LMWH-VTE Prophylaxis for Survivors of Acute Ischemic Stroke- Assessment of Standard Dosing Regimen

NCT ID: NCT03593291

Last Updated: 2018-08-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-11-01

Study Completion Date

2019-08-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) assay is a functional assay that facilitates the measurement of antithrombin (AT)-catalyzed inhibition of factor Xa by unfractionated heparin (UFH) and direct inhibition of factor Xa by low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). As a result, Anti-factor Xa level reflect the in situ pharmacological activity of LMWH. 0.2 to 0.5 units/ml has been considered to be the desired level for prevention of VTE. Although this method was available since the 1970s, their cost was viewed to prohibit their broad use until recently.

Previous studies determined the safety and effectiveness of fixed dose prophylactic regiments via clinical outcomes. This strategy has several shortcomings.

The current study was there for devised to examine in vivo activity of LMWH in patients receiving a fixed dose prophylactic regimen, in order to assess the effectiveness of this method.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) assay is a functional assay that facilitates the measurement of antithrombin (AT)-catalyzed inhibition of factor Xa by unfractionated heparin (UFH) and direct inhibition of factor Xa by low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). As a result, Anti-factor Xa level reflect the in situ pharmacological activity of LMWH. 0.2 to 0.5 units/ml has been considered to be the desired level for prevention of VTE. Although this method was available since the 1970s, their cost was viewed to prohibit their broad use until recently.

Previous studies determined the safety and effectiveness of fixed dose prophylactic regiments via clinical outcomes. This strategy has several shortcomings.

The current study was there for devised to examine in vivo activity of LMWH in patients receiving a fixed dose prophylactic regimen, in order to assess the effectiveness of this method.

Purpose To perform an exploratory prospective analysis of longitudinal data sets to assess anti-factor Xa levels in a cohort of patients recovering from acute ischemic stroke and receiving prophylactic-dose LMWH for VTE prevention.

Primary Outcome Measures:

1. assess anti-factor Xa levels
2. adverse events related to thrombosis
3. adverse event related to hemorrhage

Secondary Outcome Measures:

Patient demographic data Patient anthropometric data Adverse events/weekly (falls, infections, VTE, stress ulcer…) Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study: 40 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Senior) Gender Eligible for Study: All Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample Study Population Patients hospitalized for rehabilitation following acute ischemic stroke

Methods:

Clinical decision to administer LMWH prophylactic treatment will be made in line with standard clinical practice and in accordance to the criteria described above.

Search for patients diagnosed with sub-acute stroke and receiving LMWH treatment will be performed on the digital database of the Loewenstien rehabilitation hospital Rannana, Israel.

Patients receiving LMWH prophylaxis with fixed dose regimen will be recruited flowing signing of consent form.

Flowing at least 7 consecutive days of treatment blood sample will be drown 3-4 hours post LMWH administration and sent for The anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) assay. In the event of high or low results the Hematological consult will be contacted for decision about dose adjustment or other intervention/investigation.

All data will be drawn from patient's electronic/hardcopy files. patient characteristics (age, gender, , past medical history), Stroke characteristics (type, location, NIHSS), days from stroke onset to rehabilitation admission, along with each patient's length of stay, neurological impairments, and Rehabilitation outcomes. Trained research associates, who are familiar with the process of chart review, will extract the information from the charts using the form provided.

Statistical analysis: multi variant combative analysis of outcome measures will be carried out to compare study and control groups.

Estimated Enrollment: 100 patients

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Anti Xa

Levels of Anti Xa measure

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Acute Ischemic stroke per imaging study
* Clinical decision to administer VTE prophylaxis. (i.e.patients in whom a diagnosis of hemorrhagic stroke has been excluded, the risk of bleeding (hemorrhagic transformation of stroke or bleeding into another site) is assessed to be low, and who have one or more of the following: • major restriction of mobility • previous history of VTE • dehydration or comorbidities (such as malignant disease).Age: 55-80 years)

Exclusion Criteria

* Obese (\>150 KG)
* Suffer from renal insufficiency (ccl\<30)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Meir Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Loewenstein Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Motti Ratmansky, MD

PI

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Motti Ratmansky, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Loewenstein Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Loewenstein Hospital

Raanana, , Israel

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Motti Ratmansky, MD

Role: CONTACT

+97297709102

Deborah Rubin-Asher, MD

Role: CONTACT

+97297709164

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Moti Ratmansky, MD

Role: primary

97297709907

Deborah Asher, MD

Role: backup

97297709164

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0022-17-LOE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.