Trial Outcomes & Findings for Survey Study for Velaglucerase Alfa (VPRIV) in Japan (NCT NCT03625882)
NCT ID: NCT03625882
Last Updated: 2025-01-10
Results Overview
An AE is any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is any event that results in: death; life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalisation or results in prolongation of existing hospitalisation; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; a congenital anomaly/birth defect or a medically important event.
COMPLETED
63 participants
Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
2025-01-10
Participant Flow
Participants took part in the survey at 45 investigative sites in Japan, from 2 Sep 2014 to 14 May 2024.
Participants with Gaucher disease who received Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa were enrolled. Participants received VPRIV intravenous infusion as part of a routine medical care.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa Intravenous Infusion
Participants with Gaucher disease received Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa intravenous infusion as part of a routine medical care.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
63
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
60
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa Intravenous Infusion
Participants with Gaucher disease received Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa intravenous infusion as part of a routine medical care.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa Intravenous Infusion
n=60 Participants
Participants with Gaucher disease received Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa intravenous infusion as part of a routine medical care.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
19.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.77 • n=60 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
30 Participants
n=60 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
30 Participants
n=60 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)Population: Safety Analysis Set, The safety analysis set was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa intravenous infusion.
An AE is any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is any event that results in: death; life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalisation or results in prolongation of existing hospitalisation; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; a congenital anomaly/birth defect or a medically important event.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa Intravenous Infusion
n=60 Participants
Participants with Gaucher disease received Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa intravenous infusion as part of a routine medical care.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Following Initiation of Treatment With Velaglucerase Alfa
Adverse Events
|
42 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Following Initiation of Treatment With Velaglucerase Alfa
Serious Adverse Events
|
27 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Every 12 weeks up to 8 yearsPopulation: Efficacy Analysis Set: all participants who received at least one dose of Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa intravenous infusion. The number analyzed was the number of participants what the data was available in this outcome measure during the study.
Number of participants of efficacy categories in assessment of change from baseline in hemoglobin concentration during the study was reported. The efficacy categories were classified as Good: increased by at least 1.5g/dL, Moderate response: increase of at least 0.5 g/dL and less than 1.5 g/dL, and Ineffective: increase less than 0.5 g/dL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa Intravenous Infusion
n=35 Participants
Participants with Gaucher disease received Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa intravenous infusion as part of a routine medical care.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants of Efficacy Categories in Assessment of Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Concentration
Good
|
11 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants of Efficacy Categories in Assessment of Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Concentration
Moderate response
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants of Efficacy Categories in Assessment of Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Concentration
Ineffective
|
20 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Every 12 weeks up to 8 yearsPopulation: Efficacy Analysis Set: all participants who received at least one dose of Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa intravenous infusion. The number analyzed was the number of participants what the data was available in this outcome measure during the study.
Number of participants of efficacy categories in assessment of change from baseline in platelet counts during the study was reported. The efficacy categories were classified as Good: increase of at least 30 × 10\^9/L, Moderate response: increase of at least 15 × 10\^9/L and less than 30 × 10\^9/L, and Ineffective: less than 15 × 10\^9/L.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa Intravenous Infusion
n=19 Participants
Participants with Gaucher disease received Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa intravenous infusion as part of a routine medical care.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants of Efficacy Categories in Assessment of Change From Baseline in Platelet Counts
Good
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants of Efficacy Categories in Assessment of Change From Baseline in Platelet Counts
Moderate response
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants of Efficacy Categories in Assessment of Change From Baseline in Platelet Counts
Ineffective
|
4 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Every 24 weeks up to 8 yearsPopulation: Efficacy Analysis Set: all participants who received at least one dose of Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa intravenous infusion. The number analyzed was the number of participants what the data was available in this outcome measure during the study.
Number of participants of efficacy categories in assessment of change from baseline in liver volumes during the study was reported. The efficacy categories were classified as Good: reduction of at least 30%, Moderate response: reduction of at least 10% and less than 30%, and Ineffective: less than 10% reduction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa Intravenous Infusion
n=7 Participants
Participants with Gaucher disease received Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa intravenous infusion as part of a routine medical care.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants of Efficacy Categories in Assessment of Change From Baseline in Liver Volumes
Good
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants of Efficacy Categories in Assessment of Change From Baseline in Liver Volumes
Moderate response
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants of Efficacy Categories in Assessment of Change From Baseline in Liver Volumes
Ineffective
|
6 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Every 24 weeks up to 8 yearsPopulation: Efficacy Analysis Set: all participants who received at least one dose of Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa intravenous infusion. The number analyzed was the number of participants what the data was available in this outcome measure during the study.
Number of participants of efficacy categories in assessment of change from baseline in spleen volumes during the study was reported. The efficacy categories were classified as Good: reduction of at least 30%, Moderate response: reduction of at least 10% and less than 30%, and Ineffective: less than 10% reduction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa Intravenous Infusion
n=8 Participants
Participants with Gaucher disease received Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa intravenous infusion as part of a routine medical care.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants of Efficacy Categories in Assessment of Change From Baseline in Spleen Volumes
Good
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants of Efficacy Categories in Assessment of Change From Baseline in Spleen Volumes
Moderate response
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants of Efficacy Categories in Assessment of Change From Baseline in Spleen Volumes
Ineffective
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, at the time of last data collection (up to 8 years)Population: Efficacy Analysis Set: all participants who received at least one dose of Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa intravenous infusion. The number analyzed was the number of participants what the data was available in this outcome measure during the study.
T-scores were the number of standard deviations (SDs) above or below the average for a young adult at peak BMD. A T-score of 0 was equal to the mean. Negative numbers indicated values lower than the mean and positive numbers indicated values higher than the mean. The reported data in this outcome measure was lumbar spine BMD T-scores and femur neck BMD T-scores related to bone density at baseline and the last data collection.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa Intravenous Infusion
n=1 Participants
Participants with Gaucher disease received Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa intravenous infusion as part of a routine medical care.
|
|---|---|
|
Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-scores and Femur Neck BMD T-scores at Baseline and the Last Data Collection
Lumbar Spine BMD T-scores: Baseline
|
-4.30 T-score
Standard Deviation NA
The standard deviation was not evaluable due to low number of participants with events.
|
|
Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-scores and Femur Neck BMD T-scores at Baseline and the Last Data Collection
Lumbar Spine BMD T-scores: At the last data collection
|
-0.30 T-score
Standard Deviation NA
The standard deviation was not evaluable due to low number of participants with events.
|
|
Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-scores and Femur Neck BMD T-scores at Baseline and the Last Data Collection
Femur Neck BMD T-scores: Baseline
|
-2.90 T-score
Standard Deviation NA
The standard deviation was not evaluable due to low number of participants with events.
|
|
Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-scores and Femur Neck BMD T-scores at Baseline and the Last Data Collection
Femur Neck BMD T-scores: At the last data collection
|
-0.60 T-score
Standard Deviation NA
The standard deviation was not evaluable due to low number of participants with events.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, at the time of last data collection (up to 8 years)Population: Efficacy Analysis Set: all participants who received at least one dose of Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa intravenous infusion. The number analyzed was the number of participants what the data was available in this outcome measure during the study.
Z-scores express the BMD as the number of SDs above or below the average BMD of a healthy participant of the same age and gender. A Z-score of 0 was equal to the mean. Negative numbers indicated values lower than the mean and positive numbers indicated values higher than the mean. The reported data in this outcome measure was lumbar spine BMD Z-scores and femur neck BMD Z-scores related to bone density at baseline and the last data collection.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa Intravenous Infusion
n=2 Participants
Participants with Gaucher disease received Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa intravenous infusion as part of a routine medical care.
|
|---|---|
|
Lumbar Spine BMD Z-scores and Femur Neck BMD Z-scores at Baseline and the Last Data Collection
Lumbar Spine BMD Z-scores: Baseline
|
-2.20 Z-score
Standard Deviation NA
The standard deviation was not evaluable due to low number of participants with events.
|
|
Lumbar Spine BMD Z-scores and Femur Neck BMD Z-scores at Baseline and the Last Data Collection
Lumbar Spine BMD Z-scores: At the last data collection
|
-1.15 Z-score
Standard Deviation 1.202
|
|
Lumbar Spine BMD Z-scores and Femur Neck BMD Z-scores at Baseline and the Last Data Collection
Femur Neck BMD Z-scores: Baseline
|
-0.60 Z-score
Standard Deviation NA
The standard deviation was not evaluable due to low number of participants with events.
|
|
Lumbar Spine BMD Z-scores and Femur Neck BMD Z-scores at Baseline and the Last Data Collection
Femur Neck BMD Z-scores: At the last data collection
|
-0.50 Z-score
Standard Deviation NA
The standard deviation was not evaluable due to low number of participants with events.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, at the time of last data collection (up to 8 years)Population: Efficacy Analysis Set: all participants who received at least one dose of Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa intravenous infusion. The number analyzed was the number of participants what the data was available in this outcome measure during the study.
The reported data in this outcome measure was lumbar spine BMD and femur neck BMD related to bone density at baseline and the last data collection.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa Intravenous Infusion
n=2 Participants
Participants with Gaucher disease received Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa intravenous infusion as part of a routine medical care.
|
|---|---|
|
Lumbar Spine BMD and Femur Neck BMD at Baseline and the Last Data Collection
Lumbar Spine BMD: Baseline
|
0.7215 gram per square centimeter
Standard Deviation 0.19304
|
|
Lumbar Spine BMD and Femur Neck BMD at Baseline and the Last Data Collection
Lumbar Spine BMD: At the last data collection
|
0.3550 gram per square centimeter
Standard Deviation NA
The standard deviation was not evaluable due to low number of participants with events.
|
|
Lumbar Spine BMD and Femur Neck BMD at Baseline and the Last Data Collection
Femur Neck BMD: Baseline
|
0.6335 gram per square centimeter
Standard Deviation 0.11809
|
|
Lumbar Spine BMD and Femur Neck BMD at Baseline and the Last Data Collection
Femur Neck BMD: At the last data collection
|
0.3400 gram per square centimeter
Standard Deviation NA
The standard deviation was not evaluable due to low number of participants with events.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)Population: Efficacy Analysis Set: all participants who received at least one dose of Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa intravenous infusion. The number analyzed was the number of participants what the data was available in this outcome measure during the study.
Number of participants with positive anti-velaglucerase alfa antibody test results was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa Intravenous Infusion
n=15 Participants
Participants with Gaucher disease received Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa intravenous infusion as part of a routine medical care.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-velaglucerase Alfa Antibody Test Results
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)Population: Safety Analysis Set, The safety analysis set was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa intravenous infusion.
An AE is any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is any event that results in: death; life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalisation or results in prolongation of existing hospitalisation; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; a congenital anomaly/birth defect or a medically important event. Adverse drug reaction refers to AE related to administered drug.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa Intravenous Infusion
n=60 Participants
Participants with Gaucher disease received Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa intravenous infusion as part of a routine medical care.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reaction and Serious Adverse Drug Reaction Following Initiation of Treatment With Velaglucerase Alfa
Adverse Drug Reaction
|
14 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reaction and Serious Adverse Drug Reaction Following Initiation of Treatment With Velaglucerase Alfa
Serious Adverse Drug Reaction
|
5 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)Population: Safety Analysis Set, The safety analysis set was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa intravenous infusion.
An AE is any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Adverse drug reaction refers to AE related to administered drug. Infusion reactions were defined as reactions occurring up to 24 hours after the start of the infusion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa Intravenous Infusion
n=60 Participants
Participants with Gaucher disease received Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa intravenous infusion as part of a routine medical care.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Reactions Categorized as Infusion Reactions Following Initiation of Treatment With Velaglucerase Alfa
|
6 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa Intravenous Infusion
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa Intravenous Infusion
n=60 participants at risk
Participants with Gaucher disease received Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa intravenous infusion as part of a routine medical care.
|
|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Peritonitis
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
5.0%
3/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia aspiration
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
3.3%
2/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
3.3%
2/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal sepsis
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Device related sepsis
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Acute myeloid leukaemia
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Myelodysplastic syndrome
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Autoimmune neutropenia
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Eating disorder
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Tension
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Bipolar disorder
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Myoclonus
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Seizure
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Myoclonic epilepsy
|
3.3%
2/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardio-respiratory arrest
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular fibrillation
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asphyxia
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Central sleep apnoea syndrome
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory disorder
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
5.0%
3/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ischaemic
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Duodenal ulcer
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastroenteritis eosinophilic
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Bile duct stone
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Vesicoureteric reflux
|
3.3%
2/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal impairment
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
General disorders
General physical health deterioration
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Head injury
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Foreign body in throat
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa Intravenous Infusion
n=60 participants at risk
Participants with Gaucher disease received Recombinant Velaglucerase Alfa intravenous infusion as part of a routine medical care.
|
|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
5.0%
3/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
8.3%
5/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
6.7%
4/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
10.0%
6/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
5.0%
3/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Zinc deficiency
|
5.0%
3/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
5.0%
3/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Myoclonus
|
5.0%
3/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
5.0%
3/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic function abnormal
|
10.0%
6/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
13.3%
8/60 • Baseline up to end of the study (8 years)
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of AEs and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to the survey treatment.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place