Trial Outcomes & Findings for Long Term Comparative Effectiveness of Once Weekly Semaglutide Versus Standard of Care in a Real World Adult US Population With Type 2 Diabetes - a Randomized Pragmatic Trial (NCT NCT03596450)
NCT ID: NCT03596450
Last Updated: 2024-07-03
Results Overview
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0 % (53 mmol/mol) at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0 % at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0 % at year 1.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
1278 participants
At year 1
2024-07-03
Participant Flow
The trial was conducted at 138 sites in the United States.
A total of 1,278 participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either semaglutide or standard of care (SOC).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Semaglutide
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
644
|
634
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
463
|
447
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
181
|
187
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Semaglutide
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
9
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
18
|
26
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
50
|
56
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
14
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
38
|
36
|
|
Overall Study
Accidentally Randomized
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Other reasons
|
48
|
53
|
|
Overall Study
Pregnancy
|
2
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Gender data for one participant is missing in the Semaglutide arm.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=644 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=634 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Total
n=1278 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
57.47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.305 • n=644 Participants
|
57.24 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.982 • n=634 Participants
|
57.36 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.142 • n=1278 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
309 Participants
n=643 Participants • Gender data for one participant is missing in the Semaglutide arm.
|
276 Participants
n=634 Participants • Gender data for one participant is missing in the Semaglutide arm.
|
585 Participants
n=1277 Participants • Gender data for one participant is missing in the Semaglutide arm.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
334 Participants
n=643 Participants • Gender data for one participant is missing in the Semaglutide arm.
|
358 Participants
n=634 Participants • Gender data for one participant is missing in the Semaglutide arm.
|
692 Participants
n=1277 Participants • Gender data for one participant is missing in the Semaglutide arm.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
57 Participants
n=644 Participants
|
57 Participants
n=634 Participants
|
114 Participants
n=1278 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
586 Participants
n=644 Participants
|
577 Participants
n=634 Participants
|
1163 Participants
n=1278 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=644 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=634 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=1278 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
517 Participants
n=644 Participants
|
487 Participants
n=634 Participants
|
1004 Participants
n=1278 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
90 Participants
n=644 Participants
|
99 Participants
n=634 Participants
|
189 Participants
n=1278 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
3 Participants
n=644 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=634 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=1278 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian
|
16 Participants
n=644 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=634 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=1278 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
17 Participants
n=644 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=634 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=1278 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
|
1 Participants
n=644 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=634 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=1278 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At year 1Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0 % (53 mmol/mol) at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0 % at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0 % at year 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=430 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=462 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) Less Than 7.0 Percentage (%) (53 Millimoles Per Mole [mmol/Mol]) at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Yes
|
244 Participants
|
226 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) Less Than 7.0 Percentage (%) (53 Millimoles Per Mole [mmol/Mol]) at Year 1 (Yes/No)
No
|
186 Participants
|
236 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (less than or equal to 90 days prior to randomization at week 0), year 1Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change in HbA1c from baseline to year 1 is presented in %-point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=430 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=461 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in HbA1c (Percentage-point [%-Point]) From Baseline to Year 1
|
-1.46 Percentage-point of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 1.669
|
-1.14 Percentage-point of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 1.707
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0 % (53 mmol/mol) at year 2 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0 % at year 2; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0 % at year 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=374 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=374 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) Less Than 7.0% (53 Millimoles Per Mole [mmol/Mol]) at Year 2 (Yes/No)
Yes
|
209 Participants
|
162 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) Less Than 7.0% (53 Millimoles Per Mole [mmol/Mol]) at Year 2 (Yes/No)
No
|
165 Participants
|
212 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (less than or equal to 90 days prior to randomization at week 0), year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change in HbA1c from baseline to year 2 is presented in percentage-point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=374 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=373 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in HbA1c (Percentage-point [%-Point]) From Baseline to Year 2
|
-1.45 Percentage-point of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 1.723
|
-0.98 Percentage-point of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 1.767
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At year 1Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who attained individualized HbA1c target at year 1 is presented. Study physicians set and documented an individualized HbA1c target for participants prior to randomization based on their clinical judgement and knowledge of the participant. Yes: number of participants who achieved individualized HbA1c target attained at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve individualized HbA1c target attained at year 1
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=430 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=462 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Attained Individualized HbA1c Target at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Yes
|
216 Participants
|
170 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Attained Individualized HbA1c Target at Year 1 (Yes/No)
No
|
214 Participants
|
292 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At year 1Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) or at least 1% point improvement in HbA1c compared to baseline at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% or at least 1% point improvement in HbA1c compared to baseline at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% or at least 1% point improvement in HbA1c compared to baseline at year 1
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=430 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=462 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) or At Least 1% Point Improvement in HbA1c Compared to Baseline at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Yes
|
321 Participants
|
301 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) or At Least 1% Point Improvement in HbA1c Compared to Baseline at Year 1 (Yes/No)
No
|
109 Participants
|
160 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) or At Least 1% Point Improvement in HbA1c Compared to Baseline at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Data missing
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At year 1Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c target attainment per HEDIS criteria (less than 8.0% if age ≥ 65 years or with defined comorbidities, otherwise less than 7.0%) at year 1 is presented. Yes: Number of participants who achieved HbA1c target attainment per HEDIS criteria at year 1; No: Number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c target attainment per HEDIS criteria at year 1
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=95 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=98 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Target Attainment Per Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) Criteria at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Yes
|
64 Participants
|
53 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Target Attainment Per Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) Criteria at Year 1 (Yes/No)
No
|
31 Participants
|
45 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change in body weight (in pounds) from baseline to year 1 is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=458 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=461 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Body Weight (in Pounds) From Baseline to Year 1
|
-9.8 Pounds (lbs)
Standard Deviation 21.15
|
-5.4 Pounds (lbs)
Standard Deviation 20.70
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Percentage change in body weight from baseline to year 1 is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=458 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=461 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Year 1
|
-3.93 Percentage change in body weight
Standard Deviation 11.092
|
-2.02 Percentage change in body weight
Standard Deviation 8.924
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change in SBP from baseline to year 1 is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=456 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=457 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Year 1
|
-2.3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 16.40
|
-1.8 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 16.34
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change in DBP from baseline to year 1 is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=456 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=457 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Baseline to Year 1
|
-1.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.08
|
-0.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9.79
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 to year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Time to first study drug discontinuation during 2 years is presented. First study drug discontinuation=date of the first time a patient is not taking study drug as defined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=634 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=621 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to First Study Drug Discontinuation During 2 Years
|
1.36 Years
Standard Deviation 0.853
|
1.54 Years
Standard Deviation 0.719
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 to year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Time to first treatment intensification (add-on) or change (switch) after randomization during 2 years is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=575 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=550 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to First Treatment Intensification (Add-on) or Change (Switch) After Randomization During 2 Years
|
1.55 Years
Standard Deviation 0.731
|
1.43 Years
Standard Deviation 0.742
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 to year 1Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Percentage of MPR for study drug medication adherence for the first year of the study is presented. Medication adherence referred to a participant's conformance to the provider's recommendation with respect to timing, dosage, and frequency of medication taken during the prescribed length of time. The MPR was used to assess adherence. MPR was calculated as follows: MPR (%) = Sum of days supply for all prescription fills\*100/Total number of days in time period. MPR was capped at 100%. MPR was calculated from pharmacy claims data and irrespective of adherence to randomized treatment or changes to antidiabetic treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=135 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=134 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) for Study Drug Medication Adherence for the First Year of the Study
|
53.1 Percentage of MPR
Standard Deviation 40.9
|
55.8 Percentage of MPR
Standard Deviation 41.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization.
Number of hypoglycemic episodes leading to an inpatient admission or emergency room (ER) encounter from baseline to year 2 is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=644 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=634 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Hypoglycemic Episodes Leading to an Inpatient Admission or Emergency Room (ER) Encounter From Baseline to Year 2
|
2 Episodes
|
1 Episodes
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At year 1Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for DTSQ at the dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
DTSQc total treatment satisfaction score measured at year 1 is presented. The DTSQc provides a measure of how satisfied participants are with their current diabetes treatment compared with previous treatment. It consists of 8 questions, which are to be answered on a Likert scale from -3 to +3 (-3 = much less satisfied now to +3 = much more satisfied now), with 0 (midpoint), representing no change. Six questions are summed to produce a total treatment satisfaction score. The remaining two questions concern perceived frequency of hyperglycemia and perceived frequency of hypoglycemia, respectively. The DTSQc total treatment satisfaction score ranges from -18 to +18, with higher scores associated with greater treatment satisfaction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=447 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=460 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, Change Version (DTSQc), Total Treatment Satisfaction Score Measured at Year 1
|
13.5 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.28
|
12.8 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.82
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for DTSQ at the dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
DTSQc total treatment satisfaction score measured at year 2 is presented. The DTSQc provides a measure of how satisfied participants are with their current diabetes treatment compared with previous treatment. It consists of 8 questions, which are to be answered on a Likert scale from -3 to +3 (-3 = much less satisfied now to +3 = much more satisfied now), with 0 (midpoint), representing no change. Six questions are summed to produce a total treatment satisfaction score. The remaining two questions concern perceived frequency of hyperglycemia and perceived frequency of hypoglycemia, respectively. The DTSQc total treatment satisfaction score ranges from -18 to +18, with higher scores associated with greater treatment satisfaction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=388 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=380 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
