Trial Outcomes & Findings for An Open-label, 8-week Safety, Efficacy, and Assessment of Cooling Methods for Administration of CNTX-4975-05 for Knee OA (NCT NCT03661996)
NCT ID: NCT03661996
Last Updated: 2022-03-09
Results Overview
A composite score was calculated for each of the 5 treatment regimens by summing the scores of three assessments: (1) procedure pain 30 minutes after injection of CNTX-4975-05 on a 0-4 scale, 0 was best indicating no procedure pain, 4 was worst indicating severe procedure pain; (2) assessment of subjects' satisfaction with the regimen on a scale of 1 (completely dissatisfied) to 7 (completely satisfied), 1 was worst and 7 was best; and (3) assessment of investigators' satisfaction with the regimen on a scale of 1 (completely dissatisfied) to 7 (completely satisfied), 1 was worst and 7 was best. The procedure pain at 30 minutes was reversed to a 1-7 scale so 7 was best indicating no procedure pain and 1 was worst indicating severe procedure pain. The three assessments were summed for a total score from 3-21, 3 being the worst outcome and 21 being the best outcome. The geometric mean of the scores was derived for each group. All assessments were administered on Day 1 (Baseline).
COMPLETED
PHASE3
854 participants
Day 1 assessments
2022-03-09
Participant Flow
Subjects were recruited between 18 September 2018 and 22 October 2019
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Group 1. Breg Cooling Control
Breg Cooler (total cool time at least 85 minutes) with IA injection of 2% lidocaine followed by a second IA injection CNTX-4975
|
Group 2. Gel Pack Cooling
Gel Pack Cooling (total cool time at least 60 minutes) with IA injection of 2% lidocaine followed by a second IA injection CNTX-4975
|
Group 3. Shortened Gel Pack Cooling
Gel pack cooling (total cool time at least 35 minutes) with IA injection of 2% lidocaine followed by a second IA injection CNTX-4975
|
Group 4. Single Needle Injection Gel Pack Cooling - 2% Lidocaine
Gel pack cooling (total cool time at least 45 minutes) with a combined single IA injection of 2% lidocaine followed by CNTX-4975
|
Group 5. Single Needle Injection Gel Pack Cooling - 1% Lidocaine
Gel pack cooling (total cool time at least 45 minutes) with a combined single IA injection of 1% lidocaine followed by CNTX-4975
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
162
|
180
|
176
|
163
|
173
|
|
Overall Study
Treated
|
162
|
179
|
175
|
160
|
172
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
150
|
172
|
170
|
150
|
159
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
12
|
8
|
6
|
13
|
14
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Group 1. Breg Cooling Control
Breg Cooler (total cool time at least 85 minutes) with IA injection of 2% lidocaine followed by a second IA injection CNTX-4975
|
Group 2. Gel Pack Cooling
Gel Pack Cooling (total cool time at least 60 minutes) with IA injection of 2% lidocaine followed by a second IA injection CNTX-4975
|
Group 3. Shortened Gel Pack Cooling
Gel pack cooling (total cool time at least 35 minutes) with IA injection of 2% lidocaine followed by a second IA injection CNTX-4975
|
Group 4. Single Needle Injection Gel Pack Cooling - 2% Lidocaine
Gel pack cooling (total cool time at least 45 minutes) with a combined single IA injection of 2% lidocaine followed by CNTX-4975
|
Group 5. Single Needle Injection Gel Pack Cooling - 1% Lidocaine
Gel pack cooling (total cool time at least 45 minutes) with a combined single IA injection of 1% lidocaine followed by CNTX-4975
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
5
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
5
|
1
|
7
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
Sponsors Decision
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
An Open-label, 8-week Safety, Efficacy, and Assessment of Cooling Methods for Administration of CNTX-4975-05 for Knee OA
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Group 1. Breg Cooling Control
n=162 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from separate needles of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine followed by CNTX-4975-05 15 minutes later. The subject was cooled with the Breg ice water pump and circumferential knee wrap for 15 minutes before lidocaine injection, followed by 30 minutes before the CNTX-4975-05 injection, and for at least 30 minutes and up to 90 minutes after the CNTX-4975-05 injection as needed.
|
Group 2. Gel Pack Cooling
n=179 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from separate needles of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine followed by CNTX-4975-05 10 minutes later. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 40 minutes before the lidocaine injection, followed by 10 minutes before the CNTX-4975-05 injection, and for at least 10 minutes and up to 90 minutes after the CNTX-4975-05 injection as needed.
|
Group 3. Shortened Gel Pack Cooling
n=175 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from separate needles of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine followed by CNTX-4975-05 5 minutes later. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 30 minutes before the lidocaine injection, followed by 5 minutes before the CNTX-4975-05 injection, and with no required cooling after the CNTX-4975-05 injection, but up to 90 minutes of cooling as needed.
|
Group 4. Single Needle Injection Gel Pack Cooling - 2% Lidocaine
n=160 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from a single needle of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine and CNTX-4975-05, with up to 3 minutes in between injections. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 45 minutes before the single needle injection of lidocaine and CNTX-4975-05. There was no cooling in between injections and no cooling required after the single needle injections, but up to 90 minutes of cooling as needed.
|
Group 5. Single Needle Injection Gel Pack Cooling - 1% Lidocaine
n=172 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from a single needle of 1% lidocaine without epinephrine and CNTX-4975-05, with up to 3 minutes in between injections. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 45 minutes before the single needle injection of lidocaine and CNTX-4975-05. There was no cooling in between injections and no cooling required after the single needle injections, but up to 90 minutes of cooling as needed.
|
Total
n=848 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
62.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 • n=5 Participants
|
61.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8 • n=7 Participants
|
63.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2 • n=5 Participants
|
62.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4 • n=4 Participants
|
65.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9 • n=21 Participants
|
63.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4 • n=8 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
104 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
101 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
104 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
99 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
100 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
508 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
58 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
78 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
71 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
61 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
72 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
340 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
69 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
88 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
196 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
93 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
91 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
160 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
143 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
164 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
651 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index (kg/m^2)
|
31.21 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.349 • n=5 Participants
|
29.94 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.276 • n=7 Participants
|
31.89 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.904 • n=5 Participants
|
31.54 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.083 • n=4 Participants
|
31.72 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.099 • n=21 Participants
|
31.25 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.252 • n=8 Participants
|
|
Radiographic Osteoarthritis Type
Unilateral
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
155 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Radiographic Osteoarthritis Type
Bilateral
|
153 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
136 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
144 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
138 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
122 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
693 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Subject Type
Single Knee Injection (Unilateral Mod-Sec OA Knee Pain)
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
71 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
57 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
69 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
273 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Subject Type
Single knee Injection (Non-Index knee PJR/TJR)
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Subject Type
Bilateral Knee Injections (Bilateral mod-Sec OA Knee Pain)
|
133 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
117 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
92 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
94 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
87 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
523 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
KOOS Pain Subscale (Index Knee)
|
42.42 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.959 • n=5 Participants
|
44.89 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.397 • n=7 Participants
|
48.30 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.071 • n=5 Participants
|
44.70 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.803 • n=4 Participants
|
44.33 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.201 • n=21 Participants
|
44.97 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.830 • n=8 Participants
|
|
KOOS Symptoms Subscale (Index Knee)
|
47.69 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.611 • n=5 Participants
|
50.86 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.161 • n=7 Participants
|
52.75 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.570 • n=5 Participants
|
47.97 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.484 • n=4 Participants
|
51.73 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.227 • n=21 Participants
|
50.26 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.348 • n=8 Participants
|
|
KOOS Function (Daily Living) Subscale (Index Knee)
|
46.42 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.586 • n=5 Participants
|
47.81 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.791 • n=7 Participants
|
52.50 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.846 • n=5 Participants
|
48.87 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.535 • n=4 Participants
|
47.05 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.511 • n=21 Participants
|
48.55 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.607 • n=8 Participants
|
|
KOOS Function (Sport and Recreational Activities) Subscale (Index Knee)
|
25.06 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.485 • n=5 Participants
|
23.44 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.417 • n=7 Participants
|
26.29 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.980 • n=5 Participants
|
30.66 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.312 • n=4 Participants
|
30.74 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.279 • n=21 Participants
|
27.12 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.747 • n=8 Participants
|
|
KOOS Quality of Life Subscale (Index Knee)
|
31.98 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.387 • n=5 Participants
|
36.31 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.450 • n=7 Participants
|
30.24 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.751 • n=5 Participants
|
32.93 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.248 • n=4 Participants
|
27.54 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.620 • n=21 Participants
|
31.83 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.313 • n=8 Participants
|
|
Pain with Walking NPRS (0-10) Score
|
7.58 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.413 • n=5 Participants
|
7.23 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.311 • n=7 Participants
|
6.70 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.585 • n=5 Participants
|
6.83 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.493 • n=4 Participants
|
6.91 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.367 • n=21 Participants
|
7.05 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.467 • n=8 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 assessmentsPopulation: The intent to treat (ITT) population included all enrolled subjects who received any amount of CNTX-4975-05. A subject was considered enrolled if they had a Treatment Day 1 study visit.
