Denosumab and Nivolumab Combination As 2d-line Therapy in Stage IV NSC Lung Cancer with Bone Metastases (DENIVOS)
NCT ID: NCT03669523
Last Updated: 2025-02-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
82 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-11-06
2023-10-19
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Expert and medical Society guidelines, notably European Society for Medical Oncology in 2014, then in 2016, recommended using anti-resorptive agents (bisphosphonates or denosumab) to prevent SREs, attenuate pain and improve the quality of life, and decrease the medical-economic impact of this major metastatic site. Denosumab was accorded marketing authorization in France in 2011 as an anti-resorptive agent for bone metastases to delay the occurrence of SREs in lung-cancer patients.
Immunotherapy, notably immune-checkpoint inhibitors, like nivolumab (anti-programed death-1), has recently become an integral part of the therapeutic arsenal against NSCLCs. Nivolumab was accorded marketing authorization based on the phase III CHECKMATE 017 (squamous cell NSCLCs) and CHECKMATE 057 (non-squamous cell NSCLCs) trials versus docetaxel, after the phase II CHECKMATE 063 trial.
The denosumab-nivolumab combination is commonly used in current practice but has not been evaluated prospectively. The aim of this trial is to evaluate the combination of denosumab and nivolumab in second line of NSCLC with bone metastases.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Denosumab in Combination With Chemotherapy as First-line Treatment of Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT01951586
Survival imProvement in Lung cancEr iNduced by DenOsUmab theRapy
NCT02129699
A Study Evaluating the Efficacy of PD-1 Inhibitor Combined With Denosumab and Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Driver Gene-Negative Status
NCT07034391
Long-term Outcomes Among Patients With Programmed Death-ligand 1 <1% Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With First-line Nivolumab + Ipilimumab + 2 Cycles of Chemotherapy
NCT07024862
An Observational Study to Evaluate Neoadjuvant Nivolumab (OPDIVO®) in Combination With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Non-Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Participants in Germany
NCT06169956
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Expert and medical Society guidelines, notably European Society for Medical Oncology in 2014, then in 2016, recommended using anti-resorptive agents (bisphosphonates or denosumab) to prevent SREs, attenuate pain and improve the quality of life, and decrease the medical-economic impact of this major metastatic site.
Denosumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody. It mimics the action of osteoprotegerin (OPG), thereby inhibiting osteoclastogenesis by blocking the binding of the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB (RANK) to its ligand (RANKL), and thus interrupts the vicious circle between tumor cells and bone. RANK is a transmembrane protein expressed on osteoclasts, and its ligand, RANKL, is soluble and secreted by osteoblasts. Denosumab was accorded marketing authorization in France in 2011 as an anti-resorptive agent for bone metastases to delay the occurrence of SREs in lung-cancer patients. The results of 3 phase III studies evaluating the place of denosumab versus zoledronic acid have been published. Lung cancers were included in the trial examining solid tumors (other than breast and prostate) and multiple myeloma, and represented 40% of the population. In a non-inferiority analysis, the primary objective was reached with denosumab prolonging by approximately 4 months the time to the first SRE (20.6 versus 16.3 months, hazard ratio 0.84 \[95% confidence interval 0.71-0.98\] p=0.0007). In the lung-cancer subgroup, this difference did not reach significance (hazard ratio 0.85 \[95% confidence interval 0.65-1.12\]). In contrast, the exploratory analysis of that subgroup showed overall survival prolonged by 1.2 months for the denosumab arm versus zoledronic acid (8.9 versus 7.7 months, hazard ratio 0.8 \[95% confidence interval 0.67-0.95\] p=0.01).
Immunotherapy, notably immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs), like nivolumab (anti-programed death-1 (PD-1)), has recently become an integral part of the therapeutic arsenal against NSCLCs. Nivolumab was accorded marketing authorization based on the phase III CHECKMATE 017 (squamous cell NSCLCs) and CHECKMATE 057 (non-squamous cell NSCLCs) trials versus docetaxel, after the phase II CHECKMATE 063 trial. The search for a biomarker predictive of the response to immunotherapy is becoming more-and-more crucial, so as not to expose patients who risk early cancer hyper-progression. Immunohistochemical labeling of PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) on tumor cells (± infiltrating the stroma) is the most studied and reliable biomarker. Knowing its status has become indispensable in immunotherapy trials because an elevated PD-L1 has been correlated to a better response. Prescribing second-line nivolumab is not conditioned by the PD-L1 status because those trials had not foreseen stratification according to this criterion's status. However, post-hoc analysis of PD-L1 in the CHECKMATE 057 trial on non-squamous cell NSCLCs showed prolonged overall survival for patients with PD-L1-positive tumors, whether the positivity threshold was 1%, 5% or 10%. Thus, knowing the PD-L1 status is necessary to interpret the results of immunotherapy trials.
The RANK-RANKL system was studied in preclinical osteoimmunology models. It is expressed by certain cells, notably antigen-presenting cells, such as dendritic cells or lymphocytes, essential for the adaptive immunity function solicited by immunotherapy. It is part of the tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNF-R) family and is implicated in the interactions between dendritic cells and lymphocytes. The RANK-RANKL role in the development and function of regulatory T cells (Tregs) remains poorly elucidated. Information on the interaction of the RANK-RANKL system and adaptive immunity obtained with the preclinical models is discordant and rare. A case report on a patient with melanoma bone metastases treated with denosumab and ipilimumab (ICPI of the anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 type) obtained a promising carcinological outcome, without any sign of deleterious interaction.
The aim of this trial is to evaluate the combination of denosumab and nivolumab in second line of NSCLC with bone metastases.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Denosumab-nivolumab combination
Both drugs to be continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity and for a maximum of two years
Denosumab-nivolumab combination
* Denosumab: 120 mg every 4 weeks subcutaneously
* Nivolumab: 240mg intravenously on day 1 every 2 weeks
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Denosumab-nivolumab combination
* Denosumab: 120 mg every 4 weeks subcutaneously
* Nivolumab: 240mg intravenously on day 1 every 2 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who had received first-line platin salt-based chemotherapy and will be given second-line nivolumab;
* Patients with bone metastases, symptomatic or not, confirmed by X-rays, CT scan, MRI, PET-CT scan or technetium bone scintigraphy
* Presence of at least 1 measurable target lesion, according to RECIST criteria 1.1, in a non-irradiated site
* For non-squamous cell NSCLC, patients without known activating epidermal growth factor receptor mutation, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) or reactive oxygen species (ROS)-1 translocation, or B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF V600) mutation
* PD-L1 status known and expressed as a percentage of tumor cells; assessed at the diagnosis or the more recent PD-L1 expression status available.
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0/1
* Estimated life-expectancy ≥12 weeks
* No prior malignant tumor during the previous 5 years, except for in situ carcinomas of the cervix or basal or squamous cell carcinomas of the skin adequately treated;
* Adequate organ function determined by laboratory analyses less than 7 days before inclusion:
* Normal hepatic function: bilirubin \< 1.5× normal (N), alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase \<2.5× N or \<5× N if hepatic metastases are present
* Renal function (renal clearance of creatinine at least ≥45 mL/min)
* Hematological function: absolute number of neutrophils ≥1.5×109/L and/or platelets ≥100×109/L, hemoglobin ≥8 g/dL
* Women of child-bearing age must use an effective contraceptive method and mechanical contraception during and up to 6 months after the end of treatment;
* Men must use effective contraception during and up to 6 months after the treatment period
* Patient with asymptomatic brain metastases (treated or not) OR symptomatic brain metastases but adequately treated and controlled at the time of enrolment (without or with corticotherapy ≤ 10mg/day), can be included. Carcinomatous meningitis is excluded regardless of clinical stability
* Subjects must have signed and dated an approved written informed consent form in accordance with regulatory and institutional guidelines. This must be obtained before the performance of any protocol related procedures that are not part of normal subject care
* Patient affiliated or benefitting from the French national health insurance program
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with symptomatic cerebral metastases not treated and not controlled
* Contraindication to nivolumab use:
* Prior autoimmune disease(s), define as disease required systemic treatment in the past (i.e. with use of disease modifying agents, corticosteroids or immunosuppressive drugs). Replacement therapy (eg., thyroxine, insulin, or physiologic corticosteroid replacement therapy for adrenal or pituitary insufficiency, etc.) is not considered a form of systemic treatment
* Prior diffuse interstitial pneumopathy
* Systemic immunosuppressive therapy; define as steroid medication at a dose greater than prednisone 10 mg/day or equivalent. For patients with mismatch repair-deficient high-grade gliomas, concurrent steroid medication at a dose greater than prednisone 20mg/day or equivalent
* Contraindication for denosumab use:
* Poor dental status requiring immediate specialized management, like oral surgery
* Prior or current signs of osteonecrosis of the jaw/osteomyelitis
* Invasive dental intervention schedule during the study or not yet healed
* Patient with known sensitivity to any of the products to be administered during the study
* Concomitant administration of bisphosphonates
* Hypocalcemia or severe uncorrected hypercalcemia
* Medical or psychological condition preventing informed consent
* Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
* PD-L1-status results unavailable
* Simultaneous participation of the patient in another clinical research trial
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
French Lung Cancer Group
UNKNOWN
Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Chantal Decroisette, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CH Annecy Genevois
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CH du Pays d'Aix
Aix-en-Provence, , France
Chu Angers
Angers, , France
Centre Hospitalier de Beauvais
Beauvais, , France
Centre Hospitalier Fleyriat
Bourg-en-Bresse, , France
CHU Morvan - Institut de Cancérologie et d'Hématologie
Brest, , France
CH Intercommunal
Créteil, , France
Ch Intercommunal Elbeuf Louvier Val de Reuil
Elbeuf, , France
CH Intercommunal des Alpes du Sud
Gap, , France
Hôpital Robert Boulin
Libourne, , France
Chu Dupuytren
Limoges, , France
CH Marne La Vallée
Marne La Vallée, , France
Hopital Européen
Marseille, , France
Hopital Nord APHM
Marseille, , France
CH Meaux
Meaux, , France
Centre Catalan d'Oncologie
Perpignan, , France
CH Annecy-Genevois
Pringy, , France
CHU Hôpital Pontchailloux
Rennes, , France
CHU Rouen
Rouen, , France
CHU La Réunion - Site de Bellepierre
Saint-Denis, , France
Groupe Hospitalier Sud Réunion - CHU de la Réunion
Saint-Pierre, , France
Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, , France
CLCC Paul Strauss
Strasbourg, , France
Centre Hospitalier de Bigorre
Tarbes, , France
Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Saint-Anne
Toulon, , France
CHITS Toulon Sainte-Musse
Toulon, , France
Hôpital André Mignot Centre Hospitalier de Versailles
Versailles, , France
CH Villefranche sur Saone
Villefranche-sur-Saône, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2018-001105-85
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
P_2017_007
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.