Trial Outcomes & Findings for PF-06651600 for the Treatment of Alopecia Areata (NCT NCT03732807)
NCT ID: NCT03732807
Last Updated: 2022-02-24
Results Overview
SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT score less than or equal to (\<=) 20 at week 24 were reported.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
718 participants
Week 24
2022-02-24
Participant Flow
Total 1097 participants signed the informed consent form. Out of which 379 participants were screen failures, 718 actually enrolled into the study and were assigned to study treatments.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe alopecia areata (AA) with greater than or equal to (\>=) 50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 milligram (mg) tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Period (up to Week 24)
STARTED
|
132
|
130
|
130
|
132
|
63
|
65
|
66
|
|
Treatment Period (up to Week 24)
COMPLETED
|
122
|
124
|
121
|
117
|
58
|
63
|
61
|
|
Treatment Period (up to Week 24)
NOT COMPLETED
|
10
|
6
|
9
|
15
|
5
|
2
|
5
|
|
Treatment Extension (Week 25 up to 48)
STARTED
|
113
|
111
|
108
|
106
|
49
|
59
|
57
|
|
Treatment Extension (Week 25 up to 48)
COMPLETED
|
107
|
100
|
103
|
97
|
44
|
56
|
53
|
|
Treatment Extension (Week 25 up to 48)
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
11
|
5
|
9
|
5
|
3
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe alopecia areata (AA) with greater than or equal to (\>=) 50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 milligram (mg) tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Period (up to Week 24)
Adverse Event
|
3
|
0
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
|
Treatment Period (up to Week 24)
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period (up to Week 24)
Physician Decision
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
5
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Treatment Period (up to Week 24)
Pregnancy
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
|
Treatment Period (up to Week 24)
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period (up to Week 24)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
|
Treatment Period (up to Week 24)
Lack of Efficacy
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Treatment Extension (Week 25 up to 48)
Adverse Event
|
0
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
|
Treatment Extension (Week 25 up to 48)
Lack of Efficacy
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
1
|
|
Treatment Extension (Week 25 up to 48)
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
|
Treatment Extension (Week 25 up to 48)
Non-Compliant with study drug
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Treatment Extension (Week 25 up to 48)
Physician Decision
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Treatment Extension (Week 25 up to 48)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
|
Treatment Extension (Week 25 up to 48)
Other
|
1
|
4
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
PF-06651600 for the Treatment of Alopecia Areata
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Total
n=718 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
34.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.98 • n=5 Participants
|
33.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.75 • n=7 Participants
|
32.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.36 • n=5 Participants
|
33.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.83 • n=4 Participants
|
34.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.88 • n=21 Participants
|
33.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.01 • n=8 Participants
|
35.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.89 • n=8 Participants
|
33.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.33 • n=24 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
81 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
85 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
71 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
80 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
46 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
446 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
51 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
45 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
59 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
272 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
87 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
113 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
114 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
116 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
109 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
61 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
626 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
186 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
92 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
90 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
79 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
91 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
488 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Participants with missing SALT scores due to coronavirus disease-19 related reasons were excluded from this analysis, while participants with missing data due to other reasons were considered as non-responders. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT score less than or equal to (\<=) 20 at week 24 were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=124 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=121 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=124 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=119 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=59 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 24
|
1.54 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 3.65
|
30.65 Percentage of participants
Interval 22.53 to 38.76
|
22.31 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.9 to 29.73
|
23.39 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.94 to 30.84
|
14.29 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.0 to 20.57
|
1.69 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.99
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Analysis 4: Data imputed by using a missing at random (MAR) mechanism for participants with missing data due to COVID-19. Missing data due to reasons not related to COVID-19 were consider as non-responders.
SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT score \<= 10 at week 24 were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=125 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=118 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=119 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=119 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=114 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=55 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Analysis 4
|
1.54 Percentage of participants
|
21.29 Percentage of participants
|
12.87 Percentage of participants
|
13.42 Percentage of participants
|
10.62 Percentage of participants
|
1.65 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Analysis 1: Participants with missing SALT score at Week 24 due to COVID-19 related reasons excluded from analysis at that time point, participants with missing SALT scores due to other reasons counted as non-responders at that time point.
SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT score \<= 10 at week 24 were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=124 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=121 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=124 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=119 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=59 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Analysis 1
|
1.54 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 3.65
|
21.77 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.51 to 29.04
|
13.22 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.19 to 19.26
|
13.71 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.66 to 19.76
|
10.92 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.32 to 16.53
|
1.69 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.99
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
PGI-C is a self-administered questionnaire to evaluate the improvement or worsening of participant's AA as compared to the start of the study. PGI-C was assessed on a 7-point Likert scale ranged from 1 (greatly improved) to 7 (greatly worsened). Categories were defined based on the PGI-C scores as follows: 1=greatly improved, 2=moderately improved, 3=slightly improved, 4=not changed, 5=slightly worsened, 6=moderately worsened and 7=greatly worsened.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=125 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=120 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=119 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=120 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=116 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=55 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 24
|
9.23 Percentage of participants
|
52.19 Percentage of participants
|
45.40 Percentage of participants
|
49.17 Percentage of participants
|
41.95 Percentage of participants
|
11.36 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
The exposure response of Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) on the regrowth of scalp hair was characterized using a Bayesian three-parameter hyperbolic Emax model for the SALT score \<=20 at Week 24 with an additional term for effect of loading dose. In Emax exposure-response model the response function was the log odds of the percentage of participants with response based on SALT \<=20 at Week 24, which was fit on the logistic scale and then back-transformed to percentage. The effect of loading dose is included as fixed factor in the model. The variable that represents loading dose has values of 1 for groups 200/50 mg once daily and 200/30 mg once daily and of 0 for the remaining groups. SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=124 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=121 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=124 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=119 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=59 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Exposure Response of PF-06651600 on Regrowth of Lost Hair Based on Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 24: Maximum Effect (Emax) Model
|
1.63 Percentage of participants
|
32.37 Percentage of participants
|
20.57 Percentage of participants
|
22.52 Percentage of participants
|
13.58 Percentage of participants
|
4.81 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
The exposure response of Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) on the regrowth of scalp hair was characterized using a Bayesian three-parameter hyperbolic Emax model for the SALT score \<=10 at Week 24 with an additional term for effect of loading dose. In Emax exposure-response model the response function was the log odds of the percentage of participants with response based on SALT \<=10 at Week 24, which was fit on the logistic scale and then back-transformed to percentage. The effect of loading dose is included as fixed factor in the model. The variable that represents loading dose has values of 1 for groups 200/50 mg once daily and 200/30 mg once daily and of 0 for the remaining groups. SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=124 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=121 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=124 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=119 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=59 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Exposure Response of PF-06651600 on Regrowth of Lost Hair Based on Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Maximum Effect (Emax) Model
|
1.66 Percentage of participants
|
21.29 Percentage of participants
|
13.76 Percentage of participants
|
14.43 Percentage of participants
|
9.02 Percentage of participants
|
3.88 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.
SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 4
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=20.
|
0.78 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.29
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% confidence interval (CI) could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=20.
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=20.
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=20.
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=20.
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=20.
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 8
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=20.
|
5.47 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.53 to 9.41
|
4.13 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.59 to 7.68
|
2.46 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.21
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=20.
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=20.
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=20.
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 28
|
1.75 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.16
|
34.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.68 to 42.65
|
23.53 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.91 to 31.15
|
26.05 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.16 to 33.94
|
20.49 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.33 to 27.65
|
5.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.51
|
6.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.33 to 12.37
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 12
|
1.64 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.83
|
11.90 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.25 to 17.56
|
8.87 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.87 to 13.88
|
6.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.09 to 10.61
|
3.28 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.12 to 6.44
|
3.39 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.01
|
1.59 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.67
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 18
|
1.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.91
|
19.83 Percentage of participants
Interval 12.73 to 26.94
|
13.22 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.19 to 19.26
|
13.11 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.12 to 19.1
|
9.40 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.11 to 14.69
|
3.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.88
|
1.61 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.75
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 34
|
19.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.7 to 29.65
|
38.40 Percentage of participants
Interval 29.87 to 46.93
|
27.64 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.74 to 35.55
|
33.87 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.54 to 42.2
|
28.69 Percentage of participants
Interval 20.66 to 36.71
|
5.08 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.69
|
9.23 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.19 to 16.27
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 40
|
23.08 Percentage of participants
Interval 12.83 to 33.32
|
39.06 Percentage of participants
Interval 30.61 to 47.51
|
33.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.0 to 41.66
|
39.34 Percentage of participants
Interval 30.68 to 48.01
|
30.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.8 to 38.2
|
6.78 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.36 to 13.19
|
15.38 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.61 to 24.16
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 48
|
33.85 Percentage of participants
Interval 22.34 to 45.35
|
39.53 Percentage of participants
Interval 31.1 to 47.97
|
34.43 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.0 to 42.86
|
43.20 Percentage of participants
Interval 34.52 to 51.88
|
31.15 Percentage of participants
Interval 22.93 to 39.37
|
9.84 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.36 to 17.31
|
18.75 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.19 to 28.31
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.
SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT score \<=10 were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 28
|
1.75 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.16
|
29.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.03 to 37.3
|
16.81 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.09 to 23.53
|
18.49 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.51 to 25.46
|
16.39 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.82 to 22.96
|
3.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.88
|
3.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 4
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=10.
|
0.78 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.29
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=10.
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=10.
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=10.
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=10.
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=10.
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 8
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=10.
|
2.34 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.96
|
0.83 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.44
|
0.82 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.42
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=10.
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=10.
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=10.
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 18
|
1.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.91
|
12.40 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.52 to 18.27
|
7.44 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.76 to 12.11
|
6.56 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.16 to 10.95
|
5.13 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.13 to 9.12
|
1.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.91
|
1.61 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.75
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 34
|
13.11 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.64 to 21.59
|
30.40 Percentage of participants
Interval 22.34 to 38.46
|
18.70 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.81 to 25.59
|
23.39 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.94 to 30.84
|
22.13 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.76 to 29.5
|
3.39 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.01
|
4.62 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 9.72
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 40
|
18.46 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.03 to 27.89
|
31.25 Percentage of participants
Interval 23.22 to 39.28
|
25.20 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.53 to 32.88
|
27.05 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.17 to 34.93
|
25.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.25 to 32.75
|
3.39 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.01
|
9.23 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.19 to 16.27
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 48
|
24.62 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.14 to 35.09
|
33.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.2 to 41.47
|
27.87 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.91 to 35.82
|
31.20 Percentage of participants
Interval 23.08 to 39.32
|
25.41 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.68 to 33.14
|
6.56 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.35 to 12.77
|
14.06 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.55 to 22.58
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 12
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=10.
|
6.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.09 to 10.61
|
5.65 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.58 to 9.71
|
5.56 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.56 to 9.56
|
0.82 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.42
|
1.69 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.99
|
1.59 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.67
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.
SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. A SALT 75 response was a 75% or greater reduction from baseline in SALT score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 24
|
1.54 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.53
|
31.45 Percentage of participants
Interval 23.28 to 39.62
|
20.66 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.45 to 27.88
|
22.58 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.22 to 29.94
|
13.45 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.32 to 19.57
|
1.69 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.99
|
3.08 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.28
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 4
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least 75% improvement in SALT score.
|
0.78 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.29
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least 75% improvement in SALT score.
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least 75% improvement in SALT score.
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least 75% improvement in SALT score.
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least 75% improvement in SALT score.
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least 75% improvement in SALT score.
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 12
|
1.64 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.83
|
11.90 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.25 to 17.56
|
8.06 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.27 to 12.86
|
6.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.09 to 10.61
|
2.46 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.21
|
1.69 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.99
|
1.59 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.67
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 40
|
23.08 Percentage of participants
Interval 12.83 to 33.32
|
39.84 Percentage of participants
Interval 31.36 to 48.33
|
34.96 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.53 to 43.39
|
42.62 Percentage of participants
Interval 33.85 to 51.4
|
30.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.8 to 38.2
|
5.08 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.69
|
15.38 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.61 to 24.16
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 8
|
1.59 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.67
|
4.69 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.03 to 8.35
|
3.31 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.12 to 6.49
|
1.64 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 3.89
|
0.83 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.44
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least 75% improvement in SALT score.
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least 75% improvement in SALT score.
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 18
|
1.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.91
|
20.66 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.45 to 27.88
|
14.88 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.54 to 21.22
|
9.84 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.55 to 15.12
|
11.11 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.42 to 16.81
|
1.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.91
|
1.61 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.75
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 28
|
3.51 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.29
|
34.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.68 to 42.65
|
24.37 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.66 to 32.08
|
27.73 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.69 to 35.77
|
21.31 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.04 to 28.58
|
5.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.51
|
4.76 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.02
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 34
|
21.31 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.03 to 31.59
|
38.40 Percentage of participants
Interval 29.87 to 46.93
|
32.52 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.24 to 40.8
|
38.71 Percentage of participants
Interval 30.14 to 47.28
|
28.69 Percentage of participants
Interval 20.66 to 36.71
|
5.08 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.69
|
10.77 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.23 to 18.31
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 48
|
32.31 Percentage of participants
Interval 20.94 to 43.68
|
39.53 Percentage of participants
Interval 31.1 to 47.97
|
36.07 Percentage of participants
Interval 27.54 to 44.59
|
46.40 Percentage of participants
Interval 37.66 to 55.14
|
31.15 Percentage of participants
Interval 22.93 to 39.37
|
9.84 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.36 to 17.31
|
21.88 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.75 to 32.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.
SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=131 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24
Change at Week 8
|
-1.2 Units on a scale
Interval -3.99 to 1.5
|
-12.8 Units on a scale
Interval -15.56 to -10.05
|
-12.5 Units on a scale
Interval -15.28 to -9.71
|
-6.3 Units on a scale
Interval -9.1 to -3.5
|
-5.0 Units on a scale
Interval -7.82 to -2.21
|
-1.7 Units on a scale
Interval -5.74 to 2.34
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24
Change at Week 12
|
-2.4 Units on a scale
Interval -6.12 to 1.35
|
-22.7 Units on a scale
Interval -26.47 to -18.97
|
-20.1 Units on a scale
Interval -23.87 to -16.3
|
-12.4 Units on a scale
Interval -16.18 to -8.61
|
-10.3 Units on a scale
Interval -14.11 to -6.47
|
-3.5 Units on a scale
Interval -9.0 to 1.98
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24
Change at Week 24
|
-5.1 Units on a scale
Interval -10.03 to -0.13
|
-36.5 Units on a scale
Interval -41.54 to -31.53
|
-29.2 Units on a scale
Interval -34.21 to -24.15
|
-33.3 Units on a scale
Interval -38.33 to -28.25
|
-23.6 Units on a scale
Interval -28.72 to -18.45
|
-4.2 Units on a scale
Interval -11.5 to 3.13
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24
Change at Week 4
|
-0.9 Units on a scale
Interval -2.17 to 0.46
|
-2.3 Units on a scale
Interval -3.64 to -1.01
|
-2.7 Units on a scale
Interval -4.03 to -1.35
|
-1.8 Units on a scale
Interval -3.16 to -0.5
|
-1.3 Units on a scale
Interval -2.6 to 0.06
|
-1.3 Units on a scale
Interval -3.19 to 0.69
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24
Change at Week 18
|
-3.9 Units on a scale
Interval -8.31 to 0.43
|
-31.2 Units on a scale
Interval -35.63 to -26.83
|
-25.0 Units on a scale
Interval -29.41 to -20.55
|
-22.5 Units on a scale
Interval -26.94 to -18.07
|
-17.5 Units on a scale
Interval -22.02 to -13.02
|
-2.4 Units on a scale
Interval -8.87 to 3.97
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 28, 34, 40, and 48Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.
SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48
Change at Week 28
|
-11.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.75
|
-44.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 36.35
|
-33.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.85
|
-36.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.42
|
-29.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.56
|
-5.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.15
|
-5.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.51
|
|
Change From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48
Change at Week 40
|
-36.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 34.56
|
-49.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 36.11
|
-38.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 37.14
|
-46.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.68
|
-35.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.90
|
-11.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.01
|
-23.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48
Change at Week 48
|
-46.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.51
|
-49.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 36.09
|
-40.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 37.27
|
-48.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 36.63
|
-40.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.87
|
-13.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.13
|
-32.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.39
|
|
Change From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48
Baseline
|
94.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.31
|
90.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.05
|
90.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.28
|
90.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.69
|
90.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.07
|
88.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.87
|
91.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.22
|
|
Change From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48
Change at Week 34
|
-27.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.78
|
-48.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 36.16
|
-35.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.50
|
-43.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 34.35
|
-33.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.01
|
-7.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.61
|
-12.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.47
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.
EBA is a numeric rating scale developed to characterize eyebrow hair loss. The numeric rating scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (normal), where, 0= no eyebrow, 1=minimal eyebrow, 2=moderate eyebrow and 3= normal eyebrow, where higher scores represent less hair loss of eyebrows.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 24
|
3.64 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.58
|
33.98 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.83 to 43.13
|
25.49 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.03 to 33.95
|
29.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 20.11 to 37.89
|
16.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.43 to 23.9
|
8.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.51 to 16.15
|
5.77 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 12.11
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 8
|
3.77 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.9
|
10.28 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.53 to 16.03
|
13.86 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.12 to 20.6
|
2.97 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.28
|
4.90 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.71 to 9.09
|
3.85 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 9.07
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least a 2-grade improvement or a score of 3 in EBA.
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 12
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least a 2-grade improvement or a score of 3 in EBA.
|
22.86 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.83 to 30.89
|
17.48 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.14 to 24.81
|
9.62 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.95 to 15.28
|
7.62 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.54 to 12.69
|
6.25 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 13.1
|
4.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 9.43
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 18
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least a 2-grade improvement or a score of 3 in EBA.
|
29.70 Percentage of participants
Interval 20.79 to 38.61
|
18.81 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.19 to 26.43
|
17.82 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.36 to 25.29
|
12.87 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.34 to 19.4
|
10.20 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.73 to 18.68
|
8.16 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.5 to 15.83
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 28
|
4.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 9.82
|
37.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 27.54 to 46.46
|
29.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 20.11 to 37.89
|
27.27 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.5 to 36.05
|
24.76 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.51 to 33.02
|
12.24 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.07 to 21.42
|
6.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 12.58
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 34
|
15.69 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.71 to 25.67
|
41.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 31.88 to 50.81
|
30.77 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.9 to 39.64
|
34.65 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.37 to 43.93
|
31.43 Percentage of participants
Interval 22.55 to 40.31
|
14.58 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.6 to 24.57
|
13.46 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.18 to 22.74
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 40
|
20.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.43 to 30.57
|
43.40 Percentage of participants
Interval 33.96 to 52.83
|
30.39 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.47 to 39.32
|
39.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 29.44 to 48.56
|
33.65 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.57 to 42.74
|
16.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.84 to 26.16
|
26.92 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.87 to 38.98
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 48
|
30.91 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.7 to 43.12
|
42.99 Percentage of participants
Interval 33.61 to 52.37
|
32.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 23.53 to 41.82
|
43.56 Percentage of participants
Interval 33.89 to 53.23
|
33.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.32 to 42.35
|
16.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.84 to 26.16
|
31.37 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.64 to 44.11
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 4
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least a 2-grade improvement or a score of 3 in EBA.
|
1.87 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.44
|
2.88 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.1
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least a 2-grade improvement or a score of 3 in EBA.
|
0.93 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.76
|
1.96 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.77
|
3.85 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 9.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.
ELA is a numeric rating scale developed to characterize eyelash hair loss. The numeric rating scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (normal), where, 0=no eyelash, 1=minimal eyelash, 2=moderate eyelash and 3=normal eyelash, where higher scores represent less hair loss of eyelash.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 4
|
2.04 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
3.03 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.41
|
1.08 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 3.17
|
5.38 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.79 to 9.96
|
1.03 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 3.04
|
4.55 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.7
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least a 2-grade improvement or a score of 3 in ELA.
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 8
|
2.04 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
9.09 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.43 to 14.75
|
4.44 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.19 to 8.7
|
8.79 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.97 to 14.61
|
4.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.18 to 8.51
|
2.22 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.53
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least a 2-grade improvement or a score of 3 in ELA.
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 12
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least a 2-grade improvement or a score of 3 in ELA.
|
16.49 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.11 to 23.88
|
10.99 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.56 to 17.41
|
11.70 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.2 to 18.2
|
7.37 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.11 to 12.62
|
4.76 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 11.2
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least a 2-grade improvement or a score of 3 in ELA.
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 18
|
2.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.39
|
25.53 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.72 to 34.35
|
20.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.74 to 28.26
|
20.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.74 to 28.26
|
12.09 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.39 to 18.79
|
6.98 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 14.59
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least a 2-grade improvement or a score of 3 in ELA.
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 24
|
9.80 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.64 to 17.97
|
30.21 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.02 to 39.39
|
21.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 12.84 to 29.86
|
28.89 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.52 to 38.25
|
26.09 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.11 to 35.06
|
4.88 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 11.47
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least a 2-grade improvement or a score of 3 in ELA.
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 28
|
6.82 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 14.27
|
29.79 Percentage of participants
Interval 20.54 to 39.03
|
25.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.95 to 34.05
|
36.78 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.65 to 46.91
|
24.21 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.6 to 32.82
|
4.76 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 11.2
|
4.55 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 34
|
16.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.12 to 27.21
|
34.02 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.59 to 43.45
|
26.37 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.32 to 35.43
|
38.89 Percentage of participants
Interval 28.82 to 48.96
|
26.32 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.46 to 35.17
|
7.32 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 15.29
|
6.52 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 13.66
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 40
|
25.49 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.53 to 37.45
|
39.80 Percentage of participants
Interval 30.1 to 49.49
|
28.09 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.75 to 37.43
|
38.20 Percentage of participants
Interval 28.11 to 48.3
|
27.66 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.62 to 36.7
|
18.60 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.97 to 30.24
|
17.39 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.44 to 28.34
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 48
|
37.25 Percentage of participants
Interval 23.99 to 50.52
|
38.38 Percentage of participants
Interval 28.8 to 47.96
|
29.55 Percentage of participants
Interval 20.01 to 39.08
|
40.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 29.88 to 50.12
|
30.53 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.27 to 39.79
|
20.93 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.77 to 33.09
|
35.56 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.57 to 49.54
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.
PGI-C is a self-administered questionnaire to evaluate the improvement or worsening of participant's AA as compared to the start of the study. PGI-C was assessed on a 7-point Likert scale ranged from 1 (greatly improved) to 7 (greatly worsened). Categories were defined based on the PGI-C scores as follows: 1=greatly improved, 2=moderately improved, 3=slightly improved, 4=not changed, 5=slightly worsened, 6=moderately worsened and 7=greatly worsened.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 4: moderately improved
|
1.59 Percentage of participants
|
3.10 Percentage of participants
|
11.29 Percentage of participants
|
4.72 Percentage of participants
|
7.87 Percentage of participants
|
1.61 Percentage of participants
|
1.54 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 8: greatly improved
|
1.59 Percentage of participants
|
17.19 Percentage of participants
|
14.88 Percentage of participants
|
8.13 Percentage of participants
|
4.13 Percentage of participants
|
1.64 Percentage of participants
|
1.56 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 8: moderately improved
|
3.17 Percentage of participants
|
13.28 Percentage of participants
|
21.49 Percentage of participants
|
7.32 Percentage of participants
|
16.53 Percentage of participants
|
4.92 Percentage of participants
|
4.69 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 12: greatly improved
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
22.83 Percentage of participants
|
22.58 Percentage of participants
|
13.60 Percentage of participants
|
12.20 Percentage of participants
|
3.39 Percentage of participants
|
3.17 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 12: moderately improved
|
10.00 Percentage of participants
|
18.11 Percentage of participants
|
19.35 Percentage of participants
|
14.40 Percentage of participants
|
14.63 Percentage of participants
|
3.39 Percentage of participants
|
7.94 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 18: greatly improved
|
1.67 Percentage of participants
|
27.64 Percentage of participants
|
22.31 Percentage of participants
|
18.03 Percentage of participants
|
19.33 Percentage of participants
|
1.64 Percentage of participants
|
3.28 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 18: moderately improved
|
10.00 Percentage of participants
|
23.58 Percentage of participants
|
23.97 Percentage of participants
|
27.87 Percentage of participants
|
15.13 Percentage of participants
|
6.56 Percentage of participants
|
4.92 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 24: greatly improved
|
1.54 Percentage of participants
|
36.51 Percentage of participants
|
26.45 Percentage of participants
|
28.80 Percentage of participants
|
28.93 Percentage of participants
|
1.67 Percentage of participants
|
4.62 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 24: moderately improved
|
9.23 Percentage of participants
|
16.67 Percentage of participants
|
20.66 Percentage of participants
|
20.80 Percentage of participants
|
13.22 Percentage of participants
|
10.00 Percentage of participants
|
3.08 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 34: greatly improved
|
18.64 Percentage of participants
|
43.20 Percentage of participants
|
35.54 Percentage of participants
|
37.40 Percentage of participants
|
31.97 Percentage of participants
|
5.08 Percentage of participants
|
7.81 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 34: moderately improved
|
22.03 Percentage of participants
|
12.00 Percentage of participants
|
17.36 Percentage of participants
|
15.45 Percentage of participants
|
15.57 Percentage of participants
|
6.78 Percentage of participants
|
20.31 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 40: greatly improved
|
30.77 Percentage of participants
|
43.75 Percentage of participants
|
34.68 Percentage of participants
|
37.70 Percentage of participants
|
30.00 Percentage of participants
|
6.78 Percentage of participants
|
13.85 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 40: moderately improved
|
24.62 Percentage of participants
|
15.63 Percentage of participants
|
14.52 Percentage of participants
|
14.75 Percentage of participants
|
19.17 Percentage of participants
|
11.86 Percentage of participants
|
15.38 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 48: greatly improved
|
42.19 Percentage of participants
|
44.96 Percentage of participants
|
33.33 Percentage of participants
|
42.40 Percentage of participants
|
31.15 Percentage of participants
|
6.56 Percentage of participants
|
26.56 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 48: moderately improved
|
17.19 Percentage of participants
|
13.18 Percentage of participants
|
18.70 Percentage of participants
|
13.60 Percentage of participants
|
18.03 Percentage of participants
|
9.84 Percentage of participants
|
17.19 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 4: greatly improved
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
5.43 Percentage of participants
|
4.03 Percentage of participants
|
2.36 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specified time point.
AAPPO scale is 11-item self-administered questionnaire that measured hair loss, emotional symptoms, and activity limitations over past week. Items 1-4 assessed current hair loss, eyebrow loss, eyelash loss and body hair loss and were analyzed separately on scale of 0-4, with 0 ='no hair loss' and 4='complete hair loss'. Items 5-8 assessed emotional symptoms. Response choices on these items were scored from 0 ='never' to 4='always'. Items 9-11 assessed activity limitations. Response choices on these items were scored from 0='not at all' to 4='completely'. Change from baseline in AAPPO emotional symptoms sub score were calculated as mean of items 5-8 and ranged from 0(never) to 4(always), where higher scores indicated more emotional symptoms. Change from baseline in AAPPO activity limitations sub score was calculated as mean of items 9-11 and ranged from 0(not at all) to 4(completely), where higher scores indicated more activity limitations. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=131 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 12: emotional symptoms
|
-0.36 Units on a scale
Interval -0.49 to -0.23
|
-0.53 Units on a scale
Interval -0.66 to -0.4
|
-0.54 Units on a scale
Interval -0.67 to -0.41
|
-0.48 Units on a scale
Interval -0.61 to -0.34
|
-0.49 Units on a scale
Interval -0.63 to -0.36
|
-0.50 Units on a scale
Interval -0.69 to -0.31
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 18: emotional symptoms
|
-0.43 Units on a scale
Interval -0.56 to -0.29
|
-0.64 Units on a scale
Interval -0.78 to -0.51
|
-0.57 Units on a scale
Interval -0.71 to -0.44
|
-0.60 Units on a scale
Interval -0.74 to -0.46
|
-0.54 Units on a scale
Interval -0.68 to -0.4
|
-0.44 Units on a scale
Interval -0.63 to -0.24
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 24: emotional symptoms
|
-0.47 Units on a scale
Interval -0.61 to -0.33
|
-0.61 Units on a scale
Interval -0.75 to -0.46
|
-0.61 Units on a scale
Interval -0.76 to -0.47
|
-0.69 Units on a scale
Interval -0.83 to -0.54
|
-0.58 Units on a scale
Interval -0.72 to -0.43
|
-0.49 Units on a scale
Interval -0.7 to -0.28
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 4: activity limitations
|
-0.18 Units on a scale
Interval -0.29 to -0.07
|
-0.19 Units on a scale
Interval -0.29 to -0.08
|
-0.04 Units on a scale
Interval -0.15 to 0.07
|
-0.16 Units on a scale
Interval -0.27 to -0.05
|
-0.13 Units on a scale
Interval -0.24 to -0.02
|
-0.20 Units on a scale
Interval -0.36 to -0.04
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 8: activity limitations
|
-0.20 Units on a scale
Interval -0.31 to -0.09
|
-0.24 Units on a scale
Interval -0.34 to -0.13
|
-0.25 Units on a scale
Interval -0.36 to -0.14
|
-0.18 Units on a scale
Interval -0.29 to -0.07
|
-0.09 Units on a scale
Interval -0.2 to 0.02
|
-0.21 Units on a scale
Interval -0.37 to -0.05
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 12: activity limitations
|
-0.21 Units on a scale
Interval -0.32 to -0.11
|
-0.27 Units on a scale
Interval -0.38 to -0.17
|
-0.22 Units on a scale
Interval -0.32 to -0.11
|
-0.21 Units on a scale
Interval -0.32 to -0.11
|
-0.24 Units on a scale
Interval -0.35 to -0.13
|
-0.27 Units on a scale
Interval -0.42 to -0.11
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 18: activity limitations
|
-0.26 Units on a scale
Interval -0.36 to -0.15
|
-0.35 Units on a scale
Interval -0.45 to -0.24
|
-0.26 Units on a scale
Interval -0.36 to -0.15
|
-0.23 Units on a scale
Interval -0.34 to -0.12
|
-0.23 Units on a scale
Interval -0.34 to -0.12
|
-0.28 Units on a scale
Interval -0.44 to -0.13
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 24: activity limitations
|
-0.29 Units on a scale
Interval -0.39 to -0.19
|
-0.30 Units on a scale
Interval -0.4 to -0.2
|
-0.30 Units on a scale
Interval -0.4 to -0.2
|
-0.31 Units on a scale
Interval -0.41 to -0.21
|
-0.28 Units on a scale
Interval -0.38 to -0.18
|
-0.31 Units on a scale
Interval -0.45 to -0.16
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 4: emotional symptoms
|
-0.28 Units on a scale
Interval -0.4 to -0.16
|
-0.37 Units on a scale
Interval -0.49 to -0.25
|
-0.22 Units on a scale
Interval -0.34 to -0.1
|
-0.33 Units on a scale
Interval -0.45 to -0.21
|
-0.31 Units on a scale
Interval -0.44 to -0.19
|
-0.29 Units on a scale
Interval -0.47 to -0.11
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 8: emotional symptoms
|
-0.39 Units on a scale
Interval -0.51 to -0.27
|
-0.50 Units on a scale
Interval -0.62 to -0.38
|
-0.46 Units on a scale
Interval -0.58 to -0.34
|
-0.50 Units on a scale
Interval -0.62 to -0.37
|
-0.36 Units on a scale
Interval -0.48 to -0.23
|
-0.45 Units on a scale
Interval -0.62 to -0.27
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 34, 40, and 48Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specified time point.
AAPPO scale is 11-item self-administered questionnaire that measured hair loss, emotional symptoms, and activity limitations over past week. Items 1-4 assessed current hair loss, eyebrow loss, eyelash loss and body hair loss and were analyzed separately on scale of 0-4, with 0 ='no hair loss' and 4='complete hair loss'. Items 5-8 assessed emotional symptoms. Response choices on these items were scored from 0 ='never' to 4='always'. Items 9-11 assessed activity limitations. Response choices on these items were scored from 0='not at all' to 4='completely'. Change from baseline in AAPPO emotional symptoms sub score were calculated as mean of items 5-8 and ranged from 0(never) to 4(always), where higher scores indicated more emotional symptoms. Change from baseline in AAPPO activity limitations sub score was calculated as mean of items 9-11 and ranged from 0(not at all) to 4(completely), where higher scores indicated more activity limitations. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 34: emotional symptoms
|
-0.77 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
-0.78 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
-0.72 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
-0.72 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
-0.71 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
-0.62 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
-0.64 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
|
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 40: emotional symptoms
|
-0.83 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
-0.84 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
-0.80 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
-0.81 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
|
-0.83 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
-0.62 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
-0.66 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 48: emotional symptoms
|
-0.98 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
-0.96 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
-0.84 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
-0.85 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
-0.72 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
-0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
-0.68 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 34: activity limitations
|
-0.36 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.59
|
-0.37 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
-0.31 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.78
|
-0.26 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.73
|
-0.37 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.78
|
-0.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
-0.42 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.78
|
|
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 40: activity limitations
|
-0.40 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
-0.44 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
-0.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
-0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
-0.42 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.81
|
-0.23 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
-0.39 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
|
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 48: activity limitations
|
-0.44 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
-0.43 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.79
|
-0.39 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
-0.29 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
-0.36 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
-0.26 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
-0.36 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.81
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specified time point.
AAPPO scale is a 11-item self-administered questionnaire that measured hair loss, emotional symptoms, and activity limitations over the past week. Items 1-4 were to assess the current hair loss, eyebrow loss, eyelash loss and body hair loss and were analyzed separately on a scale of 0-4, with 0 ='no hair loss' and 4='complete hair loss', where higher scores indicated more hair loss.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 18: current hair loss on scalp
|
8.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.34 to 15.33
|
27.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.27 to 35.43
|
25.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.25 to 32.75
|
13.79 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.52 to 20.07
|
16.38 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.64 to 23.11
|
8.62 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 15.84
|
6.78 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.36 to 13.19
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 24: current hair loss on scalp
|
10.77 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.23 to 18.31
|
35.83 Percentage of participants
Interval 27.25 to 44.41
|
30.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.8 to 38.2
|
26.27 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.33 to 34.21
|
24.58 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.81 to 32.34
|
5.26 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 11.06
|
6.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.33 to 12.37
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 34: current hair loss on scalp
|
22.03 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.46 to 32.61
|
42.02 Percentage of participants
Interval 33.15 to 50.89
|
34.45 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.92 to 42.99
|
29.31 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.03 to 37.59
|
30.25 Percentage of participants
Interval 22.0 to 38.51
|
7.14 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 13.89
|
11.29 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.41 to 19.17
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 40: current hair loss on scalp
|
29.23 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.17 to 40.29
|
41.80 Percentage of participants
Interval 33.05 to 50.56
|
36.59 Percentage of participants
Interval 28.07 to 45.1
|
35.65 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.9 to 44.41
|
32.48 Percentage of participants
Interval 23.99 to 40.96
|
8.93 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.46 to 16.4
|
19.05 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.35 to 28.74
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 18: current hair loss on eyebrows
|
11.11 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.93 to 20.29
|
27.66 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.62 to 36.7
|
33.68 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.18 to 43.19
|
27.47 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.3 to 36.64
|
19.78 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.6 to 27.96
|
13.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.4 to 23.27
|
7.14 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 14.93
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 24: current hair loss on eyebrows
|
12.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.99 to 21.01
|
32.29 Percentage of participants
Interval 22.94 to 41.65
|
32.98 Percentage of participants
Interval 23.47 to 42.48
|
30.43 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.03 to 39.84
|
29.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 20.04 to 38.65
|
6.82 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 14.27
|
10.87 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.87 to 19.86
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 40: current hair loss on eyebrows
|
32.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.07 to 44.93
|
42.27 Percentage of participants
Interval 32.44 to 52.1
|
36.84 Percentage of participants
Interval 27.14 to 46.54
|
38.89 Percentage of participants
Interval 28.82 to 48.96
|
38.04 Percentage of participants
Interval 28.12 to 47.96
|
20.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.31 to 31.69
|
23.91 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.59 to 36.24
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 48: current hair loss on eyebrows
|
38.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.55 to 51.45
|
44.90 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.05 to 54.75
|
34.04 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.46 to 43.62
|
43.96 Percentage of participants
Interval 33.76 to 54.15
|
39.36 Percentage of participants
Interval 29.49 to 49.24
|
15.56 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.97 to 26.14
|
33.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.56 to 47.11
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 12: current hair loss on eyelashes
|
14.63 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.82 to 25.45
|
29.41 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.73 to 39.1
|
26.74 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.39 to 36.1
|
16.46 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.28 to 24.63
|
19.05 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.65 to 27.44
|
8.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 17.36
|
8.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 17.36
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 18: current hair loss on eyelashes
|
12.20 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.18 to 22.21
|
31.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.35 to 41.3
|
37.65 Percentage of participants
Interval 27.35 to 47.95
|
21.05 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.89 to 30.22
|
22.22 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.17 to 31.28
|
7.89 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.47
|
2.94 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.62
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 24: current hair loss on eyelashes
|
13.04 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.31 to 22.78
|
31.40 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.59 to 41.2
|
42.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 31.54 to 52.79
|
31.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 20.82 to 41.51
|
28.05 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.33 to 37.77
|
8.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 17.36
|
2.63 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.72
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 34: current hair loss on eyelashes
|
21.43 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.02 to 33.84
|
40.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 29.59 to 50.41
|
36.59 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.16 to 47.01
|
37.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.39 to 48.28
|
34.52 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.36 to 44.69
|
11.43 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.89 to 21.97
|
13.51 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.5 to 24.53
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 4: current hair loss on body
|
4.26 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.03
|
11.46 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.09 to 17.83
|
9.28 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.5 to 15.05
|
10.42 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.31 to 16.53
|
6.38 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.44 to 11.32
|
2.13 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.25
|
11.36 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.99 to 20.74
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 24: current hair loss on body
|
16.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.98 to 26.68
|
25.81 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.91 to 34.7
|
27.96 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.84 to 37.08
|
20.43 Percentage of participants
Interval 12.24 to 28.62
|
22.22 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.63 to 30.81
|
6.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 13.95
|
11.36 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.99 to 20.74
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 34: current hair loss on eyebrows
|
22.73 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.34 to 35.11
|
42.71 Percentage of participants
Interval 32.81 to 52.6
|
38.71 Percentage of participants
Interval 28.81 to 48.61
|
38.89 Percentage of participants
Interval 28.82 to 48.96
|
31.91 Percentage of participants
Interval 22.49 to 41.34
|
16.28 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.24 to 27.31
|
13.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.4 to 23.27
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 4: current hair loss on eyelashes
|
8.89 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.57 to 17.2
|
11.49 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.79 to 18.2
|
4.60 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 9.0
|
7.59 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.75 to 13.44
|
9.30 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.16 to 15.44
|
5.26 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 12.36
|
5.26 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 12.36
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 8: current hair loss on eyelashes
|
6.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 13.95
|
17.44 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.42 to 25.46
|
17.65 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.54 to 25.75
|
12.82 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.4 to 20.24
|
14.81 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.08 to 22.55
|
7.89 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.47
|
8.11 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.9
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 40: current hair loss on eyelashes
|
28.26 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.25 to 41.27
|
43.02 Percentage of participants
Interval 32.56 to 53.49
|
39.29 Percentage of participants
Interval 28.84 to 49.73
|
32.89 Percentage of participants
Interval 22.33 to 43.46
|
36.59 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.16 to 47.01
|
10.81 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.81 to 20.82
|
13.16 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.41 to 23.91
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 48: current hair loss on eyelashes
|
39.13 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.03 to 53.23
|
41.86 Percentage of participants
Interval 31.43 to 52.29
|
37.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.94 to 47.76
|
38.16 Percentage of participants
Interval 27.24 to 49.08
|
34.52 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.36 to 44.69
|
8.11 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.9
|
28.95 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.53 to 43.37
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 8: current hair loss on body
|
6.38 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 13.37
|
14.74 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.61 to 21.86
|
15.96 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.55 to 23.36
|
13.98 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.93 to 21.03
|
10.11 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.85 to 16.38
|
2.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.39
|
11.63 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.05 to 21.21
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 12: current hair loss on body
|
11.36 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.99 to 20.74
|
17.02 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.42 to 24.62
|
19.15 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.19 to 27.1
|
14.89 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.7 to 22.09
|
14.29 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.1 to 21.48
|
4.44 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.47
|
7.14 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 14.93
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 18: current hair loss on body
|
9.09 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.6 to 17.59
|
19.78 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.6 to 27.96
|
25.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.15 to 33.85
|
15.05 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.79 to 22.32
|
15.91 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.27 to 23.55
|
10.64 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.82 to 19.45
|
7.50 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 15.66
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 34: current hair loss on body
|
22.73 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.34 to 35.11
|
33.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 23.75 to 42.91
|
33.70 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.04 to 43.35
|
31.52 Percentage of participants
Interval 22.03 to 41.02
|
26.09 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.11 to 35.06
|
11.36 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.99 to 20.74
|
9.30 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.62 to 17.98
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 40: current hair loss on body
|
22.45 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.77 to 34.13
|
35.11 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.46 to 44.76
|
36.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.46 to 45.88
|
30.77 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.29 to 40.25
|
25.56 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.54 to 34.57
|
8.70 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.55 to 16.84
|
11.36 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.99 to 20.74
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 48: current hair loss on body
|
34.69 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.37 to 48.02
|
34.74 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.16 to 44.31
|
34.41 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.75 to 44.06
|
36.56 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.77 to 46.35
|
30.43 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.03 to 39.84
|
10.87 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.87 to 19.86
|
20.45 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.54 to 32.37
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 4: current hair loss on scalp
|
6.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.33 to 12.37
|
11.38 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.77 to 16.99
|
9.76 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.51 to 15.0
|
4.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.59 to 7.74
|
4.84 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.06 to 8.62
|
1.69 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.99
|
3.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 8: current hair loss on scalp
|
4.76 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.02
|
11.48 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.82 to 17.13
|
16.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.0 to 23.33
|
7.76 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.89 to 12.63
|
8.47 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.45 to 13.5
|
1.72 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.07
|
8.06 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.29 to 14.84
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 12: current hair loss on scalp
|
6.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.35 to 12.98
|
20.66 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.45 to 27.88
|
19.51 Percentage of participants
Interval 12.51 to 26.52
|
12.71 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.7 to 18.72
|
13.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.25 to 19.42
|
3.57 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.43
|
4.92 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.34
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 48: current hair loss on scalp
|
33.85 Percentage of participants
Interval 22.34 to 45.35
|
42.28 Percentage of participants
Interval 33.55 to 51.01
|
33.61 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.22 to 41.99
|
42.37 Percentage of participants
Interval 33.46 to 51.29
|
32.77 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.34 to 41.21
|
8.62 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 15.84
|
20.97 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.83 to 31.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 4: current hair loss on eyebrows
|
6.25 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 13.1
|
9.09 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.43 to 14.75
|
7.14 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.04 to 12.24
|
7.45 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.14 to 12.75
|
4.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.17 to 8.16
|
4.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.24
|
8.70 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.55 to 16.84
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 8: current hair loss on eyebrows
|
4.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 9.82
|
17.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.85 to 24.84
|
21.05 Percentage of participants
Interval 12.85 to 29.25
|
11.96 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.33 to 18.59
|
10.99 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.56 to 17.41
|
6.52 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 13.66
|
11.11 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.93 to 20.29
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 12: current hair loss on eyebrows
|
11.11 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.93 to 20.29
|
27.84 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.92 to 36.75
|
27.84 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.92 to 36.75
|
18.09 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.3 to 25.87
|
15.96 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.55 to 23.36
|
11.63 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.05 to 21.21
|
6.82 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 14.27
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 4, 8, 12, and 24Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.
HADS is a validated 14-item PRO measure used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Items were rated on a 4-point severity scale. The HADS produces 2 scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states with established normal score cut-offs. The instrument have been validated for use by adolescents aged 12 and older. Each subscale comprised of 7 items and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week prior to baseline visit, on 4-point response scale. Separate scores were calculated for anxiety and depression with score ranges from 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range was from 0 to 21 for depression subscale; higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=131 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24
Change at Week 4
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Interval -0.73 to 0.07
|
-0.1 Units on a scale
Interval -0.54 to 0.26
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Interval -0.82 to -0.01
|
-0.1 Units on a scale
Interval -0.48 to 0.33
|
-0.1 Units on a scale
Interval -0.48 to 0.33
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Interval -0.86 to 0.32
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24
Change at Week 8
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Interval -0.73 to 0.1
|
-0.5 Units on a scale
Interval -0.89 to -0.06
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Interval -0.71 to 0.12
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Interval -0.58 to 0.26
|
0.2 Units on a scale
Interval -0.25 to 0.59
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Interval -0.79 to 0.43
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24
Change at Week 12
|
-0.1 Units on a scale
Interval -0.53 to 0.3
|
-0.6 Units on a scale
Interval -1.04 to -0.21
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Interval -0.81 to 0.03
|
0.0 Units on a scale
Interval -0.45 to 0.39
|
0.1 Units on a scale
Interval -0.32 to 0.53
|
-0.5 Units on a scale
Interval -1.07 to 0.15
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24
Change at Week 24
|
0.0 Units on a scale
Interval -0.46 to 0.39
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Interval -0.79 to 0.07
|
-0.8 Units on a scale
Interval -1.21 to -0.35
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Interval -0.7 to 0.16
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Interval -0.66 to 0.21
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Interval -1.04 to 0.21
|
—
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 48Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.
HADS is a validated 14-item PRO measure used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Items were rated on a 4-point severity scale. The HADS produces 2 scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states with established normal score cut-offs. The instrument have been validated for use by adolescents aged 12 and older. Each subscale comprised of 7 items and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week prior to baseline visit, on 4-point response scale. Separate scores were calculated for anxiety and depression with score ranges from 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range was from 0 to 21 for depression subscale; higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48
Baseline
|
3.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.36
|
2.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.60
|
3.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.16
|
2.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.00
|
2.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.99
|
2.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.80
|
3.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48
Change at Week 48
|
-0.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.25
|
-0.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.13
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.15
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.67
|
-0.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.44
|
-0.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.53
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.28
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 4, 8, 12, and 24Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.
HADS is a validated 14-item PRO measure used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Items were rated on a 4-point severity scale. The HADS produces 2 scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states with established normal score cut-offs. The instrument have been validated for use by adolescents aged 12 and older. Each subscale comprised of 7 items and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week prior to baseline visit, on 4-point response scale. Separate scores were calculated for anxiety and depression with score ranges from 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range was from 0 to 21 for anxiety subscale; higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=131 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24
Change at Week 4
|
-0.1 Units on a scale
Interval -0.54 to 0.32
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Interval -0.78 to 0.08
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Interval -0.79 to 0.08
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Interval -0.79 to 0.08
|
-0.5 Units on a scale
Interval -0.97 to -0.1
|
-0.6 Units on a scale
Interval -1.25 to 0.02
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24
Change at Week 8
|
-0.5 Units on a scale
Interval -0.96 to -0.03
|
-0.8 Units on a scale
Interval -1.25 to -0.31
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Interval -0.88 to 0.07
|
-0.8 Units on a scale
Interval -1.27 to -0.31
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Interval -0.79 to 0.17
|
-0.9 Units on a scale
Interval -1.59 to -0.2
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24
Change at Week 12
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Interval -0.84 to 0.09
|
-0.7 Units on a scale
Interval -1.22 to -0.28
|
-0.9 Units on a scale
Interval -1.4 to -0.46
|
-0.7 Units on a scale
Interval -1.22 to -0.27
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Interval -0.77 to 0.19
|
-0.9 Units on a scale
Interval -1.55 to -0.17
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24
Change at Week 24
|
-0.6 Units on a scale
Interval -1.06 to -0.07
|
-0.8 Units on a scale
Interval -1.26 to -0.25
|
-0.7 Units on a scale
Interval -1.19 to -0.18
|
-0.8 Units on a scale
Interval -1.28 to -0.27
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Interval -0.76 to 0.26
|
-1.0 Units on a scale
Interval -1.69 to -0.21
|
—
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 48Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.
HADS is a validated 14-item PRO measure used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Items were rated on a 4-point severity scale. The HADS produces 2 scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states with established normal score cut-offs. The instrument have been validated for use by adolescents aged 12 and older. Each subscale comprised of 7 items and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week prior to baseline visit, on 4-point response scale. Separate scores were calculated for anxiety and depression with score ranges from 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range was from 0 to 21 for anxiety subscale; higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=131 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48
Baseline
|
5.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.20
|
4.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.84
|
4.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.18
|
4.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.31
|
4.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.42
|
5.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.38
|
5.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.70
|
|
Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48
Change at Week 48
|
-1.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.31
|
-1.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.92
|
-0.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.10
|
-0.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.09
|
-0.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.40
|
-1.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.89
|
-0.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.53
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Week 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.
HADS is a validated 14-item PRO measure used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Items were rated on a 4-point severity scale. The HADS produces 2 scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states with established normal score cut-offs. The instrument have been validated for use by adolescents aged 12 and older. Each subscale comprised of 7 items and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week prior to baseline visit, on 4-point response scale. Separate scores were calculated for anxiety and depression with score ranges from 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range was from 0 to 21 for depression subscale; higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=5 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=7 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=5 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48
Week 12
|
60.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.06 to 100.0
|
50.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.99 to 90.01
|
63.64 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.21 to 92.06
|
66.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 39.99 to 93.34
|
30.77 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.68 to 55.86
|
20.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 55.06
|
62.50 Percentage of participants
Interval 28.95 to 96.05
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48
Week 24
|
50.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 99.0
|
71.43 Percentage of participants
Interval 37.96 to 100.0
|
63.64 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.21 to 92.06
|
41.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.77 to 69.56
|
42.86 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.93 to 68.78
|
50.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 99.0
|
50.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.01 to 80.99
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48
Week 4
|
60.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.06 to 100.0
|
42.86 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.2 to 79.52
|
60.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 29.64 to 90.36
|
53.85 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.75 to 80.95
|
42.86 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.93 to 68.78
|
40.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 82.94
|
50.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.01 to 80.99
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48
Week 8
|
50.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 99.0
|
66.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 28.95 to 100.0
|
45.45 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.03 to 74.88
|
58.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 30.44 to 86.23
|
33.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.66 to 60.01
|
20.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 55.06
|
40.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.64 to 70.36
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48
Week 48
|
60.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.06 to 100.0
|
50.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.99 to 90.01
|
63.64 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.21 to 92.06
|
58.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 30.44 to 86.23
|
46.15 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.05 to 73.25
|
80.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 44.94 to 100.0
|
60.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 29.64 to 90.36
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Week 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.
HADS is a validated 14-item PRO measure used to assessed states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Items were rated on a 4-point severity scale. The HADS produces 2 scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states with established normal score cut-offs. The instrument have been validated for use by adolescents aged 12 and older. Each subscale comprised of 7 items and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week prior to baseline visit, on 4-point response scale. Separate scores were calculated for anxiety and depression with score ranges from 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range was from 0 to 21 for anxiety subscale; higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=19 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=29 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=22 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=26 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48
Week 4
|
31.58 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.68 to 52.48
|
51.72 Percentage of participants
Interval 33.54 to 69.91
|
45.45 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.65 to 66.26
|
34.62 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.33 to 52.9
|
37.50 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.78 to 61.22
|
40.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.21 to 64.79
|
30.77 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.68 to 55.86
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48
Week 8
|
33.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.56 to 55.11
|
46.43 Percentage of participants
Interval 27.96 to 64.9
|
50.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 28.09 to 71.91
|
68.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 49.71 to 86.29
|
41.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.77 to 69.56
|
71.43 Percentage of participants
Interval 47.76 to 95.09
|
46.15 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.05 to 73.25
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48
Week 12
|
47.37 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.92 to 69.82
|
50.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 31.48 to 68.52
|
57.89 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.69 to 80.1
|
38.46 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.76 to 57.16
|
56.25 Percentage of participants
Interval 31.94 to 80.56
|
42.86 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.93 to 68.78
|
41.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.77 to 69.56
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48
Week 24
|
44.44 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.49 to 67.4
|
51.85 Percentage of participants
Interval 33.01 to 70.7
|
65.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 44.1 to 85.9
|
50.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 30.78 to 69.22
|
46.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.42 to 71.91
|
57.14 Percentage of participants
Interval 31.22 to 83.07
|
38.46 Percentage of participants
Interval 12.02 to 64.91
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48
Week 48
|
57.89 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.69 to 80.1
|
53.85 Percentage of participants
Interval 34.68 to 73.01
|
66.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 44.89 to 88.44
|
60.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 40.8 to 79.2
|
50.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 23.81 to 76.19
|
61.54 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.09 to 87.98
|
58.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 30.44 to 86.23
|
Adverse Events
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=131 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=129 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=62 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
0.76%
1/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.78%
1/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
|
0.00%
0/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.76%
1/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Empyema
|
0.76%
1/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.76%
1/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Chemical poisoning
|
0.00%
0/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.78%
1/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer
|
0.00%
0/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Invasive lobular breast carcinoma
|
0.76%
1/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion spontaneous
|
0.76%
1/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.5%
1/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Conversion disorder
|
0.00%
0/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.5%
1/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal behaviour
|
0.00%
0/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.78%
1/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.6%
1/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Heavy menstrual bleeding
|
0.00%
0/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.5%
1/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.00%
0/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
|
0.00%
0/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.6%
1/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=131 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=129 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=62 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.76%
1/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
3.9%
5/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
3.8%
5/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
2.3%
3/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
6.2%
4/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.76%
1/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
5.3%
7/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.6%
1/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.5%
1/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
6.9%
9/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
3.1%
4/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
9.2%
12/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
6.1%
8/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
6.2%
4/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.5%
1/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
8.4%
11/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
2.3%
3/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
2.3%
3/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
9.1%
12/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
4.8%
3/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
12.3%
8/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.5%
1/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
4.6%
6/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
5.4%
7/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.5%
2/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
3.8%
5/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.6%
1/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
3.1%
2/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
4.5%
3/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
3.1%
4/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
4.7%
6/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
4.6%
6/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
4.5%
6/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
6.5%
4/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
4.6%
3/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
3.0%
2/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Folliculitis
|
8.4%
11/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
8.5%
11/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
6.2%
8/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
3.8%
5/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
6.5%
4/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
6.2%
4/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
6.1%
4/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
6.1%
8/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.78%
1/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
2.3%
3/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
2.3%
3/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
4.8%
3/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.5%
1/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
14.5%
19/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
16.3%
21/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
13.8%
18/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
15.9%
21/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
11.3%
7/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
10.8%
7/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
6.1%
4/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
13.7%
18/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
9.3%
12/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
8.5%
11/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
12.1%
16/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
3.2%
2/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
10.8%
7/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
9.1%
6/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
8.4%
11/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
2.3%
3/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
3.8%
5/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
6.2%
4/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
3.0%
2/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
3.1%
4/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
3.9%
5/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.5%
2/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
3.0%
4/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
3.2%
2/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
3.1%
2/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
9.1%
6/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
4.6%
6/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
2.3%
3/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
2.3%
3/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
3.8%
5/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
9.7%
6/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.5%
1/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
6.9%
9/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
6.2%
8/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
3.1%
4/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
6.1%
8/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.6%
1/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
3.0%
2/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
13.0%
17/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
10.9%
14/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
12.3%
16/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
18.2%
24/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
19.4%
12/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
12.3%
8/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
12.1%
8/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
2.3%
3/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.5%
2/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.76%
1/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.6%
1/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.5%
1/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
6.1%
4/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
4.6%
6/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
2.3%
3/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
2.3%
3/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
6.2%
4/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
3.0%
2/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
0.76%
1/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.78%
1/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.5%
2/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
2.3%
3/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
6.5%
4/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.5%
1/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.5%
1/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
3.1%
4/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
4.7%
6/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
4.6%
6/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.76%
1/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
3.1%
2/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
7.6%
5/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
|
4.6%
6/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
7.8%
10/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
9.2%
12/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
9.1%
12/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
4.8%
3/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
7.7%
5/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
12.1%
8/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
3.1%
4/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
5.4%
7/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
2.3%
3/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.6%
1/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.5%
1/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.5%
1/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
3.8%
5/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
2.3%
3/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
5.4%
7/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.76%
1/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.5%
1/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.5%
1/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
6.9%
9/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
7.0%
9/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
5.4%
7/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
3.8%
5/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
1.6%
1/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
6.2%
4/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
6.1%
4/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER