Efficacy and Safety of Plecanatide in Children 6 to <18 Years With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation (IBS-C)
NCT ID: NCT03596905
Last Updated: 2025-12-31
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
218 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-06-30
2024-11-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Does plecanatide increase the number of spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) compared to placebo?
* Is plecanatide safe and well tolerated in this pediatric population? Researchers will compare plecanatide at different doses to a placebo (a look-alike substance with no active drug) to see if plecanatide improves bowel function.
Participants will:
* Take plecanatide or placebo orally once daily for 4 weeks
* Complete daily symptom diaries
* Attend clinic visits for assessments and safety checks
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study includes two age cohorts:
Group A: 6 to 11 years Group B: 12 to \<18 years
Participants are randomly assigned to receive one of four plecanatide doses (0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, 2.0 mg, or 3.0 mg) or placebo. All treatments were taken orally once daily for 4 weeks following a 28-day screening/baseline period. After treatment, participants were followed for 2 weeks.
The primary objective is to determine whether plecanatide increases the number of spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) compared to placebo.
Secondary objectives include:
Time to first bowel movement after starting treatment Changes in stool consistency Changes in abdominal pain and discomfort Overall safety and tolerability of plecanatide
Safety assessments include monitoring adverse events, laboratory tests, and treatment compliance. Participants recorded daily bowel habits and symptoms in an electronic diary and attended scheduled clinic visits for evaluations.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
0.5 mg plecanatide
Plecanatide 0.5 mg Taken orally once daily for 4 weeks Group A: 6 to 11 years old
Plecanatide
Taken orally daily for 4 weeks
1.0 mg plecanatide - Group A
Plecanatide 1.0 mg Taken orally daily for 4 weeks Group A: 6 to 11 years old
Plecanatide
Taken orally daily for 4 weeks
2.0 mg plecanatide
Plecanatide 2.0 mg Taken orally daily for 4 weeks Group B: 12 to 18 Years of Age
Plecanatide
Taken orally daily for 4 weeks
3.0 mg plecanatide
Plecanatide 3.0 mg Taken orally daily for 4 weeks Group B: 12 to \< 18 years old
Plecanatide
Taken orally daily for 4 weeks
Matching placebo - Group A
Matching placebo Taken orally daily for 4 weeks Group A: 6 to 11 years old
Matching placebo
Taken orally daily for 4 weeks
1.0 mg plecanatide - Group B
Plecanatide 1.0 mg Taken orally daily for 4 weeks Group B: ≥ 12 to \< 18 Years of Age
Plecanatide
Taken orally daily for 4 weeks
Matching Placebo - Group B
Matching placebo Taken orally daily for 4 weeks Group B: 12 to \< 18 years old
Matching placebo
Taken orally daily for 4 weeks
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Plecanatide
Taken orally daily for 4 weeks
Matching placebo
Taken orally daily for 4 weeks
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Male or female child or adolescent age 6 to \< 18;
2. Meets ROME IV criteria for child/adolescent IBS-C defined as:
For at least 2 months before diagnosis the patient has had:
1. Abdominal pain at least 4 days per month associated with one or more of the following:
1. Related to defecation
2. A change in frequency of stool
3. A change in form (appearance) of stool;
2. The pain does not resolve with resolution of the constipation (children in whom the pain resolves have functional constipation, not irritable bowel syndrome);
3. After appropriate evaluation, the symptoms cannot be fully explained by another medical condition
4. More than one-fourth (25%) of bowel movements with Bristol stool form types 1 or 2 and less than one-fourth (25%) of bowel movements with Bristol stool form types 6 or 7 on the BSFS or 4 or 5 on the mBSFS-C;
3\. Patient's parent/guardian/LAR is able to voluntarily provide written, signed, and dated consent and patient is able to voluntarily provide assent as per IRB guidance; 4. Patient and patient's parent/guardian/LAR demonstrates an understanding, ability, and willingness to fully comply with protocol requirements and study procedures (e.g., acceptance of venipuncture, acceptance of urine drug screen for opiates, visit schedule, complete daily electronic diary reporting).
Exclusion Criteria
1. The patient has a mental age \<4 years in the investigator's opinion;
2. The patient has previously been diagnosed with anorectal malformations, neurological deficits, or anatomical anomalies that would constitute a predisposition to constipation;
3. The patient currently requires iron supplements, amitriptyline, or other tricyclic antidepressants for depression, opioid-containing medications or compounds for pain, or has other conditions that require medications known to cause constipation. A patient with an onset of constipation prior to the use of these medications and who has been on a stable dose for at least 8 weeks prior to Screening might be considered eligible for this study if the investigator deems these medications do not significantly contribute to the patient's constipation. Screening of these patients needs to be approved by the medical monitor and the sponsor;
4. The patient is pregnant or lactating;
5. Females age 12 to \< 18 or females age 6 to 11 of childbearing potential (defined as post menarche) who does not agree to practice one of the following medically acceptable methods of birth control throughout the study;
* Hormonal methods such as oral, implantable, injectable, vaginal ring, or transdermal contraceptives for a minimum of 1 full cycle (based on the patient's usual menstrual cycle period) before study drug administration.
* Total abstinence from sexual intercourse (since the last menses before study drug administration
* Intrauterine device.