DTSQc, Total Treatment Satisfaction Score Measured at Year 2
|
13.2 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.24
|
12.2 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.87
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for SF-12 at dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
Change from baseline in SF-12 v2, PCS-12 score at year 1 is presented. The SF-12 v2 is a 12-item generic health-related quality of life measure that assesses physical and mental functioning. The items were scored using the scoring software. It contains two summary scores: Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score. The scores are norm-scored such that the scores range from 0-100 with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. A higher score is associated with better quality of life and a lower score, poorer quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=439 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=449 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form 12-Item Version 2 Survey (SF-12 v2), Physical Component Summary (PCS-12) Score at Year 1
|
2.8 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.20
|
2.3 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.60
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for SF-12 at dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
Change from baseline in SF-12 v2, PCS-12 score at year 2 is presented. The SF-12 v2 is a 12-item generic health-related quality of life measure that assesses physical and mental functioning. The items were scored using the scoring software. It contains two summary scores: Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score. The scores are norm-scored such that the scores range from 0-100 with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. A higher score is associated with better quality of life and a lower score, poorer quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=383 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=376 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-12 v2, PCS-12 Score at Year 2
|
2.6 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.68
|
2.4 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.99
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for SF-12 at dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
Change from baseline in SF-12 v2, MCS-12 score at year 1 is presented. The SF-12 v2 is a 12-item generic health-related quality of life measure that assesses physical and mental functioning. The items were scored using the scoring software. It contains two summary scores: PCS Score and MCS Score. The scores are norm-scored such that the scores range from 0-100 with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. A higher score is associated with better quality of life and a lower score, poorer quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=439 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=449 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-12 v2, Mental Component Summary (MCS-12) Score at Year 1
|
2.4 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.54
|
1.1 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.17
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for SF-12 at dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
Change from baseline in SF-12 v2, MCS-12 score at year 2 is presented. The SF-12 v2 is a 12-item generic health-related quality of life measure that assesses physical and mental functioning. The items were scored using the scoring software. It contains two summary scores: PCS Score and MCS Score. The scores are norm-scored such that the scores range from 0-100 with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. A higher score is associated with better quality of life and a lower score, poorer quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=383 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=376 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-12 v2, MCS-12 Score at Year 2
|
2.4 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.43
|
0.2 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.31
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for WPAI-GH at the dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
Change from baseline in WPAI-GH Absenteeism (work time missed) score at year 1 is presented. The WPAI-GH yields four types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed), Presenteesism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness), Work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism), and Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages (0-100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes (percent work time missed due to health, percent impairment while working due to health, percent overall work impairment due to health, percent activity impairment due to health).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=236 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=241 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment, General Health Questionnaire (WPAI-GH) Absenteeism (Work Time Missed) Score at Year 1
|
-1.5 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.39
|
0.9 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.39
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for WPAI-GH at the dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
Change from baseline in WPAI-GH Absenteeism (work time missed) score at year 2 is presented. The WPAI-GH yields four types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed), Presenteesism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness), Work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism), and Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages (0-100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes (percent work time missed due to health, percent impairment while working due to health, percent overall work impairment due to health, percent activity impairment due to health).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=204 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=200 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in WPAI-GH Absenteeism (Work Time Missed) Score at Year 2
|
-2.1 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.86
|
0.0 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.15
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for WPAI-GH at the dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
Change from baseline in WPAI-GH Presenteeism (Impairment at Work/Reduced On-the-job Effectiveness) score at year 1 is presented. The WPAI-GH yields four types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed), Presenteesism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness), Work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism), and Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages (0-100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes (percent work time missed due to health, percent impairment while working due to health, percent overall work impairment due to health, percent activity impairment due to health).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=230 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=238 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in WPAI-GH Presenteeism (Impairment at Work/Reduced On-the-job Effectiveness) Score at Year 1
|
-5.1 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.31
|
-4.5 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.25
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for WPAI-GH at the dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
Change from baseline in WPAI-GH Presenteeism (Impairment at Work/Reduced On-the-job Effectiveness) score at year 2 is presented. The WPAI-GH yields four types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed), Presenteesism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness), Work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism), and Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages (0-100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes (percent work time missed due to health, percent impairment while working due to health, percent overall work impairment due to health, percent activity impairment due to health).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=196 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=198 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in WPAI-GH Presenteeism (Impairment at Work/Reduced On-the-job Effectiveness) Score at Year 2
|
-6.0 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.30
|
-3.8 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.89
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for WPAI-GH at the dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
Change from baseline in WPAI-GH work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism) score at year 1 is presented. The WPAI-GH yields four types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed), Presenteesism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness), Work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism), and Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages (0-100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes (percent work time missed due to health, percent impairment while working due to health, percent overall work impairment due to health, percent activity impairment due to health).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=229 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=238 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in WPAI-GH Work Productivity Loss (Overall Work Impairment/Absenteeism Plus Presenteeism) Score at Year 1
|
-4.8 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.64
|
-4.5 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.79
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for WPAI-GH at the dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
Change from baseline in WPAI-GH work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism) score at year 2 is presented. The WPAI-GH yields four types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed), Presenteesism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness), Work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism), and Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages (0-100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes (percent work time missed due to health, percent impairment while working due to health, percent overall work impairment due to health, percent activity impairment due to health).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=196 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=198 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in WPAI-GH Work Productivity Loss (Overall Work Impairment/Absenteeism Plus Presenteeism) Score at Year 2
|
-6.4 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.18
|
-4.0 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.89
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 1Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for WPAI-GH at the dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
Change from baseline in WPAI-GH activity impairment score at year 1 is presented. The WPAI-GH yields four types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed), Presenteesism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness), Work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism), and Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages (0-100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes (percent work time missed due to health, percent impairment while working due to health, percent overall work impairment due to health, percent activity impairment due to health).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=435 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=445 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in WPAI-GH Activity Impairment Score at Year 1
|
-6.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.91
|
-3.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.15
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for WPAI-GH at the dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
Change from baseline in WPAI-GH activity impairment score at year 2 is presented. The WPAI-GH yields four types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed), Presenteesism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness), Work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism), and Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages (0-100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes (percent work time missed due to health, percent impairment while working due to health, percent overall work impairment due to health, percent activity impairment due to health).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=379 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=375 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in WPAI-GH Activity Impairment Score at Year 2
|
-5.8 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.51
|
-3.1 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.03
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for HCRU at dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
All cause healthcare resource utilization - mean number of inpatient admissions per participant from baseline to year 2 is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=101 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=102 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
All Cause Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU): Mean Number of Inpatient Admissions Per Participant From Baseline to Year 2
|
0.20 inpatient admissions
Standard Deviation 0.55
|
0.25 inpatient admissions
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for HCRU at dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not. It is only calculated for participants with at least one inpatient admission.
All cause HCRU - mean cumulative length of stay for inpatient admissions per participant from baseline to year 2 is presented. Cumulative inpatient length of stay is the sum of the length of stay of all inpatient admissions a participant experiences from baseline to year 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=16 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=16 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
All Cause HCRU: Mean Cumulative Length of Stay for Inpatient Admissions Per Participant From Baseline to Year 2
|
4.7 Days
Standard Deviation 3.4
|
7.7 Days
Standard Deviation 12.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for HCRU at dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
All cause HCRU - mean number of emergency room (ER) encounters per participant from baseline to year 2 is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=101 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=102 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
All Cause HCRU: Mean Number of Emergency Room (ER) Encounters Per Participant From Baseline to Year 2
|
0.72 ER encounters
Standard Deviation 2.01
|
0.29 ER encounters
Standard Deviation 0.77
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for HCRU at dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
All cause HCRU - mean number of outpatient encounters per participant from baseline to year 2 is presented. Physician outpatient office visit is defined by a medical claim with outpatient place of service and an evaluation and management code.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=101 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=102 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
All Cause HCRU: Mean Number of Outpatient Encounters Per Participant From Baseline to Year 2
|
18.7 outpatient encounters
Standard Deviation 17.7
|
16.5 outpatient encounters
Standard Deviation 13.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for HCRU at dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
All cause HCRU - mean number of medication visits per participant from baseline to year 2 is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=101 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=102 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
All Cause HCRU: Mean Number of Medication Visits Per Participant From Baseline to Year 2
|
7.4 medication visits
Standard Deviation 43.1
|
2.9 medication visits
Standard Deviation 5.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for HCRU at dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
