Trial Outcomes & Findings for Multicentre Observational Study on the Wound Pain Relief Properties of ORTODERMINA® (NCT NCT03720119)

NCT ID: NCT03720119

Last Updated: 2023-04-12

Results Overview

The evaluation of wound pain relief was based on a 5-point Visual Rating Scale (0 = none improvement; 4 = total relief). Patients recorded the VRS score every day of treatment in their diary. The improvement in the pain relief was defined as a VRS scores at end of treatment significantly greater than 0.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

78 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Every day for 15 days

Results posted on

2023-04-12

Participant Flow

Patients were recruited from January 27, 2015 to March 05, 2018 in three Italian hospitals in Pisa and Trieste

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Single Cohort
A single cohort of 78 patients with painful wounds \>1 cm2 -painful ulcers and pressure ulcers grade II, per NPUAP classification-, both sexes, aged ≥18 years. Patients were treated with Ortodermina, as per clinical practice. Three investigational sites have been involved.
Overall Study
STARTED
78
Overall Study
COMPLETED
69
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
9

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Multicentre Observational Study on the Wound Pain Relief Properties of ORTODERMINA®

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Single Cohort
n=78 Participants
A single cohort of 78 patients with painful wounds \>1 cm2 -painful ulcers and pressure ulcers grade II, per NPUAP classification-, both sexes, aged ≥18 years. Patients were treated with Ortodermina, as per clinical practice. Three investigational sites have been involved.
Age, Continuous
62.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.4 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
49 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
78 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Type of wounds
Traumatic
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
Type of wounds
Pathological
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
Type of wounds
Surgical
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Type of wounds
Geriatric
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Size of wounds
Width
5.99 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.13 • n=5 Participants
Size of wounds
Length
4.76 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.35 • n=5 Participants
Size of wounds
Depth
0.29 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.29 • n=5 Participants
Presence of exudate
Present
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
Presence of exudate
Not present
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
Presence of exudate
Not defined
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Odour of wounds
Absent
78 Participants
n=5 Participants
Odour of wounds
Present
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Edges of wounds
Regular
40 Participants
n=5 Participants
Edges of wounds
Irregular
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
Edges of wounds
Reactive
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
Edges of wounds
Herythematous
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
Edges of wounds
Not defined
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Colour of wounds
Pink/red/yellow
68 Participants
n=5 Participants
Colour of wounds
Not defined
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
Wounds classification
NPUAP Grade II
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
Wounds classification
Not available
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
Concomitant Therapies
1 therapy
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
Concomitant Therapies
2-4 therapies
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
Concomitant Therapies
>4 therapies
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
Concomitant Therapies
No therapy
28 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Every day for 15 days

Population: There are missing data in some time-points

The evaluation of wound pain relief was based on a 5-point Visual Rating Scale (0 = none improvement; 4 = total relief). Patients recorded the VRS score every day of treatment in their diary. The improvement in the pain relief was defined as a VRS scores at end of treatment significantly greater than 0.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Single Cohort
n=78 Participants
A single cohort of 78 patients with painful wounds \>1 cm2 -painful ulcers and pressure ulcers grade II, per NPUAP classification-, both sexes, aged ≥18 years. Patients were treated with Ortodermina, as per clinical practice. Three investigational sites have been involved.
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 4 · None relief
3 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 4 · Mild
24 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 4 · Moderate
31 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 4 · A lot
15 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 4 · Complete relief
4 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 5 · None relief
5 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 5 · Mild
17 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 5 · Moderate
39 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 5 · A lot
11 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 5 · Complete relief
4 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 6 · None relief
6 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 6 · Mild
21 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 6 · Moderate
33 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 6 · A lot
9 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 6 · Complete relief
4 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 7 · None relief
5 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 7 · Mild
16 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 7 · Moderate
35 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 7 · A lot
9 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 7 · Complete relief
5 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 8 · None relief
7 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 8 · Mild
18 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 8 · Moderate
25 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 8 · A lot
15 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 8 · Complete relief
5 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 9 · None relief
5 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 9 · Mild
22 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 9 · Moderate
22 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 9 · A lot
14 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 9 · Complete relief
3 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 10 · None relief
10 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 10 · Mild
16 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 10 · Moderate
22 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 10 · A lot
16 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 10 · Complete relief
3 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 11 · None relief
10 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 11 · Mild
16 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 11 · Moderate
20 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 11 · A lot
14 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 11 · Complete relief
4 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 12 · None relief
12 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 12 · Mild
14 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 12 · Moderate
20 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 12 · A lot
14 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 12 · Complete relief
5 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 13 · None relief
16 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 13 · Mild
10 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 13 · Moderate
20 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 13 · A lot
14 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 13 · Complete relief
4 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 14 · None relief
14 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 14 · Mild
11 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 14 · Moderate
20 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 14 · A lot
12 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 14 · Complete relief
3 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 15 · None relief
13 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 15 · Mild
13 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 15 · Moderate
15 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 15 · A lot
13 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 15 · Complete relief
4 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 2 · None relief
3 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 2 · Mild
23 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 2 · Moderate
28 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 2 · A lot
20 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 2 · Complete relief
3 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 3 · None relief
2 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 3 · Mild
24 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 3 · Moderate
30 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 3 · A lot
18 Participants
Change of Pain Relief From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 5-point Visual Rating Scale (VRS)
Day 3 · Complete relief
2 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Every day for 15 days

Population: The degree of pain intensity was recorded by patients on daily diary and revised by Investigators at final visit.

The evaluation of the pain intensity was based on a 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS score from 0= no pain to 10= the most intense pain imaginable). Patients recorded the NPRS score every day of treatment in their diary. The improvement in the pain intensity is defined as a decrease in NPRS scores from baseline to the end of treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Single Cohort
n=78 Participants
A single cohort of 78 patients with painful wounds \>1 cm2 -painful ulcers and pressure ulcers grade II, per NPUAP classification-, both sexes, aged ≥18 years. Patients were treated with Ortodermina, as per clinical practice. Three investigational sites have been involved.
Change of Pain Intensity From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
NPRS score of Day 1
6.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.90
Change of Pain Intensity From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
NPRS score of Day 2
5.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.91
Change of Pain Intensity From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
NPRS score of Day 3
5.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.09
Change of Pain Intensity From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
NPRS score of Day 4
4.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.17
Change of Pain Intensity From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
NPRS score of Day 5
4.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.16
Change of Pain Intensity From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
NPRS score of Day 6
3.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
Change of Pain Intensity From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
NPRS score of Day 7
3.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.05
Change of Pain Intensity From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
NPRS score of Day 8
3.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.22
Change of Pain Intensity From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
NPRS score of Day 9
3.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.22
Change of Pain Intensity From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
NPRS score of Day 10
3.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.28
Change of Pain Intensity From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
NPRS score of Day 11
3.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.40
Change of Pain Intensity From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
NPRS score of Day 12
3.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.40
Change of Pain Intensity From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
NPRS score of Day 13
3.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.48
Change of Pain Intensity From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
NPRS score of Day 14
3.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.27
Change of Pain Intensity From Baseline to the End of Treatment Using the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
NPRS score of Day 15
2.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.23

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 15 days, starting from informed consent signature up to the end of the study

Evaluation of incidence and severity of AEs and SAEs in all patients entered in the study

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Single Cohort
n=78 Participants
A single cohort of 78 patients with painful wounds \>1 cm2 -painful ulcers and pressure ulcers grade II, per NPUAP classification-, both sexes, aged ≥18 years. Patients were treated with Ortodermina, as per clinical practice. Three investigational sites have been involved.
Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
0 adverse event
65 Participants
Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
1 adverse event
8 Participants
Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
2 adverse events
1 Participants
Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
3 adverse events
2 Participants
Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
4 adverse events
1 Participants
Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
5 adverse events
1 Participants

Adverse Events

Single Cohort

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 13 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Single Cohort
n=78 participants at risk
A single cohort of 78 patients with painful wounds \>1 cm2 -painful ulcers and pressure ulcers grade II, per NPUAP classification-, both sexes, aged ≥18 years. Patients were treated with Ortodermina, as per clinical practice. Three investigational sites have been involved.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain
3.8%
3/78 • Number of events 6 • 15 days, from informed consent signature to the end of the study
Infections and infestations
Infection
3.8%
3/78 • Number of events 4 • 15 days, from informed consent signature to the end of the study
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
BURNING SENSATION
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 4 • 15 days, from informed consent signature to the end of the study
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomach Ache
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 15 days, from informed consent signature to the end of the study
General disorders
Pain
3.8%
3/78 • Number of events 3 • 15 days, from informed consent signature to the end of the study
Infections and infestations
PYODERMA GANGRENOSUM
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 15 days, from informed consent signature to the end of the study
Infections and infestations
COUGH
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 2 • 15 days, from informed consent signature to the end of the study
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
ACCIDENTAL FALL WITH FACIAL TRAUMA
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 15 days, from informed consent signature to the end of the study
General disorders
FEVER
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 15 days, from informed consent signature to the end of the study
Gastrointestinal disorders
Heartburn
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 15 days, from informed consent signature to the end of the study
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wound Pain
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1 • 15 days, from informed consent signature to the end of the study

Additional Information

Dr Laura Patrucco

Sofar

Phone: +39 02909362

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place