Trial Outcomes & Findings for DEF-315 Better Accuracy in Ejection Fraction (EF) Assessment With DEFINITY (NCT NCT03719612)
NCT ID: NCT03719612
Last Updated: 2021-01-28
Results Overview
Demonstrate improvement in accuracy in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment using DEFINITY® contrast-enhanced over unenhanced echocardiography by comparing LVEF percentage differences from CMR measured by 3 independent blinded image readers.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
160 participants
Up to 30 days between day of echocardiograms and CMR imaging
2021-01-28
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
DEFINITY®
Each patient will undergo an unenhanced ultrasound examination and a DEFINITY® contrast-enhanced ultrasound
DEFINITY®: All subjects will receive a single dose of DEFINITY®
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
160
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
148
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
12
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
DEF-315 Better Accuracy in Ejection Fraction (EF) Assessment With DEFINITY
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
DEFINITY®
n=160 Participants
Each patient will undergo an unenhanced ultrasound examination and a DEFINITY® contrast-enhanced ultrasound
DEFINITY®: All subjects will receive a single dose of DEFINITY®
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
106 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
54 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
55 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
105 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
146 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
120 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
LVEF Group
LVEF <30%
|
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
LVEF Group
LVEF 30-40%
|
48 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
LVEF Group
LVEF 41-50%
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
LVEF Group
LVEF >50%
|
40 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 30 days between day of echocardiograms and CMR imagingPopulation: Modified ITT Population
Demonstrate improvement in accuracy in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment using DEFINITY® contrast-enhanced over unenhanced echocardiography by comparing LVEF percentage differences from CMR measured by 3 independent blinded image readers.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Blinded Reader 1
n=144 Participants
Independent Blinded Reader 1 of 3
|
Blinded Reader 2
n=144 Participants
Independent Blinded Reader 2 of 3
|
Blinded Reader 3
n=144 Participants
Independent Blinded Reader 3 of 3
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Value of LVEF Percentage Differences From CMR by Blinded Reader
Echo Enhanced
|
5.70 Percent Ejection Fraction
Standard Deviation 4.292
|
5.88 Percent Ejection Fraction
Standard Deviation 4.330
|
5.03 Percent Ejection Fraction
Standard Deviation 3.548
|
|
Absolute Value of LVEF Percentage Differences From CMR by Blinded Reader
Echo Unenhanced
|
6.08 Percent Ejection Fraction
Standard Deviation 4.530
|
6.00 Percent Ejection Fraction
Standard Deviation 4.813
|
5.36 Percent Ejection Fraction
Standard Deviation 3.889
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 30 days between day of echocardiogram and CMR imagingPopulation: Modified ITT Population - Sub-optimal Echocardiograms
Demonstrate improvement in accuracy in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment using DEFINITY® contrast-enhanced over unenhanced echocardiography in subjects with suboptimal echocardiograms by comparing LVEF percentage differences from CMR measured by 3 independent blinded readers.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Blinded Reader 1
n=48 Participants
Independent Blinded Reader 1 of 3
|
Blinded Reader 2
n=48 Participants
Independent Blinded Reader 2 of 3
|
Blinded Reader 3
n=48 Participants
Independent Blinded Reader 3 of 3
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Secondary Objective 1: Absolute Value of LVEF Percentage Differences From CMR by Blinded Reader for Sub-optimal Echocardiograms
Echo Enhanced
|
5.67 Percent Ejection Fraction
Standard Deviation 3.717
|
6.16 Percent Ejection Fraction
Standard Deviation 3.746
|
4.68 Percent Ejection Fraction
Standard Deviation 3.456
|
|
Secondary Objective 1: Absolute Value of LVEF Percentage Differences From CMR by Blinded Reader for Sub-optimal Echocardiograms
Echo Unenhanced
|
6.95 Percent Ejection Fraction
Standard Deviation 5.219
|
6.81 Percent Ejection Fraction
Standard Deviation 4.694
|
5.33 Percent Ejection Fraction
Standard Deviation 3.764
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 30 days between day of echocardiograms and CMR imagingPopulation: Modified ITT Population
Demonstrate a reduction in inter-reader variability for the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction using DEFINITY® contrast-enhanced versus unenhanced echocardiography by comparing LVEF percentage differences from CMR between 3 independent blinded readers.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Blinded Reader 1
n=144 Participants
Independent Blinded Reader 1 of 3
|
Blinded Reader 2
n=144 Participants
Independent Blinded Reader 2 of 3
|
Blinded Reader 3
n=144 Participants
Independent Blinded Reader 3 of 3
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Secondary Objective 2: Absolute Value LVEF Percentage Differences From CMR Between Blinded Readers
Echo Enhanced
|
5.70 Percent Ejection Fraction
Standard Deviation 4.292
|
5.88 Percent Ejection Fraction
Standard Deviation 4.330
|
5.03 Percent Ejection Fraction
Standard Deviation 3.548
|
|
Secondary Objective 2: Absolute Value LVEF Percentage Differences From CMR Between Blinded Readers
Echo Unenhanced
|
6.08 Percent Ejection Fraction
Standard Deviation 4.530
|
6.00 Percent Ejection Fraction
Standard Deviation 4.813
|
5.36 Percent Ejection Fraction
Standard Deviation 3.889
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 30 days between day of echocardiogram and CMR imagingPopulation: Modified ITT Population
Demonstrate a reduction in inter-reader variability for the assessment of end-diastolic/systolic volumes using DEFINITY® contrast-enhanced versus unenhanced echocardiography by comparing end-diastolic and systolic volume differences from CMR between 3 independent blinded readers.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Blinded Reader 1
n=144 Participants
Independent Blinded Reader 1 of 3
|
Blinded Reader 2
n=144 Participants
Independent Blinded Reader 2 of 3
|
Blinded Reader 3
n=144 Participants
Independent Blinded Reader 3 of 3
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Secondary Objective 3: Absolute Value End-diastolic and Systolic Volume Differences From CMR Between Blinded Readers
Echo Enhanced End Systolic
|
38.05 mL
Standard Deviation 32.921
|
32.41 mL
Standard Deviation 32.896
|
31.68 mL
Standard Deviation 30.603
|
|
Secondary Objective 3: Absolute Value End-diastolic and Systolic Volume Differences From CMR Between Blinded Readers
Echo Enhanced End Diastolic
|
57.85 mL
Standard Deviation 44.204
|
51.13 mL
Standard Deviation 43.391
|
47.97 mL
Standard Deviation 40.589
|
|
Secondary Objective 3: Absolute Value End-diastolic and Systolic Volume Differences From CMR Between Blinded Readers
Echo Unenhanced End Diastolic
|
64.91 mL
Standard Deviation 44.084
|
62.01 mL
Standard Deviation 43.392
|
48.32 mL
Standard Deviation 39.895
|
|
Secondary Objective 3: Absolute Value End-diastolic and Systolic Volume Differences From CMR Between Blinded Readers
Echo Unenhanced End Systolic
|
42.87 mL
Standard Deviation 34.793
|
39.08 mL
Standard Deviation 34.139
|
32.45 mL
Standard Deviation 31.314
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 30 days between day of echocardiograms and CMR imagingPopulation: Modified ITT Population - Sub-optimal Echocardiograms
Demonstrate a reduction in inter-reader variability for the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction using DEFINITY® contrast-enhanced versus unenhanced echocardiography by comparing LVEF percentage differences from CMR between 3 independent blinded readers in subjects with suboptimal echocardiograms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Blinded Reader 1
n=48 Participants
Independent Blinded Reader 1 of 3
|
Blinded Reader 2
n=48 Participants
Independent Blinded Reader 2 of 3
|
Blinded Reader 3
n=48 Participants
Independent Blinded Reader 3 of 3
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Secondary Objective 4: Absolute Value of LVEF Percentage Differences From CMR Between Readers for Sub-optimal Echocardiograms
Echo Enhanced
|
5.67 Percent Ejection Fraction
Standard Deviation 3.717
|
6.16 Percent Ejection Fraction
Standard Deviation 3.746
|
4.68 Percent Ejection Fraction
Standard Deviation 3.456
|
|
Secondary Objective 4: Absolute Value of LVEF Percentage Differences From CMR Between Readers for Sub-optimal Echocardiograms
Echo Unenhanced
|
6.95 Percent Ejection Fraction
Standard Deviation 5.219
|
6.81 Percent Ejection Fraction
Standard Deviation 4.694
|
5.33 Percent Ejection Fraction
Standard Deviation 3.764
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 30 days between day of echocardiograms and CMR imagingPopulation: Modified ITT Population - Sub-optimal Echocardiograms
Demonstrate a reduction in inter-reader variability for the assessment of end-diastolic/systolic volumes using DEFINITY® contrast-enhanced versus unenhanced echocardiography by comparing end-diastolic and systolic volume differences from CMR between 3 independent blinded readers in subjects with suboptimal echocardiograms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Blinded Reader 1
n=48 Participants
Independent Blinded Reader 1 of 3
|
Blinded Reader 2
n=48 Participants
Independent Blinded Reader 2 of 3
|
Blinded Reader 3
n=48 Participants
Independent Blinded Reader 3 of 3
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Secondary Objective 5: Absolute Value End-diastolic and Systolic Volume Differences From CMR Between Blinded Readers for Suboptimal Echocardiograms
Echo Enhanced End Diastolic
|
71.67 mL
Standard Deviation 49.916
|
63.73 mL
Standard Deviation 49.571
|
61.86 mL
Standard Deviation 47.523
|
|
Secondary Objective 5: Absolute Value End-diastolic and Systolic Volume Differences From CMR Between Blinded Readers for Suboptimal Echocardiograms
Echo Unenhanced End Diastolic
|
74.89 mL
Standard Deviation 51.468
|
69.07 mL
Standard Deviation 46.316
|
64.38 mL
Standard Deviation 46.827
|
|
Secondary Objective 5: Absolute Value End-diastolic and Systolic Volume Differences From CMR Between Blinded Readers for Suboptimal Echocardiograms
Echo Enhanced End Systolic
|
45.59 mL
Standard Deviation 32.844
|
38.55 mL
Standard Deviation 33.493
|
39.52 mL
Standard Deviation 30.946
|
|
Secondary Objective 5: Absolute Value End-diastolic and Systolic Volume Differences From CMR Between Blinded Readers for Suboptimal Echocardiograms
Echo Unenhanced End Systolic
|
48.00 mL
Standard Deviation 37.639
|
41.88 mL
Standard Deviation 32.989
|
40.72 mL
Standard Deviation 32.333
|
Adverse Events
DEFINITY®
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
DEFINITY®
n=160 participants at risk
Each patient will undergo an unenhanced ultrasound examination and a DEFINITY® contrast-enhanced ultrasound
DEFINITY®: All subjects will receive a single dose of DEFINITY®
|
|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • Up to 12 days: Enrolled subjects were followed for adverse events and serious adverse events from the time the Informed Consent was signed at screening (Day -7 to Day 0) through 72+/-24 hours after completion of Definity administration (Day 0).
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place