Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Clinical Study to Investigate the Dermal and Ocular Tolerance of a Developmental Cosmetic Facial Serum Formulation in Healthy Females With Sensitive Skin (NCT NCT03640832)
NCT ID: NCT03640832
Last Updated: 2020-11-27
Results Overview
A qualified dermatologist visually assessed the signs and symptoms of cutaneous irritation for dermal erythema, dryness, scaling, and edema on a scale with a score range of 0 to 3, where 0=none, 0.5=very slight, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe. Cutaneous irritation total score = dermal score of erythema + dermal score of dryness + dermal score of scaling + dermal score of edema. Total possible score range is 0 to 12 (higher value indicated more cutaneous irritation). Change from baseline for 21 days of product use = total score at Day 21 minus total score at baseline. Participants with a unit change of greater than (\>) 1 in total score (TS) of cutaneous irritation from baseline to 21 days of product use, are reported in this outcome measure.
COMPLETED
NA
90 participants
Baseline and Day 21
2020-11-27
Participant Flow
All the participants were enrolled from one center in Germany.
A total of 141 participants were screened for the study out of which 90 participants were enrolled and randomized to any of the 2 treatment arms. A total of 51 participants did not meet the study criteria and were not randomized. All 90 randomized participants completed the study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Developmental Facial Serum (Test Product)
Participants were randomized to topically (facial) apply Physiogel Developmental Facial Serum, twice daily (morning and evening) to the freshly cleansed skin before applying moisturizer up to 21 (+2) days
|
Physiogel Calming Relief Anti-redness Serum(Reference Product)
Participants were randomized to topically (facial) apply Physiogel Calming Relief Anti-Redness Serum, twice daily (morning and evening) to the freshly cleansed skin before applying moisturizer up to 21 (+2) days
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
44
|
46
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
44
|
46
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A Clinical Study to Investigate the Dermal and Ocular Tolerance of a Developmental Cosmetic Facial Serum Formulation in Healthy Females With Sensitive Skin
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Developmental Facial Serum (Test Product)
n=44 Participants
Participants were randomized to topically (facial) apply Physiogel Developmental Facial Serum, twice daily (morning and evening) to the freshly cleansed skin before applying moisturizer up to 21 (+2) days
|
Physiogel Calming Relief Anti-redness Serum(Reference Product)
n=46 Participants
Participants were randomized to topically (facial) apply Physiogel Calming Relief Anti-Redness Serum, twice daily (morning and evening) to the freshly cleansed skin before applying moisturizer up to 21 (+2) days
|
Total
n=90 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Dermatologist Assessment of Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation Total Score at Baseline
Baseline, TS= 4
|
2 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Dermatologist Assessment of Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation Total Score at Baseline
Baseline, TS= 4.5
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
49.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.05 • n=93 Participants
|
48.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.84 • n=4 Participants
|
49.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.95 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
44 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
46 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
90 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - South East Asian heritage
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - White/Caucasian/European heritage
|
43 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
87 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown or not reported
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
I - pale white skin
|
6 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
II - white skin
|
13 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
III - light brown skin
|
22 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
IV - moderate brown skin
|
3 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Dermatologist Assessment of Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation Total Score at Baseline
Baseline, total score(TS)= 1
|
11 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Dermatologist Assessment of Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation Total Score at Baseline
Baseline, TS= 1.5
|
16 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Dermatologist Assessment of Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation Total Score at Baseline
Baseline, TS= 2
|
7 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Dermatologist Assessment of Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation Total Score at Baseline
Baseline, TS= 2.5
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Dermatologist Assessment of Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation Total Score at Baseline
Baseline, TS= 3
|
5 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Dermatologist Assessment of Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation Total Score at Baseline
Baseline, TS= 3.5
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 21Population: The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product).
A qualified dermatologist visually assessed the signs and symptoms of cutaneous irritation for dermal erythema, dryness, scaling, and edema on a scale with a score range of 0 to 3, where 0=none, 0.5=very slight, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe. Cutaneous irritation total score = dermal score of erythema + dermal score of dryness + dermal score of scaling + dermal score of edema. Total possible score range is 0 to 12 (higher value indicated more cutaneous irritation). Change from baseline for 21 days of product use = total score at Day 21 minus total score at baseline. Participants with a unit change of greater than (\>) 1 in total score (TS) of cutaneous irritation from baseline to 21 days of product use, are reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Developmental Facial Serum (Test Product)
n=44 Participants
Participants were randomized to topically (facial) apply Physiogel Developmental Facial Serum, twice daily (morning and evening) to the freshly cleansed skin before applying moisturizer up to 21 (+2) days
|
Physiogel Calming Relief Anti-redness Serum(Reference Product)
n=46 Participants
Participants were randomized to topically (facial) apply Physiogel Calming Relief Anti-Redness Serum, twice daily (morning and evening) to the freshly cleansed skin before applying moisturizer up to 21 (+2) days
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of Greater Than (>) 1 in Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation Total Scores From Baseline to 21 Days of Product Use
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 21Population: The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product).
A qualified ophthalmologist visually assessed the signs and symptoms of ocular irritation for ocular eczema of the eyelid, conjunctivitis, follicles and chemosis conjunctivae on a scale with a score range of 0 to 3, where 0=none, 0.5=very slight, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe. Ocular irritation total score = ocular score of eczema of the eyelid + ocular score of conjunctivitis + ocular score of follicles + ocular score of chemosis conjunctivae. Total possible score range is 0 to 12 (higher value indicated more ocular irritation). Change from baseline for 21 days of product use = total score at Day 21 minus total score at baseline. Participants with a unit change of \> 1 in total score of ocular irritation from baseline to 21 days of product use, are reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Developmental Facial Serum (Test Product)
n=44 Participants
Participants were randomized to topically (facial) apply Physiogel Developmental Facial Serum, twice daily (morning and evening) to the freshly cleansed skin before applying moisturizer up to 21 (+2) days
|
Physiogel Calming Relief Anti-redness Serum(Reference Product)
n=46 Participants
Participants were randomized to topically (facial) apply Physiogel Calming Relief Anti-Redness Serum, twice daily (morning and evening) to the freshly cleansed skin before applying moisturizer up to 21 (+2) days
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Ocular Irritation Total Scores From Baseline to 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 0
|
44 Participants
|
46 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Ocular Irritation Total Scores From Baseline to 21 Days of Product Use
Change at Day 21, TS >1
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 1-2 hours post first use, Day 21Population: The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product).
Participants were instructed to self-assess any sensations of cutaneous discomfort for redness, dryness, stinging/burning, itching and tightness on a scale with a score range of 0 to 3, where 0=none, 0.5=very slight, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe. Participant self-assessment of cutaneous irritation total score = redness + dryness + itching + stinging/burning + tightness. Total possible score range is 0 to 15 (higher value indicated more cutaneous irritation). Change from baseline at 1-2 hours post first use = total score at 1 to 2 hours minus total score at baseline. Similarly, change from baseline for 21 days of product use = total score at Day 21 minus total score at baseline. Participants with a unit change of \>1 in total score of cutaneous irritation from baseline to 1-2 hours post first product use and 21 days of product use, are reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Developmental Facial Serum (Test Product)
n=44 Participants
Participants were randomized to topically (facial) apply Physiogel Developmental Facial Serum, twice daily (morning and evening) to the freshly cleansed skin before applying moisturizer up to 21 (+2) days
|
Physiogel Calming Relief Anti-redness Serum(Reference Product)
n=46 Participants
Participants were randomized to topically (facial) apply Physiogel Calming Relief Anti-Redness Serum, twice daily (morning and evening) to the freshly cleansed skin before applying moisturizer up to 21 (+2) days
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 1
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 1.5
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 2
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 2.5
|
2 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 3
|
8 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 3.5
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 4
|
6 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 4.5
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 5
|
5 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 5.5
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 6
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 6.5
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 7
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 7.5
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 8
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 9
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 10
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 12
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Change at 1-2 hours, TS >1
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Cutaneous Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Change at Day 21, TS >1
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 1-2 hours post first use, Day 21Population: The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product).
Participants were instructed to self-assess any sensations of ocular discomfort for redness, dryness, stinging/burning and itching on a scale with a score range of 0 to 3, where 0=none, 0.5=very slight, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe. Participant self-assessment of ocular irritation total score = redness + dryness + itching + stinging/burning. Total possible score range is 0 to 12 (higher value indicated more ocular irritation). Change from baseline at 1-2 hours post first use = total score at 1 to 2 hours minus total score at baseline. Similarly, change from baseline for 21 days of product use = total score at Day 21 minus total score at baseline. Participants with a change of \> 1 in total score of ocular irritation from baseline to 1-2 hours post first product use and Day 21 days of product use, are reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Developmental Facial Serum (Test Product)
n=44 Participants
Participants were randomized to topically (facial) apply Physiogel Developmental Facial Serum, twice daily (morning and evening) to the freshly cleansed skin before applying moisturizer up to 21 (+2) days
|
Physiogel Calming Relief Anti-redness Serum(Reference Product)
n=46 Participants
Participants were randomized to topically (facial) apply Physiogel Calming Relief Anti-Redness Serum, twice daily (morning and evening) to the freshly cleansed skin before applying moisturizer up to 21 (+2) days
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Ocular Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 0
|
23 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Ocular Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 0.5
|
10 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Ocular Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 1
|
3 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Ocular Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 1.5
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Ocular Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 2
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Ocular Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 2.5
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Ocular Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 4
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Ocular Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 6
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Ocular Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Baseline, TS= 6.5
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Ocular Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Change at 1-2 hours, TS >1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With a Unit Change of >1 in Signs and Symptoms of Ocular Irritation (Self-assessment) From Baseline to 1 to 2 Hours Post First Product Use and 21 Days of Product Use
Change at Day 21, TS >1
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Developmental Facial Serum (Test Product)
Physiogel Calming Relief Anti-redness Serum(Reference Product)
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Developmental Facial Serum (Test Product)
n=44 participants at risk
Participants were randomized to topically (facial) apply Physiogel Developmental Facial Serum, twice daily (morning and evening) to the freshly cleansed skin before applying moisturizer up to 21 (+2) days
|
Physiogel Calming Relief Anti-redness Serum(Reference Product)
n=46 participants at risk
Participants were randomized to topically (facial) apply Physiogel Calming Relief Anti-Redness Serum, twice daily (morning and evening) to the freshly cleansed skin before applying moisturizer up to 21 (+2) days
|
|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Chalazion
|
0.00%
0/44 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
2.2%
1/46 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye paraesthesia
|
0.00%
0/44 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
2.2%
1/46 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye pruritus
|
2.3%
1/44 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
0.00%
0/46 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
6.8%
3/44 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
0.00%
0/46 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arthropod bite
|
2.3%
1/44 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
0.00%
0/46 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Jaw cyst
|
0.00%
0/44 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
2.2%
1/46 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
0.00%
0/44 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
2.2%
1/46 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
2.3%
1/44 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
0.00%
0/46 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/44 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
6.5%
3/46 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Dysmenorrhoea
|
2.3%
1/44 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
0.00%
0/46 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal discomfort
|
2.3%
1/44 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
0.00%
0/46 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
|
6.8%
3/44 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
2.2%
1/46 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash macular
|
0.00%
0/44 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
2.2%
1/46 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin burning sensation
|
0.00%
0/44 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
2.2%
1/46 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin irritation
|
0.00%
0/44 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
2.2%
1/46 • up to 21 (+2) days
The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study product (test or reference product). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as new adverse events (AEs) that occurred on or after the first product application. One participant might have experienced more than one AE during the study. All treatment emergent AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER