Efficacy and Safety of Plecanatide in Children 6 to <18 Years With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation (IBS-C)

NCT ID: NCT03596905

Last Updated: 2025-12-31

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

218 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-06-30

Study Completion Date

2024-11-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if plecanatide can improve bowel function and relieve symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) in children and adolescents aged 6 to \<18 years. The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Does plecanatide increase the number of spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) compared to placebo?
* Is plecanatide safe and well tolerated in this pediatric population? Researchers will compare plecanatide at different doses to a placebo (a look-alike substance with no active drug) to see if plecanatide improves bowel function.

Participants will:

* Take plecanatide or placebo orally once daily for 4 weeks
* Complete daily symptom diaries
* Attend clinic visits for assessments and safety checks

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of plecanatide in pediatric patients aged 6 to \<18 years with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C). IBS-C is a condition that causes abdominal pain and infrequent, hard bowel movements.

The study includes two age cohorts:

Group A: 6 to 11 years Group B: 12 to \<18 years

Participants are randomly assigned to receive one of four plecanatide doses (0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, 2.0 mg, or 3.0 mg) or placebo. All treatments were taken orally once daily for 4 weeks following a 28-day screening/baseline period. After treatment, participants were followed for 2 weeks.

The primary objective is to determine whether plecanatide increases the number of spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) compared to placebo.

Secondary objectives include:

Time to first bowel movement after starting treatment Changes in stool consistency Changes in abdominal pain and discomfort Overall safety and tolerability of plecanatide

Safety assessments include monitoring adverse events, laboratory tests, and treatment compliance. Participants recorded daily bowel habits and symptoms in an electronic diary and attended scheduled clinic visits for evaluations.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

0.5 mg plecanatide

Plecanatide 0.5 mg Taken orally once daily for 4 weeks Group A: 6 to 11 years old

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Plecanatide

Intervention Type DRUG

Taken orally daily for 4 weeks

1.0 mg plecanatide - Group A

Plecanatide 1.0 mg Taken orally daily for 4 weeks Group A: 6 to 11 years old

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Plecanatide

Intervention Type DRUG

Taken orally daily for 4 weeks

2.0 mg plecanatide

Plecanatide 2.0 mg Taken orally daily for 4 weeks Group B: 12 to 18 Years of Age

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Plecanatide

Intervention Type DRUG

Taken orally daily for 4 weeks

3.0 mg plecanatide

Plecanatide 3.0 mg Taken orally daily for 4 weeks Group B: 12 to \< 18 years old

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Plecanatide

Intervention Type DRUG

Taken orally daily for 4 weeks

Matching placebo - Group A

Matching placebo Taken orally daily for 4 weeks Group A: 6 to 11 years old

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Matching placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Taken orally daily for 4 weeks

1.0 mg plecanatide - Group B

Plecanatide 1.0 mg Taken orally daily for 4 weeks Group B: ≥ 12 to \< 18 Years of Age

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Plecanatide

Intervention Type DRUG

Taken orally daily for 4 weeks

Matching Placebo - Group B

Matching placebo Taken orally daily for 4 weeks Group B: 12 to \< 18 years old

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Matching placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Taken orally daily for 4 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Plecanatide

Taken orally daily for 4 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching placebo

Taken orally daily for 4 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Trulance No other names

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

A patient will be eligible for study participation if he or she meets all of the following criteria:

1. Male or female child or adolescent age 6 to \< 18;
2. Meets ROME IV criteria for child/adolescent IBS-C defined as:

For at least 2 months before diagnosis the patient has had:

1. Abdominal pain at least 4 days per month associated with one or more of the following:

1. Related to defecation
2. A change in frequency of stool
3. A change in form (appearance) of stool;
2. The pain does not resolve with resolution of the constipation (children in whom the pain resolves have functional constipation, not irritable bowel syndrome);
3. After appropriate evaluation, the symptoms cannot be fully explained by another medical condition
4. More than one-fourth (25%) of bowel movements with Bristol stool form types 1 or 2 and less than one-fourth (25%) of bowel movements with Bristol stool form types 6 or 7 on the BSFS or 4 or 5 on the mBSFS-C;

3\. Patient's parent/guardian/LAR is able to voluntarily provide written, signed, and dated consent and patient is able to voluntarily provide assent as per IRB guidance; 4. Patient and patient's parent/guardian/LAR demonstrates an understanding, ability, and willingness to fully comply with protocol requirements and study procedures (e.g., acceptance of venipuncture, acceptance of urine drug screen for opiates, visit schedule, complete daily electronic diary reporting).

Exclusion Criteria

A patient will be excluded from the study if he or she meets any of the following criteria:

1. The patient has a mental age \<4 years in the investigator's opinion;
2. The patient has previously been diagnosed with anorectal malformations, neurological deficits, or anatomical anomalies that would constitute a predisposition to constipation;
3. The patient currently requires iron supplements, amitriptyline, or other tricyclic antidepressants for depression, opioid-containing medications or compounds for pain, or has other conditions that require medications known to cause constipation. A patient with an onset of constipation prior to the use of these medications and who has been on a stable dose for at least 8 weeks prior to Screening might be considered eligible for this study if the investigator deems these medications do not significantly contribute to the patient's constipation. Screening of these patients needs to be approved by the medical monitor and the sponsor;
4. The patient is pregnant or lactating;
5. Females age 12 to \< 18 or females age 6 to 11 of childbearing potential (defined as post menarche) who does not agree to practice one of the following medically acceptable methods of birth control throughout the study;

* Hormonal methods such as oral, implantable, injectable, vaginal ring, or transdermal contraceptives for a minimum of 1 full cycle (based on the patient's usual menstrual cycle period) before study drug administration.
* Total abstinence from sexual intercourse (since the last menses before study drug administration
* Intrauterine device.
* Double-barrier method (condoms, sponge, or diaphragm with spermicidal jellies or cream.
6. The patient follows a diet not considered normal by the investigator for the patient's age, relative to variety of food, caloric content, and quantity. The patient must have been on a stable diet for at least 30 days prior to Screening;
7. The patient's mobility or normal exercise tolerance is compromised in the investigator's opinion;
8. The patient has a history of an eating disorder;
9. The patient has clinical or laboratory signs and symptoms of significant cerebral, respiratory, renal, hepatobiliary, pancreatic, intestinal (including acute appendicitis, inflammatory bowel disease, or undiagnosed abdominal pain), endocrinologic, or infectious disease that in the investigator's judgment could interfere with study assessments or completion of the study. (Note: A patient with a history of thyroid disease may be enrolled if he or she has normal T3 and T4 at Screening. If the patient is taking medication for active thyroid disease, his or her T3 and T4 level must be within normal limits and the dose of any medication used to treat it must be stable for at least 30 days prior to Screening);
10. The patient has any other medical condition or is receiving concomitant medication or therapy that would in the investigator's opinion compromise his or her safety or compliance with the study protocol or compromise data collection;
11. The patient has a history or evidence of drug or alcohol abuse in the 12 months before Screening;
12. The patient has a hypersensitivity, allergy, or contraindication to plecanatide;
13. The patient has received any experimental drug, including linaclotide and lubiprostone, or experimental therapy within 30 days of study start;
14. The patient is unable to tolerate protocol-prescribed rescue medication (Dulcolax®), or unwilling to use it as the only laxative for the duration of the trial;
15. The patient has taken a medication considered to be a protocol-defined prohibited prior or concomitant medication or supplement as defined in section 3.3.2;
16. The patient and his or her caregiver are unable to communicate well with the study staff and comply with the study requirements (restrictions, appointments, and examination schedule). (The patient/caregiver must be able to complete required Daily BM and Symptom diary entries during the Screening/Baseline period and for the duration of the study. The patient/caregiver must also agree to provide contact information to receive daily reminders should the patient not complete the daily electronic diary entries or require password resets);
17. The patient has been screened for or participated in this or another Synergy study in the past;
18. The patient has a sibling that is currently participating or has participated in another Synergy study.

19. Patient reports having more than 1 loose, mushy stool (Diary-recorded stool consistency of 6 on the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS or 4 on the modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for Children \[mBSFSC\]) or any watery stool (Diary-recorded stool consistency of 7 on the BSFS or 5 on the mBSFS-C) with any SBM that occurred in the absence of laxative use on the calendar day of the BM or the calendar day before the BM during each 7-day (week) period before the randomization day and up to the day of randomization;
20. ≥ 3 CSBMs per week for either week of the 2-week baseline diary assessment immediately preceding the randomization visit;
21. \> 6 SBMs per week for either week of the 2-week baseline diary assessment immediately preceding the randomization visit;
22. Patient reports worst abdominal pain intensity (WAPI) scores in the 2-week baseline diary that meet either of the following:

1. WAPI score of 0 on the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale or Wong-Baker Faces® Pain Rating Scale for more than two days during each week of the 2-week baseline diary period.
2. An average WAPI \< 3 for either of the two weeks of the baseline diary;
23. Completion of \< 5 of the 7 required daily diary entries in each week of the 2-week baseline diary assessment immediately preceding the randomization visit;
24. Use of rescue medication (Dulcolax®, bisacodyl) for more than 2 days during either of the two weeks of the 2-week baseline diary assessment immediately preceding the randomization visit.
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bausch Health Americas, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bausch Site 178

Saraland, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 176

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 160

Corona, California, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 147

Garden Grove, California, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 142

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 143

Ventura, California, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 175

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 197

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 135

Doral, Florida, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 190

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 150

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 130

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 165

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 110

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 174

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 132

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 148

Stockbridge, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 115

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 139

Sioux City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 192

Bowling Green, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 172

Covington, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 180

Crowley, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 112

Lafayette, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 220

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 145

Akron, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 194

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 111

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 195

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 225

Cedar Park, Texas, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 173

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 193

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 170

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 140

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 120

Newport News, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Bausch Site 146

Bellevue, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SP304202-14

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id