Influence of Cognitive Function Software Therapy on the Improvement of Manual Skills in Multiple Sclerosis Patients

NCT ID: NCT03693118

Last Updated: 2018-10-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

86 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-01-13

Study Completion Date

2018-05-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating disease of the central nervous system leading to the impairment of motor, visual and cognitive functions. A standardized rehabilitation of cognitive functions can be provided by a systematized treatment program devised to improve neurological patients' quality of life. The degree of difficulty of the computerized tasks was adapted to a patient's predispositions and modified once a desirable improvement in the practiced skill has reached.

The aim of the study was to assess the influence of cognitive therapy by means of the cognitive software on manual dexterity in patients with multiple sclerosis. We also attempted to establish whether factors like age, sex and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores contribute to the outcomes of that therapy. All patients enrolled will have a documented history of MS disease prior to study enrollment. The EDSS scores varied between 1.5-4 (mean score 2.1). The Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT), administered to all of the patients, was used to evaluate the subjects' manual dexterity. Having been administered the NHPT test the initial 86-patient group was reduced to a cohort of 40 subjects qualified for the study, who were subsequently randomly divided into two groups - the study and the control - each consisting of 20 subjects. Three times a week the study group received the upper limb treatment by means of the cognitive function platform. They were expected to achieve 96 levels of visuo-motor coordination in 3 months or the treatment was to be terminated. After completing each task the patient would move on to a higher level of difficulty. Failure meant having to redo that particular task. One training session lasted 20 min., after which the patient could take a break.

Having completed the training each patient was administered the NHPT test again in view of assessing the efficiency of their upper limb. Due to progressive deterioration of health and other factors only 10 patients managed to complete the training.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Multiple Sclerosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Grup1, Grup2

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Reh1,Reh2

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The initial group comprised 86 subjects including. The Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT), administered to all of the patients, was used to evaluate the subjects' manual dexterity. The standardized scale enabled obtaining scores of high validity (right: r= 0.984, left: r = 0.993). Having been administered the NHPT test the initial 86-patient group was reduced to a cohort of 40 subjects qualified for the study, who were subsequently randomly divided into two groups - the study and the control - each consisting of 20 subjects. Three times a week the study group received the upper limb treatment by means of the cognitive function platform. They were expected to achieve 96 levels of visuo-motor coordination in 3 months or the treatment was to be terminated. Prior to the first session of the treatment the patients were provided with all relevant instructions and information about the test displayed on the monitor. They could also choose which hand they would start with.

Grup1,Grup2

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Reh1,Reh2

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The initial group comprised 86 subjects including. The Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT), administered to all of the patients, was used to evaluate the subjects' manual dexterity. The standardized scale enabled obtaining scores of high validity (right: r= 0.984, left: r = 0.993). Having been administered the NHPT test the initial 86-patient group was reduced to a cohort of 40 subjects qualified for the study, who were subsequently randomly divided into two groups - the study and the control - each consisting of 20 subjects. Three times a week the study group received the upper limb treatment by means of the cognitive function platform. They were expected to achieve 96 levels of visuo-motor coordination in 3 months or the treatment was to be terminated. Prior to the first session of the treatment the patients were provided with all relevant instructions and information about the test displayed on the monitor. They could also choose which hand they would start with.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Reh1,Reh2

The initial group comprised 86 subjects including. The Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT), administered to all of the patients, was used to evaluate the subjects' manual dexterity. The standardized scale enabled obtaining scores of high validity (right: r= 0.984, left: r = 0.993). Having been administered the NHPT test the initial 86-patient group was reduced to a cohort of 40 subjects qualified for the study, who were subsequently randomly divided into two groups - the study and the control - each consisting of 20 subjects. Three times a week the study group received the upper limb treatment by means of the cognitive function platform. They were expected to achieve 96 levels of visuo-motor coordination in 3 months or the treatment was to be terminated. Prior to the first session of the treatment the patients were provided with all relevant instructions and information about the test displayed on the monitor. They could also choose which hand they would start with.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

MS clinically diagnosed based on McDonald's criteria of 2011 The EDSS between 1.5-4; relapsing-remitting form MS;

exclusio criteria Mental disorders, alcoholism, severe vision disorders including diplopia coinciding upper limb therapy

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pomeranian Medical University Szczecin

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Pawlukowska Wioletta

Study Director: Przemysław Nowacki MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Departmen of Neurology

Szczecin, Unii Lubelskiej, Poland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Poland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PomeranianMU2018

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.