All cause HCRU - number of participants with inpatient admission from baseline to year 2 is presented. Yes: number of participants who experienced inpatient admission; no: number of participants who did not experience inpatient admission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=101 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=102 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
All Cause HCRU: Number of Participants With Inpatient Admission (Yes/No) From Baseline to Year 2
Yes
|
16 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
|
All Cause HCRU: Number of Participants With Inpatient Admission (Yes/No) From Baseline to Year 2
No
|
85 Participants
|
86 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for HCRU at dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
All cause HCRU - number of participants with ER encounter from baseline to year 2 is presented. Yes: number of participants who experienced ER Encounter; no: number of participants who did not experience ER Encounter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=101 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=102 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
All Cause HCRU: Number of Participants With ER Encounter (Yes/No) From Baseline to Year 2
Yes
|
24 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
All Cause HCRU: Number of Participants With ER Encounter (Yes/No) From Baseline to Year 2
No
|
77 Participants
|
81 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for HCRU at dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
All cause HCRU - number of participants with outpatient encounter from baseline to year 2 is presented. Physician outpatient office visit is defined by a medical claim with outpatient place of service and an evaluation and management code. Yes: number of participants who experienced outpatient encounter; no: number of participants who did not experience outpatient encounter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=101 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=102 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
All Cause HCRU: Number of Participants With Outpatient Encounter (Yes/No) From Baseline to Year 2
Yes
|
97 Participants
|
101 Participants
|
|
All Cause HCRU: Number of Participants With Outpatient Encounter (Yes/No) From Baseline to Year 2
No
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for diabetes related HCRU at dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
Diabetes related HCRU - mean number of diabetes related inpatient admissions per participant from baseline to year 2 is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=101 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=102 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Diabetes Related HCRU: Mean Number of Diabetes Related Inpatient Admissions Per Participant From Baseline to Year 2
|
0.13 inpatient admissions
Standard Deviation 0.37
|
0.19 inpatient admissions
Standard Deviation 0.70
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2Population: FAS: all randomized participants analyzed according to treatment group they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for the outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for diabetes related HCRU at dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug/not. It is only calculated for participants with at least 1 diabetes related inpatient admission.
Diabetes related HCRU - mean cumulative length of stay for diabetes related inpatient admissions per participant from baseline to year 2 is presented. Cumulative inpatient length of stay is the sum of the length of stay of all diabetes related inpatient admissions a participant experiences from baseline to year 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=12 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=12 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Diabetes Related HCRU: Mean Cumulative Length of Stay for Diabetes Related Inpatient Admissions Per Participant From Baseline to Year 2
|
4.7 Days
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
8.9 Days
Standard Deviation 12.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for diabetes related HCRU at dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
Diabetes related HCRU - mean number of diabetes related ER encounters per participant from baseline to year 2 is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=101 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=102 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Diabetes Related HCRU: Mean Number of Diabetes Related ER Encounters Per Participant From Baseline to Year 2
|
0.50 ER encounters
Standard Deviation 1.49
|
0.17 ER encounters
Standard Deviation 0.47
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for diabetes related HCRU at dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
Diabetes related HCRU - mean number of diabetes related outpatient encounters per participant from baseline to year 2 is presented. Physician outpatient office visit is defined by a medical claim with outpatient place of service and an evaluation and management code.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=101 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=102 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Diabetes Related HCRU: Mean Number of Diabetes Related Outpatient Encounters Per Participant From Baseline to Year 2
|
9.8 outpatient encounters
Standard Deviation 12.9
|
8.1 outpatient encounters
Standard Deviation 5.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for diabetes related HCRU at dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
Diabetes related HCRU - mean number of diabetes related medication visits per participant from baseline to year 2 is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=101 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=102 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Diabetes Related HCRU: Mean Number of Diabetes Related Medication Visits Per Participant From Baseline to Year 2
|
1.4 medication visits
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
1.1 medication visits
Standard Deviation 1.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for diabetes related HCRU at dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
Diabeted related HCRU - number of participants with diabetes related inpatient admission from baseline to year 2 is presented. Yes: number of participants who experienced diabetes related inpatient admission; no: number of participants who did not experience diabetes related inpatient admission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=101 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=102 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Diabetes Related HCRU: Number of Participants With Diabetes Related Inpatient Admission (Yes/No) From Baseline to Year 2
Yes
|
12 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Diabetes Related HCRU: Number of Participants With Diabetes Related Inpatient Admission (Yes/No) From Baseline to Year 2
No
|
89 Participants
|
90 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for diabetes related HCRU at dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
Diabeted related HCRU - number of participants with diabeted related ER encounter from baseline to year 2 is presented. Yes: number of participants who experienced diabeted related ER encounter; no: number of participants who did not experience diabeted related ER encounter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=101 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=102 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Diabetes Related HCRU: Number of Participants With Diabetes Related ER Encounter (Yes/No) From Baseline to Year 2
Yes
|
18 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Diabetes Related HCRU: Number of Participants With Diabetes Related ER Encounter (Yes/No) From Baseline to Year 2
No
|
83 Participants
|
89 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0) to year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure. Analysis is based only on participants with available data for diabetes related HCRU at dedicated study visit including measurements irrespective of whether participants discontinued study drug or not.
Diabeted related HCRU - number of participants with diabeted related outpatient encounter from baseline to year 2 is presented. Physician outpatient office visit is defined by a medical claim with outpatient place of service and an evaluation and management code. Yes: number of participants who experienced diabeted related outpatient encounter; no: number of participants who did not experience diabeted related outpatient encounter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=101 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=102 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Diabetes Related HCRU: Number of Participants With Diabetes Related Outpatient Encounter (Yes/No) From Baseline to Year 2
Yes
|
95 Participants
|
97 Participants
|
|
Diabetes Related HCRU: Number of Participants With Diabetes Related Outpatient Encounter (Yes/No) From Baseline to Year 2
No
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who attained individualized HbA1c target at year 2 is presented. Study physicians set and documented an individualized HbA1c target for participants prior to randomization based on their clinical judgement and knowledge of the participant. Yes: number of participants who achieved individualized HbA1c target attained at year 2; No: number of participants who did not achieve individualized HbA1c target attained at year 2
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=374 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=374 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Attained Individualized HbA1c Target at Year 2 (Yes/No)
Yes
|
182 Participants
|
129 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Attained Individualized HbA1c Target at Year 2 (Yes/No)
No
|
192 Participants
|
245 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) or at least 1% point improvement in HbA1c compared to baseline at year 2 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% or at least 1% point improvement in HbA1c compared to baseline at year 2; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% or at least 1% point improvement in HbA1c compared to baseline at year 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=374 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=373 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) or At Least 1% Point Improvement in HbA1c Compared to Baseline at Year 2 (Yes/No)
Yes
|
274 Participants
|
228 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) or At Least 1% Point Improvement in HbA1c Compared to Baseline at Year 2 (Yes/No)
No
|
100 Participants
|
145 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At year 1Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=430 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=462 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 8.0% (64 mmol/Mol) at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Yes
|
344 Participants
|
344 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 8.0% (64 mmol/Mol) at Year 1 (Yes/No)
No
|
86 Participants
|
118 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 2 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 2; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=374 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=374 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 8.0% (64 mmol/Mol) at Year 2 (Yes/No)
Yes
|
293 Participants
|
271 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 8.0% (64 mmol/Mol) at Year 2 (Yes/No)
No
|
81 Participants
|
103 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At year 1Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and no further antidiabetic medication intensification after randomization at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and no further antidiabetic medication intensification after randomization at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and no further antidiabetic medication intensification after randomization at year 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=430 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=462 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) and No Further Antidiabetic Medication Intensification After Randomization at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Yes
|
229 Participants
|
206 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) and No Further Antidiabetic Medication Intensification After Randomization at Year 1 (Yes/No)
No
|
201 Participants
|
254 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) and No Further Antidiabetic Medication Intensification After Randomization at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Data missing
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and no further antidiabetic medication intensification after randomization at year 2 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and no further antidiabetic medication intensification after randomization at year 2; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and no further antidiabetic medication intensification after randomization at year 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=374 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=373 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) and No Further Antidiabetic Medication Intensification After Randomization at Year 2 (Yes/No)
Yes
|
186 Participants
|
135 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) and No Further Antidiabetic Medication Intensification After Randomization at Year 2 (Yes/No)
No
|
188 Participants
|
238 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c target attainment per HEDIS criteria (less than 8.0% if age ≥ 65 years or with defined comorbidities, otherwise less than 7.0%) at year 2 is presented. Yes: Number of participants who achieved HbA1c target attainment per HEDIS criteria at year 2; No: Number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c target attainment per HEDIS criteria at year 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=63 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=52 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Target Attainment Per Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) Criteria at Year 2 (Yes/No)
Yes
|
43 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Target Attainment Per Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) Criteria at Year 2 (Yes/No)
No
|
20 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At year 1Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at year 1 in participants with HbA1c \>9.0% at baseline is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at year 1 in participants with HbA1c \>9.0% at baseline; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at year 1 in participants with HbA1c \>9.0% at baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=131 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=122 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) at Year 1 in Participants With HbA1c >9.0% at Baseline (Yes/No)
Yes
|
41 Participants
|
42 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) at Year 1 in Participants With HbA1c >9.0% at Baseline (Yes/No)
No
|
90 Participants
|
80 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at year 2 in participants with HbA1c \>9.0% at baseline is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at year 2 in participants with HbA1c \>9.0% at baseline; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at year 2 in participants with HbA1c \>9.0% at baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=114 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=98 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) at Year 2 in Participants With HbA1c >9.0% at Baseline (Yes/No)
Yes
|
41 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) at Year 2 in Participants With HbA1c >9.0% at Baseline (Yes/No)
No
|
73 Participants
|
70 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At year 1Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 1 in participants with HbA1c \>9.0% at baseline is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 1 in participants with HbA1c \>9.0% at baseline; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 1 in participants with HbA1c \>9.0% at baseline
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=131 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=122 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 8.0% (64 mmol/Mol) at Year 1 in Participants With HbA1c >9.0% at Baseline (Yes/No)
Yes
|
77 Participants
|
67 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 8.0% (64 mmol/Mol) at Year 1 in Participants With HbA1c >9.0% at Baseline (Yes/No)
