Patient Satisfaction Scales

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

256 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-06-22

Study Completion Date

2019-03-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to assess differences between 4 types of single satisfaction measures. Secondly, if there is a difference in satisfaction between English speaking and Spanish speaking patients.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Multifaceted Physioterapeutic Intervention at Workplace

NCT02636309

Musculoskeletal Pain Quality of Life

COMPLETED NA

Comparative Effects of Cervicothoracic Junction Mobilization and Thoracic Manipulation in Subachromial Impinegment Syndrome

NCT06110039

Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

UNKNOWN NA

Crafted Communication for Biopsychosocial Care in Musculoskeletal Practice

NCT04482348

Mental Health Wellness 1

COMPLETED NA

Surgeons Can Avoid Lasting Pain Through Exercise Literacy

NCT05175443

Neck Pain Shoulder Pain

COMPLETED NA

Impact of Practitioner and Instructional Set on Subject Perceptions and Expectations of Cervical Spine Manipulation

NCT03509649

Neck Pain

UNKNOWN NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

All Orthopedic Disorders New or Follow-up Patients

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Satisfaction measure 1

25% of the cohort

5 anchors and numbers

Intervention Type OTHER

How helpful was this visit? 0 This visit was not helpful at all

1 2-3 There were many ways it could have been better 4 5 Neither useless nor helpful visit 6 7-8 Exceptionally helpful visit 9 10 One of the most helpful doctor visits I have ever had

Satisfaction measure 2

25% of the cohort

5 anchors and no numbers

Intervention Type OTHER

How helpful was this visit? This visit was not helpful at all There were many ways it could have been better Neither useless nor helpful visit Exceptionally helpful visit One of the most helpful doctor visits I have ever had

Satisfaction measure 3

25% of the cohort

Visual analog scale with 3 anchors and numbers

Intervention Type OTHER

How helpful was this visit? 0 neutral/50 100 Least helpful visit Most helpful visit

Satisfaction measure 4

25% of the cohort

Visual analog scale with 3 anchors and no numbers

Intervention Type OTHER

How helpful was this visit?

This visit was not Neither useless nor One of the most helpful doctor helpful at all helpful visit visits I have ever had

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

5 anchors and numbers

How helpful was this visit? 0 This visit was not helpful at all

1 2-3 There were many ways it could have been better 4 5 Neither useless nor helpful visit 6 7-8 Exceptionally helpful visit 9 10 One of the most helpful doctor visits I have ever had

Intervention Type OTHER

5 anchors and no numbers

How helpful was this visit? This visit was not helpful at all There were many ways it could have been better Neither useless nor helpful visit Exceptionally helpful visit One of the most helpful doctor visits I have ever had

Intervention Type OTHER

Visual analog scale with 3 anchors and numbers

How helpful was this visit? 0 neutral/50 100 Least helpful visit Most helpful visit

Intervention Type OTHER

Visual analog scale with 3 anchors and no numbers

How helpful was this visit?

This visit was not Neither useless nor One of the most helpful doctor helpful at all helpful visit visits I have ever had

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All new or return patients seeing a UE / LE surgeon
* Age 18-89
* Able to provide informed consent
* English speaking
* UT Health Austin Musculoskeletal Institute, Austin Regional Clinic, Seton Institute for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Orthopaedic Specialists of Austin, Texas Orthopedics, and ATX Ortho.