A composite score was calculated for each of the 5 treatment regimens by summing the scores of three assessments: (1) procedure pain 30 minutes after injection of CNTX-4975-05 on a 0-4 scale, 0 was best indicating no procedure pain, 4 was worst indicating severe procedure pain; (2) assessment of subjects' satisfaction with the regimen on a scale of 1 (completely dissatisfied) to 7 (completely satisfied), 1 was worst and 7 was best; and (3) assessment of investigators' satisfaction with the regimen on a scale of 1 (completely dissatisfied) to 7 (completely satisfied), 1 was worst and 7 was best. The procedure pain at 30 minutes was reversed to a 1-7 scale so 7 was best indicating no procedure pain and 1 was worst indicating severe procedure pain. The three assessments were summed for a total score from 3-21, 3 being the worst outcome and 21 being the best outcome. The geometric mean of the scores was derived for each group. All assessments were administered on Day 1 (Baseline).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1. Breg Cooling Control
n=162 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from separate needles of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine followed by CNTX-4975-05 15 minutes later. The subject was cooled with the Breg ice water pump and circumferential knee wrap for 15 minutes before lidocaine injection, followed by 30 minutes before the CNTX-4975-05 injection, and for at least 30 minutes and up to 90 minutes after the CNTX-4975-05 injection as needed.
|
Group 2. Gel Pack Cooling
n=179 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from separate needles of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine followed by CNTX-4975-05 10 minutes later. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 40 minutes before the lidocaine injection, followed by 10 minutes before the CNTX-4975-05 injection, and for at least 10 minutes and up to 90 minutes after the CNTX-4975-05 injection as needed.
|
Group 3. Shortened Gel Pack Cooling
n=175 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from separate needles of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine followed by CNTX-4975-05 5 minutes later. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 30 minutes before the lidocaine injection, followed by 5 minutes before the CNTX-4975-05 injection, and with no required cooling after the CNTX-4975-05 injection, but up to 90 minutes of cooling as needed.
|
Group 4. Single Needle Injection Gel Pack Cooling - 2% Lidocaine
n=160 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from a single needle of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine and CNTX-4975-05, with up to 3 minutes in between injections. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 45 minutes before the single needle injection of lidocaine and CNTX-4975-05. There was no cooling in between injections and no cooling required after the single needle injections, but up to 90 minutes of cooling as needed.
|
Group 5. Single Needle Injection Gel Pack Cooling - 1% Lidocaine
n=172 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from a single needle of 1% lidocaine without epinephrine and CNTX-4975-05, with up to 3 minutes in between injections. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 45 minutes before the single needle injection of lidocaine and CNTX-4975-05. There was no cooling in between injections and no cooling required after the single needle injections, but up to 90 minutes of cooling as needed.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Determination of Optimal Procedure for Administering CNTX-4975-05 With Regards to Pain, Participant Satisfaction, and Investigator's Satisfaction
|
17.18 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.016
|
18.26 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.015
|
16.48 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.016
|
17.40 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.016
|
16.00 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.015
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8Population: The intent to treat (ITT) population included all enrolled subjects who received any amount of CNTX-4975-05.A subject was considered enrolled if they had a Treatment Day 1 study visit.
The KOOS (KOOS = Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) was developed as an extension of the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) to evaluate the dimensions of knee osteoarthritis associated pain and injury. It includes 5 separately scored subscales: Pain, Symptoms (including stiffness), Function (Daily Living), Function (Sports and Recreational Activities), and knee-related Quality of Life. Each subscale score is rated on a 5-point scale (i.e., 0 to 4). The previous week is the time period evaluated when answering the questions. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale. The KOOS was administered on Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 8. Higher scores (or positive change from baseline) indicate improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1. Breg Cooling Control
n=260 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from separate needles of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine followed by CNTX-4975-05 15 minutes later. The subject was cooled with the Breg ice water pump and circumferential knee wrap for 15 minutes before lidocaine injection, followed by 30 minutes before the CNTX-4975-05 injection, and for at least 30 minutes and up to 90 minutes after the CNTX-4975-05 injection as needed.
|
Group 2. Gel Pack Cooling
n=50 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from separate needles of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine followed by CNTX-4975-05 10 minutes later. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 40 minutes before the lidocaine injection, followed by 10 minutes before the CNTX-4975-05 injection, and for at least 10 minutes and up to 90 minutes after the CNTX-4975-05 injection as needed.
|
Group 3. Shortened Gel Pack Cooling
n=492 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from separate needles of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine followed by CNTX-4975-05 5 minutes later. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 30 minutes before the lidocaine injection, followed by 5 minutes before the CNTX-4975-05 injection, and with no required cooling after the CNTX-4975-05 injection, but up to 90 minutes of cooling as needed.
|
Group 4. Single Needle Injection Gel Pack Cooling - 2% Lidocaine
n=381 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from a single needle of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine and CNTX-4975-05, with up to 3 minutes in between injections. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 45 minutes before the single needle injection of lidocaine and CNTX-4975-05. There was no cooling in between injections and no cooling required after the single needle injections, but up to 90 minutes of cooling as needed.
|
Group 5. Single Needle Injection Gel Pack Cooling - 1% Lidocaine
The subject received intra-articular injections from a single needle of 1% lidocaine without epinephrine and CNTX-4975-05, with up to 3 minutes in between injections. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 45 minutes before the single needle injection of lidocaine and CNTX-4975-05. There was no cooling in between injections and no cooling required after the single needle injections, but up to 90 minutes of cooling as needed.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in KOOS "Symptoms" Subscale Score by Subject Type
|
17.15 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.396
|
20.41 score on a scale
Standard Error 3.692
|
20.05 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.981
|
18.40 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.011
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8Population: The intent to treat (ITT) population included all enrolled subjects who received any amount of CNTX-4975-05. A subject was considered enrolled if they had a Treatment Day 1 study visit.
The KOOS (KOOS = Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) was developed as an extension of the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) to evaluate the dimensions of knee osteoarthritis associated pain and injury. It includes 5 separately scored subscales: Pain, Symptoms (including stiffness), Function (Daily Living), Function (Sports and Recreational Activities), and knee-related Quality of Life. Each subscale score is rated on a 5-point scale (i.e., 0 to 4). The previous week is the time period evaluated when answering the questions. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale. The KOOS was administered on Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 8. Higher scores (or positive change from baseline) indicate improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1. Breg Cooling Control
n=260 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from separate needles of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine followed by CNTX-4975-05 15 minutes later. The subject was cooled with the Breg ice water pump and circumferential knee wrap for 15 minutes before lidocaine injection, followed by 30 minutes before the CNTX-4975-05 injection, and for at least 30 minutes and up to 90 minutes after the CNTX-4975-05 injection as needed.
|
Group 2. Gel Pack Cooling
n=50 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from separate needles of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine followed by CNTX-4975-05 10 minutes later. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 40 minutes before the lidocaine injection, followed by 10 minutes before the CNTX-4975-05 injection, and for at least 10 minutes and up to 90 minutes after the CNTX-4975-05 injection as needed.
|
Group 3. Shortened Gel Pack Cooling
n=488 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from separate needles of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine followed by CNTX-4975-05 5 minutes later. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 30 minutes before the lidocaine injection, followed by 5 minutes before the CNTX-4975-05 injection, and with no required cooling after the CNTX-4975-05 injection, but up to 90 minutes of cooling as needed.
|
Group 4. Single Needle Injection Gel Pack Cooling - 2% Lidocaine
n=379 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from a single needle of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine and CNTX-4975-05, with up to 3 minutes in between injections. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 45 minutes before the single needle injection of lidocaine and CNTX-4975-05. There was no cooling in between injections and no cooling required after the single needle injections, but up to 90 minutes of cooling as needed.
|
Group 5. Single Needle Injection Gel Pack Cooling - 1% Lidocaine
The subject received intra-articular injections from a single needle of 1% lidocaine without epinephrine and CNTX-4975-05, with up to 3 minutes in between injections. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 45 minutes before the single needle injection of lidocaine and CNTX-4975-05. There was no cooling in between injections and no cooling required after the single needle injections, but up to 90 minutes of cooling as needed.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in KOOS "Pain" Subscale Score by Subject Type
|
22.45 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.478
|
23.90 score on a scale
Standard Error 4.613
|
25.62 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.865
|
22.10 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.053
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8Population: The intent to treat (ITT) population included all enrolled subjects who received any amount of CNTX-4975-05. A subject was considered enrolled if they had a Treatment Day 1 study visit.