No
|
54 Participants
|
55 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 2 in participants with HbA1c \>9.0% at baseline is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 2 in participants with HbA1c \>9.0% at baseline; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at year 2 in participants with HbA1c \>9.0% at baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=114 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=98 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 8.0% (64 mmol/Mol) at Year 2 in Participants With HbA1c >9.0% at Baseline (Yes/No)
Yes
|
70 Participants
|
53 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 8.0% (64 mmol/Mol) at Year 2 in Participants With HbA1c >9.0% at Baseline (Yes/No)
No
|
44 Participants
|
45 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Percentage change in body weight from baseline to year 2 is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=389 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=386 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Year 2
|
-4.47 Percentage change in body weight
Standard Deviation 12.204
|
-2.68 Percentage change in body weight
Standard Deviation 7.988
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change in body weight (in pounds) from baseline to year 2 is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=389 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=386 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Body Weight (in Pounds) From Baseline to Year 2
|
-11.1 lbs
Standard Deviation 24.65
|
-6.8 lbs
Standard Deviation 18.54
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change in SBP from baseline to year 2 is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=388 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=386 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Year 2
|
-3.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 17.03
|
-2.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 16.91
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior to the randomization at week 0), year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change in DBP from baseline to year 2 is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=388 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=386 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Baseline to Year 2
|
-1.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.58
|
-1.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9.92
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 to year 1Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization.
Number of participants who reported hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter during year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who reported hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter during year 1; No: number of participants who did not report hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter during year 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=644 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=634 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Reported Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter During Year 1 (Yes/No)
Yes
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Reported Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter During Year 1 (Yes/No)
No
|
644 Participants
|
634 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 to year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who reported hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter during year 2 is presented. Yes: number of participants who reported hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter during year 2; No: number of participants who did not report hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter during year 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=644 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=634 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Reported Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter During Year 2 (Yes/No)
Yes
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Reported Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter During Year 2 (Yes/No)
No
|
643 Participants
|
633 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At year 1Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 1
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=410 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=426 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Experiencing Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter and Body Weight Loss of ≥ 5% Versus Baseline at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Yes
|
128 Participants
|
68 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Experiencing Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter and Body Weight Loss of ≥ 5% Versus Baseline at Year 1 (Yes/No)
No
|
282 Participants
|
358 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At year 1Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved absolute HbA1c reduction of ≥ 0.5% without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and a body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved absolute HbA1c reduction of ≥ 0.5% without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and a body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve absolute HbA1c reduction of ≥ 0.5% without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and a body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=410 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=425 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Absolute HbA1c Reduction of ≥ 0.5% Without Experiencing Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter and a Body Weight Loss of ≥ 5% Versus Baseline at Year 1 (Yes/No)
No
|
248 Participants
|
346 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absolute HbA1c Reduction of ≥ 0.5% Without Experiencing Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter and a Body Weight Loss of ≥ 5% Versus Baseline at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Yes
|
162 Participants
|
79 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 2 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 2; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=349 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=352 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Experiencing Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter and Body Weight Loss of ≥ 5% Versus Baseline at Year 2 (Yes/No)
Yes
|
108 Participants
|
76 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Experiencing Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter and Body Weight Loss of ≥ 5% Versus Baseline at Year 2 (Yes/No)
No
|
241 Participants
|
276 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved absolute HbA1c reduction of ≥ 0.5% without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and a body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 2 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved absolute HbA1c reduction of ≥ 0.5% without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and a body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 2; No: number of participants who did not achieve absolute HbA1c reduction of ≥ 0.5% without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and a body weight loss of ≥ 5% versus baseline at year 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=349 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=351 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Absolute HbA1c Reduction of ≥ 0.5% Without Experiencing Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter and a Body Weight Loss of ≥ 5% Versus Baseline at Year 2 (Yes/No)
Yes
|
136 Participants
|
89 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Absolute HbA1c Reduction of ≥ 0.5% Without Experiencing Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter and a Body Weight Loss of ≥ 5% Versus Baseline at Year 2 (Yes/No)
No
|
213 Participants
|
262 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At year 1Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and no body weight gain versus baseline at year 1 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and no body weight gain versus baseline at year 1; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and no body weight gain versus baseline at year 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=410 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=426 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Experiencing Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter and No Body Weight Gain Versus Baseline at Year 1 (Yes/No)
Yes
|
199 Participants
|
159 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Experiencing Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter and No Body Weight Gain Versus Baseline at Year 1 (Yes/No)
No
|
211 Participants
|
267 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and no body weight gain versus baseline at year 2 is presented. Yes: number of participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and no body weight gain versus baseline at year 2; No: number of participants who did not achieve HbA1c less than 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without experiencing hypoglycemia leading to inpatient admission or ER encounter and no body weight gain versus baseline at year 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=349 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=352 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Experiencing Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter and No Body Weight Gain Versus Baseline at Year 2 (Yes/No)
Yes
|
159 Participants
|
118 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Experiencing Hypoglycemia Leading to Inpatient Admission or ER Encounter and No Body Weight Gain Versus Baseline at Year 2 (Yes/No)
No
|
190 Participants
|
234 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 to year 2Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were assigned at randomization. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Percentage of MPR for study drug medication adherence for the two years of the study is presented. Medication adherence referred to a participant's conformance to the provider's recommendation with respect to timing, dosage, and frequency of medication taken during the prescribed length of time. The MPR was used to assess adherence. MPR was calculated as follows: MPR (%) = Sum of days supply for all prescription fills\*100/Total number of days in time period. MPR was capped at 100%. MPR was calculated from pharmacy claims data and irrespective of adherence to randomized treatment or changes to antidiabetic treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=100 Participants
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=95 Participants
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) for Study Drug Medication Adherence For The Two Years of The Study
|
57.9 Percentage of MPR
Standard Deviation 40.5
|
55.7 Percentage of MPR
Standard Deviation 38.3
|
Adverse Events
Semaglutide
Standard of Care
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Semaglutide
n=634 participants at risk
Participants received semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
Standard of Care
n=621 participants at risk
Participants received standard of care (any commercially available oral or injectable antidiabetic medication, excluding semaglutide) in addition to up to 2 oral antidiabetic medications as treatment intensification for 2 years. Medication dose and dose escalation was at the discretion of the study physician according to routine practice for medications for glycemic control in participants.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung carcinoma cell type unspecified stage III
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Myelodysplastic syndrome
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Pancreatic carcinoma
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Coronavirus infection
|
0.79%
5/634 • Number of events 5 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.81%
5/621 • Number of events 6 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 2 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abdominal sepsis
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Disseminated varicella zoster vaccine virus infection
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Meningitis
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Osteomyelitis
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Osteomyelitis acute
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Peritonitis
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.32%
2/621 • Number of events 2 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis acute
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.32%
2/621 • Number of events 2 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.32%
2/621 • Number of events 2 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.32%
2/621 • Number of events 2 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure acute
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Arteriosclerosis coronary artery
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardio-respiratory arrest
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery dissection
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer recurrent
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon cancer metastatic
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumour disease
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Intraductal proliferative breast lesion
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Invasive ductal breast carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Small cell lung cancer extensive stage
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Uterine cancer
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Uterine leiomyoma
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Acute haemorrhagic ulcerative colitis
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ulcerative
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal ischaemia
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatic cyst
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis acute
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.81%
5/621 • Number of events 5 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.32%
2/621 • Number of events 2 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
0.47%
3/634 • Number of events 3 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Accidental death
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Generalised oedema
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Abnormal loss of weight
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetic ketoacidosis
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Fluid overload
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Ketoacidosis
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Diabetic nephropathy
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 2 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Myasthenia gravis
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Visual field defect
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Craniocerebral injury
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Humerus fracture
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Subarachnoid haemorrhage
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Polymyalgia rheumatica
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hypercoagulation
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Investigations
C-reactive protein increased
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Breast dysplasia
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia viral
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Acinar cell carcinoma of pancreas
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Adenocarcinoma pancreas
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Apparent death
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Pre-eclampsia
|
0.16%
1/634 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.00%
0/621 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Hospitalisation
|
0.00%
0/634 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
0.16%
1/621 • Number of events 1 • Up to year 2 (week 104)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product or medical device, which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship to the product or device. The safety population includes all randomized patients initiated on study drug.
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee At the end of the trial, one or more scientific publications may be prepared collaboratively by the investigator(s) and Novo Nordisk. Novo Nordisk reserves the right to postpone publication and/or communication for up to 60 days to protect intellectual property.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER