Evaluation of the Efficacy of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Compared to MRI for Differentiation of Hepatic Lesions
NCT ID: NCT03652636
Last Updated: 2024-10-02
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
47 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-08-05
2023-07-21
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Radiomics Analysis of Focal Liver Lesions Based on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging
NCT04682886
Diagnosis of Fatty Liver with Outpatient Ultrasound
NCT03542578
Comparing Diagnostic Accuracy for Liver Tumours Between the Combination of CEUS and CEMRI Versus CECT and CEMRI
NCT03267290
Characterization of Focal Liver Lesions by Real-time Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Imaging (CEUS)
NCT00243633
Comparing the Diagnostic Efficiencies of CEUS and EOB-MRI in Patients With High Risk of HCC
NCT04212286
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
FNH is the second most common benign neoplasm of the liver, with a strong female predilection. These lesions are usually asymptomatic and incidentally discovered, and carry only a small risk of complication such as bleeding. There is no malignant potential. Hepatic adenomas (HAs) are more rare benign neoplasms that also have a female predilection. However, these lesions are more likely to be symptomatic, and carry a higher bleeding risk especially as they grow over 4 cm. In addition, they harbor a small risk of malignant transformation to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Of note, patients may present with both types of lesion concurrently.
Currently, MRI with hepatobiliary contrast agents is the standard for differentiation of these lesions. These agents (such as gadoxetate disodium, or Eovist) are actively transported into hepatocytes, which are present in FNH and only in very rare cases with HA. Previous research (such as from Grazioli et al.) has shown that hepatobiliary agents can differentiate these lesions with excellent accuracy. However, there is still overlap between these lesions on imaging, and for certain patients MRI may be difficult or impossible.
FDA approval of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) agents in 2016 has opened a new avenue for abdominal imaging. CEUS utilizes gas containing lipid microbubbles to provide pure intravascular contrast, allowing for evaluation of vascular and solid organ perfusion. It has an excellent safety profile and is not excreted by the kidneys, allowing for use in patients with acute and chronic renal disease. It has been used for some time outside of the US for liver lesion evaluation, and the enhancement patterns of both FNH and HA have been described in the literature by Kim et al. as having different appearances. CEUS can be especially useful for focal liver lesion imaging for patients who cannot or will not undergo MRI, and it has the advantages of flexibility, increased temporal resolution, and decreased cost. This study aims to compare the utility of CEUS for differentiating FNH and HA with the current standard of hepatobiliary contrast MRI.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
One: Patient population with hepatic lesion(s)
Patient scheduled to get MRI will also be asked to receive an ultrasound of the liver
Sulfur Hexafluoride Microspheres
2.5 mL intravenous injection given at the time of ultrasound, with second 2.5 mL intravenous injection given during ultrasound as needed to improve visualization
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sulfur Hexafluoride Microspheres
2.5 mL intravenous injection given at the time of ultrasound, with second 2.5 mL intravenous injection given during ultrasound as needed to improve visualization
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age 18 years or greater
3. Scheduled to undergo abdominal MRI with contrast at a performance site for evaluation of a hepatic lesion(s).
Exclusion Criteria
2. History of acute cardiac ischemia
3. History of hypersensitivity reaction to Lumason
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Indiana University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jordan K. Swensson
Assistant Professor of Clinical Radiology and Imaging Sciences
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jordan K Swennson, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Indiana University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
IU University Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Swensson J, McCrate M, Halappa VG, Stethen T, Akisik F. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Compared With Hepatobiliary Agent MRI for Differentiation of Focal Nodular Hyperplasia and Hepatic Adenoma: A Prospective Trial. Ultrasound Q. 2024 Nov 22;40(4):e00696. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000696. eCollection 2024 Dec 1.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RADY-SWENSSON
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.