Impact of a PCT(Procalcitonin) Rapid Test -Based Approach on ATB (Antibiotics) Use in Children With Fever Without Source

NCT ID: NCT03607162

Last Updated: 2021-12-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

4928 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-11-01

Study Completion Date

2021-12-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Because a newly available point-of-care test may have real interest especially for children in the Emergency Department (ED) setting, by limiting painful and stressful venipunctures and decreasing the length of stay in the ED, the investigators hypothesize that integrating this new capillary Procalcitonin (PCT) rapid test in the DIAFEVER CPR (Clinical Prediction Rules) could represent a highly valuable diagnostic tool to identify a group with low Invasive Bacterial Infection (IBI) risk and could limit unnecessary exams and antibiotic prescriptions. The aim of this present study is to demonstrate the impact of this new PCT rapid-test-based CPR on antibiotic prescription rate in young children with Fever Without Source (FWS) presenting to the ED and on morbidity and mortality

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This prospective multicentric randomized study will include 5000 febrile children aged six days to three years, diagnosed with fever without source, in 26 participating French and Swiss emergency departments, during a 36-month period.

During one period, all children will receive usual care. In a second period, the DIAFEVER algorithm will be applied in half of the clusters, and in the remaining clusters, children will still receive usual care.

Then in the last period of one year, all centers will apply the new PCT-based algorithm.

At day 15 after the first consultation, data concerning death, intensive care unit admission, disease-specific complications, diagnosis of bacterial infections and proportion of antibiotic treatments will be assessed by questioning parents by use of an online electronic case report form or a phone call. The endpoints will be compared between the two groups by using a mixed logistic regression model adjusted on clustering of participants within centers and period within centers.

To perform complementary studies, a biocollection will be proposed to parents when blood tests will be indicated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fever Without Source

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Bacteriemia meningitis Urinary tract infection antibiotic treatment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

This is an open cluster randomized clinical trial with random and sequential crossover of clusters from control to intervention until all clusters are exposed. Clusters are defined as EDs.

2 periods will be considered, one when all children will receive usual care, whatever the cluster, and a second one when, in half of the clusters, the DIAFEVER algorithm will be applied, and in the remaining clusters, children will still receive usual care.
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Usual care

Local usual management of FWS (pragmatic approach)

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

DIAFEVER algorithm

New DIAFEVER sequential algorithm PCT rapid test-based will be applied

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

DIAFEVER algorithm

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

PCT rapid test-based predictive algorithm

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DIAFEVER algorithm

PCT rapid test-based predictive algorithm

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Febrile children aged 6 days to \<36 months old presenting to an ED at their initial visit with an acute illness for a maximum of 8 days and diagnosed with a FWS defined as body temperature (measured at home or the ED) \> 38°C and a physical examination by a physician without source
* Oral non-opposition will be requested from one of the parents or caregivers of the patient.
* No current antibiotic treatment or within the 48 hours before the ED presentation.
* Parental affiliation with an appropriate health insurance system
* Parents speaking French

Exclusion Criteria

* A clear source of fever identified after a careful inspection of medical history and a physical examination
* No fever on consultation or previously subjectively assessed by parents without use of a thermometer
* Refusal of the parents to participate
* Child ≥ 36 months or \< 6 days old (ie, early-onset neonatal infection)
* Ongoing ABT treatment or within the 48 hours before ED presentation
* Children with FWS who revisited the ED after their initial visit
* Participation with another interventional study involving human subjects or being in the exclusion period at the end of a previous study involving human subjects
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Days

Maximum Eligible Age

36 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Nantes University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital

Angers, , France

Site Status

University Hospital

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

University Hospital

Brest, , France

Site Status

University Hospital

Caen, , France

Site Status

AP-HP Antoine Béclère

Clamart, , France

Site Status

University Hospital

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Hopital Louis Mourier

Colombes, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal

Créteil, , France

Site Status

University Hospital

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

CHD Vendée

La Roche-sur-Yon, , France

Site Status

Regional University Hospital

Lille, , France

Site Status

Saint Antoine Saint Vincent Hospital

Lille, , France

Site Status

Southern Bretagne Hospital

Lorient, , France

Site Status

Hospices civils de Lyon

Lyon, , France

Site Status

University Hospital

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Regional University Hospital

Nancy, , France

Site Status

University Hospital

Nice, , France

Site Status

AP-HP Necker-Enfants Malades

Paris, , France

Site Status

AP-HP Robert Debré

Paris, , France

Site Status

Regional University Hospital

Rennes, , France

Site Status

CHU

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Saint Brieuc Hospital

Saint-Brieuc, , France

Site Status

Chu Saint Etienne

Saint-Etienne, , France

Site Status

University Hospital

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

University Hospital

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Hopital des Enfants

Geneva, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hubert G, Launay E, Feildel Fournial C, Chauvire-Drouard A, Lorton F, Tavernier E, Giraudeau B, Gras Le Guen C. Assessment of the impact of a new sequential approach to antimicrobial use in young febrile children in the emergency department (DIAFEVERCHILD): a French prospective multicentric controlled, open, cluster-randomised, parallel-group study protocol. BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 13;10(8):e034828. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034828.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32792425 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RC18_0042

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id