Hostile Interpretation Bias Training to Treat Irritability

NCT ID: NCT03592368

Last Updated: 2024-04-23

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

97 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-10-15

Study Completion Date

2023-01-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hostile interpretation bias may be a feature of severe, chronic irritability in children, one of the most common psychiatric symptoms of childhood. Interpretation bias training (IBT) is a computer-based training program that may reduce irritability in youths. This trial lays the groundwork for a test IBT on irritability.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This trial lays the foundation for a preliminary test of efficacy of IBT on irritability by establishing IBT's neurocognitive treatment targets: hostile interpretation bias and response in the neural threat-learning system.

The design is a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial of IBT on its targets. The study will have four arms, with 25 participants in each arm for all four conditions of training (active versus sham) and scanning (in MRI or out of MRI scanner). During IBT, participants judge as happy or angry facial expressions which are on a continuum between happy and angry. The point at which judgments shift from predominantly happy to angry on this continuum is the indifference point. During training feedback encourages no change in the indifference point or a change in the indifference point towards more happy judgments of ambiguous faces. A shift in indifference point towards more benign judgments is interpreted as a reduction in hostile interpretation.

The design will test whether active relative to sham IBT shifts the indifference point towards more benign judgments. Neural response to active versus sham IBT will be measured in half the sample.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Irritable Mood Mood Disorders

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active IBT, Out of MRI

Interpretation bias training where participants learn more positive judgements of ambiguous facial expressions relative to their own baseline bias. This arm is completed in the clinic.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

IBT

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interpretation bias training

Sham IBT, Out of MRI

Interpretation bias training where participants' baseline judgements of ambiguous facial expressions is reinforced. This arm is completed in the clinic.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

IBT

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interpretation bias training

Active IBT, In MRI

Interpretation bias training where participants learn more positive judgements of ambiguous facial expressions relative to their own baseline judgments. This arm is completed in a magnetic resonance imaging machine.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

IBT

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interpretation bias training

Sham IBT, In MRI

Interpretation bias training where participants' baseline judgements of ambiguous facial expressions is reinforced. This arm is completed in a magnetic resonance imaging machine.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

IBT

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interpretation bias training

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

IBT

Interpretation bias training

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adolescents in mental health treatment, with at least:

1. mild, clinically significant irritability, and
2. typical intellectual functioning (IQ\>80)

Exclusion Criteria

* Any of the following mental health diagnoses:

1. current post-traumatic stress
2. lifetime bipolar I or II disorder
3. lifetime cyclothymic disorder
4. lifetime psychotic disorder
5. lifetime autism spectrum disorder
* Major medical problems, including head trauma.
* MRI-specific safety exclusions for the MRI arms.
* Clinical instability.
Minimum Eligible Age

13 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Colorado, Denver

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Joel Stoddard, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Colorado, Denver

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Colorado, School of Medicine

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Stoddard J, Sharif-Askary B, Harkins EA, Frank HR, Brotman MA, Penton-Voak IS, Maoz K, Bar-Haim Y, Munafo M, Pine DS, Leibenluft E. An Open Pilot Study of Training Hostile Interpretation Bias to Treat Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2016 Feb;26(1):49-57. doi: 10.1089/cap.2015.0100. Epub 2016 Jan 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26745832 (View on PubMed)

Haller SP, Stoddard J, Botz-Zapp C, Clayton M, MacGillivray C, Perhamus G, Stiles K, Kircanski K, Penton-Voak IS, Bar-Haim Y, Munafo M, Towbin KE, Brotman MA. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Computerized Interpretation Bias Training for Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder: A Fast-Fail Study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;61(1):37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2021.05.022. Epub 2021 Jun 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34147585 (View on PubMed)

Stoddard J, Haller SP, Costa V, Brotman MA, Jones M. A Computational Model Reveals Learning Dynamics During Interpretation Bias Training With Clinical Applications. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2023 Oct;8(10):1033-1040. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2023.03.013. Epub 2023 Apr 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37062362 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

17-0464

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ICBT for Antenatal Depression
NCT02366429 COMPLETED NA