Trial Outcomes & Findings for Soiled Airway Tracheal Intubation and the Effectiveness of Decontamination by Paramedics (NCT NCT03599687)

NCT ID: NCT03599687

Last Updated: 2020-08-13

Results Overview

This measure is a comparison of Group AAB's first-pass intubation success rate, using an attempt which occurred before SALAD training, and Group ABB's intubation success rate, using an intubation attempt that occurred after SALAD training.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

164 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

pre- and post-training as part of 2 hour study session

Results posted on

2020-08-13

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Group AAB
In order to adjust for improvements in participant performance that might arise from repeated attempts at intubation, beyond that of the SALAD training itself, paramedics were randomised into one of two group. In AAB, participants randomised into making two pre-training and one post-training intubation attempts.
Group ABB
Participants randomised into making one pre-training and two post-training intubation attempts.
Overall Study
STARTED
82
82
Overall Study
COMPLETED
82
82
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Group AAB
n=82 Participants
In order to adjust for improvements in participant performance that might arise from repeated attempts at intubation, beyond that of the SALAD training itself, paramedics were randomised into one of two group. In AAB, participants randomised into making two pre-training and one post-training intubation attempts.
Group ABB
n=82 Participants
Participants randomised into making one pre-training and two post-training intubation attempts.
Total
n=164 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Customized
Adults > 18 years
82 Participants
n=82 Participants
82 Participants
n=82 Participants
164 Participants
n=164 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender Unknown
82 Participants
n=82 Participants
82 Participants
n=82 Participants
164 Participants
n=164 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
82 participants
n=82 Participants
82 participants
n=82 Participants
164 participants
n=164 Participants
Intubation attempts in past 12 months
2.5 attempts
n=82 Participants
3.0 attempts
n=82 Participants
3.0 attempts
n=164 Participants
Successful intubation attempts in past 12 months
2 attempts
n=82 Participants
2 attempts
n=82 Participants
2 attempts
n=164 Participants
Years as a paramedic
5 years
n=82 Participants
3.5 years
n=82 Participants
4 years
n=164 Participants
Awareness of SALAD technique
15 Participants
n=82 Participants
21 Participants
n=82 Participants
36 Participants
n=164 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: pre- and post-training as part of 2 hour study session

This measure is a comparison of Group AAB's first-pass intubation success rate, using an attempt which occurred before SALAD training, and Group ABB's intubation success rate, using an intubation attempt that occurred after SALAD training.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group AAB
n=82 Participants
In order to adjust for improvements in participant performance that might arise from repeated attempts at intubation, beyond that of the SALAD training itself, paramedics were randomised into one of two group. In AAB, participants randomised into making two pre-training and one post-training intubation attempts.
Group ABB
n=82 Participants
Participants randomised into making one pre-training and two post-training intubation attempts.
Difference in First-pass Intubation Success Rates Before and After SALAD Training
44 Participants
74 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: seconds

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group AAB
n=23 Participants
In order to adjust for improvements in participant performance that might arise from repeated attempts at intubation, beyond that of the SALAD training itself, paramedics were randomised into one of two group. In AAB, participants randomised into making two pre-training and one post-training intubation attempts.
Group ABB
n=28 Participants
Participants randomised into making one pre-training and two post-training intubation attempts.
Difference Between Mean Time Taken (in Seconds) to Perform a Successful Intubation on the First- Attempt, Before and After SALAD Training Approximately 30 Minutes Apart.
15.4 seconds
Standard Error 3.5
3.7 seconds
Standard Error 3.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: pre- and post-training as part of 2 hour study session

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group AAB
n=82 Participants
In order to adjust for improvements in participant performance that might arise from repeated attempts at intubation, beyond that of the SALAD training itself, paramedics were randomised into one of two group. In AAB, participants randomised into making two pre-training and one post-training intubation attempts.
Group ABB
n=82 Participants
Participants randomised into making one pre-training and two post-training intubation attempts.
Difference in Success Rates Between Participants Who Have Two Post-training Intubation Attempts Versus Participants Who Only Have One Post-training Intubation Attempt
71 Participants
73 Participants

Adverse Events

Group AAB

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Group ABB

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Richard Pilbery

Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust

Phone: +447463734823

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place