Trial Outcomes & Findings for Cooking for Health (NCT NCT03699709)
NCT ID: NCT03699709
Last Updated: 2025-03-18
Results Overview
Sugar-sweetened beverages include self-reported intake of fruit drinks, sugar-based energy drinks, and soda. Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages will be estimated using measures of consumption frequency and portion size. Average intakes will be calculated for each study participant using the University of Minnesota Nutrition Data Systems for Research Software by multiplying the frequency response for each beverage on the food frequency questionnaire by the recalled portion size, and then summing for all relevant beverages. Change from baseline with be assessed at 6 months and 12 months (12 months - baseline; 6 months - baseline). As the intervention hopes to decrease intake of sugar-sweetened beverages, lower (i.e., more negative) after - before differences represent a better outcome.
COMPLETED
NA
176 participants
measured at baseline, and months 6 and 12
2025-03-18
Participant Flow
No significant events after participant enrollment, but prior to randomization to intervention or control arm.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Intervention Arm
Budgeting, purchasing and cooking educational intervention: Receive culturally-tailored healthy food budgeting, purchasing, and cooking skills curriculum
|
Control Arm
No intervention (all intervention materials were given to participants randomized to the control arm at the end of the study)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
88
|
88
|
|
Overall Study
Month 6 Visit
|
74
|
79
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
71
|
82
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
17
|
6
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Intervention Arm
Budgeting, purchasing and cooking educational intervention: Receive culturally-tailored healthy food budgeting, purchasing, and cooking skills curriculum
|
Control Arm
No intervention (all intervention materials were given to participants randomized to the control arm at the end of the study)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
10
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
5
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
incarcerated
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
scheduled, but no show
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Cooking for Health
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Intervention Arm
n=88 Participants
Budgeting, purchasing and cooking educational intervention: Receive culturally-tailored healthy food budgeting, purchasing, and cooking skills curriculum
|
Control Arm
n=88 Participants
No intervention (all intervention materials were given to participants randomized to the control arm at the end of the study)
|
Total
n=176 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
51.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9 • n=5 Participants
|
48.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 • n=7 Participants
|
49.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
69 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
127 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
88 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
88 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
176 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sugar-sweetened beverages
|
1.2 servings per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4 • n=5 Participants
|
1.1 servings per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6 • n=7 Participants
|
1.2 servings per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.0 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Unhealthy Food Purchases
|
39.4 purchases per 30 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 34.7 • n=5 Participants
|
51.2 purchases per 30 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 38.2 • n=7 Participants
|
45.3 purchases per 30 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.8 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Healthy Food Purchases
|
62.4 purchases per 30 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 56.0 • n=5 Participants
|
88.0 purchases per 30 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 75.2 • n=7 Participants
|
75.3 purchases per 30 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 67.4 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: measured at baseline, and months 6 and 12Population: Participants who completed the food frequency questionnaire at the baseline and month 6 exam or the baseline and month 12 exam
Sugar-sweetened beverages include self-reported intake of fruit drinks, sugar-based energy drinks, and soda. Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages will be estimated using measures of consumption frequency and portion size. Average intakes will be calculated for each study participant using the University of Minnesota Nutrition Data Systems for Research Software by multiplying the frequency response for each beverage on the food frequency questionnaire by the recalled portion size, and then summing for all relevant beverages. Change from baseline with be assessed at 6 months and 12 months (12 months - baseline; 6 months - baseline). As the intervention hopes to decrease intake of sugar-sweetened beverages, lower (i.e., more negative) after - before differences represent a better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Arm
n=70 Participants
Budgeting, purchasing and cooking educational intervention: Receive culturally-tailored healthy food budgeting, purchasing, and cooking skills curriculum
|
Control Arm
n=78 Participants
No intervention (all intervention materials were given to participants randomized to the control arm at the end of the study)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change (From Baseline) in Self-reported Intake (Servings/Day) of Sugar-sweetened Beverages (Measured Using the Nutrition Assessment Shared Resource Food Frequency Questionnaire) at 6 Months and 12 Months
12 months-baseline
|
-0.13 servings
Standard Error 0.38
|
-0.11 servings
Standard Error 0.28
|
|
Change (From Baseline) in Self-reported Intake (Servings/Day) of Sugar-sweetened Beverages (Measured Using the Nutrition Assessment Shared Resource Food Frequency Questionnaire) at 6 Months and 12 Months
6 months-baseline
|
-0.22 servings
Standard Error 0.23
|
-0.28 servings
Standard Error 0.21
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: measured at baseline, and months 6 and 12Population: Participants who completed the healthy and unhealthy food purchases questionnaire at the baseline and month 6 exam or the baseline and month 12 exam
Change in healthy and unhealthy food purchases will be estimated using the Healthy/Unhealthy Food Acquisition Survey. The survey includes a list of 47 healthy and unhealthy foods commonly consumed in the community. At each exam (baseline, month 6, month 12), participants will report the number of times he/she acquired each of the 47 foods in the past 30 days. Change from baseline with be assessed at 6 months and 12 months (12 months - baseline; 6 months - baseline). As the intervention hopes to increase the number of healthy food purchases and decrease the number of unhealthy food purchases, higher after - before differences represent a better outcome for healthy foods and lower after - before differences represent a better outcome for unhealthy foods.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Arm
n=72 Participants
Budgeting, purchasing and cooking educational intervention: Receive culturally-tailored healthy food budgeting, purchasing, and cooking skills curriculum
|
Control Arm
n=82 Participants
No intervention (all intervention materials were given to participants randomized to the control arm at the end of the study)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change (From Baseline) in Healthy and Unhealthy Food Purchases (Measured Using the Healthy/Unhealthy Food Acquisition Survey) at 6 Months and 12 Months
12 months-baseline, unhealthy food purchases
|
-7.4 purchases per 30 days
Standard Error 3.3
|
-10.1 purchases per 30 days
Standard Error 3.7
|
|
Change (From Baseline) in Healthy and Unhealthy Food Purchases (Measured Using the Healthy/Unhealthy Food Acquisition Survey) at 6 Months and 12 Months
6 months-baseline, unhealthy food purchases
|
-6.42 purchases per 30 days
Standard Error 4.92
|
-9.91 purchases per 30 days
Standard Error 4.25
|
|
Change (From Baseline) in Healthy and Unhealthy Food Purchases (Measured Using the Healthy/Unhealthy Food Acquisition Survey) at 6 Months and 12 Months
12 months-baseline, healthy food purchases
|
7.24 purchases per 30 days
Standard Error 4.95
|
-16.3 purchases per 30 days
Standard Error 8.56
|
|
Change (From Baseline) in Healthy and Unhealthy Food Purchases (Measured Using the Healthy/Unhealthy Food Acquisition Survey) at 6 Months and 12 Months
6 months-baseline, healthy food purchases
|
0.84 purchases per 30 days
Standard Error 6.3
|
-10.5 purchases per 30 days
Standard Error 0.84
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: measured at baseline, and months 6 and 12Population: Participants who completed the Food Resource Management questions at the baseline and month 6 exam or the baseline and month 12 exam
Change in food budgeting skills will be estimated using the Food Resource Management Scale. The scale includes 4 questions related to shopping behaviors to maximize food resources. The Food Resource Management Scale is a Likert-type scale with responses ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always). Responses to the four questions will be averaged to create a total Food Resource Management Score. Change from baseline with be assessed at 6 months and 12 months (12 months - baseline; 6 months - baseline). As the intervention hopes to increase food budgeting skills, higher after-before differences represent a better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Arm
n=73 Participants
Budgeting, purchasing and cooking educational intervention: Receive culturally-tailored healthy food budgeting, purchasing, and cooking skills curriculum
|
Control Arm
n=80 Participants
No intervention (all intervention materials were given to participants randomized to the control arm at the end of the study)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change (From Baseline) in Food Budgeting Skills (Measured Using the Food Resource Management Scale) at 6 Months and 12 Months
12 months-baseline
|
0.28 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
-0.08 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
|
|
Change (From Baseline) in Food Budgeting Skills (Measured Using the Food Resource Management Scale) at 6 Months and 12 Months
6 months-baseline
|
0.08 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
0.05 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: measured at baseline, and months 6 and 12Population: Participants who completed the Cooking Confidence Scale questions at the baseline and month 6 exam or the baseline and month 12 exam
Change in cooking skills will be estimated using a minor modification of the Cooking Confidence Scale. The Cooking Confidence Scale includes 6 questions related to confidence in preparing healthy foods. It is a Likert-type scale with responses ranging from 1 (not at all confident) to 5 (very confident). Responses to the questions will be averaged. Change from baseline with be assessed at 6 months and 12 months (12 months - baseline; 6 months - baseline). As the intervention hopes to increase cooking skills, higher after - before differences represent a better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Arm
n=68 Participants
Budgeting, purchasing and cooking educational intervention: Receive culturally-tailored healthy food budgeting, purchasing, and cooking skills curriculum
|
Control Arm
n=78 Participants
No intervention (all intervention materials were given to participants randomized to the control arm at the end of the study)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change (From Baseline) in Cooking Skills (Measured Using the Cooking Confidence Scale) at 6 Months and 12 Months
12 months-baseline
|
0.16 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
-0.18 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
|
Change (From Baseline) in Cooking Skills (Measured Using the Cooking Confidence Scale) at 6 Months and 12 Months
6 months-baseline
|
0.21 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.06 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Years 2020-2023The proportion of those approached that were eligible for the intervention (and the number who subsequently participate) will be used as a marker of intervention reach.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: through study completion, estimated 12 months to complete intervention per participantThe investigators will assess adherence to the study protocol and document barriers and facilitators to implementation throughout the trial.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Semi-structured interviews will be done at months 6 and 12.During months 6 and 12, a sub-sample of study participants in the intervention arm will meet with study staff by phone for semi-structured interviews to evaluate the overall intervention. Qualitative analyses will assess participant's satisfaction with the intervention.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: through study completion, estimated 12 months to complete intervention per participantDose will be assessed in the intervention arm only
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: through study completion, estimated 12 months to complete intervention per participantDose will be assessed in the intervention arm only
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Intervention Arm
Control Arm
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Amanda Fretts
University of Washington School of Public Health Department of Epidemiology
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place