Trial Outcomes & Findings for Evaluation of 19-gauge vs 21-gauge EBUS TBNA in Assessing Thoracic Lymphadenopathy (NCT NCT03657849)
NCT ID: NCT03657849
Last Updated: 2023-03-21
Results Overview
Diagnostic yield refers to the proportion of tissue samples collected by each needle (19 gauge vs 21 gauge) that were of sufficient quantity and quality to yield (i.e. produce) an accurate diagnosis for the patient's enlarged lymph nodes. Characterization of diagnostic category (true positive, true negative, false negative, false positive) were made by comparing the patient's presumed diagnosis/initial indication for presentation in comparison to their final diagnosis as determined by a combination of pathological findings of EBUS-TBNA, follow up imaging, surgical sampling, or clinical follow up. The diagnostic yield of each needles was reported as a ratio of true positives and true negatives added together, divided by the total number of lymph nodes sampled (141). Diagnostic yield of 19-gauge needle: 89.4% Diagnostic yield of 21-gauge needled: 88.7%
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
6 months
2023-03-21
Participant Flow
60 consecutive patients referred for EBUS-TBNA sampling between July 2018 and January 2019 were enrolled after providing written consent.
A total of 144 lymph nodes were sampled from the 60 enrolled. Of these, 3 lymph nodes were excluded from analysis due to protocol deviations (two were only sampled with one needle and the third underwent one pass before the provider decided to change sites).
Unit of analysis: Lymph nodes
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Sampling With 19-gauge and 21-gauge
All patients will be allocated to the same arm. All patients will have EBUS TBNA done with both 19-gauge and 21-gauge needles during the procedure.
EBUS TBNA: All patients undergo EBUS TBNA with two needle sizes
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
60 144
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
60 141
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0 3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Evaluation of 19-gauge vs 21-gauge EBUS TBNA in Assessing Thoracic Lymphadenopathy
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Sampling With 19-gauge and 21-gauge
n=141 Lymph nodes
All patients will be allocated to the same arm. All patients will have EBUS TBNA done with both 19-gauge and 21-gauge needles during the procedure.
EBUS TBNA: All patients undergo EBUS TBNA with two needle sizes
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
Age Distribution · Patients < 18
|
0 Participants
n=60 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Age Distribution · Patients >/= 18
|
60 Participants
n=60 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
30 Participants
n=60 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
30 Participants
n=60 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
60 Participants
n=60 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: All 141 lymph nodes included in the final analysis were sampled by both the 19-guage and 21-guage needle. Participants were randomized to a particular ordering of the needles (either the 19-gauge or 21-guage needle would be used to sample lymph nodes sites first, followed by which ever remaining needle had not been used).
Diagnostic yield refers to the proportion of tissue samples collected by each needle (19 gauge vs 21 gauge) that were of sufficient quantity and quality to yield (i.e. produce) an accurate diagnosis for the patient's enlarged lymph nodes. Characterization of diagnostic category (true positive, true negative, false negative, false positive) were made by comparing the patient's presumed diagnosis/initial indication for presentation in comparison to their final diagnosis as determined by a combination of pathological findings of EBUS-TBNA, follow up imaging, surgical sampling, or clinical follow up. The diagnostic yield of each needles was reported as a ratio of true positives and true negatives added together, divided by the total number of lymph nodes sampled (141). Diagnostic yield of 19-gauge needle: 89.4% Diagnostic yield of 21-gauge needled: 88.7%
Outcome measures
| Measure |
19-Gauge Needle
n=141 lymph nodes
All lymph nodes included in the final analysis were sampled with the 19-gauge and 21-gauge needles. Results will be reported per intervention.
|
21-Gauge Needle
n=141 lymph nodes
All lymph nodes included in the final analysis were sampled with the 19-gauge and 21-gauge needles. Results will be reported per intervention.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Diagnostic Yield
True Positives
|
69 lymph nodes
|
68 lymph nodes
|
|
Diagnostic Yield
True Negatives
|
57 lymph nodes
|
57 lymph nodes
|
|
Diagnostic Yield
False Negatives + False Positives (Not included in calculation of diagnostic yield)
|
15 lymph nodes
|
16 lymph nodes
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsDiagnostic yield refers to the proportion of tissue samples collected by each needle (19 gauge vs 21 gauge) that were of sufficient quantity and quality to yield (i.e. produce) an accurate diagnosis for the patient's enlarged lymph nodes. Characterization of diagnostic category (true positive, true negative, false negative, false positive) were made by comparing the patient's presumed diagnosis/initial indication for presentation in comparison to their final diagnosis as determined by a combination of pathological findings of EBUS-TBNA, follow up imaging, surgical sampling, or clinical follow up. The diagnostic yield of each needles was reported as a ratio of true positives and true negatives added together, divided by the total number of lymph nodes sampled (141).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
19-Gauge Needle
n=141 lymph nodes
All lymph nodes included in the final analysis were sampled with the 19-gauge and 21-gauge needles. Results will be reported per intervention.
|
21-Gauge Needle
n=141 lymph nodes
All lymph nodes included in the final analysis were sampled with the 19-gauge and 21-gauge needles. Results will be reported per intervention.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Diagnostic Yield
|
126 lymph nodes
|
125 lymph nodes
|
Adverse Events
19-Gauge Needle Used First
21-Gauge Needle Used First
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
19-Gauge Needle Used First
n=30 participants at risk
Patients in this arm had their lymph nodes sampled with the 19-gauge needle first, followed by the 21-gauge needle.
All patients were sampled by both needles; randomization and group arm assignment controlled for the order in which the needles were used.
|
21-Gauge Needle Used First
n=30 participants at risk
Patients in this arm had their lymph nodes sampled with the 21-gauge needle first, followed by the 19-gauge needle.
All patients were sampled by both needles; randomization and group arm assignment controlled for the order in which the needles were used.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
respiratory failure
|
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse event data was collected from the time the patient signed the consent form (i.e. immediately prior to the Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) procedure), to the point at which the results of the confirmed and a final diagnosis was reported to the participant. Although the follow-up period varied by participant, the average length of time over which adverse events tracked and reported was 6 months.
Adverse events could not be reported per intervention (i.e., 19G versus 21G). The "passes" made on each lymph node using both gauge needles occurred in such close proximity to one other (on the order of seconds) that it would be impossible to determine what adverse events were related to which gauge needle. The adverse events listed relate to the overall bronchoscopic-biopsy procedure rather than to the size of the needle used during the biopsies.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from the time the patient signed the consent form (i.e. immediately prior to the Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) procedure), to the point at which the results of the confirmed and a final diagnosis was reported to the participant. Although the follow-up period varied by participant, the average length of time over which adverse events tracked and reported was 6 months.
Adverse events could not be reported per intervention (i.e., 19G versus 21G). The "passes" made on each lymph node using both gauge needles occurred in such close proximity to one other (on the order of seconds) that it would be impossible to determine what adverse events were related to which gauge needle. The adverse events listed relate to the overall bronchoscopic-biopsy procedure rather than to the size of the needle used during the biopsies.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
acute hypoxic respiratory failure
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from the time the patient signed the consent form (i.e. immediately prior to the Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) procedure), to the point at which the results of the confirmed and a final diagnosis was reported to the participant. Although the follow-up period varied by participant, the average length of time over which adverse events tracked and reported was 6 months.
Adverse events could not be reported per intervention (i.e., 19G versus 21G). The "passes" made on each lymph node using both gauge needles occurred in such close proximity to one other (on the order of seconds) that it would be impossible to determine what adverse events were related to which gauge needle. The adverse events listed relate to the overall bronchoscopic-biopsy procedure rather than to the size of the needle used during the biopsies.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse event data was collected from the time the patient signed the consent form (i.e. immediately prior to the Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) procedure), to the point at which the results of the confirmed and a final diagnosis was reported to the participant. Although the follow-up period varied by participant, the average length of time over which adverse events tracked and reported was 6 months.
Adverse events could not be reported per intervention (i.e., 19G versus 21G). The "passes" made on each lymph node using both gauge needles occurred in such close proximity to one other (on the order of seconds) that it would be impossible to determine what adverse events were related to which gauge needle. The adverse events listed relate to the overall bronchoscopic-biopsy procedure rather than to the size of the needle used during the biopsies.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Missing 19-guage needle spring
|
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse event data was collected from the time the patient signed the consent form (i.e. immediately prior to the Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) procedure), to the point at which the results of the confirmed and a final diagnosis was reported to the participant. Although the follow-up period varied by participant, the average length of time over which adverse events tracked and reported was 6 months.
Adverse events could not be reported per intervention (i.e., 19G versus 21G). The "passes" made on each lymph node using both gauge needles occurred in such close proximity to one other (on the order of seconds) that it would be impossible to determine what adverse events were related to which gauge needle. The adverse events listed relate to the overall bronchoscopic-biopsy procedure rather than to the size of the needle used during the biopsies.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from the time the patient signed the consent form (i.e. immediately prior to the Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) procedure), to the point at which the results of the confirmed and a final diagnosis was reported to the participant. Although the follow-up period varied by participant, the average length of time over which adverse events tracked and reported was 6 months.
Adverse events could not be reported per intervention (i.e., 19G versus 21G). The "passes" made on each lymph node using both gauge needles occurred in such close proximity to one other (on the order of seconds) that it would be impossible to determine what adverse events were related to which gauge needle. The adverse events listed relate to the overall bronchoscopic-biopsy procedure rather than to the size of the needle used during the biopsies.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
19-Gauge Needle Used First
n=30 participants at risk
Patients in this arm had their lymph nodes sampled with the 19-gauge needle first, followed by the 21-gauge needle.
All patients were sampled by both needles; randomization and group arm assignment controlled for the order in which the needles were used.
|
21-Gauge Needle Used First
n=30 participants at risk
Patients in this arm had their lymph nodes sampled with the 21-gauge needle first, followed by the 19-gauge needle.
All patients were sampled by both needles; randomization and group arm assignment controlled for the order in which the needles were used.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxia
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from the time the patient signed the consent form (i.e. immediately prior to the Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) procedure), to the point at which the results of the confirmed and a final diagnosis was reported to the participant. Although the follow-up period varied by participant, the average length of time over which adverse events tracked and reported was 6 months.
Adverse events could not be reported per intervention (i.e., 19G versus 21G). The "passes" made on each lymph node using both gauge needles occurred in such close proximity to one other (on the order of seconds) that it would be impossible to determine what adverse events were related to which gauge needle. The adverse events listed relate to the overall bronchoscopic-biopsy procedure rather than to the size of the needle used during the biopsies.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data was collected from the time the patient signed the consent form (i.e. immediately prior to the Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) procedure), to the point at which the results of the confirmed and a final diagnosis was reported to the participant. Although the follow-up period varied by participant, the average length of time over which adverse events tracked and reported was 6 months.
Adverse events could not be reported per intervention (i.e., 19G versus 21G). The "passes" made on each lymph node using both gauge needles occurred in such close proximity to one other (on the order of seconds) that it would be impossible to determine what adverse events were related to which gauge needle. The adverse events listed relate to the overall bronchoscopic-biopsy procedure rather than to the size of the needle used during the biopsies.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Blood clot
|
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse event data was collected from the time the patient signed the consent form (i.e. immediately prior to the Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) procedure), to the point at which the results of the confirmed and a final diagnosis was reported to the participant. Although the follow-up period varied by participant, the average length of time over which adverse events tracked and reported was 6 months.
Adverse events could not be reported per intervention (i.e., 19G versus 21G). The "passes" made on each lymph node using both gauge needles occurred in such close proximity to one other (on the order of seconds) that it would be impossible to determine what adverse events were related to which gauge needle. The adverse events listed relate to the overall bronchoscopic-biopsy procedure rather than to the size of the needle used during the biopsies.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Adverse event data was collected from the time the patient signed the consent form (i.e. immediately prior to the Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) procedure), to the point at which the results of the confirmed and a final diagnosis was reported to the participant. Although the follow-up period varied by participant, the average length of time over which adverse events tracked and reported was 6 months.
Adverse events could not be reported per intervention (i.e., 19G versus 21G). The "passes" made on each lymph node using both gauge needles occurred in such close proximity to one other (on the order of seconds) that it would be impossible to determine what adverse events were related to which gauge needle. The adverse events listed relate to the overall bronchoscopic-biopsy procedure rather than to the size of the needle used during the biopsies.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hypotension
|
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse event data was collected from the time the patient signed the consent form (i.e. immediately prior to the Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) procedure), to the point at which the results of the confirmed and a final diagnosis was reported to the participant. Although the follow-up period varied by participant, the average length of time over which adverse events tracked and reported was 6 months.
Adverse events could not be reported per intervention (i.e., 19G versus 21G). The "passes" made on each lymph node using both gauge needles occurred in such close proximity to one other (on the order of seconds) that it would be impossible to determine what adverse events were related to which gauge needle. The adverse events listed relate to the overall bronchoscopic-biopsy procedure rather than to the size of the needle used during the biopsies.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from the time the patient signed the consent form (i.e. immediately prior to the Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) procedure), to the point at which the results of the confirmed and a final diagnosis was reported to the participant. Although the follow-up period varied by participant, the average length of time over which adverse events tracked and reported was 6 months.
Adverse events could not be reported per intervention (i.e., 19G versus 21G). The "passes" made on each lymph node using both gauge needles occurred in such close proximity to one other (on the order of seconds) that it would be impossible to determine what adverse events were related to which gauge needle. The adverse events listed relate to the overall bronchoscopic-biopsy procedure rather than to the size of the needle used during the biopsies.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea/Vertigo
|
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse event data was collected from the time the patient signed the consent form (i.e. immediately prior to the Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) procedure), to the point at which the results of the confirmed and a final diagnosis was reported to the participant. Although the follow-up period varied by participant, the average length of time over which adverse events tracked and reported was 6 months.
Adverse events could not be reported per intervention (i.e., 19G versus 21G). The "passes" made on each lymph node using both gauge needles occurred in such close proximity to one other (on the order of seconds) that it would be impossible to determine what adverse events were related to which gauge needle. The adverse events listed relate to the overall bronchoscopic-biopsy procedure rather than to the size of the needle used during the biopsies.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from the time the patient signed the consent form (i.e. immediately prior to the Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) procedure), to the point at which the results of the confirmed and a final diagnosis was reported to the participant. Although the follow-up period varied by participant, the average length of time over which adverse events tracked and reported was 6 months.
Adverse events could not be reported per intervention (i.e., 19G versus 21G). The "passes" made on each lymph node using both gauge needles occurred in such close proximity to one other (on the order of seconds) that it would be impossible to determine what adverse events were related to which gauge needle. The adverse events listed relate to the overall bronchoscopic-biopsy procedure rather than to the size of the needle used during the biopsies.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Bleeding
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from the time the patient signed the consent form (i.e. immediately prior to the Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) procedure), to the point at which the results of the confirmed and a final diagnosis was reported to the participant. Although the follow-up period varied by participant, the average length of time over which adverse events tracked and reported was 6 months.
Adverse events could not be reported per intervention (i.e., 19G versus 21G). The "passes" made on each lymph node using both gauge needles occurred in such close proximity to one other (on the order of seconds) that it would be impossible to determine what adverse events were related to which gauge needle. The adverse events listed relate to the overall bronchoscopic-biopsy procedure rather than to the size of the needle used during the biopsies.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse event data was collected from the time the patient signed the consent form (i.e. immediately prior to the Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) procedure), to the point at which the results of the confirmed and a final diagnosis was reported to the participant. Although the follow-up period varied by participant, the average length of time over which adverse events tracked and reported was 6 months.
Adverse events could not be reported per intervention (i.e., 19G versus 21G). The "passes" made on each lymph node using both gauge needles occurred in such close proximity to one other (on the order of seconds) that it would be impossible to determine what adverse events were related to which gauge needle. The adverse events listed relate to the overall bronchoscopic-biopsy procedure rather than to the size of the needle used during the biopsies.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
poor ventilation
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected from the time the patient signed the consent form (i.e. immediately prior to the Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) procedure), to the point at which the results of the confirmed and a final diagnosis was reported to the participant. Although the follow-up period varied by participant, the average length of time over which adverse events tracked and reported was 6 months.
Adverse events could not be reported per intervention (i.e., 19G versus 21G). The "passes" made on each lymph node using both gauge needles occurred in such close proximity to one other (on the order of seconds) that it would be impossible to determine what adverse events were related to which gauge needle. The adverse events listed relate to the overall bronchoscopic-biopsy procedure rather than to the size of the needle used during the biopsies.
|
0.00%
0/30 • Adverse event data was collected from the time the patient signed the consent form (i.e. immediately prior to the Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) procedure), to the point at which the results of the confirmed and a final diagnosis was reported to the participant. Although the follow-up period varied by participant, the average length of time over which adverse events tracked and reported was 6 months.
Adverse events could not be reported per intervention (i.e., 19G versus 21G). The "passes" made on each lymph node using both gauge needles occurred in such close proximity to one other (on the order of seconds) that it would be impossible to determine what adverse events were related to which gauge needle. The adverse events listed relate to the overall bronchoscopic-biopsy procedure rather than to the size of the needle used during the biopsies.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place