Evaluation of the Efficacy of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Compared to MRI for Differentiation of Hepatic Lesions

NCT ID: NCT03652636

Last Updated: 2024-10-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

47 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-08-05

Study Completion Date

2023-07-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In patients with hepatic lesions, to evaluate the efficacy of contrast enhanced ultrasound compared to MRI in differentiating focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Hepatic imaging plays an important role in identifying and differentiating both benign and malignant neoplasms of the liver. One of the clinical and radiologic dilemmas facing hepatic medicine is the accurate differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatic adenoma (HA). This is a question of some import, as there are significant prognosis and treatment differences between these entities, as well as overlap in the patient populations in whom they occur.

FNH is the second most common benign neoplasm of the liver, with a strong female predilection. These lesions are usually asymptomatic and incidentally discovered, and carry only a small risk of complication such as bleeding. There is no malignant potential. Hepatic adenomas (HAs) are more rare benign neoplasms that also have a female predilection. However, these lesions are more likely to be symptomatic, and carry a higher bleeding risk especially as they grow over 4 cm. In addition, they harbor a small risk of malignant transformation to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Of note, patients may present with both types of lesion concurrently.

Currently, MRI with hepatobiliary contrast agents is the standard for differentiation of these lesions. These agents (such as gadoxetate disodium, or Eovist) are actively transported into hepatocytes, which are present in FNH and only in very rare cases with HA. Previous research (such as from Grazioli et al.) has shown that hepatobiliary agents can differentiate these lesions with excellent accuracy. However, there is still overlap between these lesions on imaging, and for certain patients MRI may be difficult or impossible.

FDA approval of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) agents in 2016 has opened a new avenue for abdominal imaging. CEUS utilizes gas containing lipid microbubbles to provide pure intravascular contrast, allowing for evaluation of vascular and solid organ perfusion. It has an excellent safety profile and is not excreted by the kidneys, allowing for use in patients with acute and chronic renal disease. It has been used for some time outside of the US for liver lesion evaluation, and the enhancement patterns of both FNH and HA have been described in the literature by Kim et al. as having different appearances. CEUS can be especially useful for focal liver lesion imaging for patients who cannot or will not undergo MRI, and it has the advantages of flexibility, increased temporal resolution, and decreased cost. This study aims to compare the utility of CEUS for differentiating FNH and HA with the current standard of hepatobiliary contrast MRI.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatic Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

One: Patient population with hepatic lesion(s)

Patient scheduled to get MRI will also be asked to receive an ultrasound of the liver

Group Type OTHER

Sulfur Hexafluoride Microspheres

Intervention Type DRUG

2.5 mL intravenous injection given at the time of ultrasound, with second 2.5 mL intravenous injection given during ultrasound as needed to improve visualization

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sulfur Hexafluoride Microspheres

2.5 mL intravenous injection given at the time of ultrasound, with second 2.5 mL intravenous injection given during ultrasound as needed to improve visualization

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lumason

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Males and females
2. Age 18 years or greater
3. Scheduled to undergo abdominal MRI with contrast at a performance site for evaluation of a hepatic lesion(s).

Exclusion Criteria

1. History of cardiac shunting
2. History of acute cardiac ischemia
3. History of hypersensitivity reaction to Lumason
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Indiana University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jordan K. Swensson

Assistant Professor of Clinical Radiology and Imaging Sciences

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jordan K Swennson, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Indiana University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

IU University Hospital

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Swensson J, McCrate M, Halappa VG, Stethen T, Akisik F. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Compared With Hepatobiliary Agent MRI for Differentiation of Focal Nodular Hyperplasia and Hepatic Adenoma: A Prospective Trial. Ultrasound Q. 2024 Nov 22;40(4):e00696. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000696. eCollection 2024 Dec 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39589314 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RADY-SWENSSON

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.