Maintenance (vs. Change) of Critical Attitudes Towards Psychotherapy

NCT ID: NCT03594903

Last Updated: 2018-11-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-11-30

Study Completion Date

2019-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a video intervention, which was designed to improve therapy expectation of persons with critical attitudes towards psychotherapy via violating their expectations about therapy. Therefore, 120 participants will be recruited and randomized to two groups:

(1) An experimental group that is watching a video with patients (actors) that are giving oral information about their therapy and the mostly positive therapy outcome, (2) a control group that is watching a video with the same patients before therapy or after the first therapy session who are giving information about symptoms and their expectation on therapy. The primary outcome is the Milwaukee Psychotherapy Expectation Questionnaire (MPEQ) collected before and after the video.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Therapy expectation is one of the main predictors of therapy outcome. This could be shown through many results in the medical sector as well as in studies that are focusing on psychotherapeutic interventions across different mental disorders. Although psychotherapy is a successful treatment for many disorders it is still hold in low esteem by some parts of the population and from some patient groups in particular. This can cause (that) patients who are in need of treatment not being recommended to the right therapy. Furthermore patients with low therapy expectation are more likely to (prematurely) abandon their therapy or having a lower therapy outcome. So therapy expectation should definitely be addressed in the very first therapy sessions because of it´s high impact.

The Violex-model gives an overview on how expectations in general are developed, maintained or modified. The model postulates that a process called immunization can lead to maintenance of expectation even if they receive information that contradicts their expectation. However no trial has yet examined weather the suggestions of the model are adaptable to therapy expectation. Therefore the investigators are recruiting participants with critical attitudes towards psychotherapy and trying to provoke expectation violation via an online experiment containing videos with patients reporting about their mostly positive outcome of psychotherapy. A control group is watching a video with patients who are just giving information about their symptoms and their first impressions on psychotherapy. The primary outcome is the Milwaukee Psychotherapy Expectation Questionnaire (MPEQ) collected before and after the video. Furthermore the participants are asked about their attitudes towards psychotherapeutic treatment (QAPT, German Version FEP), their own experience with psychotherapy and experiences of relevant others, behavioral intensions towards seeking psychotherapy, their mental wellbeing and demographic data. Before watching the video participants are also asked to formulate one to three individual expectations on psychotherapy. After watching the video they are asked how much they still believe in their individual expectation.

The investigators are aiming to modify low therapy expectation by generating expectation violation and paying particular attention to the issue of persistence of expectations via having a closer look on possible immunization strategies. For doing so they developed immunization items (data- and construct-orientated) that are shown at the end of the experiment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Negative Therapy Expectation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

participants are assigned to one of two groups in parallel for the duration of the study
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Expectation violation (positive outcome of therapy)

Experimental: patients' report about therapy outcome Video with patients giving information about (mostly) positive therapy outcome

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

video intervention (therapy expectation violation)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The investigators asked experts (psychotherapist and scientists in the area of clinical psychology) about typical therapy expectation violations in therapy and searched the literature for information about typical therapy processes and outcomes. Having these information they designed a script for the experimental video. The patients in the video are played by actors aged from 28 to 58 years (two male and two female actors). Patients are representing common mental disorders (depression, anxiety disorder, alcohol addiction, depression after physical disease). The abbreviated name, age and disorder of the patients is displayed for 3 seconds in the video. The patients are giving information about the mostly positive outcome and the process of their therapy. All participants are watching a video with all patients (7 minutes). The videos (control and experimental group) have been evaluated by 12 experts (psychotherapist and scientists in the area of clinical psychology).

Control group (symptoms + expectation)

Control group: patient´s report about symptoms and therapy expectations

Participants in the control group are watching a video with the same patients (actors) as in the experimental video. In this video patients are shown before or after the first therapy session. They are giving information about symptoms and their expectation on therapy but NOT about therapy outcome.

Group Type OTHER

video intervention (symptoms+ expectation)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants in the control group are watching a video with the same patients (actors) as in the experimental video. In this video patients are shown before or after the first therapy session. They are giving information about symptoms and their expectation on therapy but NOT about therapy outcome.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

video intervention (therapy expectation violation)

The investigators asked experts (psychotherapist and scientists in the area of clinical psychology) about typical therapy expectation violations in therapy and searched the literature for information about typical therapy processes and outcomes. Having these information they designed a script for the experimental video. The patients in the video are played by actors aged from 28 to 58 years (two male and two female actors). Patients are representing common mental disorders (depression, anxiety disorder, alcohol addiction, depression after physical disease). The abbreviated name, age and disorder of the patients is displayed for 3 seconds in the video. The patients are giving information about the mostly positive outcome and the process of their therapy. All participants are watching a video with all patients (7 minutes). The videos (control and experimental group) have been evaluated by 12 experts (psychotherapist and scientists in the area of clinical psychology).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

video intervention (symptoms+ expectation)

Participants in the control group are watching a video with the same patients (actors) as in the experimental video. In this video patients are shown before or after the first therapy session. They are giving information about symptoms and their expectation on therapy but NOT about therapy outcome.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age: 18 years or older
* Critical attitude towards psychotherapy (self-selection)
* ability to speak and read German
* access to the internet

Exclusion Criteria

* known major mental disorder, such as schizophrenia or another psychotic disorder, or drug or alcohol addiction or dementia (based on self-report)
* medication that influences cognitive processes substantially (benzodiazepine)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Philipps University Marburg

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Braun-Koch K, Rief W. Maintenance vs. Change of Negative Therapy Expectation: An Experimental Investigation Using Video Samples. Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 4;13:836227. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.836227. eCollection 2022.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35444567 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018-19k

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.