Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of INCB050465 in Primary Sjögren's Syndrome (NCT NCT03627065)
NCT ID: NCT03627065
Last Updated: 2021-08-13
Results Overview
The SGUS is a combination of the scores of the 4 salivary glands (2 parotid and 2 submandibular) each gland is scored on a 5-point scale (0 to 4; 4 being more severe), with the maximum total score being 16.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
10 participants
Week 4 and Week 12
2021-08-13
Participant Flow
Approximately 12 participants were planned. Ten participants were enrolled and analyzed for efficacy and safety.
Ten participants were enrolled and treated. Seven participants completed treatment. Three participants discontinued treatment and withdrew from the study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Parsaclisib
parsaclisib was administered orally once a day.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Parsaclisib
parsaclisib was administered orally once a day.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Study Terminated by sponsor
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study of INCB050465 in Primary Sjögren's Syndrome
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Parsaclisib
n=10 Participants
parsaclisib was administered orally once a day for up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
54.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.47 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White/Caucasian
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/African-American
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12Population: Full analysis set included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
The SGUS is a combination of the scores of the 4 salivary glands (2 parotid and 2 submandibular) each gland is scored on a 5-point scale (0 to 4; 4 being more severe), with the maximum total score being 16.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Parsaclisib
n=10 Participants
parsaclisib was administered orally once a day for up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Proportion of Participants With a 1 Point or Greater Change on the Salivary Gland Ultrasound (SGUS) Score for Parotid and Submandibular Glands
Week 4
|
0 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Participants With a 1 Point or Greater Change on the Salivary Gland Ultrasound (SGUS) Score for Parotid and Submandibular Glands
Week 12
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 12Population: Full analysis set included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of study drug, and detectable levels of CXCL13.
To assess the impact of parsaclisib on salivary CXCL13.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Parsaclisib
n=2 Participants
parsaclisib was administered orally once a day for up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Salivary CXCL13 Levels
Week 4
|
0.96 L/h
Standard Deviation 0.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Salivary CXCL13 Levels
Week 12
|
1.98 L/h
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 21 weeksPopulation: The full analysis set included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Adverse events reported for the first time or worsening of a pre-existing event after first dose of study drug.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Parsaclisib
n=10 Participants
parsaclisib was administered orally once a day for up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
|
4 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12Population: The full analysis set included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Defined as change in stimulated and unstimulated whole salivary flow from baseline
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Parsaclisib
n=10 Participants
parsaclisib was administered orally once a day for up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Change in Whole Salivary Flow
Mean change in unstimulated salivary flow Week 8
|
0.07 g/min
Standard Deviation 0.109
|
|
Change in Whole Salivary Flow
Mean change in stimulated salivary flow Week 4
|
0.07 g/min
Standard Deviation 0.152
|
|
Change in Whole Salivary Flow
Mean change in stimulated salivary flow Week 8
|
-0.05 g/min
Standard Deviation 0.129
|
|
Change in Whole Salivary Flow
Mean change in stimulated salivary flow Week 12
|
-0.05 g/min
Standard Deviation 0.144
|
|
Change in Whole Salivary Flow
Mean change in unstimulated salivary flow Week 4
|
0.03 g/min
Standard Deviation 0.046
|
|
Change in Whole Salivary Flow
Mean change in unstimulated salivary flow Week 12
|
0.04 g/min
Standard Deviation 0.082
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12Population: Full analysis set included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Defined as change in ESSDAI. The ESSDAI is a physician-assessed disease activity index for primary Sjögren's syndrome developed by the EULAR consortium. It consists of 44 items in 12 organ-specific 'domains' contributing to disease activity (constitutional, lymphadenopathy, articular, muscular, cutaneous, glandular, pulmonary, renal, peripheral nervous system, central nervous system, hematological, biological). Each domain is assessed for activity level (i.e., no, low, moderate, high) and assigned a numerical score based on pre-determined weighting of each individual domain. An overall score is then calculated as the sum of all individual weighted domain scores. Overall score is calculated as sum of all individual weighted domain scores (ranges from 0 (best) to 123 (worst activity).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Parsaclisib
n=10 Participants
parsaclisib was administered orally once a day for up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Change in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index
Mean Change at Week 4
|
-0.3 Index
Standard Deviation 2.92
|
|
Change in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index
Mean Change at Week 8
|
-2.0 Index
Standard Deviation 4.12
|
|
Change in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index
Mean Change at Week 12
|
-5.3 Index
Standard Deviation 4.15
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 12Population: Full analysis set included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Defined as Change in ESSPRI. EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Patient-Reported Index (ESSPRI) Score is defined as the change in score between baseline (Week -1) and Week 12. The ESSPRI is a patient-reported, subjective symptom index for primary Sjögren's syndrome developed by the EULAR consortium. It consists of three questions covering the cardinal symptoms of Sjögren's syndrome: dryness, fatigue and pain (articular and/or muscular). Each domain scored on scale of 0-10 (0 =no symptom at all and 10 = worst symptom imaginable), and an overall score is calculated as the mean of the three individual domains where all domains carry the same weight.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Parsaclisib
n=9 Participants
parsaclisib was administered orally once a day for up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Change in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index
Mean Change at Week 4
|
-1.9 Index
Standard Deviation 2.26
|
|
Change in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index
Mean Change at Week 8
|
-2.0 Index
Standard Deviation 1.93
|
|
Change in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index
Mean Change at Week 12
|
-1.8 Index
Standard Deviation 1.98
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 12.Population: Full analysis set included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Defined as change in symptom scores for dryness of eyes, mouth, and vagina. The dryness questionnaire will ask participants to rate the dryness of eyes, mouth, or vagina (female participants only) with 24-hour recall using an 11-point numerical rating system ranging from 0 (no dryness) to 10
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Parsaclisib
n=10 Participants
parsaclisib was administered orally once a day for up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Change in Symptom Scores for Dryness
Change in Symptom Score for eye dryness at Week 4
|
-2.6 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.96
|
|
Change in Symptom Scores for Dryness
Change in Symptom Score for eye dryness at Week 8
|
-2.4 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.07
|
|
Change in Symptom Scores for Dryness
Change in Symptom Score for eye dryness at Week 12
|
-2.4 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.64
|
|
Change in Symptom Scores for Dryness
Change in Symptom Score for mouth dryness at Week 4
|
-2.8 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.64
|
|
Change in Symptom Scores for Dryness
Change in Symptom Score for mouth dryness at Week 8
|
-2.1 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.41
|
|
Change in Symptom Scores for Dryness
Change in Symptom Score for mouth dryness at Week 12
|
-3.6 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.99
|
|
Change in Symptom Scores for Dryness
Change in Symptom Score for vaginal dryness at Week 4
|
-1.3 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.20
|
|
Change in Symptom Scores for Dryness
Change in Symptom Score for vaginal dryness at Week 8
|
-2.3 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.50
|
|
Change in Symptom Scores for Dryness
Change in Symptom Score for vaginal dryness at Week 12
|
-1.3 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.94
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12Population: Full analysis set included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Defined as proportions of participants in each PGIC category. The PGIC asks a single question regarding how the patient is feeling since beginning new therapy. The questionnaire uses a 7-point scale (from 1 to 7), ranging from "very much improved, 1" to "very much worse, 7
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Parsaclisib
n=10 Participants
parsaclisib was administered orally once a day for up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Baseline · Very Much Worse
|
0 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Baseline · Worse
|
0 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Baseline · Somewhat Worse
|
0 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Baseline · No Change
|
9 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Baseline · Somewhat Improved
|
0 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Baseline · Improved
|
0 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Baseline · Very much Improved
|
0 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Week 4 · Very Much Worse
|
0 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Week 4 · Worse
|
0 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Week 4 · Somewhat Worse
|
0 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Week 4 · No Change
|
3 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Week 4 · Somewhat Improved
|
2 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Week 4 · Improved
|
4 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Week 4 · Very much Improved
|
0 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Week 8 · Very Much Worse
|
0 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Week 8 · Worse
|
0 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Week 8 · Somewhat Worse
|
0 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Week 8 · No Change
|
2 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Week 8 · Somewhat Improved
|
2 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Week 8 · Improved
|
3 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Week 8 · Very much Improved
|
0 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Week 12 · Very Much Worse
|
0 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Week 12 · Worse
|
0 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Week 12 · Somewhat Worse
|
0 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Week 12 · No Change
|
2 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Week 12 · Somewhat Improved
|
2 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Week 12 · Improved
|
3 Participants
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Questionnaire
Week 12 · Very much Improved
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 12Population: Full analysis set included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Defined as change in PROMIS Fatigue short form. The PROMIS fatigue short form includes 7 items with a rating scale of 1 to 5, 1 being no fatigue and 5 being severe fatigue. The recall period is 7 days.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Parsaclisib
n=10 Participants
parsaclisib was administered orally once a day for up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Change in PROMIS Fatigue Short Form
Change in Score at Week 4
|
-2.6 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.03
|
|
Change in PROMIS Fatigue Short Form
Change in Score at Week 8
|
-1.9 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.79
|
|
Change in PROMIS Fatigue Short Form
Change in Score at Week 12
|
-1.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.87
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 12Population: Full analysis set included all female participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Defined as change in FSFI. The FSFI is a brief, self-report measure of female sexual function (female participants only). The questionnaire contains 19 item sexual functioning questionnaire to rate sexual function between 2.0 and 36.0, where 2.0 is low sexual function and 36.0 is high sexual function. Difference in FSFI scores are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Parsaclisib
n=9 Participants
parsaclisib was administered orally once a day for up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Female Participants Only : Change in Female Sexual Function Index
Change in Functional Index at Week 4
|
1.8 Index
Standard Deviation 3.19
|
|
Female Participants Only : Change in Female Sexual Function Index
Change in Functional Index at Week 8
|
2.8 Index
Standard Deviation 4.76
|
|
Female Participants Only : Change in Female Sexual Function Index
Change in Functional Index at Week 12
|
1.3 Index
Standard Deviation 1.83
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 12Population: Full analysis set included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Defined as change in EQ-5D. The EQ-5D is a standardized measure of health status. It consists of 5 questions, each with a 5-item rating scale plus a visual analog scale rating from 1 to 100 for overall health status. Higher score represents more severe symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Parsaclisib
n=10 Participants
parsaclisib was administered orally once a day for up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Change in European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions Questionnaire
Change in EQ5D at week 8
|
0.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.05
|
|
Change in European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions Questionnaire
Change in EQ5D at week 4
|
7.2 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.34
|
|
Change in European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions Questionnaire
Change in EQ5D at week 12
|
-6.4 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.49
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12Population: The full analysis set included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Defined as change and percent change in stimulated and unstimulated whole salivary flow from baseline
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Parsaclisib
n=10 Participants
parsaclisib was administered orally once a day for up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage Change in Whole Salivary Flow
Percent change in stimulated salivary flow Week 4
|
17.57 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 36.225
|
|
Percentage Change in Whole Salivary Flow
Percent change in stimulated salivary flow Week 8
|
-10.59 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 32.874
|
|
Percentage Change in Whole Salivary Flow
Percent change in stimulated salivary flow Week 12
|
-16.07 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 41.754
|
|
Percentage Change in Whole Salivary Flow
Percent change in unstimulated salivary flow Week 4
|
228.10 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 282.634
|
|
Percentage Change in Whole Salivary Flow
Percent change in unstimulated salivary flow Week 8
|
307.56 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 601.557
|
|
Percentage Change in Whole Salivary Flow
Percent change in unstimulated salivary flow Week 12
|
281.12 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 541.333
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12Population: Full analysis set included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Defined as percent change in ESSDAI. The ESSDAI is a physician-assessed disease activity index for primary Sjögren's syndrome developed by the EULAR consortium. It consists of 44 items in 12 organ-specific 'domains' contributing to disease activity (constitutional, lymphadenopathy, articular, muscular, cutaneous, glandular, pulmonary, renal, peripheral nervous system, central nervous system, hematological, biological). Each domain is assessed for activity level (i.e., no, low, moderate, high) and assigned a numerical score based on pre-determined weighting of each individual domain. An overall score is then calculated as the sum of all individual weighted domain scores. Overall score is calculated as sum of all individual weighted domain scores (ranges from 0 (best) to 123 (worst activity).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Parsaclisib
n=10 Participants
parsaclisib was administered orally once a day for up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage Change in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index
Percent Change at Week 4
|
1.8 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 28.13
|
|
Percentage Change in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index
Percent Change at Week 8
|
-5.2 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 24.09
|
|
Percentage Change in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index
Percent Change at Week 12
|
-32.1 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 25.70
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 12Population: Full analysis set included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Defined as percentage change in ESSPRI. EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Patient-Reported Index (ESSPRI) Score is defined as the change in score between baseline (Week -1) and Week 12. The ESSPRI is a patient-reported, subjective symptom index for primary Sjögren's syndrome developed by the EULAR consortium. It consists of three questions covering the cardinal symptoms of Sjögren's syndrome: dryness, fatigue and pain (articular and/or muscular). Each domain scored on scale of 0-10 (0 =no symptom at all and 10 = worst symptom imaginable), and an overall score is calculated as the mean of the three individual domains where all domains carry the same weight.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Parsaclisib
n=10 Participants
parsaclisib was administered orally once a day for up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage Change in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index
Percent Change at Week 4
|
-24.4 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 40.36
|
|
Percentage Change in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index
Percent Change at Week 8
|
-29.0 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 28.27
|
|
Percentage Change in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index
Percent Change at Week 12
|
-25.8 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 30.52
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 12.Population: Full analysis set included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Defined as percent change in symptom scores for dryness of eyes, mouth, and vagina. The dryness questionnaire will ask participants to rate the dryness of eyes, mouth, or vagina (female participants only) with 24-hour recall using an 11-point numerical rating system ranging from 0 (no dryness) to 10
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Parsaclisib
n=10 Participants
parsaclisib was administered orally once a day for up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage Change in Symptom Scores for Dryness
Percent change in Symptom Score for eye dryness at Week 4
|
-33.2 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 35.29
|
|
Percentage Change in Symptom Scores for Dryness
Percent change in Symptom Score for eye dryness at Week 8
|
-39.3 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 23.89
|
|
Percentage Change in Symptom Scores for Dryness
Percent change in Symptom Score for eye dryness at Week 12
|
-40.9 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 39.09
|
|
Percentage Change in Symptom Scores for Dryness
Percent change in Symptom Score for mouth dryness at Week 4
|
-37.7 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 37.56
|
|
Percentage Change in Symptom Scores for Dryness
Percent change in Symptom Score for mouth dryness at Week 8
|
-28.0 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 32.97
|
|
Percentage Change in Symptom Scores for Dryness
Percent change in Symptom Score for mouth dryness at Week 12
|
-50.9 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 45.88
|
|
Percentage Change in Symptom Scores for Dryness
Percent change in Symptom Score for vaginal dryness at Week 4
|
-24.0 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 49.18
|
|
Percentage Change in Symptom Scores for Dryness
Percent change in Symptom Score for vaginal dryness at Week 8
|
-54.2 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 51.59
|
|
Percentage Change in Symptom Scores for Dryness
Percent change in Symptom Score for vaginal dryness at Week 12
|
-49.0 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 42.54
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 12Population: Full analysis set included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Defined as percent change in PROMIS Fatigue short form. The PROMIS fatigue short form includes 7 items with a rating scale of 1 to 5, 1 being no fatigue and 5 being severe fatigue. The recall period is 7 days.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Parsaclisib
n=10 Participants
parsaclisib was administered orally once a day for up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage Change in PROMIS Fatigue Short Form
Percent change in Score at Week 4
|
-11.1 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 21.87
|
|
Percentage Change in PROMIS Fatigue Short Form
Percent change in Score at Week 8
|
-7.5 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 13.17
|
|
Percentage Change in PROMIS Fatigue Short Form
Percent change in Score at Week 12
|
-6.4 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 13.16
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 12Population: Full analysis set included all female participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Defined as percent change in FSFI. The FSFI is a brief, self-report measure of female sexual function (female participants only). The questionnaire contains 19 item sexual functioning questionnaire to rate sexual function between 2.0 and 36.0, where 2.0 is low sexual function and 36.0 is high sexual function. Difference in FSFI scores are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Parsaclisib
n=9 Participants
parsaclisib was administered orally once a day for up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Female Participants Only : Percentage Change in Female Sexual Function Index
Percent change in Functional Index at Week 4
|
39.0 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 94.61
|
|
Female Participants Only : Percentage Change in Female Sexual Function Index
Percent change in Functional Index at Week 8
|
8.7 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 31.63
|
|
Female Participants Only : Percentage Change in Female Sexual Function Index
Percent change in Functional Index at Week 12
|
23.3 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 30.08
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 12Population: Full analysis set included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Defined as percent change in EQ-5D. The EQ-5D is a standardized measure of health status. It consists of 5 questions, each with a 5-item rating scale plus a visual analog scale rating from 1 to 100 for overall health status. Higher score represents more severe symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Parsaclisib
n=10 Participants
parsaclisib was administered orally once a day for up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage Change in European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions Questionnaire
Percent Change in EQ5D at week 4
|
21.1 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 55.37
|
|
Percentage Change in European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions Questionnaire
Percent Change in EQ5D at week 8
|
11.9 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 62.91
|
|
Percentage Change in European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions Questionnaire
Percent Change in EQ5D at week 12
|
-8.9 Percentage Change
Standard Deviation 49.54
|
Adverse Events
Parsaclisib
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Parsaclisib
n=10 participants at risk
parsaclisib was administered orally once a day.
|
|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Up to 21 weeks
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dental caries
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Up to 21 weeks
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Up to 21 weeks
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastroesophageal reflux disease
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Up to 21 weeks
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Up to 21 weeks
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Up to 21 weeks
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Neurodermatitis
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Up to 21 weeks
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral candidiasis
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 2 • Up to 21 weeks
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Up to 21 weeks
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Up to 21 weeks
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Clinical Study Agreement
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER