Study on the Effects of Different Premedication for LISA on Stress and Cerebral Tissue Oxygenation in Preterm Infants

NCT ID: NCT03718507

Last Updated: 2021-08-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-05-20

Study Completion Date

2020-02-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Given the popularity that LISA technique has gainig in worldwide neonatal units, the lack of evidence regarding its premedication is becoming even more relevant to provide the best care to premature infants.

Objective of this clinical trial is to establish the best premedication for LISA procedure considering neonatal pain assessed with premature infants pain scale, salivary cortisol levels as an indicator of stress and crSO2 values as indicators of cerebral oxygenation. Moreover, we aim to verify if sucrose 24% given orally is an effective tool for pain management in preterm neonates also in more invasive procedure, comparable to pharmacological treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In the last decades, one of the most relevant interventions which have led to a significant increase in preterm infants survival rate is the introduction of surfactant replacement therapy.

Nowadays, given the trend towards the less invasive respiratory support also for low and extremely low gestational age infants, the use of intubation and prolonged mechanical ventilation has been minimized. In fact, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) has been proved to be closely related to prolonged intubation and it is one of the main problem clinicians must face with. This is the reason why the INSURE technique was introduced as a routine care procedure in neonatal units. In fact, INSURE is the acronym for INtubation - SURfactant administration-Extubation. This technique ensures the baby the positive effects of surfactant on respiratory mechanics minimizing the intubation length. However, the INSURE procedure still involves intubation, meaning that it is still invansive and some infants cannot be extubated immediately afterward. Thus, lately new technique for surfactant administration has been introduced. The most extensively studied are the so-called less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) and minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST). With these procedures, infants receive non-invasive continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment, while being given intratracheal surfactant via a feeding tube or small catheter. Although the paucity of literature available to date, for extremely preterm infants LISA has shown to be able to reduce the need for intubation, ventilation and supplemental oxygen when compared with the standard technique of rescue intubation and ventilation. In comparison with the INSURE procedure the less invasive surfactant administration was associated with a reduced need for ventilation and reduced risk of BPD.

Even if this technique can provide the gentlest treatment presently available in administering surfactant, it implies laryngoscopy and somewhat discomfort. The importance of proper care in managing preterm infants, especially during painful procedures, has been well demonstrated and all the caregivers have to be even more committed to this aspect.

Pain in neonates is usually assessed through pain scales and using clinical parameters such as pulse oximetry (SatO2) and Heart Rate (HR). Since pain scores are subject to caregivers' individual perception and parameters can be influenced by other clinical underlying condition, especially in preterm infants, determination of cortisol concentration could be a useful alternative.

Cortisol is the major glucocorticoid produced in the adrenal cortex. Cortisol production has a circadian rhythm, with levels peaking in the early morning and dropping to lowest values at night. Levels rise independently of circadian rhythm in response to stress.

There is convincing evidence that providing neonates with oral glucose during painful procedure reduces the stress related to the procedure itself, without serious side effects or harms related to this intervention. Different concentrations of glucose solution are currently available and have been used in neonatal field.

To date, there is still high debate on the need to provide sedation to babies undergoing LISA, and lack of evidence available regarding the optimal premedication. Some Authors report to use LISA technique without any sort of sedation, while others perform it with the same sedation they use for INSURE method.

Moreover, there is lack of evidence in regard to the effects of this method on cerebral oxygenation, which can be easily monitored using NIRS (near infrared spectroscopy).

Since LISA technique's popularity is increasing, we believe that there is urgent need to better clarify how this approach can be performed in the gentlest way.

Given these premises, we indeed speculate that oral glucose as a premedication for LISA procedure could be an intriguing alternative to standard sedation.

Objective of this clinical trial is to establish the best premedication for LISA procedure considering neonatal pain assessed with premature infants pain scale, salivary cortisol levels as an indicator of stress and crSO2 values as indicators of cerebral oxygenation. Moreover, we aim to verify if sucrose 24% given orally is an effective tool for pain management in preterm neonates also in more invasive procedure, comparable to pharmacological treatment.

Evaluation of the efficacy of non-pharmacological sedation will lead to:

* a gentler approach for preterm babies and a better understanding of LISA technique
* an improvement in pain management, where sucrose can be applied for several painful procedures of different degrees of invasiveness, not only in the mildest ones
* a significant reduction in prolonged ventilation due to surfactant administration's pharmacological sedation
* a safer use of surfactant administration also in level II neonatal unit, since the risk for subsequent need of invasive respiratory support due to excessive sedation would be considerably reduced
* a significant economic impact on public health care system, for the inferior cost of oral sucrose
* a relevant decrease of the onset and subsequent public cost of BPD, if data about LISA technique capability to reduce it will be further confirmed.
* Primary Outcome:

Verify which is the best premedication for LISA procedure to reduce neonatal pain.

* Secondary Outcomes:
* Verify the effects of different forms of premedication on cerebral oxygenation during LISA procedure
* Verify the effects of different forms of premedication on cortisol levels before and after LISA procedure
* Verify the efficacy of sucrose 24% in pain control during more invasive procedures
* Verify the influence of premedication on adverse events' occurrence during LISA procedure
* Verify the effects of different pre-medications on the ease in administering surfactant with LISA technique (time required, number of attempts, …)

Trial Design:

An investigator-initiated randomized, single center, pilot study that will enroll 20 preterm neonates between 27 and 29+6 weeks of gestation.

Multiple births will be randomised into the same treatment arm.

Trial Interventions:

* Study group 1: patients will receive atropine (0.01-0.02 mg/kg i.v. bolus) and fentanyl (0.5-2 mcg/kg i.v. in 5 minutes) before LISA in addition to standard care (wrapping). NIRS will be monitored during the whole procedure
* Study group 2: patients will be given atropine (0.01-0.02 mg/kg i.v. bolus) and oral sucrose 24% (0.5 ml) 2 minutes before LISA in addition to standard care (wrapping). NIRS will be monitored during the whole procedure.

All the procedure will be videorecorded and subsequently analyzed

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Respiratory Distress Syndrome Surfactant Deficiency Syndrome Neonatal Near Infrared Spectroscopy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

GROUP Fentanyl

patients will receive atropine (0.01-0.02 mg/kg i.v. bolus) and fentanyl (0.5-2 mcg/kg i.v. in 5 minutes) before LISA in addition to standard care (wrapping). NIRS will be monitored during the whole procedure, which will be video-recorded.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fentanyl

Intervention Type DRUG

atropine (0.01-0.02 mg/kg i.v. bolus) and fentanyl (0.5-2 mcg/kg i.v. in 5 minutes)

GROUP Sucrose

patients will be given atropine (0.01-0.02 mg/kg i.v. bolus) and oral sucrose 24% (0.5 ml) 2 minutes before LISA in addition to standard care (wrapping). NIRS will be monitored during the whole procedure, which will be video-recorded.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sucrose 24% Oral Solution

Intervention Type DRUG

0.5 ml given orally 2 minutes before LISA procedure

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fentanyl

atropine (0.01-0.02 mg/kg i.v. bolus) and fentanyl (0.5-2 mcg/kg i.v. in 5 minutes)

Intervention Type DRUG

Sucrose 24% Oral Solution

0.5 ml given orally 2 minutes before LISA procedure

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

atropine atropine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Preterm neonate 27-29+6 weeks AND
* Need for non-invasive respiratory support (CPAP or nHFT) AND
* Need for surfactant according to the unit guidelines AND
* Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* No written informed consent and/or
* Severe malformation of the upper/lower airways, brain and/or heart and/or lung and/or prenatal cerebral injury.
Minimum Eligible Age

27 Weeks

Maximum Eligible Age

29 Weeks

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Ilia Bresesti

Dr

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SL2018PS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

EXTERNAL NEGATIVE PRESSURE DURING LISA
NCT07271368 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Feasibility Study - Neofact
NCT04086095 COMPLETED NA