Trial Outcomes & Findings for RESP-FIT: Technology-Enhanced Self-Management in COPD (NCT NCT03652662)
NCT ID: NCT03652662
Last Updated: 2021-03-30
Results Overview
Feasibility of intervention was measured by the number of participants who adhered to treatment and completed the trial (from baseline to final visit follow-up). Treatment acceptability was measured by the Mobile Application Rating Scale. The Mobile Application Rating Scale asks the participant to report the appropriateness of the app for his/her target audience ranging from little or no (1) to very high level of the acceptability measure (5).
COMPLETED
NA
34 participants
through study completion, average of 6 weeks
2021-03-30
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
RESP-FIT Intervention
Intervention:
IMST/EMST Training (5 breaths, 5 times a day, 5 times a week) Fitbit activity monitoring Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
RESP-FIT: Inspiratory and Expiratory muscle strength training 5 times a week, plus Fitbit activity monitoring (Daily) Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
|
RESP-FIT Comparator
Active Comparator:
Fitbit activity monitoring (Daily) Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
RESP-FIT Comparator: Fitbit activity monitoring (Daily) Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
18
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
15
|
15
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
RESP-FIT Intervention
Intervention:
IMST/EMST Training (5 breaths, 5 times a day, 5 times a week) Fitbit activity monitoring Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
RESP-FIT: Inspiratory and Expiratory muscle strength training 5 times a week, plus Fitbit activity monitoring (Daily) Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
|
RESP-FIT Comparator
Active Comparator:
Fitbit activity monitoring (Daily) Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
RESP-FIT Comparator: Fitbit activity monitoring (Daily) Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
RESP-FIT: Technology-Enhanced Self-Management in COPD
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
RESP-FIT Intervention
n=15 Participants
Intervention:
IMST/EMST Training (5 breaths, 5 times a day, 5 times a week) Fitbit activity monitoring Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
RESP-FIT: Inspiratory and Expiratory muscle strength training 5 times a week, plus Fitbit activity monitoring (Daily) Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
|
RESP-FIT Comparator
n=15 Participants
Active Comparator:
Fitbit activity monitoring (Daily) Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
RESP-FIT Comparator: Fitbit activity monitoring (Daily) Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
|
Total
n=30 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
14 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
62 years
n=93 Participants
|
53 years
n=4 Participants
|
58 years
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
10 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
5 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
15 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
4 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
11 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
15 participants
n=93 Participants
|
15 participants
n=4 Participants
|
30 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Forced Expiratory Volume by spirometry
|
55.7 L/sec
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17 • n=93 Participants
|
55.5 L/sec
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.4 • n=4 Participants
|
55.6 L/sec
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.2 • n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: through study completion, average of 6 weeksPopulation: 15 participants were initially enrolled in both groups, 13 participants in the intervention group completed the trial, and 14 in the comparator group.
Feasibility of intervention was measured by the number of participants who adhered to treatment and completed the trial (from baseline to final visit follow-up). Treatment acceptability was measured by the Mobile Application Rating Scale. The Mobile Application Rating Scale asks the participant to report the appropriateness of the app for his/her target audience ranging from little or no (1) to very high level of the acceptability measure (5).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RESP-FIT Intervention
n=15 Participants
Intervention:
IMST/EMST Training (5 breaths, 5 times a day, 5 times a week) Fitbit activity monitoring Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
RESP-FIT: Inspiratory and Expiratory muscle strength training 5 times a week, plus Fitbit activity monitoring (Daily) Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
|
RESP-FIT Comparator
n=15 Participants
Active Comparator:
Fitbit activity monitoring (Daily) Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
RESP-FIT Comparator: Fitbit activity monitoring (Daily) Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Intervention Feasibility (Number of Participants Who Adhered to Treatment)
|
13 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 6 weeksChange in self-efficacy (measured with the PROMIS Self-Efficacy Scale). This measures the individual's confidence in his/her ability to successfully perform specific tasks or behaviors related to one's health, with 0 being "not at all confident" to 10 being "totally confident." The PROMIS adult Self-Efficacy item banks assess self-reported current level of confidence in managing chronic conditions, including confidence in managing daily activities, managing emotions, managing medications and treatments, managing social interactions and managing symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RESP-FIT Intervention
n=15 Participants
Intervention:
IMST/EMST Training (5 breaths, 5 times a day, 5 times a week) Fitbit activity monitoring Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
RESP-FIT: Inspiratory and Expiratory muscle strength training 5 times a week, plus Fitbit activity monitoring (Daily) Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
|
RESP-FIT Comparator
n=15 Participants
Active Comparator:
Fitbit activity monitoring (Daily) Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
RESP-FIT Comparator: Fitbit activity monitoring (Daily) Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Self-efficacy
|
6.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.9
|
6.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 6 weeksChange in fatigue (measured with the PROMIS v1.0 Fatigue Scale). The PROMIS Fatigue item banks assess a range of self-reported symptoms, from mild subjective feelings of tiredness to an overwhelming, debilitating, and sustained sense of exhaustion that likely decreases one's ability to execute daily activities and function normally in family or social roles. Fatigue is divided into the experience of fatigue (frequency, duration, and intensity) and the impact of fatigue on physical, mental, and social activities. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured. For negatively-worded concepts like fatigue, a T-score of 60 is one SD worse than average.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RESP-FIT Intervention
n=15 Participants
Intervention:
IMST/EMST Training (5 breaths, 5 times a day, 5 times a week) Fitbit activity monitoring Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
RESP-FIT: Inspiratory and Expiratory muscle strength training 5 times a week, plus Fitbit activity monitoring (Daily) Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
|
RESP-FIT Comparator
n=15 Participants
Active Comparator:
Fitbit activity monitoring (Daily) Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
RESP-FIT Comparator: Fitbit activity monitoring (Daily) Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Fatigue
|
61.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.8
|
57.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 6 weeksChange in difficulty breathing (measured with the PROMIS v1.0 Dyspnea). Participant can select from 5 items evaluating how shortness of breath over the past 7 days affected ability to do various activities (Getting dressed, walking stairs, household chores, or walking fast pace) ranging from "I did not do this," "no difficulty," "a little difficulty," "some difficulty," and "much difficulty." A score of 50 is the average for the general population with a standard deviation of 10 as calibration testing was performed on a large sample of the general population. The dyspnea instruments were calibrated on a sample of adults with COPD, so a score of 50 is the average for people with COPD. For the adult PROMIS Dyspnea Severity 10a short form, a raw score of 10 converts to a T-score of 48.8 with a standard error (SE) of 2.0, for an average dyspnea rating. The T-score can range from 29.7-76.7. A higher score represents more dyspnea being measured.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RESP-FIT Intervention
n=15 Participants
Intervention:
IMST/EMST Training (5 breaths, 5 times a day, 5 times a week) Fitbit activity monitoring Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
RESP-FIT: Inspiratory and Expiratory muscle strength training 5 times a week, plus Fitbit activity monitoring (Daily) Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
|
RESP-FIT Comparator
n=15 Participants
Active Comparator:
Fitbit activity monitoring (Daily) Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
RESP-FIT Comparator: Fitbit activity monitoring (Daily) Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Dyspnea
|
58.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.8
|
55.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.3
|
Adverse Events
RESP-FIT Intervention
RESP-FIT Comparator
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
RESP-FIT Intervention
n=15 participants at risk
Intervention:
IMST/EMST Training (5 breaths, 5 times a day, 5 times a week) Fitbit activity monitoring Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
RESP-FIT: Inspiratory and Expiratory muscle strength training 5 times a week, plus Fitbit activity monitoring (Daily) Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
|
RESP-FIT Comparator
n=15 participants at risk
Active Comparator:
Fitbit activity monitoring (Daily) Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
RESP-FIT Comparator: Fitbit activity monitoring (Daily) Daily symptom and training log entered into mobile application (SAMS)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastroparesis
|
0.00%
0/15 • 1 year
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
|
|
Cardiac disorders
TIA
|
0.00%
0/15 • 1 year
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place