Approach Bias Modification for the Treatment of Cannabis Use Disorder

NCT ID: NCT03629990

Last Updated: 2024-12-17

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

104 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-16

Study Completion Date

2023-10-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Effective and durable treatments for cannabis use disorder remain elusive. Given the increasing prevalence rates of cannabis use and CUD nationwide, investigation of novel treatments is warranted. Implicit cognitive processing is an emerging, and potentially critical therapeutic target.

Cognitive models of addiction posit an override of explicit control-related cognitive processes by implicit reward-driven processes resulting from chronic drug exposure. One form of implicit cognitive processing is approach bias, or, the automatic tendency to approach rather than avoid drug cues, which has been identified for alcohol, nicotine, opioids, and cannabis. Cannabis approach bias predicts increased cannabis use, dependence severity, and cannabis-related problems among heavy cannabis users. Approach bias modification (ABM) is a novel treatment approach that seeks to reduce approach bias by attenuating the incentive-salience of drug cues, and subsequently, drug cue reactivity and drug use. ABM has been shown to reduce relapse rates in alcohol dependent adults by 10-13% at one-year follow-up, and dependence severity in nicotine dependent adults. Our pilot data suggests that ABM may also reduce cannabis craving and that gender may moderate the effect of ABM on cannabis sessions per day in non-treatment seeking adults with CUD. A recent fMRI study with alcohol-dependent adults found decreased mesolimbic activation in participants who received ABM compared to sham-control participants. ABM appears to target implicit reward-driven processes, and could be an effective adjunct to traditional psychosocial and/or future pharmacological interventions that target explicit control-related processes.

Building on our promising feasibility data, the proposed K23 research study will examine the effects of ABM on cue-reactivity and cannabis outcomes in a four-session randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot treatment trial. One-hundred and six (106) treatment-seeking adults with moderate to severe CUD will be randomized to receive either MET/CBT plus ABM or Motivational Enhancement Therapy/Cognitive Behavioral Therapy(MET/CBT) plus sham-ABM. An equal number of men and women will be recruited and randomization will be stratified by gender. ABM sessions will occur following each of the three weekly MET/CBT therapy sessions. Primary outcomes will include cannabis cue-reactivity and cannabis use.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cannabis Use Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active ABM + CBT/MET

Participants in the Active ABM condition will receive approach bias modification (ABM) training sessions aimed at reducing cognitive bias for cannabis cues.

All participants will receive MET/CBT therapy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Approach Bias Modification (ABM)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Approach bias modification (ABM) is a novel treatment that involves retraining the implicit action tendency to approach a drug cue by manipulating contingencies in a stimulus-response paradigm.

Psychosocial therapy for cannabis use disorder.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

All participants will receive psychosocial therapy for cannabis use disorder.

Sham ABM + CBT/MET

Participants in the Sham ABM condition will undergo similar computerized tasks without the manipulation of response contingencies that target modification of approach bias.

All participants will receive MET/CBT therapy.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham ABM

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Sham ABM involves similar computerized procedures that mimic the active experimental condition, but do not involve manipulation of response contingencies and thus it does not contain any "active" intervention.

Psychosocial therapy for cannabis use disorder.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

All participants will receive psychosocial therapy for cannabis use disorder.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Approach Bias Modification (ABM)

Approach bias modification (ABM) is a novel treatment that involves retraining the implicit action tendency to approach a drug cue by manipulating contingencies in a stimulus-response paradigm.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Sham ABM

Sham ABM involves similar computerized procedures that mimic the active experimental condition, but do not involve manipulation of response contingencies and thus it does not contain any "active" intervention.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Psychosocial therapy for cannabis use disorder.

All participants will receive psychosocial therapy for cannabis use disorder.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Be age 18-65 and must be able to provide informed consent.
2. Meet DSM-5 criteria for current moderate to severe CUD (past 60 days).
3. Identify cannabis as their primary substance of choice.
4. Consent to remain abstinent from alcohol and cannabis for 12 hours immediately prior to study visits and other drugs of abuse (except nicotine) for three days prior (see Additional Instrumentation below for methods); by restricting cannabis and other substance use as proposed, participants should not be under the acute effects of cannabis or other substances.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Evidence of, or a history of serious medical or neurological disease that may affect cognitive processing.
2. History of, or current psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, or current untreated major depressive disorder as these may interfere with subjective measurements.
3. Current use of psychotropic medications because these may affect subjective measurements (individuals taking antidepressants will be allowed).
4. Current suicidal ideation. Individuals who endorse suicidal ideation will be seen by a psychologist or psychiatrist in the office and will be referred to treatment as necessary.
5. Women who are pregnant, nursing or of childbearing potential and not practicing an effective means of birth control.
6. Moderate to severe DSM-5 substance use disorder within the past 60 days (other than nicotine or cannabis).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medical University of South Carolina

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Brian J Sherman, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical University of South Carolina

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medial University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5K23DA045099-05

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

Pro00077532

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id