The KOOS (KOOS = Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) was developed as an extension of the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) to evaluate the dimensions of knee osteoarthritis associated pain and injury. It includes 5 separately scored subscales: Pain, Symptoms (including stiffness), Function (Daily Living), Function (Sports and Recreational Activities), and knee-related Quality of Life. Each subscale score is rated on a 5-point scale (i.e., 0 to 4). The previous week is the time period evaluated when answering the questions. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale. The KOOS Pain with Walking is a single question from the KOOS Pain subscale. The KOOS was administered on Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 8. Higher scores (or positive change from baseline) indicate improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1. Breg Cooling Control
n=260 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from separate needles of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine followed by CNTX-4975-05 15 minutes later. The subject was cooled with the Breg ice water pump and circumferential knee wrap for 15 minutes before lidocaine injection, followed by 30 minutes before the CNTX-4975-05 injection, and for at least 30 minutes and up to 90 minutes after the CNTX-4975-05 injection as needed.
|
Group 2. Gel Pack Cooling
n=50 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from separate needles of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine followed by CNTX-4975-05 10 minutes later. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 40 minutes before the lidocaine injection, followed by 10 minutes before the CNTX-4975-05 injection, and for at least 10 minutes and up to 90 minutes after the CNTX-4975-05 injection as needed.
|
Group 3. Shortened Gel Pack Cooling
n=488 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from separate needles of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine followed by CNTX-4975-05 5 minutes later. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 30 minutes before the lidocaine injection, followed by 5 minutes before the CNTX-4975-05 injection, and with no required cooling after the CNTX-4975-05 injection, but up to 90 minutes of cooling as needed.
|
Group 4. Single Needle Injection Gel Pack Cooling - 2% Lidocaine
n=379 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from a single needle of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine and CNTX-4975-05, with up to 3 minutes in between injections. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 45 minutes before the single needle injection of lidocaine and CNTX-4975-05. There was no cooling in between injections and no cooling required after the single needle injections, but up to 90 minutes of cooling as needed.
|
Group 5. Single Needle Injection Gel Pack Cooling - 1% Lidocaine
The subject received intra-articular injections from a single needle of 1% lidocaine without epinephrine and CNTX-4975-05, with up to 3 minutes in between injections. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 45 minutes before the single needle injection of lidocaine and CNTX-4975-05. There was no cooling in between injections and no cooling required after the single needle injections, but up to 90 minutes of cooling as needed.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in KOOS "Pain With Walking" Single Question Score by Subject Type
|
21.08 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.744
|
25.26 score on a scale
Standard Error 6.062
|
25.85 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.035
|
23.34 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.238
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8Population: The intent to treat (ITT) population included all enrolled subjects who received any amount of CNTX-4975-05. A subject was considered enrolled if they had a Treatment Day 1 study visit.
The KOOS (KOOS = Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) was developed as an extension of the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) to evaluate the dimensions of knee osteoarthritis associated pain and injury. It includes 5 separately scored subscales: Pain, Symptoms (including stiffness), Function (Daily Living), Function (Sports and Recreational Activities), and knee-related QOL. Each subscale score is rated on a 5-point scale (i.e., 0 to 4). The previous week is the time period evaluated when answering the questions. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale. The KOOS was administered on Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 8. Higher scores (or positive change from baseline) indicate improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1. Breg Cooling Control
n=260 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from separate needles of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine followed by CNTX-4975-05 15 minutes later. The subject was cooled with the Breg ice water pump and circumferential knee wrap for 15 minutes before lidocaine injection, followed by 30 minutes before the CNTX-4975-05 injection, and for at least 30 minutes and up to 90 minutes after the CNTX-4975-05 injection as needed.
|
Group 2. Gel Pack Cooling
n=50 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from separate needles of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine followed by CNTX-4975-05 10 minutes later. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 40 minutes before the lidocaine injection, followed by 10 minutes before the CNTX-4975-05 injection, and for at least 10 minutes and up to 90 minutes after the CNTX-4975-05 injection as needed.
|
Group 3. Shortened Gel Pack Cooling
n=487 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from separate needles of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine followed by CNTX-4975-05 5 minutes later. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 30 minutes before the lidocaine injection, followed by 5 minutes before the CNTX-4975-05 injection, and with no required cooling after the CNTX-4975-05 injection, but up to 90 minutes of cooling as needed.
|
Group 4. Single Needle Injection Gel Pack Cooling - 2% Lidocaine
n=379 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from a single needle of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine and CNTX-4975-05, with up to 3 minutes in between injections. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 45 minutes before the single needle injection of lidocaine and CNTX-4975-05. There was no cooling in between injections and no cooling required after the single needle injections, but up to 90 minutes of cooling as needed.
|
Group 5. Single Needle Injection Gel Pack Cooling - 1% Lidocaine
The subject received intra-articular injections from a single needle of 1% lidocaine without epinephrine and CNTX-4975-05, with up to 3 minutes in between injections. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 45 minutes before the single needle injection of lidocaine and CNTX-4975-05. There was no cooling in between injections and no cooling required after the single needle injections, but up to 90 minutes of cooling as needed.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in KOOS "Function (Daily Living)" Subscale Score by Subject Type
|
20.86 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.481
|
25.66 score on a scale
Standard Error 4.568
|
25.57 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.861
|
22.26 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.058
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8Population: The intent to treat (ITT) population included all enrolled subjects who received any amount of CNTX-4975-05. A subject was considered enrolled if they had a Treatment Day 1 study visit.
The KOOS (KOOS = Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) was developed as an extension of the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) to evaluate the dimensions of knee osteoarthritis associated pain and injury. It includes 5 separately scored subscales: Pain, Symptoms (including stiffness), Function (Daily Living), Function (Sports and Recreational Activities), and knee-related QOL. Each subscale score is rated on a 5-point scale (i.e., 0 to 4). The previous week is the time period evaluated when answering the questions. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale. The KOOS was administered on Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 8. Higher scores (or positive change from baseline) indicate improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1. Breg Cooling Control
n=255 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from separate needles of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine followed by CNTX-4975-05 15 minutes later. The subject was cooled with the Breg ice water pump and circumferential knee wrap for 15 minutes before lidocaine injection, followed by 30 minutes before the CNTX-4975-05 injection, and for at least 30 minutes and up to 90 minutes after the CNTX-4975-05 injection as needed.
|
Group 2. Gel Pack Cooling
n=49 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from separate needles of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine followed by CNTX-4975-05 10 minutes later. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 40 minutes before the lidocaine injection, followed by 10 minutes before the CNTX-4975-05 injection, and for at least 10 minutes and up to 90 minutes after the CNTX-4975-05 injection as needed.
|
Group 3. Shortened Gel Pack Cooling
n=482 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from separate needles of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine followed by CNTX-4975-05 5 minutes later. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 30 minutes before the lidocaine injection, followed by 5 minutes before the CNTX-4975-05 injection, and with no required cooling after the CNTX-4975-05 injection, but up to 90 minutes of cooling as needed.
|
Group 4. Single Needle Injection Gel Pack Cooling - 2% Lidocaine
n=375 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from a single needle of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine and CNTX-4975-05, with up to 3 minutes in between injections. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 45 minutes before the single needle injection of lidocaine and CNTX-4975-05. There was no cooling in between injections and no cooling required after the single needle injections, but up to 90 minutes of cooling as needed.
|
Group 5. Single Needle Injection Gel Pack Cooling - 1% Lidocaine
The subject received intra-articular injections from a single needle of 1% lidocaine without epinephrine and CNTX-4975-05, with up to 3 minutes in between injections. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 45 minutes before the single needle injection of lidocaine and CNTX-4975-05. There was no cooling in between injections and no cooling required after the single needle injections, but up to 90 minutes of cooling as needed.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in KOOS "Function (Sport and Recreational Activities)" Subscale Score by Subject Type
|
25.17 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.248
|
33.11 score on a scale
Standard Error 5.795
|
27.80 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.233
|
24.80 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.598
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8Population: The intent to treat (ITT) population included all enrolled subjects who received any amount of CNTX-4975-05. A subject was considered enrolled if they had a Treatment Day 1 study visit.
The KOOS (KOOS = Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) was developed as an extension of the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) to evaluate the dimensions of knee osteoarthritis associated pain and injury. It includes 5 separately scored subscales: Pain, Symptoms (including stiffness), Function (Daily Living), Function (Sports and Recreational Activities), and knee-related QOL. Each subscale score is rated on a 5-point scale (i.e., 0 to 4). The previous week is the time period evaluated when answering the questions. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale. The KOOS was administered on Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 8. Higher scores (or positive change from baseline) indicate improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1. Breg Cooling Control
n=260 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from separate needles of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine followed by CNTX-4975-05 15 minutes later. The subject was cooled with the Breg ice water pump and circumferential knee wrap for 15 minutes before lidocaine injection, followed by 30 minutes before the CNTX-4975-05 injection, and for at least 30 minutes and up to 90 minutes after the CNTX-4975-05 injection as needed.
|
Group 2. Gel Pack Cooling
n=50 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from separate needles of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine followed by CNTX-4975-05 10 minutes later. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 40 minutes before the lidocaine injection, followed by 10 minutes before the CNTX-4975-05 injection, and for at least 10 minutes and up to 90 minutes after the CNTX-4975-05 injection as needed.
|
Group 3. Shortened Gel Pack Cooling
n=488 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from separate needles of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine followed by CNTX-4975-05 5 minutes later. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 30 minutes before the lidocaine injection, followed by 5 minutes before the CNTX-4975-05 injection, and with no required cooling after the CNTX-4975-05 injection, but up to 90 minutes of cooling as needed.
|
Group 4. Single Needle Injection Gel Pack Cooling - 2% Lidocaine
n=379 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from a single needle of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine and CNTX-4975-05, with up to 3 minutes in between injections. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 45 minutes before the single needle injection of lidocaine and CNTX-4975-05. There was no cooling in between injections and no cooling required after the single needle injections, but up to 90 minutes of cooling as needed.
|
Group 5. Single Needle Injection Gel Pack Cooling - 1% Lidocaine
The subject received intra-articular injections from a single needle of 1% lidocaine without epinephrine and CNTX-4975-05, with up to 3 minutes in between injections. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 45 minutes before the single needle injection of lidocaine and CNTX-4975-05. There was no cooling in between injections and no cooling required after the single needle injections, but up to 90 minutes of cooling as needed.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in KOOS "Knee-Related Quality of Life" Subscale Score by Subject Type
|
22.10 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.898
|
16.75 score on a scale
Standard Error 6.255
|
21.52 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.062
|
19.40 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.365
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8Population: The intent to treat (ITT) population included all enrolled subjects who received any amount of CNTX-4975-05. A subject was considered enrolled if they had a Treatment Day 1 study visit.
The pain with walking Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (0-10, 0 being no pain, 10 being greatest pain) collected subjects' average pain with walking over the past 24 hours. Subjects recorded the pain in their target knee, either the index knee or additionally the non-index knee in the case of bilateral subjects. The NPRS was collected at Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 8. Lower scores (or negative change from baseline) indicate improvement
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1. Breg Cooling Control
n=260 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from separate needles of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine followed by CNTX-4975-05 15 minutes later. The subject was cooled with the Breg ice water pump and circumferential knee wrap for 15 minutes before lidocaine injection, followed by 30 minutes before the CNTX-4975-05 injection, and for at least 30 minutes and up to 90 minutes after the CNTX-4975-05 injection as needed.
|
Group 2. Gel Pack Cooling
n=51 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from separate needles of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine followed by CNTX-4975-05 10 minutes later. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 40 minutes before the lidocaine injection, followed by 10 minutes before the CNTX-4975-05 injection, and for at least 10 minutes and up to 90 minutes after the CNTX-4975-05 injection as needed.
|
Group 3. Shortened Gel Pack Cooling
n=491 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from separate needles of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine followed by CNTX-4975-05 5 minutes later. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 30 minutes before the lidocaine injection, followed by 5 minutes before the CNTX-4975-05 injection, and with no required cooling after the CNTX-4975-05 injection, but up to 90 minutes of cooling as needed.
|
Group 4. Single Needle Injection Gel Pack Cooling - 2% Lidocaine
n=414 Participants
The subject received intra-articular injections from a single needle of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine and CNTX-4975-05, with up to 3 minutes in between injections. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 45 minutes before the single needle injection of lidocaine and CNTX-4975-05. There was no cooling in between injections and no cooling required after the single needle injections, but up to 90 minutes of cooling as needed.
|
Group 5. Single Needle Injection Gel Pack Cooling - 1% Lidocaine
The subject received intra-articular injections from a single needle of 1% lidocaine without epinephrine and CNTX-4975-05, with up to 3 minutes in between injections. The subject was cooled with the Elasto-Gel circumferential knee wrap for 45 minutes before the single needle injection of lidocaine and CNTX-4975-05. There was no cooling in between injections and no cooling required after the single needle injections, but up to 90 minutes of cooling as needed.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain With Walking NPRS (0-10) Score by Subject Type
|
-3.48 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.191
|
-3.52 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.416
|
-4.02 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.118
|
-3.72 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.122
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Single Knee Injection (Unilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) Day 1 Through Week 8/Early Termination
Single Knee Injection (Non-Index Knee PJR/TJR) Day 1 Through Week 8/Early Termination
Bilateral Knee Injection (Bilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) Day 1 Through Day 7
Bilateral Knee Injection (Bilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) Day 7 Through Week 8/Early Termination
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Single Knee Injection (Unilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) Day 1 Through Week 8/Early Termination
n=273 participants at risk
Subjects with moderate to severe OA knee pain in the index knee and mild to no pain in the non-index knee; TEAEs presented for subjects in the Single Knee Injection groups represents TEAEs occurring from Day 1 through Week 8/Early Termination
|
Single Knee Injection (Non-Index Knee PJR/TJR) Day 1 Through Week 8/Early Termination
n=52 participants at risk
Single Knee Injection (Non-index Knee partial or total joint replacement)
Data presented for subjects in the Single Knee Injection groups represents TEAEs occurring from Day 1 through Week 8/Early Termination
|
Bilateral Knee Injection (Bilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) Day 1 Through Day 7
n=523 participants at risk
Subjects with moderate to severe knee OA pain in both the index and non-index knee; TEAEs presented for subjects in the Bilateral Knee Injection group only from Day 1 (index knee) through Day 7 (i.e., prior to them receiving the second intra-articular injection of CNTX-4975)
|
Bilateral Knee Injection (Bilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) Day 7 Through Week 8/Early Termination
n=427 participants at risk
Subjects with moderate to severe knee OA pain in both the index and non-index knee that received bilateral injections of CNTX-4975; TEAEs presented for subjects in the Bilateral Knee Injection group from Day 8 (i.e., after receiving the second injection of CNTX-4975 into the nonindex knee) to Week 8/Early Termination. Note: 96 subjects did not receive a second injection of CNTX-4975
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.37%
1/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial Fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.23%
1/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.23%
1/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal Infection
|
0.00%
0/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.23%
1/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain Upper
|
0.00%
0/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.23%
1/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
0.00%
0/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.23%
1/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Single Knee Injection (Unilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) Day 1 Through Week 8/Early Termination
n=273 participants at risk
Subjects with moderate to severe OA knee pain in the index knee and mild to no pain in the non-index knee; TEAEs presented for subjects in the Single Knee Injection groups represents TEAEs occurring from Day 1 through Week 8/Early Termination
|
Single Knee Injection (Non-Index Knee PJR/TJR) Day 1 Through Week 8/Early Termination
n=52 participants at risk
Single Knee Injection (Non-index Knee partial or total joint replacement)
Data presented for subjects in the Single Knee Injection groups represents TEAEs occurring from Day 1 through Week 8/Early Termination
|
Bilateral Knee Injection (Bilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) Day 1 Through Day 7
n=523 participants at risk
Subjects with moderate to severe knee OA pain in both the index and non-index knee; TEAEs presented for subjects in the Bilateral Knee Injection group only from Day 1 (index knee) through Day 7 (i.e., prior to them receiving the second intra-articular injection of CNTX-4975)
|
Bilateral Knee Injection (Bilateral Mod-Sev OA Knee Pain) Day 7 Through Week 8/Early Termination
n=427 participants at risk
Subjects with moderate to severe knee OA pain in both the index and non-index knee that received bilateral injections of CNTX-4975; TEAEs presented for subjects in the Bilateral Knee Injection group from Day 8 (i.e., after receiving the second injection of CNTX-4975 into the nonindex knee) to Week 8/Early Termination. Note: 96 subjects did not receive a second injection of CNTX-4975
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back Pain
|
1.8%
5/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
3.8%
2/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.57%
3/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
1.5%
4/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
1.9%
1/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.70%
3/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint Swelling
|
0.73%
2/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
1.9%
1/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.38%
2/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.47%
2/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle Spasm
|
0.73%
2/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.73%
2/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.47%
2/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.37%
1/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.57%
3/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Upper Pain
|
0.73%
2/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.19%
1/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.47%
2/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.37%
1/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.19%
1/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.38%
2/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
0.73%
2/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.38%
2/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
1.2%
5/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.37%
1/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
1.9%
1/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper Respiratory tract infectiosn
|
0.37%
1/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
1.9%
1/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.47%
2/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary Track Infection
|
0.00%
0/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.47%
2/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament Sprain
|
0.73%
2/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin abrasion
|
0.37%
1/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
1.9%
1/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Puritus
|
0.73%
2/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
1.9%
1/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
0.00%
0/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
1.9%
1/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.19%
1/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
0.37%
1/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
1.9%
1/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase
|
0.73%
2/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine increased
|
0.00%
0/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.47%
2/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.37%
1/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
1.9%
1/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.38%
2/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.70%
3/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Tooth extraction
|
0.37%
1/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.19%
1/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.00%
0/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.47%
2/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.00%
0/273 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.00%
0/523 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
0.47%
2/427 • Adverse events were collected from Screening to the End of the Study (8 Weeks)
Adverse events are reported here according to bilateral or unilateral injection group. Adverse events by injection group is of greater safety consequence and interest than events by cooling regimens because the injection group delineates exposures to CNTX-4975-05 (index knee only or bilateral intra-articular injections) while the cooling regimens does not. Therefore representing adverse events by injection group is a better indicator of safety in relation to study drug.
|
Additional Information
Clinical Operations
Centrexion Therapeutics Corporation
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place