor needs to file any patent application to protect any of Sponsor's intellectual property contained in the proposed publication.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER