Buprenorphine Pharmacometric Open Label Research Study of Drug Exposure
NCT ID: NCT03608696
Last Updated: 2022-02-11
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-08-29
2019-07-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Buprenorphine for Treatment of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome in Infants With In Utero Exposure to Benzodiazepines
NCT01671410
Medication Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder in Expectant Mothers: Infant Neurodevelopmental Outcomes Sub-study
NCT03911739
Blinded Trial of Buprenorphine or Morphine in the Treatment of the Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome
NCT01452789
Maternal Buprenorphine-naloxone Treatment and the Infant
NCT03291847
Buprenorphine for the Treatment of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome
NCT00521248
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is a set of signs of withdrawal in an infant with in utero exposure to opioids. Cardinal manifestations include increased muscle tone, autonomic instability, irritability, poor sucking reflex, gastrointestinal symptoms, and impaired weight gain. All infants are treated with non-pharmacologic methods such as swaddling, rooming in with mother and minimization of stimuli. Despite these measures, \~50% of infants require pharmacologic treatment to ensure proper growth and development. While the optimal pharmacologic treatment for NAS has not been identified, expert review identifies an opioid as the primary therapy. In the US 80% of infants are treated with morphine and 20% with methadone. Sublingual buprenorphine has been demonstrated to be safe and effective in an open label phase 1 clinical trial conducted by the Thomas Jefferson University Team \[NCT00521248\]. These data were used to plan the BBORN (Blinded Buprenorphine OR Neonatal morphine solution) clinical trial \[NCT01452789\] comparing buprenorphine to morphine for NAS. BBORN demonstrated a 40% reduction in length of treatment compared to morphine in a double blind fashion (New England Journal of Medicine, June 2017). The external validity of this finding has been supported by retrospective examination of buprenorphine used in a treatment paradigm at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center, with a reduction in length of treatment of \~30% in \>200 infants.
Dose selection for both the phase 1 trial and the efficacy trial (BBORN) were empirically derived. A population pharmacokinetic model for buprenorphine in NAS has been published by our group. In addition a pre-specified endpoint for the BBORN trial was a pharmacokinetic analysis of buprenorphine. A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model from the BBORN study has been published (Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 2018). The time to control of symptoms was directly tied to buprenorphine exposure, which itself appeared to be driven primarily by clearance. Among the strengths of pharmacometric models is the ability to simulate in silico many potential dose regimens. In this manner, a dose regimen can be chosen that is more likely to be in the desired range of concentrations. This approach also allows for incorporation of covariates of drug exposure or response to treatment. This is much safer and efficient than the traditional approach of choosing an empiric dose that would need to be tested in clinical trial. An ideal dose would quickly reach this exposure while maintaining a good safety margin. There was no evidence of decline in respiratory rate in infants treated with higher doses of buprenorphine compared to lower doses, or those treated with buprenorphine compared to those treated with morphine. This may allow a higher initial dose to more quickly reach therapeutic buprenorphine concentrations. This ultimately could lead to shorter lengths of treatment and stay, though achieving this goal is outside of the scope of the current proposed project.
In summary, buprenorphine at the dose and schedule used in prior clinical trials has been demonstrated to be safe and effective. The goal of the proposed study is to simulate a dose of sublingual buprenorphine for NAS using pharmacometric modelling techniques. This dose will be tested in infants requiring treatment for NAS. Pharmacokinetic samples would be collected and used to confirm and refine the pharmacokinetic model. The proposed study would allow broad examination and refinement of the exposure/response relationship. This optimized dose could later be used in an efficacy trial.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
buprenorphine
Buprenorphine 0.075 mg ml sublingual solution
Initial daily dose 24 mcg/kg/day Initial unit dose 8 mcg/kg q8 hours Maximum daily dose 75 mcg/kg/day Maximum unit dose 25 mcg/kg q8 hours Up-titration rate 33% Maximum # of up-titrations 4 Weaning rate 15% Cessation (bottom) dose \< Initial dose Dosing interval until bottom dose (hrs) 8 Dose interval extension #1 at bottom dose (hrs) 12 Dose interval extension #2 at bottom dose (hrs) 24
Buprenorphine
buprenorphine 0.075 mg/ml solution
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Buprenorphine
buprenorphine 0.075 mg/ml solution
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Exposure to opioids in utero
3. Demonstration of signs and symptoms of neonatal abstinence syndrome requiring pharmacologic treatment
Exclusion Criteria
2. Medical illness requiring intensification of medical therapy. This includes but is not limited to suspected sepsis requiring antibiotic therapy.
3. Hypoglycemia requiring treatment with intravenous dextrose
4. Bilirubin \>20 mg/dL (The need for phototherapy is not exclusionary)
5. Inability of mother to give informed consent due to co-morbid psychiatric diagnosis
4 Weeks
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.
INDUSTRY
Thomas Jefferson University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Walter K Kraft, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Thomas Jefferson University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Thomas Jefferson University Hosptial
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Eudy-Byrne R, Zane N, Adeniyi-Jones SC, Gastonguay MR, Ruiz-Garcia A, Kaushal G, Kraft WK. Pharmacometric dose optimization of buprenorphine in neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Nov;14(6):2171-2183. doi: 10.1111/cts.13074. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
18C.272
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.