Trial Outcomes & Findings for PF-06651600 for the Treatment of Alopecia Areata (NCT NCT03732807)

NCT ID: NCT03732807

Last Updated: 2022-02-24

Results Overview

SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT score less than or equal to (\<=) 20 at week 24 were reported.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Target enrollment

718 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Week 24

Results posted on

2022-02-24

Participant Flow

Total 1097 participants signed the informed consent form. Out of which 379 participants were screen failures, 718 actually enrolled into the study and were assigned to study treatments.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe alopecia areata (AA) with greater than or equal to (\>=) 50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 milligram (mg) tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Treatment Period (up to Week 24)
STARTED
132
130
130
132
63
65
66
Treatment Period (up to Week 24)
COMPLETED
122
124
121
117
58
63
61
Treatment Period (up to Week 24)
NOT COMPLETED
10
6
9
15
5
2
5
Treatment Extension (Week 25 up to 48)
STARTED
113
111
108
106
49
59
57
Treatment Extension (Week 25 up to 48)
COMPLETED
107
100
103
97
44
56
53
Treatment Extension (Week 25 up to 48)
NOT COMPLETED
6
11
5
9
5
3
4

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe alopecia areata (AA) with greater than or equal to (\>=) 50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 milligram (mg) tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Treatment Period (up to Week 24)
Adverse Event
3
0
2
4
2
0
1
Treatment Period (up to Week 24)
Lost to Follow-up
1
0
1
2
1
0
0
Treatment Period (up to Week 24)
Physician Decision
0
1
2
5
0
0
1
Treatment Period (up to Week 24)
Pregnancy
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
Treatment Period (up to Week 24)
Protocol Violation
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
Treatment Period (up to Week 24)
Withdrawal by Subject
4
4
4
4
1
1
2
Treatment Period (up to Week 24)
Lack of Efficacy
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
Treatment Extension (Week 25 up to 48)
Adverse Event
0
2
2
1
0
0
2
Treatment Extension (Week 25 up to 48)
Lack of Efficacy
2
1
0
3
3
0
1
Treatment Extension (Week 25 up to 48)
Lost to Follow-up
0
0
2
1
1
2
0
Treatment Extension (Week 25 up to 48)
Non-Compliant with study drug
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
Treatment Extension (Week 25 up to 48)
Physician Decision
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
Treatment Extension (Week 25 up to 48)
Withdrawal by Subject
3
2
1
1
0
1
1
Treatment Extension (Week 25 up to 48)
Other
1
4
0
2
0
0
0

Baseline Characteristics

PF-06651600 for the Treatment of Alopecia Areata

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Total
n=718 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
34.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.98 • n=5 Participants
33.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.75 • n=7 Participants
32.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.36 • n=5 Participants
33.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.83 • n=4 Participants
34.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.88 • n=21 Participants
33.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.01 • n=8 Participants
35.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.89 • n=8 Participants
33.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.33 • n=24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
81 Participants
n=5 Participants
85 Participants
n=7 Participants
71 Participants
n=5 Participants
80 Participants
n=4 Participants
43 Participants
n=21 Participants
46 Participants
n=8 Participants
40 Participants
n=8 Participants
446 Participants
n=24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
51 Participants
n=5 Participants
45 Participants
n=7 Participants
59 Participants
n=5 Participants
52 Participants
n=4 Participants
20 Participants
n=21 Participants
19 Participants
n=8 Participants
26 Participants
n=8 Participants
272 Participants
n=24 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
23 Participants
n=4 Participants
8 Participants
n=21 Participants
7 Participants
n=8 Participants
4 Participants
n=8 Participants
87 Participants
n=24 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
113 Participants
n=5 Participants
114 Participants
n=7 Participants
116 Participants
n=5 Participants
109 Participants
n=4 Participants
55 Participants
n=21 Participants
58 Participants
n=8 Participants
61 Participants
n=8 Participants
626 Participants
n=24 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
5 Participants
n=24 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
3 Participants
n=24 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
43 Participants
n=5 Participants
34 Participants
n=4 Participants
17 Participants
n=21 Participants
14 Participants
n=8 Participants
17 Participants
n=8 Participants
186 Participants
n=24 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
1 Participants
n=24 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
2 Participants
n=21 Participants
2 Participants
n=8 Participants
2 Participants
n=8 Participants
27 Participants
n=24 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
92 Participants
n=5 Participants
90 Participants
n=7 Participants
79 Participants
n=5 Participants
91 Participants
n=4 Participants
42 Participants
n=21 Participants
47 Participants
n=8 Participants
47 Participants
n=8 Participants
488 Participants
n=24 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
2 Participants
n=8 Participants
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
8 Participants
n=24 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
5 Participants
n=24 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Participants with missing SALT scores due to coronavirus disease-19 related reasons were excluded from this analysis, while participants with missing data due to other reasons were considered as non-responders. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT score less than or equal to (\<=) 20 at week 24 were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=124 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=121 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=124 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=119 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=59 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 24
1.54 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 3.65
30.65 Percentage of participants
Interval 22.53 to 38.76
22.31 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.9 to 29.73
23.39 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.94 to 30.84
14.29 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.0 to 20.57
1.69 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.99

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Analysis 4: Data imputed by using a missing at random (MAR) mechanism for participants with missing data due to COVID-19. Missing data due to reasons not related to COVID-19 were consider as non-responders.

SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT score \<= 10 at week 24 were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=125 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=118 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=119 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=119 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=114 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=55 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Analysis 4
1.54 Percentage of participants
21.29 Percentage of participants
12.87 Percentage of participants
13.42 Percentage of participants
10.62 Percentage of participants
1.65 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Analysis 1: Participants with missing SALT score at Week 24 due to COVID-19 related reasons excluded from analysis at that time point, participants with missing SALT scores due to other reasons counted as non-responders at that time point.

SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT score \<= 10 at week 24 were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=124 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=121 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=124 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=119 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=59 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Analysis 1
1.54 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 3.65
21.77 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.51 to 29.04
13.22 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.19 to 19.26
13.71 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.66 to 19.76
10.92 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.32 to 16.53
1.69 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.99

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

PGI-C is a self-administered questionnaire to evaluate the improvement or worsening of participant's AA as compared to the start of the study. PGI-C was assessed on a 7-point Likert scale ranged from 1 (greatly improved) to 7 (greatly worsened). Categories were defined based on the PGI-C scores as follows: 1=greatly improved, 2=moderately improved, 3=slightly improved, 4=not changed, 5=slightly worsened, 6=moderately worsened and 7=greatly worsened.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=125 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=120 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=119 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=120 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=116 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=55 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 24
9.23 Percentage of participants
52.19 Percentage of participants
45.40 Percentage of participants
49.17 Percentage of participants
41.95 Percentage of participants
11.36 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

The exposure response of Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) on the regrowth of scalp hair was characterized using a Bayesian three-parameter hyperbolic Emax model for the SALT score \<=20 at Week 24 with an additional term for effect of loading dose. In Emax exposure-response model the response function was the log odds of the percentage of participants with response based on SALT \<=20 at Week 24, which was fit on the logistic scale and then back-transformed to percentage. The effect of loading dose is included as fixed factor in the model. The variable that represents loading dose has values of 1 for groups 200/50 mg once daily and 200/30 mg once daily and of 0 for the remaining groups. SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=124 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=121 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=124 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=119 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=59 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Exposure Response of PF-06651600 on Regrowth of Lost Hair Based on Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 24: Maximum Effect (Emax) Model
1.63 Percentage of participants
32.37 Percentage of participants
20.57 Percentage of participants
22.52 Percentage of participants
13.58 Percentage of participants
4.81 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

The exposure response of Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) on the regrowth of scalp hair was characterized using a Bayesian three-parameter hyperbolic Emax model for the SALT score \<=10 at Week 24 with an additional term for effect of loading dose. In Emax exposure-response model the response function was the log odds of the percentage of participants with response based on SALT \<=10 at Week 24, which was fit on the logistic scale and then back-transformed to percentage. The effect of loading dose is included as fixed factor in the model. The variable that represents loading dose has values of 1 for groups 200/50 mg once daily and 200/30 mg once daily and of 0 for the remaining groups. SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=124 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=121 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=124 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=119 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=59 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Exposure Response of PF-06651600 on Regrowth of Lost Hair Based on Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 24: Maximum Effect (Emax) Model
1.66 Percentage of participants
21.29 Percentage of participants
13.76 Percentage of participants
14.43 Percentage of participants
9.02 Percentage of participants
3.88 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 4
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=20.
0.78 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.29
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% confidence interval (CI) could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=20.
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=20.
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=20.
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=20.
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=20.
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 8
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=20.
5.47 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.53 to 9.41
4.13 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.59 to 7.68
2.46 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.21
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=20.
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=20.
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=20.
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 28
1.75 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.16
34.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.68 to 42.65
23.53 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.91 to 31.15
26.05 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.16 to 33.94
20.49 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.33 to 27.65
5.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.51
6.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.33 to 12.37
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 12
1.64 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.83
11.90 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.25 to 17.56
8.87 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.87 to 13.88
6.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.09 to 10.61
3.28 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.12 to 6.44
3.39 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.01
1.59 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.67
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 18
1.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.91
19.83 Percentage of participants
Interval 12.73 to 26.94
13.22 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.19 to 19.26
13.11 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.12 to 19.1
9.40 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.11 to 14.69
3.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.88
1.61 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.75
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 34
19.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.7 to 29.65
38.40 Percentage of participants
Interval 29.87 to 46.93
27.64 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.74 to 35.55
33.87 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.54 to 42.2
28.69 Percentage of participants
Interval 20.66 to 36.71
5.08 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.69
9.23 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.19 to 16.27
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 40
23.08 Percentage of participants
Interval 12.83 to 33.32
39.06 Percentage of participants
Interval 30.61 to 47.51
33.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.0 to 41.66
39.34 Percentage of participants
Interval 30.68 to 48.01
30.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.8 to 38.2
6.78 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.36 to 13.19
15.38 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.61 to 24.16
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 20 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 48
33.85 Percentage of participants
Interval 22.34 to 45.35
39.53 Percentage of participants
Interval 31.1 to 47.97
34.43 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.0 to 42.86
43.20 Percentage of participants
Interval 34.52 to 51.88
31.15 Percentage of participants
Interval 22.93 to 39.37
9.84 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.36 to 17.31
18.75 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.19 to 28.31

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants with SALT score \<=10 were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 28
1.75 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.16
29.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.03 to 37.3
16.81 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.09 to 23.53
18.49 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.51 to 25.46
16.39 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.82 to 22.96
3.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.88
3.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.5
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 4
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=10.
0.78 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.29
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=10.
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=10.
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=10.
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=10.
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=10.
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 8
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=10.
2.34 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.96
0.83 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.44
0.82 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.42
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=10.
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=10.
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=10.
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 18
1.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.91
12.40 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.52 to 18.27
7.44 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.76 to 12.11
6.56 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.16 to 10.95
5.13 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.13 to 9.12
1.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.91
1.61 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.75
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 34
13.11 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.64 to 21.59
30.40 Percentage of participants
Interval 22.34 to 38.46
18.70 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.81 to 25.59
23.39 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.94 to 30.84
22.13 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.76 to 29.5
3.39 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.01
4.62 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 9.72
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 40
18.46 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.03 to 27.89
31.25 Percentage of participants
Interval 23.22 to 39.28
25.20 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.53 to 32.88
27.05 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.17 to 34.93
25.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.25 to 32.75
3.39 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.01
9.23 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.19 to 16.27
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 48
24.62 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.14 to 35.09
33.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.2 to 41.47
27.87 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.91 to 35.82
31.20 Percentage of participants
Interval 23.08 to 39.32
25.41 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.68 to 33.14
6.56 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.35 to 12.77
14.06 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.55 to 22.58
Percentage of Participants With an Absolute SALT Score of Less Than or Equal to 10 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 12
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with SALT score \<=10.
6.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.09 to 10.61
5.65 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.58 to 9.71
5.56 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.56 to 9.56
0.82 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.42
1.69 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.99
1.59 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.67

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. A SALT 75 response was a 75% or greater reduction from baseline in SALT score.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Percentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 24
1.54 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.53
31.45 Percentage of participants
Interval 23.28 to 39.62
20.66 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.45 to 27.88
22.58 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.22 to 29.94
13.45 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.32 to 19.57
1.69 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.99
3.08 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.28
Percentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 4
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least 75% improvement in SALT score.
0.78 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.29
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least 75% improvement in SALT score.
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least 75% improvement in SALT score.
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least 75% improvement in SALT score.
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least 75% improvement in SALT score.
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least 75% improvement in SALT score.
Percentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 12
1.64 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.83
11.90 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.25 to 17.56
8.06 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.27 to 12.86
6.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.09 to 10.61
2.46 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.21
1.69 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.99
1.59 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.67
Percentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 40
23.08 Percentage of participants
Interval 12.83 to 33.32
39.84 Percentage of participants
Interval 31.36 to 48.33
34.96 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.53 to 43.39
42.62 Percentage of participants
Interval 33.85 to 51.4
30.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.8 to 38.2
5.08 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.69
15.38 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.61 to 24.16
Percentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 8
1.59 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.67
4.69 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.03 to 8.35
3.31 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.12 to 6.49
1.64 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 3.89
0.83 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.44
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least 75% improvement in SALT score.
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least 75% improvement in SALT score.
Percentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 18
1.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.91
20.66 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.45 to 27.88
14.88 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.54 to 21.22
9.84 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.55 to 15.12
11.11 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.42 to 16.81
1.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.91
1.61 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.75
Percentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 28
3.51 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.29
34.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.68 to 42.65
24.37 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.66 to 32.08
27.73 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.69 to 35.77
21.31 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.04 to 28.58
5.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.51
4.76 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.02
Percentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 34
21.31 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.03 to 31.59
38.40 Percentage of participants
Interval 29.87 to 46.93
32.52 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.24 to 40.8
38.71 Percentage of participants
Interval 30.14 to 47.28
28.69 Percentage of participants
Interval 20.66 to 36.71
5.08 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.69
10.77 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.23 to 18.31
Percentage of Participants With at Least 75% Improvement in SALT Score (SALT75) From Baseline at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 48
32.31 Percentage of participants
Interval 20.94 to 43.68
39.53 Percentage of participants
Interval 31.1 to 47.97
36.07 Percentage of participants
Interval 27.54 to 44.59
46.40 Percentage of participants
Interval 37.66 to 55.14
31.15 Percentage of participants
Interval 22.93 to 39.37
9.84 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.36 to 17.31
21.88 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.75 to 32.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=131 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Change From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24
Change at Week 8
-1.2 Units on a scale
Interval -3.99 to 1.5
-12.8 Units on a scale
Interval -15.56 to -10.05
-12.5 Units on a scale
Interval -15.28 to -9.71
-6.3 Units on a scale
Interval -9.1 to -3.5
-5.0 Units on a scale
Interval -7.82 to -2.21
-1.7 Units on a scale
Interval -5.74 to 2.34
Change From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24
Change at Week 12
-2.4 Units on a scale
Interval -6.12 to 1.35
-22.7 Units on a scale
Interval -26.47 to -18.97
-20.1 Units on a scale
Interval -23.87 to -16.3
-12.4 Units on a scale
Interval -16.18 to -8.61
-10.3 Units on a scale
Interval -14.11 to -6.47
-3.5 Units on a scale
Interval -9.0 to 1.98
Change From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24
Change at Week 24
-5.1 Units on a scale
Interval -10.03 to -0.13
-36.5 Units on a scale
Interval -41.54 to -31.53
-29.2 Units on a scale
Interval -34.21 to -24.15
-33.3 Units on a scale
Interval -38.33 to -28.25
-23.6 Units on a scale
Interval -28.72 to -18.45
-4.2 Units on a scale
Interval -11.5 to 3.13
Change From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24
Change at Week 4
-0.9 Units on a scale
Interval -2.17 to 0.46
-2.3 Units on a scale
Interval -3.64 to -1.01
-2.7 Units on a scale
Interval -4.03 to -1.35
-1.8 Units on a scale
Interval -3.16 to -0.5
-1.3 Units on a scale
Interval -2.6 to 0.06
-1.3 Units on a scale
Interval -3.19 to 0.69
Change From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24
Change at Week 18
-3.9 Units on a scale
Interval -8.31 to 0.43
-31.2 Units on a scale
Interval -35.63 to -26.83
-25.0 Units on a scale
Interval -29.41 to -20.55
-22.5 Units on a scale
Interval -26.94 to -18.07
-17.5 Units on a scale
Interval -22.02 to -13.02
-2.4 Units on a scale
Interval -8.87 to 3.97

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 28, 34, 40, and 48

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

SALT is a quantitative assessment of AA severity based on the scalp hair loss. The SALT score can vary from 0 (normal) to 100 (severe), with higher scores representing increased severity of disease. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Change From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48
Change at Week 28
-11.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.75
-44.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 36.35
-33.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.85
-36.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.42
-29.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.56
-5.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.15
-5.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.51
Change From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48
Change at Week 40
-36.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 34.56
-49.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 36.11
-38.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 37.14
-46.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.68
-35.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.90
-11.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.01
-23.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.64
Change From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48
Change at Week 48
-46.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.51
-49.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 36.09
-40.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 37.27
-48.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 36.63
-40.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.87
-13.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.13
-32.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.39
Change From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48
Baseline
94.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.31
90.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.05
90.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.28
90.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.69
90.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.07
88.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.87
91.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.22
Change From Baseline in SALT Score at Week 28, 34, 40, and 48
Change at Week 34
-27.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.78
-48.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 36.16
-35.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.50
-43.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 34.35
-33.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.01
-7.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.61
-12.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.47

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

EBA is a numeric rating scale developed to characterize eyebrow hair loss. The numeric rating scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (normal), where, 0= no eyebrow, 1=minimal eyebrow, 2=moderate eyebrow and 3= normal eyebrow, where higher scores represent less hair loss of eyebrows.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 24
3.64 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.58
33.98 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.83 to 43.13
25.49 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.03 to 33.95
29.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 20.11 to 37.89
16.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.43 to 23.9
8.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.51 to 16.15
5.77 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 12.11
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 8
3.77 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.9
10.28 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.53 to 16.03
13.86 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.12 to 20.6
2.97 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.28
4.90 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.71 to 9.09
3.85 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 9.07
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least a 2-grade improvement or a score of 3 in EBA.
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 12
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least a 2-grade improvement or a score of 3 in EBA.
22.86 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.83 to 30.89
17.48 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.14 to 24.81
9.62 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.95 to 15.28
7.62 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.54 to 12.69
6.25 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 13.1
4.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 9.43
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 18
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least a 2-grade improvement or a score of 3 in EBA.
29.70 Percentage of participants
Interval 20.79 to 38.61
18.81 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.19 to 26.43
17.82 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.36 to 25.29
12.87 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.34 to 19.4
10.20 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.73 to 18.68
8.16 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.5 to 15.83
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 28
4.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 9.82
37.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 27.54 to 46.46
29.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 20.11 to 37.89
27.27 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.5 to 36.05
24.76 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.51 to 33.02
12.24 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.07 to 21.42
6.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 12.58
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 34
15.69 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.71 to 25.67
41.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 31.88 to 50.81
30.77 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.9 to 39.64
34.65 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.37 to 43.93
31.43 Percentage of participants
Interval 22.55 to 40.31
14.58 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.6 to 24.57
13.46 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.18 to 22.74
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 40
20.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.43 to 30.57
43.40 Percentage of participants
Interval 33.96 to 52.83
30.39 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.47 to 39.32
39.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 29.44 to 48.56
33.65 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.57 to 42.74
16.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.84 to 26.16
26.92 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.87 to 38.98
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 48
30.91 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.7 to 43.12
42.99 Percentage of participants
Interval 33.61 to 52.37
32.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 23.53 to 41.82
43.56 Percentage of participants
Interval 33.89 to 53.23
33.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.32 to 42.35
16.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.84 to 26.16
31.37 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.64 to 44.11
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyebrow Assessment (EBA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal EBA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 4
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least a 2-grade improvement or a score of 3 in EBA.
1.87 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.44
2.88 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.1
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least a 2-grade improvement or a score of 3 in EBA.
0.93 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.76
1.96 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.77
3.85 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 9.07

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

ELA is a numeric rating scale developed to characterize eyelash hair loss. The numeric rating scale ranges from 0 (none) to 3 (normal), where, 0=no eyelash, 1=minimal eyelash, 2=moderate eyelash and 3=normal eyelash, where higher scores represent less hair loss of eyelash.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 4
2.04 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
3.03 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.41
1.08 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 3.17
5.38 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.79 to 9.96
1.03 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 3.04
4.55 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.7
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least a 2-grade improvement or a score of 3 in ELA.
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 8
2.04 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
9.09 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.43 to 14.75
4.44 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.19 to 8.7
8.79 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.97 to 14.61
4.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.18 to 8.51
2.22 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.53
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least a 2-grade improvement or a score of 3 in ELA.
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 12
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least a 2-grade improvement or a score of 3 in ELA.
16.49 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.11 to 23.88
10.99 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.56 to 17.41
11.70 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.2 to 18.2
7.37 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.11 to 12.62
4.76 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 11.2
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least a 2-grade improvement or a score of 3 in ELA.
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 18
2.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.39
25.53 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.72 to 34.35
20.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.74 to 28.26
20.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.74 to 28.26
12.09 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.39 to 18.79
6.98 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 14.59
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least a 2-grade improvement or a score of 3 in ELA.
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 24
9.80 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.64 to 17.97
30.21 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.02 to 39.39
21.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 12.84 to 29.86
28.89 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.52 to 38.25
26.09 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.11 to 35.06
4.88 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 11.47
0.00 Percentage of participants
95% CI could not be calculated as there were no participants with at least a 2-grade improvement or a score of 3 in ELA.
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 28
6.82 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 14.27
29.79 Percentage of participants
Interval 20.54 to 39.03
25.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.95 to 34.05
36.78 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.65 to 46.91
24.21 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.6 to 32.82
4.76 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 11.2
4.55 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.7
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 34
16.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.12 to 27.21
34.02 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.59 to 43.45
26.37 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.32 to 35.43
38.89 Percentage of participants
Interval 28.82 to 48.96
26.32 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.46 to 35.17
7.32 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 15.29
6.52 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 13.66
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 40
25.49 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.53 to 37.45
39.80 Percentage of participants
Interval 30.1 to 49.49
28.09 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.75 to 37.43
38.20 Percentage of participants
Interval 28.11 to 48.3
27.66 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.62 to 36.7
18.60 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.97 to 30.24
17.39 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.44 to 28.34
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline or a Score of 3 in Eyelash Assessment (ELA) Score (Among Participants Without Normal ELA at Baseline) at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 28, 34, 40, and 48
Week 48
37.25 Percentage of participants
Interval 23.99 to 50.52
38.38 Percentage of participants
Interval 28.8 to 47.96
29.55 Percentage of participants
Interval 20.01 to 39.08
40.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 29.88 to 50.12
30.53 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.27 to 39.79
20.93 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.77 to 33.09
35.56 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.57 to 49.54

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

PGI-C is a self-administered questionnaire to evaluate the improvement or worsening of participant's AA as compared to the start of the study. PGI-C was assessed on a 7-point Likert scale ranged from 1 (greatly improved) to 7 (greatly worsened). Categories were defined based on the PGI-C scores as follows: 1=greatly improved, 2=moderately improved, 3=slightly improved, 4=not changed, 5=slightly worsened, 6=moderately worsened and 7=greatly worsened.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 4: moderately improved
1.59 Percentage of participants
3.10 Percentage of participants
11.29 Percentage of participants
4.72 Percentage of participants
7.87 Percentage of participants
1.61 Percentage of participants
1.54 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 8: greatly improved
1.59 Percentage of participants
17.19 Percentage of participants
14.88 Percentage of participants
8.13 Percentage of participants
4.13 Percentage of participants
1.64 Percentage of participants
1.56 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 8: moderately improved
3.17 Percentage of participants
13.28 Percentage of participants
21.49 Percentage of participants
7.32 Percentage of participants
16.53 Percentage of participants
4.92 Percentage of participants
4.69 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 12: greatly improved
0 Percentage of participants
22.83 Percentage of participants
22.58 Percentage of participants
13.60 Percentage of participants
12.20 Percentage of participants
3.39 Percentage of participants
3.17 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 12: moderately improved
10.00 Percentage of participants
18.11 Percentage of participants
19.35 Percentage of participants
14.40 Percentage of participants
14.63 Percentage of participants
3.39 Percentage of participants
7.94 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 18: greatly improved
1.67 Percentage of participants
27.64 Percentage of participants
22.31 Percentage of participants
18.03 Percentage of participants
19.33 Percentage of participants
1.64 Percentage of participants
3.28 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 18: moderately improved
10.00 Percentage of participants
23.58 Percentage of participants
23.97 Percentage of participants
27.87 Percentage of participants
15.13 Percentage of participants
6.56 Percentage of participants
4.92 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 24: greatly improved
1.54 Percentage of participants
36.51 Percentage of participants
26.45 Percentage of participants
28.80 Percentage of participants
28.93 Percentage of participants
1.67 Percentage of participants
4.62 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 24: moderately improved
9.23 Percentage of participants
16.67 Percentage of participants
20.66 Percentage of participants
20.80 Percentage of participants
13.22 Percentage of participants
10.00 Percentage of participants
3.08 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 34: greatly improved
18.64 Percentage of participants
43.20 Percentage of participants
35.54 Percentage of participants
37.40 Percentage of participants
31.97 Percentage of participants
5.08 Percentage of participants
7.81 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 34: moderately improved
22.03 Percentage of participants
12.00 Percentage of participants
17.36 Percentage of participants
15.45 Percentage of participants
15.57 Percentage of participants
6.78 Percentage of participants
20.31 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 40: greatly improved
30.77 Percentage of participants
43.75 Percentage of participants
34.68 Percentage of participants
37.70 Percentage of participants
30.00 Percentage of participants
6.78 Percentage of participants
13.85 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 40: moderately improved
24.62 Percentage of participants
15.63 Percentage of participants
14.52 Percentage of participants
14.75 Percentage of participants
19.17 Percentage of participants
11.86 Percentage of participants
15.38 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 48: greatly improved
42.19 Percentage of participants
44.96 Percentage of participants
33.33 Percentage of participants
42.40 Percentage of participants
31.15 Percentage of participants
6.56 Percentage of participants
26.56 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 48: moderately improved
17.19 Percentage of participants
13.18 Percentage of participants
18.70 Percentage of participants
13.60 Percentage of participants
18.03 Percentage of participants
9.84 Percentage of participants
17.19 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score of Moderately Improved or Greatly Improved at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 4: greatly improved
0 Percentage of participants
5.43 Percentage of participants
4.03 Percentage of participants
2.36 Percentage of participants
0 Percentage of participants
0 Percentage of participants
0 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specified time point.

AAPPO scale is 11-item self-administered questionnaire that measured hair loss, emotional symptoms, and activity limitations over past week. Items 1-4 assessed current hair loss, eyebrow loss, eyelash loss and body hair loss and were analyzed separately on scale of 0-4, with 0 ='no hair loss' and 4='complete hair loss'. Items 5-8 assessed emotional symptoms. Response choices on these items were scored from 0 ='never' to 4='always'. Items 9-11 assessed activity limitations. Response choices on these items were scored from 0='not at all' to 4='completely'. Change from baseline in AAPPO emotional symptoms sub score were calculated as mean of items 5-8 and ranged from 0(never) to 4(always), where higher scores indicated more emotional symptoms. Change from baseline in AAPPO activity limitations sub score was calculated as mean of items 9-11 and ranged from 0(not at all) to 4(completely), where higher scores indicated more activity limitations. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=131 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 12: emotional symptoms
-0.36 Units on a scale
Interval -0.49 to -0.23
-0.53 Units on a scale
Interval -0.66 to -0.4
-0.54 Units on a scale
Interval -0.67 to -0.41
-0.48 Units on a scale
Interval -0.61 to -0.34
-0.49 Units on a scale
Interval -0.63 to -0.36
-0.50 Units on a scale
Interval -0.69 to -0.31
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 18: emotional symptoms
-0.43 Units on a scale
Interval -0.56 to -0.29
-0.64 Units on a scale
Interval -0.78 to -0.51
-0.57 Units on a scale
Interval -0.71 to -0.44
-0.60 Units on a scale
Interval -0.74 to -0.46
-0.54 Units on a scale
Interval -0.68 to -0.4
-0.44 Units on a scale
Interval -0.63 to -0.24
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 24: emotional symptoms
-0.47 Units on a scale
Interval -0.61 to -0.33
-0.61 Units on a scale
Interval -0.75 to -0.46
-0.61 Units on a scale
Interval -0.76 to -0.47
-0.69 Units on a scale
Interval -0.83 to -0.54
-0.58 Units on a scale
Interval -0.72 to -0.43
-0.49 Units on a scale
Interval -0.7 to -0.28
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 4: activity limitations
-0.18 Units on a scale
Interval -0.29 to -0.07
-0.19 Units on a scale
Interval -0.29 to -0.08
-0.04 Units on a scale
Interval -0.15 to 0.07
-0.16 Units on a scale
Interval -0.27 to -0.05
-0.13 Units on a scale
Interval -0.24 to -0.02
-0.20 Units on a scale
Interval -0.36 to -0.04
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 8: activity limitations
-0.20 Units on a scale
Interval -0.31 to -0.09
-0.24 Units on a scale
Interval -0.34 to -0.13
-0.25 Units on a scale
Interval -0.36 to -0.14
-0.18 Units on a scale
Interval -0.29 to -0.07
-0.09 Units on a scale
Interval -0.2 to 0.02
-0.21 Units on a scale
Interval -0.37 to -0.05
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 12: activity limitations
-0.21 Units on a scale
Interval -0.32 to -0.11
-0.27 Units on a scale
Interval -0.38 to -0.17
-0.22 Units on a scale
Interval -0.32 to -0.11
-0.21 Units on a scale
Interval -0.32 to -0.11
-0.24 Units on a scale
Interval -0.35 to -0.13
-0.27 Units on a scale
Interval -0.42 to -0.11
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 18: activity limitations
-0.26 Units on a scale
Interval -0.36 to -0.15
-0.35 Units on a scale
Interval -0.45 to -0.24
-0.26 Units on a scale
Interval -0.36 to -0.15
-0.23 Units on a scale
Interval -0.34 to -0.12
-0.23 Units on a scale
Interval -0.34 to -0.12
-0.28 Units on a scale
Interval -0.44 to -0.13
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 24: activity limitations
-0.29 Units on a scale
Interval -0.39 to -0.19
-0.30 Units on a scale
Interval -0.4 to -0.2
-0.30 Units on a scale
Interval -0.4 to -0.2
-0.31 Units on a scale
Interval -0.41 to -0.21
-0.28 Units on a scale
Interval -0.38 to -0.18
-0.31 Units on a scale
Interval -0.45 to -0.16
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 4: emotional symptoms
-0.28 Units on a scale
Interval -0.4 to -0.16
-0.37 Units on a scale
Interval -0.49 to -0.25
-0.22 Units on a scale
Interval -0.34 to -0.1
-0.33 Units on a scale
Interval -0.45 to -0.21
-0.31 Units on a scale
Interval -0.44 to -0.19
-0.29 Units on a scale
Interval -0.47 to -0.11
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 8: emotional symptoms
-0.39 Units on a scale
Interval -0.51 to -0.27
-0.50 Units on a scale
Interval -0.62 to -0.38
-0.46 Units on a scale
Interval -0.58 to -0.34
-0.50 Units on a scale
Interval -0.62 to -0.37
-0.36 Units on a scale
Interval -0.48 to -0.23
-0.45 Units on a scale
Interval -0.62 to -0.27

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 34, 40, and 48

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specified time point.

AAPPO scale is 11-item self-administered questionnaire that measured hair loss, emotional symptoms, and activity limitations over past week. Items 1-4 assessed current hair loss, eyebrow loss, eyelash loss and body hair loss and were analyzed separately on scale of 0-4, with 0 ='no hair loss' and 4='complete hair loss'. Items 5-8 assessed emotional symptoms. Response choices on these items were scored from 0 ='never' to 4='always'. Items 9-11 assessed activity limitations. Response choices on these items were scored from 0='not at all' to 4='completely'. Change from baseline in AAPPO emotional symptoms sub score were calculated as mean of items 5-8 and ranged from 0(never) to 4(always), where higher scores indicated more emotional symptoms. Change from baseline in AAPPO activity limitations sub score was calculated as mean of items 9-11 and ranged from 0(not at all) to 4(completely), where higher scores indicated more activity limitations. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 34: emotional symptoms
-0.77 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
-0.78 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
-0.72 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
-0.72 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
-0.71 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
-0.62 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
-0.64 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 40: emotional symptoms
-0.83 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
-0.84 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
-0.80 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
-0.81 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
-0.83 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
-0.62 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
-0.66 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 48: emotional symptoms
-0.98 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
-0.96 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
-0.84 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
-0.85 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
-0.72 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
-0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
-0.68 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 34: activity limitations
-0.36 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.59
-0.37 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
-0.31 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.78
-0.26 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.73
-0.37 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.78
-0.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
-0.42 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.78
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 40: activity limitations
-0.40 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.66
-0.44 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
-0.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
-0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.68
-0.42 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.81
-0.23 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
-0.39 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
Change From Baseline in Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Domain Scores at Week 34, 40, and 48: Emotional Symptoms and Activity Limitations
Change at Week 48: activity limitations
-0.44 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
-0.43 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.79
-0.39 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
-0.29 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
-0.36 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
-0.26 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
-0.36 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.81

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specified time point.

AAPPO scale is a 11-item self-administered questionnaire that measured hair loss, emotional symptoms, and activity limitations over the past week. Items 1-4 were to assess the current hair loss, eyebrow loss, eyelash loss and body hair loss and were analyzed separately on a scale of 0-4, with 0 ='no hair loss' and 4='complete hair loss', where higher scores indicated more hair loss.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 18: current hair loss on scalp
8.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.34 to 15.33
27.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.27 to 35.43
25.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.25 to 32.75
13.79 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.52 to 20.07
16.38 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.64 to 23.11
8.62 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 15.84
6.78 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.36 to 13.19
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 24: current hair loss on scalp
10.77 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.23 to 18.31
35.83 Percentage of participants
Interval 27.25 to 44.41
30.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.8 to 38.2
26.27 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.33 to 34.21
24.58 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.81 to 32.34
5.26 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 11.06
6.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.33 to 12.37
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 34: current hair loss on scalp
22.03 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.46 to 32.61
42.02 Percentage of participants
Interval 33.15 to 50.89
34.45 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.92 to 42.99
29.31 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.03 to 37.59
30.25 Percentage of participants
Interval 22.0 to 38.51
7.14 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 13.89
11.29 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.41 to 19.17
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 40: current hair loss on scalp
29.23 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.17 to 40.29
41.80 Percentage of participants
Interval 33.05 to 50.56
36.59 Percentage of participants
Interval 28.07 to 45.1
35.65 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.9 to 44.41
32.48 Percentage of participants
Interval 23.99 to 40.96
8.93 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.46 to 16.4
19.05 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.35 to 28.74
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 18: current hair loss on eyebrows
11.11 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.93 to 20.29
27.66 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.62 to 36.7
33.68 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.18 to 43.19
27.47 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.3 to 36.64
19.78 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.6 to 27.96
13.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.4 to 23.27
7.14 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 14.93
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 24: current hair loss on eyebrows
12.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.99 to 21.01
32.29 Percentage of participants
Interval 22.94 to 41.65
32.98 Percentage of participants
Interval 23.47 to 42.48
30.43 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.03 to 39.84
29.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 20.04 to 38.65
6.82 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 14.27
10.87 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.87 to 19.86
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 40: current hair loss on eyebrows
32.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.07 to 44.93
42.27 Percentage of participants
Interval 32.44 to 52.1
36.84 Percentage of participants
Interval 27.14 to 46.54
38.89 Percentage of participants
Interval 28.82 to 48.96
38.04 Percentage of participants
Interval 28.12 to 47.96
20.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.31 to 31.69
23.91 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.59 to 36.24
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 48: current hair loss on eyebrows
38.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.55 to 51.45
44.90 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.05 to 54.75
34.04 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.46 to 43.62
43.96 Percentage of participants
Interval 33.76 to 54.15
39.36 Percentage of participants
Interval 29.49 to 49.24
15.56 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.97 to 26.14
33.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.56 to 47.11
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 12: current hair loss on eyelashes
14.63 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.82 to 25.45
29.41 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.73 to 39.1
26.74 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.39 to 36.1
16.46 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.28 to 24.63
19.05 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.65 to 27.44
8.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 17.36
8.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 17.36
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 18: current hair loss on eyelashes
12.20 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.18 to 22.21
31.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.35 to 41.3
37.65 Percentage of participants
Interval 27.35 to 47.95
21.05 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.89 to 30.22
22.22 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.17 to 31.28
7.89 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.47
2.94 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.62
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 24: current hair loss on eyelashes
13.04 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.31 to 22.78
31.40 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.59 to 41.2
42.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 31.54 to 52.79
31.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 20.82 to 41.51
28.05 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.33 to 37.77
8.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 17.36
2.63 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.72
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 34: current hair loss on eyelashes
21.43 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.02 to 33.84
40.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 29.59 to 50.41
36.59 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.16 to 47.01
37.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.39 to 48.28
34.52 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.36 to 44.69
11.43 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.89 to 21.97
13.51 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.5 to 24.53
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 4: current hair loss on body
4.26 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.03
11.46 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.09 to 17.83
9.28 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.5 to 15.05
10.42 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.31 to 16.53
6.38 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.44 to 11.32
2.13 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.25
11.36 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.99 to 20.74
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 24: current hair loss on body
16.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.98 to 26.68
25.81 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.91 to 34.7
27.96 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.84 to 37.08
20.43 Percentage of participants
Interval 12.24 to 28.62
22.22 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.63 to 30.81
6.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 13.95
11.36 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.99 to 20.74
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 34: current hair loss on eyebrows
22.73 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.34 to 35.11
42.71 Percentage of participants
Interval 32.81 to 52.6
38.71 Percentage of participants
Interval 28.81 to 48.61
38.89 Percentage of participants
Interval 28.82 to 48.96
31.91 Percentage of participants
Interval 22.49 to 41.34
16.28 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.24 to 27.31
13.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.4 to 23.27
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 4: current hair loss on eyelashes
8.89 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.57 to 17.2
11.49 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.79 to 18.2
4.60 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 9.0
7.59 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.75 to 13.44
9.30 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.16 to 15.44
5.26 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 12.36
5.26 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 12.36
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 8: current hair loss on eyelashes
6.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 13.95
17.44 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.42 to 25.46
17.65 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.54 to 25.75
12.82 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.4 to 20.24
14.81 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.08 to 22.55
7.89 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.47
8.11 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.9
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 40: current hair loss on eyelashes
28.26 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.25 to 41.27
43.02 Percentage of participants
Interval 32.56 to 53.49
39.29 Percentage of participants
Interval 28.84 to 49.73
32.89 Percentage of participants
Interval 22.33 to 43.46
36.59 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.16 to 47.01
10.81 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.81 to 20.82
13.16 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.41 to 23.91
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 48: current hair loss on eyelashes
39.13 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.03 to 53.23
41.86 Percentage of participants
Interval 31.43 to 52.29
37.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.94 to 47.76
38.16 Percentage of participants
Interval 27.24 to 49.08
34.52 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.36 to 44.69
8.11 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.9
28.95 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.53 to 43.37
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 8: current hair loss on body
6.38 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 13.37
14.74 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.61 to 21.86
15.96 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.55 to 23.36
13.98 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.93 to 21.03
10.11 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.85 to 16.38
2.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.39
11.63 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.05 to 21.21
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 12: current hair loss on body
11.36 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.99 to 20.74
17.02 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.42 to 24.62
19.15 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.19 to 27.1
14.89 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.7 to 22.09
14.29 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.1 to 21.48
4.44 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.47
7.14 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 14.93
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 18: current hair loss on body
9.09 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.6 to 17.59
19.78 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.6 to 27.96
25.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.15 to 33.85
15.05 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.79 to 22.32
15.91 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.27 to 23.55
10.64 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.82 to 19.45
7.50 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 15.66
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 34: current hair loss on body
22.73 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.34 to 35.11
33.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 23.75 to 42.91
33.70 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.04 to 43.35
31.52 Percentage of participants
Interval 22.03 to 41.02
26.09 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.11 to 35.06
11.36 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.99 to 20.74
9.30 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.62 to 17.98
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 40: current hair loss on body
22.45 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.77 to 34.13
35.11 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.46 to 44.76
36.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.46 to 45.88
30.77 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.29 to 40.25
25.56 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.54 to 34.57
8.70 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.55 to 16.84
11.36 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.99 to 20.74
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 48: current hair loss on body
34.69 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.37 to 48.02
34.74 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.16 to 44.31
34.41 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.75 to 44.06
36.56 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.77 to 46.35
30.43 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.03 to 39.84
10.87 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.87 to 19.86
20.45 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.54 to 32.37
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 4: current hair loss on scalp
6.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.33 to 12.37
11.38 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.77 to 16.99
9.76 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.51 to 15.0
4.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.59 to 7.74
4.84 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.06 to 8.62
1.69 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 4.99
3.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.5
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 8: current hair loss on scalp
4.76 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.02
11.48 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.82 to 17.13
16.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.0 to 23.33
7.76 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.89 to 12.63
8.47 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.45 to 13.5
1.72 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.07
8.06 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.29 to 14.84
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 12: current hair loss on scalp
6.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.35 to 12.98
20.66 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.45 to 27.88
19.51 Percentage of participants
Interval 12.51 to 26.52
12.71 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.7 to 18.72
13.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.25 to 19.42
3.57 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.43
4.92 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.34
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 48: current hair loss on scalp
33.85 Percentage of participants
Interval 22.34 to 45.35
42.28 Percentage of participants
Interval 33.55 to 51.01
33.61 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.22 to 41.99
42.37 Percentage of participants
Interval 33.46 to 51.29
32.77 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.34 to 41.21
8.62 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 15.84
20.97 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.83 to 31.1
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 4: current hair loss on eyebrows
6.25 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 13.1
9.09 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.43 to 14.75
7.14 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.04 to 12.24
7.45 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.14 to 12.75
4.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.17 to 8.16
4.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.24
8.70 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.55 to 16.84
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 8: current hair loss on eyebrows
4.17 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 9.82
17.35 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.85 to 24.84
21.05 Percentage of participants
Interval 12.85 to 29.25
11.96 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.33 to 18.59
10.99 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.56 to 17.41
6.52 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 13.66
11.11 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.93 to 20.29
Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline on Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Items 1-4 at Week 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 34, 40, and 48
Week 12: current hair loss on eyebrows
11.11 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.93 to 20.29
27.84 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.92 to 36.75
27.84 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.92 to 36.75
18.09 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.3 to 25.87
15.96 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.55 to 23.36
11.63 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.05 to 21.21
6.82 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 14.27

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 4, 8, 12, and 24

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

HADS is a validated 14-item PRO measure used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Items were rated on a 4-point severity scale. The HADS produces 2 scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states with established normal score cut-offs. The instrument have been validated for use by adolescents aged 12 and older. Each subscale comprised of 7 items and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week prior to baseline visit, on 4-point response scale. Separate scores were calculated for anxiety and depression with score ranges from 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range was from 0 to 21 for depression subscale; higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=131 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24
Change at Week 4
-0.3 Units on a scale
Interval -0.73 to 0.07
-0.1 Units on a scale
Interval -0.54 to 0.26
-0.4 Units on a scale
Interval -0.82 to -0.01
-0.1 Units on a scale
Interval -0.48 to 0.33
-0.1 Units on a scale
Interval -0.48 to 0.33
-0.3 Units on a scale
Interval -0.86 to 0.32
Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24
Change at Week 8
-0.3 Units on a scale
Interval -0.73 to 0.1
-0.5 Units on a scale
Interval -0.89 to -0.06
-0.3 Units on a scale
Interval -0.71 to 0.12
-0.2 Units on a scale
Interval -0.58 to 0.26
0.2 Units on a scale
Interval -0.25 to 0.59
-0.2 Units on a scale
Interval -0.79 to 0.43
Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24
Change at Week 12
-0.1 Units on a scale
Interval -0.53 to 0.3
-0.6 Units on a scale
Interval -1.04 to -0.21
-0.4 Units on a scale
Interval -0.81 to 0.03
0.0 Units on a scale
Interval -0.45 to 0.39
0.1 Units on a scale
Interval -0.32 to 0.53
-0.5 Units on a scale
Interval -1.07 to 0.15
Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24
Change at Week 24
0.0 Units on a scale
Interval -0.46 to 0.39
-0.4 Units on a scale
Interval -0.79 to 0.07
-0.8 Units on a scale
Interval -1.21 to -0.35
-0.3 Units on a scale
Interval -0.7 to 0.16
-0.2 Units on a scale
Interval -0.66 to 0.21
-0.4 Units on a scale
Interval -1.04 to 0.21

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 48

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

HADS is a validated 14-item PRO measure used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Items were rated on a 4-point severity scale. The HADS produces 2 scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states with established normal score cut-offs. The instrument have been validated for use by adolescents aged 12 and older. Each subscale comprised of 7 items and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week prior to baseline visit, on 4-point response scale. Separate scores were calculated for anxiety and depression with score ranges from 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range was from 0 to 21 for depression subscale; higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48
Baseline
3.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.36
2.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.60
3.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.16
2.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.00
2.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.99
2.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.80
3.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.54
Change From Baseline in Depression Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48
Change at Week 48
-0.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.25
-0.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.13
-0.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.15
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.67
-0.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.44
-0.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.53
-0.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.28

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 4, 8, 12, and 24

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

HADS is a validated 14-item PRO measure used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Items were rated on a 4-point severity scale. The HADS produces 2 scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states with established normal score cut-offs. The instrument have been validated for use by adolescents aged 12 and older. Each subscale comprised of 7 items and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week prior to baseline visit, on 4-point response scale. Separate scores were calculated for anxiety and depression with score ranges from 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range was from 0 to 21 for anxiety subscale; higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=131 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24
Change at Week 4
-0.1 Units on a scale
Interval -0.54 to 0.32
-0.3 Units on a scale
Interval -0.78 to 0.08
-0.4 Units on a scale
Interval -0.79 to 0.08
-0.4 Units on a scale
Interval -0.79 to 0.08
-0.5 Units on a scale
Interval -0.97 to -0.1
-0.6 Units on a scale
Interval -1.25 to 0.02
Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24
Change at Week 8
-0.5 Units on a scale
Interval -0.96 to -0.03
-0.8 Units on a scale
Interval -1.25 to -0.31
-0.4 Units on a scale
Interval -0.88 to 0.07
-0.8 Units on a scale
Interval -1.27 to -0.31
-0.3 Units on a scale
Interval -0.79 to 0.17
-0.9 Units on a scale
Interval -1.59 to -0.2
Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24
Change at Week 12
-0.4 Units on a scale
Interval -0.84 to 0.09
-0.7 Units on a scale
Interval -1.22 to -0.28
-0.9 Units on a scale
Interval -1.4 to -0.46
-0.7 Units on a scale
Interval -1.22 to -0.27
-0.3 Units on a scale
Interval -0.77 to 0.19
-0.9 Units on a scale
Interval -1.55 to -0.17
Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24
Change at Week 24
-0.6 Units on a scale
Interval -1.06 to -0.07
-0.8 Units on a scale
Interval -1.26 to -0.25
-0.7 Units on a scale
Interval -1.19 to -0.18
-0.8 Units on a scale
Interval -1.28 to -0.27
-0.3 Units on a scale
Interval -0.76 to 0.26
-1.0 Units on a scale
Interval -1.69 to -0.21

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 48

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

HADS is a validated 14-item PRO measure used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Items were rated on a 4-point severity scale. The HADS produces 2 scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states with established normal score cut-offs. The instrument have been validated for use by adolescents aged 12 and older. Each subscale comprised of 7 items and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week prior to baseline visit, on 4-point response scale. Separate scores were calculated for anxiety and depression with score ranges from 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range was from 0 to 21 for anxiety subscale; higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms. Baseline was defined as pre-dose on Day 1.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=131 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48
Baseline
5.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.20
4.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.84
4.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.18
4.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.31
4.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.42
5.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.38
5.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.70
Change From Baseline in Anxiety Subscale Score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 48
Change at Week 48
-1.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.31
-1.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.92
-0.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.10
-0.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.09
-0.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.40
-1.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.89
-0.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.53

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Week 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

HADS is a validated 14-item PRO measure used to assess states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Items were rated on a 4-point severity scale. The HADS produces 2 scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states with established normal score cut-offs. The instrument have been validated for use by adolescents aged 12 and older. Each subscale comprised of 7 items and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week prior to baseline visit, on 4-point response scale. Separate scores were calculated for anxiety and depression with score ranges from 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range was from 0 to 21 for depression subscale; higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=5 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=7 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=5 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48
Week 12
60.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.06 to 100.0
50.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.99 to 90.01
63.64 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.21 to 92.06
66.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 39.99 to 93.34
30.77 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.68 to 55.86
20.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 55.06
62.50 Percentage of participants
Interval 28.95 to 96.05
Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48
Week 24
50.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 99.0
71.43 Percentage of participants
Interval 37.96 to 100.0
63.64 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.21 to 92.06
41.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.77 to 69.56
42.86 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.93 to 68.78
50.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 99.0
50.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.01 to 80.99
Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48
Week 4
60.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.06 to 100.0
42.86 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.2 to 79.52
60.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 29.64 to 90.36
53.85 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.75 to 80.95
42.86 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.93 to 68.78
40.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 82.94
50.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.01 to 80.99
Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48
Week 8
50.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 99.0
66.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 28.95 to 100.0
45.45 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.03 to 74.88
58.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 30.44 to 86.23
33.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.66 to 60.01
20.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 55.06
40.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.64 to 70.36
Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Depression Achieving Normal Depression Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48
Week 48
60.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.06 to 100.0
50.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.99 to 90.01
63.64 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.21 to 92.06
58.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 30.44 to 86.23
46.15 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.05 to 73.25
80.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 44.94 to 100.0
60.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 29.64 to 90.36

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Week 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized, regardless of whether they received study medication. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "number analyzed" signifies participants evaluable at specific time point.

HADS is a validated 14-item PRO measure used to assessed states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Items were rated on a 4-point severity scale. The HADS produces 2 scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states with established normal score cut-offs. The instrument have been validated for use by adolescents aged 12 and older. Each subscale comprised of 7 items and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week prior to baseline visit, on 4-point response scale. Separate scores were calculated for anxiety and depression with score ranges from 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score range was from 0 to 21 for anxiety subscale; higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=19 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=29 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=22 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=26 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=15 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=13 Participants
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48
Week 4
31.58 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.68 to 52.48
51.72 Percentage of participants
Interval 33.54 to 69.91
45.45 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.65 to 66.26
34.62 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.33 to 52.9
37.50 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.78 to 61.22
40.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.21 to 64.79
30.77 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.68 to 55.86
Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48
Week 8
33.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.56 to 55.11
46.43 Percentage of participants
Interval 27.96 to 64.9
50.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 28.09 to 71.91
68.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 49.71 to 86.29
41.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.77 to 69.56
71.43 Percentage of participants
Interval 47.76 to 95.09
46.15 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.05 to 73.25
Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48
Week 12
47.37 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.92 to 69.82
50.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 31.48 to 68.52
57.89 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.69 to 80.1
38.46 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.76 to 57.16
56.25 Percentage of participants
Interval 31.94 to 80.56
42.86 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.93 to 68.78
41.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.77 to 69.56
Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48
Week 24
44.44 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.49 to 67.4
51.85 Percentage of participants
Interval 33.01 to 70.7
65.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 44.1 to 85.9
50.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 30.78 to 69.22
46.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.42 to 71.91
57.14 Percentage of participants
Interval 31.22 to 83.07
38.46 Percentage of participants
Interval 12.02 to 64.91
Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Score Indicative of Anxiety Achieving Normal Anxiety Subscale Score of HADS at Week 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48
Week 48
57.89 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.69 to 80.1
53.85 Percentage of participants
Interval 34.68 to 73.01
66.67 Percentage of participants
Interval 44.89 to 88.44
60.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 40.8 to 79.2
50.00 Percentage of participants
Interval 23.81 to 76.19
61.54 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.09 to 87.98
58.33 Percentage of participants
Interval 30.44 to 86.23

Adverse Events

Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg

Serious events: 4 serious events
Other events: 84 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 76 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 81 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 77 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 32 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 39 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg

Serious events: 3 serious events
Other events: 39 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=131 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=129 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=62 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
0.76%
1/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.78%
1/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
0.00%
0/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.76%
1/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Empyema
0.76%
1/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
0.76%
1/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Chemical poisoning
0.00%
0/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.78%
1/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer
0.00%
0/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.77%
1/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Invasive lobular breast carcinoma
0.76%
1/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion spontaneous
0.76%
1/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
1/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Psychiatric disorders
Conversion disorder
0.00%
0/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
1/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal behaviour
0.00%
0/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.78%
1/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.6%
1/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Heavy menstrual bleeding
0.00%
0/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
1/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
0.00%
0/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.77%
1/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
0.00%
0/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.6%
1/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=131 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 50 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug .
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 30 mg
n=129 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=130 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 50 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 30 mg
n=132 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 3 of 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 10 mg
n=62 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive Ritlecitinib 10 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase). Participants then continued to receive 10 mg tablet once daily in maintenance phase of 20 weeks and extension phase of 24 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 200 mg Then 50 mg
n=65 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 4 of 50 mg tablet once daily for 4 weeks and then 50 mg tablet once daily for 20 weeks. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Placebo, Ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) 50 mg
n=66 participants at risk
Participants aged 12 years or above with moderate to severe AA with \>=50% hair loss of the scalp were randomized to receive placebo once daily for 4 weeks (loading phase) and then continued to receive placebo once daily for next 20 weeks (maintenance phase). Participants then entered into extension phase of 24 weeks and received 50 mg tablet once daily. Participants were followed up to maximum of 5 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
0.76%
1/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
3.9%
5/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
3.8%
5/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.3%
3/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
6.2%
4/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
0.76%
1/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.77%
1/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
5.3%
7/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.6%
1/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
1/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
6.9%
9/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
3.1%
4/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
9.2%
12/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
6.1%
8/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
6.2%
4/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
1/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
8.4%
11/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.3%
3/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.3%
3/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
9.1%
12/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
4.8%
3/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
12.3%
8/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
1/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
4.6%
6/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
5.4%
7/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
2/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
3.8%
5/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.6%
1/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
3.1%
2/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
4.5%
3/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
General disorders
Fatigue
3.1%
4/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
4.7%
6/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
4.6%
6/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
4.5%
6/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
6.5%
4/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
4.6%
3/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
3.0%
2/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Folliculitis
8.4%
11/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
8.5%
11/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
6.2%
8/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
3.8%
5/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
6.5%
4/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
6.2%
4/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
6.1%
4/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Influenza
6.1%
8/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.78%
1/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.3%
3/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.3%
3/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
4.8%
3/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
1/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
14.5%
19/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
16.3%
21/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
13.8%
18/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
15.9%
21/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
11.3%
7/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
10.8%
7/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
6.1%
4/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
13.7%
18/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
9.3%
12/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
8.5%
11/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
12.1%
16/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
3.2%
2/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
10.8%
7/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
9.1%
6/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
8.4%
11/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.3%
3/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.77%
1/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
3.8%
5/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
6.2%
4/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
3.0%
2/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
3.1%
4/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
3.9%
5/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
2/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
3.0%
4/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
3.2%
2/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
3.1%
2/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
9.1%
6/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
4.6%
6/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.3%
3/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.3%
3/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
3.8%
5/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
9.7%
6/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
1/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
6.9%
9/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
6.2%
8/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
3.1%
4/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
6.1%
8/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.6%
1/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
3.0%
2/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
13.0%
17/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
10.9%
14/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
12.3%
16/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
18.2%
24/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
19.4%
12/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
12.3%
8/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
12.1%
8/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
2.3%
3/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
2/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.76%
1/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.6%
1/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
1/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
6.1%
4/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
4.6%
6/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.3%
3/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.3%
3/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
6.2%
4/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
3.0%
2/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
0.76%
1/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.78%
1/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
2/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.3%
3/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
6.5%
4/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
1/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
1/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
3.1%
4/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
4.7%
6/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
4.6%
6/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.76%
1/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
3.1%
2/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
7.6%
5/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
4.6%
6/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
7.8%
10/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
9.2%
12/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
9.1%
12/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
4.8%
3/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
7.7%
5/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
12.1%
8/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
3.1%
4/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
5.4%
7/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.77%
1/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.3%
3/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.6%
1/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
1/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
1/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
3.8%
5/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
2.3%
3/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
5.4%
7/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.76%
1/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
0.00%
0/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
1/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.5%
1/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
6.9%
9/131 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
7.0%
9/129 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
5.4%
7/130 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
3.8%
5/132 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
1.6%
1/62 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
6.2%
4/65 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
6.1%
4/66 • Baseline up to 5 weeks after last dose of study drug (maximum up to Week 53)
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

Additional Information

Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center

Pfizer Inc.

Phone: 1-800-718-1021

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER