Study on the Effects of Different Premedication for LISA on Stress and Cerebral Tissue Oxygenation in Preterm Infants
NCT ID: NCT03718507
Last Updated: 2021-08-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
PHASE1
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-05-20
2020-02-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objective of this clinical trial is to establish the best premedication for LISA procedure considering neonatal pain assessed with premature infants pain scale, salivary cortisol levels as an indicator of stress and crSO2 values as indicators of cerebral oxygenation. Moreover, we aim to verify if sucrose 24% given orally is an effective tool for pain management in preterm neonates also in more invasive procedure, comparable to pharmacological treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The NONA-LISA Trial
NCT05609877
Assessment of Ketamine and Propofol Sedation During LISA Method (Less Invasive Surfactant Administration)
NCT03705468
Premedication for Less Invasive Surfactant Administration
NCT03735563
LISA vs INSURE in the Treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants
NCT04126382
Implementing LISA Surfactant in Nigeria
NCT05714865
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Nowadays, given the trend towards the less invasive respiratory support also for low and extremely low gestational age infants, the use of intubation and prolonged mechanical ventilation has been minimized. In fact, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) has been proved to be closely related to prolonged intubation and it is one of the main problem clinicians must face with. This is the reason why the INSURE technique was introduced as a routine care procedure in neonatal units. In fact, INSURE is the acronym for INtubation - SURfactant administration-Extubation. This technique ensures the baby the positive effects of surfactant on respiratory mechanics minimizing the intubation length. However, the INSURE procedure still involves intubation, meaning that it is still invansive and some infants cannot be extubated immediately afterward. Thus, lately new technique for surfactant administration has been introduced. The most extensively studied are the so-called less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) and minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST). With these procedures, infants receive non-invasive continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment, while being given intratracheal surfactant via a feeding tube or small catheter. Although the paucity of literature available to date, for extremely preterm infants LISA has shown to be able to reduce the need for intubation, ventilation and supplemental oxygen when compared with the standard technique of rescue intubation and ventilation. In comparison with the INSURE procedure the less invasive surfactant administration was associated with a reduced need for ventilation and reduced risk of BPD.
Even if this technique can provide the gentlest treatment presently available in administering surfactant, it implies laryngoscopy and somewhat discomfort. The importance of proper care in managing preterm infants, especially during painful procedures, has been well demonstrated and all the caregivers have to be even more committed to this aspect.
Pain in neonates is usually assessed through pain scales and using clinical parameters such as pulse oximetry (SatO2) and Heart Rate (HR). Since pain scores are subject to caregivers' individual perception and parameters can be influenced by other clinical underlying condition, especially in preterm infants, determination of cortisol concentration could be a useful alternative.
Cortisol is the major glucocorticoid produced in the adrenal cortex. Cortisol production has a circadian rhythm, with levels peaking in the early morning and dropping to lowest values at night. Levels rise independently of circadian rhythm in response to stress.
There is convincing evidence that providing neonates with oral glucose during painful procedure reduces the stress related to the procedure itself, without serious side effects or harms related to this intervention. Different concentrations of glucose solution are currently available and have been used in neonatal field.
To date, there is still high debate on the need to provide sedation to babies undergoing LISA, and lack of evidence available regarding the optimal premedication. Some Authors report to use LISA technique without any sort of sedation, while others perform it with the same sedation they use for INSURE method.
Moreover, there is lack of evidence in regard to the effects of this method on cerebral oxygenation, which can be easily monitored using NIRS (near infrared spectroscopy).
Since LISA technique's popularity is increasing, we believe that there is urgent need to better clarify how this approach can be performed in the gentlest way.
Given these premises, we indeed speculate that oral glucose as a premedication for LISA procedure could be an intriguing alternative to standard sedation.
Objective of this clinical trial is to establish the best premedication for LISA procedure considering neonatal pain assessed with premature infants pain scale, salivary cortisol levels as an indicator of stress and crSO2 values as indicators of cerebral oxygenation. Moreover, we aim to verify if sucrose 24% given orally is an effective tool for pain management in preterm neonates also in more invasive procedure, comparable to pharmacological treatment.
Evaluation of the efficacy of non-pharmacological sedation will lead to:
* a gentler approach for preterm babies and a better understanding of LISA technique
* an improvement in pain management, where sucrose can be applied for several painful procedures of different degrees of invasiveness, not only in the mildest ones
* a significant reduction in prolonged ventilation due to surfactant administration's pharmacological sedation
* a safer use of surfactant administration also in level II neonatal unit, since the risk for subsequent need of invasive respiratory support due to excessive sedation would be considerably reduced
* a significant economic impact on public health care system, for the inferior cost of oral sucrose
* a relevant decrease of the onset and subsequent public cost of BPD, if data about LISA technique capability to reduce it will be further confirmed.
* Primary Outcome:
Verify which is the best premedication for LISA procedure to reduce neonatal pain.
* Secondary Outcomes:
* Verify the effects of different forms of premedication on cerebral oxygenation during LISA procedure
* Verify the effects of different forms of premedication on cortisol levels before and after LISA procedure
* Verify the efficacy of sucrose 24% in pain control during more invasive procedures
* Verify the influence of premedication on adverse events' occurrence during LISA procedure
* Verify the effects of different pre-medications on the ease in administering surfactant with LISA technique (time required, number of attempts, …)
Trial Design:
An investigator-initiated randomized, single center, pilot study that will enroll 20 preterm neonates between 27 and 29+6 weeks of gestation.
Multiple births will be randomised into the same treatment arm.
Trial Interventions:
* Study group 1: patients will receive atropine (0.01-0.02 mg/kg i.v. bolus) and fentanyl (0.5-2 mcg/kg i.v. in 5 minutes) before LISA in addition to standard care (wrapping). NIRS will be monitored during the whole procedure
* Study group 2: patients will be given atropine (0.01-0.02 mg/kg i.v. bolus) and oral sucrose 24% (0.5 ml) 2 minutes before LISA in addition to standard care (wrapping). NIRS will be monitored during the whole procedure.
All the procedure will be videorecorded and subsequently analyzed
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
GROUP Fentanyl
patients will receive atropine (0.01-0.02 mg/kg i.v. bolus) and fentanyl (0.5-2 mcg/kg i.v. in 5 minutes) before LISA in addition to standard care (wrapping). NIRS will be monitored during the whole procedure, which will be video-recorded.
Fentanyl
atropine (0.01-0.02 mg/kg i.v. bolus) and fentanyl (0.5-2 mcg/kg i.v. in 5 minutes)
GROUP Sucrose
patients will be given atropine (0.01-0.02 mg/kg i.v. bolus) and oral sucrose 24% (0.5 ml) 2 minutes before LISA in addition to standard care (wrapping). NIRS will be monitored during the whole procedure, which will be video-recorded.
Sucrose 24% Oral Solution
0.5 ml given orally 2 minutes before LISA procedure
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fentanyl
atropine (0.01-0.02 mg/kg i.v. bolus) and fentanyl (0.5-2 mcg/kg i.v. in 5 minutes)
Sucrose 24% Oral Solution
0.5 ml given orally 2 minutes before LISA procedure
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Need for non-invasive respiratory support (CPAP or nHFT) AND
* Need for surfactant according to the unit guidelines AND
* Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Severe malformation of the upper/lower airways, brain and/or heart and/or lung and/or prenatal cerebral injury.
27 Weeks
29 Weeks
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Ilia Bresesti
Dr
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SL2018PS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.