Low FODMAP Plus PEG 3350 for the Treatment of Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Constipation
NCT ID: NCT03687814
Last Updated: 2025-03-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
78 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-11-08
2026-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Is Microbiota Community Associated With Clinical Response to a Low FODMAP Diet in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome
NCT02565550
Effect of a Low FODMAP Diet in IBS and Functional Constipation with Bloating: a Randomized Double-Blind Trial
NCT06871748
Microbiota, Metabolome and Nutrition: an 'Artificially Intelligent' Way to Personalized Nutrition
NCT06420843
Low FODMAPs Diet in Gastrointestinal Disorders
NCT03644602
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Irritable Bowel Syndrome Associated Food Intolerance
NCT05361785
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. The PEG 3350 and low FODMAP diet group will achieve greater improvements in abdominal symptoms including pain, discomfort, and bloating than the group receiving PEG 3350 and the sham diet.
2. The PEG 3350 and low FODMAP diet group will achieve greater improvements in IBS related quality of life and anxiety than the group receiving PEG 3350 and the sham diet.
3. Both strategies will improve constipation related complaints including stool frequency, stool consistency and straining to a similar degree.
We plan to test our central hypothesis and, thereby, accomplish the objective of this application by pursuing the following 2 specific aims:
Aim 1: Compare the proportion of patients with IBS-C on a diet of low FODMAP diet plus PEG 3350 vs. sham diet plus PEG 3350 reporting an improvement of abdominal pain. Our working hypothesis is that a higher proportion of patients randomized to the low FODMAP diet plus PEG 3350 will experience a reduction in the abdominal pain when compared to PEG 3350 plus sham diet alone.
Aim 2: Compare the efficacy of the low FODMAP diet plus PEG 3350 vs. sham diet plus PEG 3350 on pre-specified key clinical and disease specific quality of life endpoints in patients with IBS-C. Through our randomized controlled trial, we will assess the impact of the dietary interventions on stool consistency, stool frequency, and bloating and quality of life endpoints.
A positive result to this study would have significant impact on the treatment of patients with IBS by expanding the indications for the low FODMAP diet to all affected patients, regardless of bowel subtype. This would be particularly relevant to IBS-C patients for whom we currently have few evidence-based diet recommendations outside of increasing fiber intake.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Low FODMAP diet plus PEG 3350
Subjects will follow a low FODMAP diet and will take PEG 3350 (Miralax).
Low FODMAP diet/PEG 3350
Subjects will follow a low FODMAP diet and will take PEG 3350 (Miralax) at 17.7 g (single dose) daily for 4 weeks.
Sham diet plus PEG 3350
Subjects will follow a sham diet and will take PEG 3350 (Miralax).
sham diet/PEG 3350
Subjects will follow a sham diet and will take PEG 3350 (Miralax) at 17.7 g (single dose) daily for 4 weeks.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Low FODMAP diet/PEG 3350
Subjects will follow a low FODMAP diet and will take PEG 3350 (Miralax) at 17.7 g (single dose) daily for 4 weeks.
sham diet/PEG 3350
Subjects will follow a sham diet and will take PEG 3350 (Miralax) at 17.7 g (single dose) daily for 4 weeks.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
• Recurrent abdominal pain, on average, at least 1 day/week in the last 3 months, associated with two or more of the following:
1. related to defecation
2. associated with a change in the frequency of stool (reduction of stools)
3. associated with a change in the form of stool (hard or lumpy stools) AND \>25% hard stools and \<25% loose stools \* Criteria fulfilled for the last 3 months
Exclusion Criteria
* \>3 spontaneous bowel movements during the last 7 days of run-in
* Have cognitive dysfunction or unable to understand or provide written informed consent
* Pregnancy (evaluated by self-report)
* Comorbid medical problems that may affect gastrointestinal transit or motility:
* Inflammatory bowel disease
* Extra-intestinal disease known to affect the gastrointestinal system (i.e., scleroderma, unstable thyroid disease, etc.)
* Severe renal or hepatic disease
* Previous abdominal surgery other than appendectomy, cholecystectomy, and gynecologic/urologic surgery if performed more than six months prior to enrollment
* Previous treatment with the low FODMAP diet under a dietician guidance
* Concurrent medications not permitted including probiotics, antibiotics, prescription or over-the-counter medication for IBS, and narcotics
* New antidepressant use (less than 3 months on stable dose)
* Active participation in another form of dietary therapy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Michigan
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Stacy Menees
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stacy B Menees, MD, MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Michigan
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Stacy Menees, MD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HUM00139784
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.