* Double-barrier method (condoms, sponge, or diaphragm with spermicidal jellies or cream.
6. The patient follows a diet not considered normal by the investigator for the patient's age, relative to variety of food, caloric content, and quantity. The patient must have been on a stable diet for at least 30 days prior to Screening;
7. The patient's mobility or normal exercise tolerance is compromised in the investigator's opinion;
8. The patient has a history of an eating disorder;
9. The patient has clinical or laboratory signs and symptoms of significant cerebral, respiratory, renal, hepatobiliary, pancreatic, intestinal (including acute appendicitis, inflammatory bowel disease, or undiagnosed abdominal pain), endocrinologic, or infectious disease that in the investigator's judgment could interfere with study assessments or completion of the study. (Note: A patient with a history of thyroid disease may be enrolled if he or she has normal T3 and T4 at Screening. If the patient is taking medication for active thyroid disease, his or her T3 and T4 level must be within normal limits and the dose of any medication used to treat it must be stable for at least 30 days prior to Screening);
10. The patient has any other medical condition or is receiving concomitant medication or therapy that would in the investigator's opinion compromise his or her safety or compliance with the study protocol or compromise data collection;
11. The patient has a history or evidence of drug or alcohol abuse in the 12 months before Screening;
12. The patient has a hypersensitivity, allergy, or contraindication to plecanatide;
13. The patient has received any experimental drug, including linaclotide and lubiprostone, or experimental therapy within 30 days of study start;
14. The patient is unable to tolerate protocol-prescribed rescue medication (Dulcolax®), or unwilling to use it as the only laxative for the duration of the trial;
15. The patient has taken a medication considered to be a protocol-defined prohibited prior or concomitant medication or supplement as defined in section 3.3.2;
16. The patient and his or her caregiver are unable to communicate well with the study staff and comply with the study requirements (restrictions, appointments, and examination schedule). (The patient/caregiver must be able to complete required Daily BM and Symptom diary entries during the Screening/Baseline period and for the duration of the study. The patient/caregiver must also agree to provide contact information to receive daily reminders should the patient not complete the daily electronic diary entries or require password resets);
17. The patient has been screened for or participated in this or another Synergy study in the past;
18. The patient has a sibling that is currently participating or has participated in another Synergy study.
19. Patient reports having more than 1 loose, mushy stool (Diary-recorded stool consistency of 6 on the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS or 4 on the modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for Children \[mBSFSC\]) or any watery stool (Diary-recorded stool consistency of 7 on the BSFS or 5 on the mBSFS-C) with any SBM that occurred in the absence of laxative use on the calendar day of the BM or the calendar day before the BM during each 7-day (week) period before the randomization day and up to the day of randomization;
20. ≥ 3 CSBMs per week for either week of the 2-week baseline diary assessment immediately preceding the randomization visit;
21. \> 6 SBMs per week for either week of the 2-week baseline diary assessment immediately preceding the randomization visit;
22. Patient reports worst abdominal pain intensity (WAPI) scores in the 2-week baseline diary that meet either of the following:
1. WAPI score of 0 on the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale or Wong-Baker Faces® Pain Rating Scale for more than two days during each week of the 2-week baseline diary period.
2. An average WAPI \< 3 for either of the two weeks of the baseline diary;
23. Completion of \< 5 of the 7 required daily diary entries in each week of the 2-week baseline diary assessment immediately preceding the randomization visit;
24. Use of rescue medication (Dulcolax®, bisacodyl) for more than 2 days during either of the two weeks of the 2-week baseline diary assessment immediately preceding the randomization visit.
6 Years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bausch Health Americas, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Bausch Site 178
Saraland, Alabama, United States
Bausch Site 176
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Bausch Site 160
Corona, California, United States
Bausch Site 147
Garden Grove, California, United States
Bausch Site 142
Los Angeles, California, United States
Bausch Site 143
Ventura, California, United States
Bausch Site 175
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Bausch Site 197
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Bausch Site 135
Doral, Florida, United States
Bausch Site 190
Hialeah, Florida, United States
Bausch Site 150
Miami, Florida, United States
Bausch Site 130
Miami, Florida, United States
Bausch Site 165
Miami, Florida, United States
Bausch Site 110
Tampa, Florida, United States
Bausch Site 174
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Bausch Site 132
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Bausch Site 148
Stockbridge, Georgia, United States
Bausch Site 115
Evansville, Indiana, United States
Bausch Site 139
Sioux City, Iowa, United States
Bausch Site 192
Bowling Green, Kentucky, United States
Bausch Site 172
Covington, Louisiana, United States
Bausch Site 180
Crowley, Louisiana, United States
Bausch Site 112
Lafayette, Louisiana, United States
Bausch Site 220
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Bausch Site 145
Akron, Ohio, United States
Bausch Site 194
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Bausch Site 111
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Bausch Site 195
Austin, Texas, United States
Bausch Site 225
Cedar Park, Texas, United States
Bausch Site 173
Dallas, Texas, United States
Bausch Site 193
Houston, Texas, United States
Bausch Site 170
Houston, Texas, United States
Bausch Site 140
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Bausch Site 120
Newport News, Virginia, United States
Bausch Site 146
Bellevue, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SP304202-14
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id